|
On May 16 2012 03:53 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2012 03:41 Acrofales wrote: Opz: do you have a royal title, or any other role that explicitly mentions your voting power? I got my one vote....No title.... you may not have 1 vote, unless the role pm says you have 1 vote
anyway
I will still be voting bluelightz, because, you know, he's scum. If there is a tie or a close lynch between two people I will help out and vote whomever I think is scummier between the 2
##vote bluelightz
|
On May 16 2012 03:53 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2012 03:41 Acrofales wrote: Opz: do you have a royal title, or any other role that explicitly mentions your voting power? I got my one vote....No title.... So no role that mentions voting power? Then there's no guarantee you have a vote. Hence the whole reason to ask.
|
On May 16 2012 03:54 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2012 03:53 ~OpZ~ wrote:On May 16 2012 03:41 Acrofales wrote: Opz: do you have a royal title, or any other role that explicitly mentions your voting power? I got my one vote....No title.... you may not have 1 vote, unless the role pm says you have 1 vote anyway I will still be voting bluelightz, because, you know, he's scum. If there is a tie or a close lynch between two people I will help out and vote whomever I think is scummier between the 2 ##vote bluelightz So... we have 2 dukes, who are deciding to shit up their votes by throwing them at targets who are NEVER getting lynched today. So far we have only 8 other claimed votes... and whoever married Adam keeping quiet about it.
|
Also, Mattchew, read my opinion on bluelightz here with this clarification.
Now switch your vote to whoever ELSE you think is scummy and might actually get lynched.
|
fine
##unvote ##vote quatol
ninja voting = death in games with me
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
So kill the potato you will? His ninja vote doesn't give me a thrill
|
Talking about ninjavoting, keep your wife in check.
|
So we have Bagmanager, potato head, and quatol who all seem like they're being actively scummy and trying to get votes.
For now I'm voting Bagmanager, but I'll check back before the deadline and Read more cases.
I'm voting Bagmanager because he was activish for a short period of time. It's a weak reason, but there's not much to go on between our lurky lurkers.
|
|
On May 16 2012 04:06 strongandbig wrote: So we have Bagmanager, potato head, and quatol who all seem like they're being actively scummy and trying to get votes.
For now I'm voting Bagmanager, but I'll check back before the deadline and Read more cases.
I'm voting Bagmanager because he was activish for a short period of time. It's a weak reason, but there's not much to go on between our lurky lurkers.
no?
forumite clearest scum imo, but ill wait til more agree
|
On May 16 2012 03:54 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2012 03:53 ~OpZ~ wrote:On May 16 2012 03:41 Acrofales wrote: Opz: do you have a royal title, or any other role that explicitly mentions your voting power? I got my one vote....No title.... you may not have 1 vote, unless the role pm says you have 1 vote anyway I will still be voting bluelightz, because, you know, he's scum. If there is a tie or a close lynch between two people I will help out and vote whomever I think is scummier between the 2 ##vote bluelightz Quit Voting bad targets like him and Quatol. Vote for Yes_This_Is_Dog...
|
On May 16 2012 04:14 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2012 03:54 Mattchew wrote:On May 16 2012 03:53 ~OpZ~ wrote:On May 16 2012 03:41 Acrofales wrote: Opz: do you have a royal title, or any other role that explicitly mentions your voting power? I got my one vote....No title.... you may not have 1 vote, unless the role pm says you have 1 vote anyway I will still be voting bluelightz, because, you know, he's scum. If there is a tie or a close lynch between two people I will help out and vote whomever I think is scummier between the 2 ##vote bluelightz Quit Voting bad targets like him and Quatol. Vote for Yes_This_Is_Dog... you are an idiot
|
On May 16 2012 03:27 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2012 03:19 YES_THIS_IS_DOG wrote:On May 16 2012 03:05 ~OpZ~ wrote: You weren't just opposing the main lynch. You were discreditting the reason for his lynch without refuting anything in regard to it, and trying to say that scum was trying to divert it off Forumite, when in reality scum was trying to divert it off of Maju. You see how that makes you look scummy right?
I was discrediting the reason for his lynch because the reasoning for his lynch was shit. I was saying that scum was trying to divert it off Forumite because it was strange that very few people were discussing Forumite, even though I was talking about it a lot. If I had known that Maju were mafia I wouldn't have tried to divert the lynch off of him. Just because I was wrong doesn't mean I'm scum. Your excuse for voting Forumite isn't very good either, and it's starting to make me suspicious of you. Why was the reason for voting Maju shit? QS7 seemed pretty fucking convinced, and convincing, despite posting less than 5 posts regarding Maju. He convinced me. He convinced most of the town, with his shit reasons. And his shit reasons were right. But maybe you can tell me what the shit reasons were? You were talking about Forumite a lot? Excuse me? Lets see if I got the impression down right. *growl growl growl wag tail* arf arf arf *growl*...Cool story bro. Lassy afraid of the Noose? I care it makes you suspicious of me? You're scum. I'm completely convinced of it. Now you are just making stuff up. Hopefully the rest of town wont be as lazy as you, and hopefully they will actually read my filter before bullshitting.
On May 16 2012 03:27 ~OpZ~ wrote: Why was the reason for voting Maju shit? QS7 seemed pretty fucking convinced, and convincing, despite posting less than 5 posts regarding Maju. He convinced me. He convinced most of the town, with his shit reasons. And his shit reasons were right. But maybe you can tell me what the shit reasons were?
On May 12 2012 04:45 YES_THIS_IS_DOG wrote: I'm not sure that Maju is the best lynch target at the moment. He has been lurking but I don't think there's enough evidence for his lynch. I didn't vote for him because there was a lack of reasons to vote him.
On May 16 2012 03:27 ~OpZ~ wrote: You were talking about Forumite a lot? Excuse me? Lets see if I got the impression down right. *growl growl growl wag tail* arf arf arf *growl*...Cool story bro. Lassy afraid of the Noose?
This part of your post is definitive proof that you are full of shit. On the verge of scummy, though I don't know why scum OR town would say something as stupid as this.
+ Show Spoiler +On May 12 2012 04:04 YES_THIS_IS_DOG wrote: Question for all you unintelligent humans: why are you not voting Forumite? On May 12 2012 04:45 YES_THIS_IS_DOG wrote: Most of you haven't provided good reasons for not voting Forumite. SCUM is trying to draw the conversation away from him. On May 12 2012 04:55 YES_THIS_IS_DOG wrote: I already made a case, but I'll reiterate because it was lost in the morse code confusion.
If you read his filter, you'll see that he rarely talks about his own opinions. He likes to talk about game mechanics, which is VERY scummy. Scum are the ones who want to hide their opinions because they fear that it will incriminate them later in the game. On May 12 2012 05:05 YES_THIS_IS_DOG wrote:Show nested quote +On May 12 2012 05:05 Bill Murray wrote:On May 12 2012 05:04 YES_THIS_IS_DOG wrote: In regards to Erandorr's analysis, he calls out Maju for not having any reads. However he explains his reads in the first post in the analysis. Not a contradiction. I had a town read on Maju. The reason I am voting him right now is because I was stifling the wagon that could potentially build on me. It didn't happen. I will more than likely take my vote off of there... but why are you so worried about defending him, anyways? Because we have a better candidate, Forumite. I don't think Maju is scum and I don't want us to lynch town.
On May 16 2012 03:29 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2012 03:19 YES_THIS_IS_DOG wrote:On May 16 2012 03:05 ~OpZ~ wrote: You weren't just opposing the main lynch. You were discreditting the reason for his lynch without refuting anything in regard to it, and trying to say that scum was trying to divert it off Forumite, when in reality scum was trying to divert it off of Maju. You see how that makes you look scummy right?
I was discrediting the reason for his lynch because the reasoning for his lynch was shit. I was saying that scum was trying to divert it off Forumite because it was strange that very few people were discussing Forumite, even though I was talking about it a lot. If I had known that Maju were mafia I wouldn't have tried to divert the lynch off of him. Just because I was wrong doesn't mean I'm scum. Your excuse for voting Forumite isn't very good either, and it's starting to make me suspicious of you. Also girl, you missed and ignored half my post. *wags tail expectantly!!!* Care to explain which part I missed?
|
On May 16 2012 04:14 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2012 04:14 ~OpZ~ wrote:On May 16 2012 03:54 Mattchew wrote:On May 16 2012 03:53 ~OpZ~ wrote:On May 16 2012 03:41 Acrofales wrote: Opz: do you have a royal title, or any other role that explicitly mentions your voting power? I got my one vote....No title.... you may not have 1 vote, unless the role pm says you have 1 vote anyway I will still be voting bluelightz, because, you know, he's scum. If there is a tie or a close lynch between two people I will help out and vote whomever I think is scummier between the 2 ##vote bluelightz Quit Voting bad targets like him and Quatol. Vote for Yes_This_Is_Dog... you are an idiot Hey bro. I didn't insult you. Don't insult me.
|
On May 16 2012 03:54 Mattchew wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2012 03:53 ~OpZ~ wrote:On May 16 2012 03:41 Acrofales wrote: Opz: do you have a royal title, or any other role that explicitly mentions your voting power? I got my one vote....No title.... you may not have 1 vote, unless the role pm says you have 1 vote anyway I will still be voting bluelightz, because, you know, he's scum. If there is a tie or a close lynch between two people I will help out and vote whomever I think is scummier between the 2 ##vote bluelightz Your confidence is really baffling and dumb
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On May 16 2012 04:20 ~OpZ~ wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2012 04:14 Mattchew wrote:On May 16 2012 04:14 ~OpZ~ wrote:On May 16 2012 03:54 Mattchew wrote:On May 16 2012 03:53 ~OpZ~ wrote:On May 16 2012 03:41 Acrofales wrote: Opz: do you have a royal title, or any other role that explicitly mentions your voting power? I got my one vote....No title.... you may not have 1 vote, unless the role pm says you have 1 vote anyway I will still be voting bluelightz, because, you know, he's scum. If there is a tie or a close lynch between two people I will help out and vote whomever I think is scummier between the 2 ##vote bluelightz Quit Voting bad targets like him and Quatol. Vote for Yes_This_Is_Dog... you are an idiot Hey bro. I didn't insult you. Don't insult me.
Its not an insult if it is the truth If it was an insult someone would of lost a tooth
|
Unless someone comes up with a case against someone who isn't a lurker, I propose we use this lynch to test the voting theory. I for one don't give a rat's ass who out of Quatol and Bag get lynched, because I think both are scummy lurkers and deserve to die.
So I propose we test the voting theory!
So far we have: Scumtol: Acro (2), Drazerk (1), Forumite (0), Dog (1), Mattchew (3) = 7 ScumManager: Carolus (1), Zelblade (0), S&B (0), Potato (3) = 4
If Hassy and QS7 vote for ScumManager that brings it to 7-7. The rest of the unknown-voters distribute themselves unequally over the two in such a way that ScumManager has more of them (like he currently does). That makes it 7-7, with Quatol getting there first (and thus should get lynched). However, if the lynch goes to Bag, we know that one of two things happened: someone lied about their votecount, or there are no powerless people.
In either case, we lynch a crappy scummy lurker.
I will use my own personal lynch to hit CC as Zelblade has convinced me that he's worth lynching.
|
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Gonna put my vote on Quatol. Been having a long conversation with Acro and Draz about how this has all been going, and it seems the best option.
##Vote: Quatol
|
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Dammit Acro, tell me before posting that!
|
Russian Federation69 Posts
On May 16 2012 04:22 Acrofales wrote: Unless someone comes up with a case against someone who isn't a lurker, I propose we use this lynch to test the voting theory. I for one don't give a rat's ass who out of Quatol and Bag get lynched, because I think both are scummy lurkers and deserve to die.
So I propose we test the voting theory!
So far we have: Scumtol: Acro (2), Drazerk (1), Forumite (0), Dog (1), Mattchew (3) = 7 ScumManager: Carolus (1), Zelblade (0), S&B (0), Potato (3) = 4
If Hassy and QS7 vote for ScumManager that brings it to 7-7. The rest of the unknown-voters distribute themselves unequally over the two in such a way that ScumManager has more of them (like he currently does). That makes it 7-7, with Quatol getting there first (and thus should get lynched). However, if the lynch goes to Bag, we know that one of two things happened: someone lied about their votecount, or there are no powerless people.
In either case, we lynch a crappy scummy lurker.
I will use my own personal lynch to hit CC as Zelblade has convinced me that he's worth lynching. aye aye cap'n.
btw guys, read this dude's filter, he's making a lot of sense right now.
|
|
|
|