|
On March 25 2012 14:30 Risen wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2012 14:26 Sinensis wrote: Let me explain something to you. Just because you think you have a plan, and you're pretty sure it makes sense, and you think it's a good plan, and you want people to believe you and do what you say, doesn't mean you actually have/are going to accomplish any of that. I have no idea how people could ignore me and not lynch me. My plan is going through one way or the other. Deal with it.
Next time you role claim detective, don't do it like this:
"Hey guys I'm the detective, lynch me!"
Do it like this:
"Hey guys I'm the detective, don't lynch me!"
|
On March 25 2012 14:56 Risen wrote:Show nested quote +On March 25 2012 14:41 Sinensis wrote:On March 25 2012 14:30 Risen wrote:On March 25 2012 14:26 Sinensis wrote: Let me explain something to you. Just because you think you have a plan, and you're pretty sure it makes sense, and you think it's a good plan, and you want people to believe you and do what you say, doesn't mean you actually have/are going to accomplish any of that. I have no idea how people could ignore me and not lynch me. My plan is going through one way or the other. Deal with it. Next time you role claim detective, don't do it like this: "Hey guys I'm the detective, lynch me!" Do it like this: "Hey guys I'm the detective, don't lynch me!" normally I'd agree, but we have a third party troll. Things had to be done to show that no one should listen to wbg
No. You're wrong. That is the right way to role claim detective. WBG has shit to do with piss. You bring him up more than any other player when we all agreed pretty much from the beginning he is just a troll this game and should not influence our decision making in any way until he has proven beyond doubt he is pro-town.
|
Which, get a clue, WBG is not pro-town.
|
On March 26 2012 05:33 Risen wrote: The only reason this all started is b/c I was convinced wbg was shooting me. I didn't receive a PM saying someone protected me, which means he was bullshitting the entire time. He pretty much flushed out the town dt b/c I had to get out the word that my check on acro was scum (I'm assuming he has a list of what everyone is, or he caught onto the fact that I used the word detect a million times in my day 1 posts)
It's my fault I fell for his night-shot claim, and I feel bad for it. I'm sorry, but once the cat was out of the bag I felt the only way to give town a fighting chance was to force the 10-3 following my lynch (again, I still think it's more logical when you think about it to lynch acro, but apparently I'm wrong)
Dude... -_-
Whatever I'm going to work be back in 6 hours.
|
On March 26 2012 08:59 evantrees wrote: Sorry waited a bit due to being uncertain if curu wasn't just late with a pm due to reason for tiny daypost. So pmed him asking then went to bed.
I was not hit last night, so mostly likely roleblocked SLJ. I really don't see SLJ being jailed, vigged and hit by scum.
Which would mean there could be two roleblockers, someone could have jailed bugs or bugs could be lieing.
@Sinensis respond or post at all?
Hey evantrees we missed you nice of you to join us here on page 47. What took so long for you to respond to me voting for you ever since Day 1? You had time for some random 1 liners but no time for me? That hurts my feelings. Who are you voting for today? I see you voted Mattchew yesterday, here's the explanation you offered:
Since I would not mind seeing him lynched or shot for now
That isn't a very solid case you made, but it was day 1 and Mattchew was being a little disagreeable at the time. Not really that suspicious, though it does leave some reasoning to be desired.
|
I know evantrees never responded to anything I or anyone else said about him, and I said I would not switch my vote unless he did respond. Well I am making an exception and voting Acro tomorrow. I am also disregarding everything Acro says until he is lynched.
|
|
I'm voting evantrees if this bothers you read my filter. He had his chance.
|
On March 30 2012 03:29 Xatalos wrote: Okay... It looks like this day was a real mess (as well as day 2 to a lesser degree) so I hope day 4 will be the day where Mafia are finally figured out. I'm not still 100% confident on my own Mafia reads, but I'll post all my opinions and findings now, in case I get killed at the deadline.
I'll go through every player with my opinions/notes as well as a verdict: good/medium/bad lynch. Good lynch: I'll vote for one of these if possible. Medium lynch: I'll vote for one of these if necessary not to get a bad lynch lynched. Bad lynch: I won't vote for one of these - I can't see them being Mafia.
gumshoe: He's been my top lynch for a long time, but I don't think he's the best lynch anymore at this point. First of all, he has been inactive for a long time, so he'll probably get modkilled soon anyway. Second, as some others said before, his careless and bold posts don't fit the Mafia mindset very well. Very possibly he's just a noob who spoke what came to his mind, no matter how possibly suspicious. Verdict: Medium lynch.
Zealos: Apparently some think he's suspicious, but I don't really see it. He's been very active, contributing and created a pro-town atmosphere. Unless I see something damning from him, I'm not willing to vote for him. Verdict: Bad lynch.
Mattchew: I really didn't like his confusing and disruptive way to play on day 1, but in the end, he's been generating a lot of useful discussion. Also, I can't believe Mafia (Acrofales) would have focused so hard on getting a fellow Mafia player lynched... I'm not willing to vote for him anymore. Verdict: Bad lynch.
risk.nuke: I was a bit suspicious of him after his first posts, but his later posts have been a lot more contributive. I'm not sold on either his innocence or guiltiness yet. Verdict: Medium lynch.
Jitsu: OriginalName was a lurker, but Jitsu has contributed quite a bit after he took over. I haven't seen anything suspicious about him yet... Verdict: Bad lynch.
Alderan: He hasn't contributed very much, but isn't really a lurker either. Not a very bad lynch choice, but not among the best. Verdict: Medium lynch.
chaoser: Clearly has experience in playing, but hasn't contributed much, disregarding some of the more trivial discussion. A semi-lurker who doesn't look very pro-town, but not anti-town either. Verdict: Medium lynch.
Lyter: Has contributed little and posted seldom. Something feels off, but not a top lynch yet. Verdict: Medium lynch.
GreYMisT: Also an experienced player, but hasn't contributed much or often. Was the runner-up in day 1 lynch, but wasn't voted by even a single Mafia player. Both him and chaoser haven't done much to help town, but GreYMisT feels more suspicious to me. Verdict: Good lynch.
sinensis: Doesn't look very interested in adding to the discussion, voting without much explanation or contribution. Apparently suspects evantrees mainly, but doesn't push his lynch other than voting for him. Verdict: Medium lynch.
evantrees: A hardcore lurker without real contribution. Certainly feels a bit suspicious, but could also be a disinterested townie. Verdict: Medium lynch.
So, I'll probably be voting for GreYMisT tomorrow if I can.
Once evantress is dead I am lynching this guy, Xatalos. I doubt if anyone in thread can change my mind with any amount of posting. His early game wishy-washy-smiley style of posting made me suspicious, now this giant list of useless has me more suspicious because his "good-lynches" boil down to:
- "Greymist hasn't contributed much or often and was the runner-up in day 1 lynch." Day 1 the town has ZERO information about anything, so basing a lynch off that info when we're this far into the game is stupid. Also, greymist has contributed more than the guy I am voting for if that's the criteria votes are being based on. Last, he wasn't even the runner-up day 1 as Xatalos said, so I'm not sure why he said it.
- He also says gumshoe has been his top lynch for a long time, but has other priorities right now instead (read: greymist).
If your priorities are preserving town numbers and eliminating mafia, you should probably follow my example.
|
The Dungeon master needs to update the "Important Posts" section. Thank you Curu.
|
On March 30 2012 07:41 Mattchew wrote: Why are you so dead set on evantrees?
Because he refuses to defend himself, or do anything helpful.
|
|
On April 01 2012 06:55 evantrees wrote: As much as I dislike nonsense like that, lets see where this goes.
##vote Xatalos
I'm still voting for you champ. I can see you still don't care though...
Oh well. Not budging.
|
|
|
|