|
On March 01 2012 12:16 Probulous wrote: As my first act I want to call out Bluelightz! Every game I have read or played with you I have not been able to tell your alignment. This diverts unecessary attention and time away from useful scum hunting. So shape up and be active. If you lurk this game I will make sure you swing from the yard-arm.
I know it is odd to quote yourself out of nowhere but I feel this has been neglected.
@Bluelightz, what the shit?
I asked you in my very first post to not lurk. You started the game by spamming stupid policy questions and asking everyone under the sun for their opinions. Then you disappeared. The only thing of yours that is more than two lines is your ridiculous reads page. Let's take a look.
On March 03 2012 09:56 Bluelightz wrote:Jackal58 - Leaning Scum - He post's nothing of worth and is useless. rgTheSchworz - Leaning Third Party Maybe - This post is interesting because IF he is the SK he is trying to make people thinking he's not the SK
Right now, I believe rgTS has the largest chance of being scum so I am voting him. ##Vote: rgTheSchworz
I'll ignore the fact that you voted for Paperscraps because he made a useless list for now  What the fuck is this? You have been told numerous times not to post town/null lists. At least this time you label someone red. But your reason is so majorly hypocritical and stupid it hurts my brain. Jackal, from what I have read always lurks day 1. But the real kicker is that you then decide not to vote for him? Instead you vote for the person you called third party and then in the same post they changed to scum?
You also left your vote there when it was clear he was never going to get lynched. That is an easy way to avoid responsibility.
I charged you this game with making your alignment clear. Especially by not lurking. You have chosen not to do this. In addition you are voting and pushing people with stupid reasoning. If you don't provide something useful before the end of today, I will be happy pushing for your lynch. You know that people have let you off previously for lurking. That is why I called you out, if you continue to do it I can only assume you are doing it on purpose and so must die.
Before someone says he can't be scum because they wouldn't let him post like this, he has done this before and gotten off with that excuse. I wouldn't put it past them to use that against us.
Sorry about the wall, told you it was hard to avoid 
|
Final Vote Count:
Misder - 3
deconduo
A Killer Cuppa Tea
Jackal58
Sandroba - 3
Palmar
Probulous
Snarfs
TheToast - 3
Pandain
Sandroba
TheToast
Palmar - 2
Paperscraps
Adam4167
deconduo - 1
Misder
Paperscraps
Pandain - 1
Sandroba
rgTheSchworz
TheToast
rgTheSchworz - 1
Bluelightz
Probulous - 0
rgTheSchworz
A Killer Cuppa Tea - 0
Probulous
Paperscraps - 0
Bluelightz
Snarfs
inb4 posting useless lists 
These people need to explain their votes
TheToast
You deliberately chose to vote for someone who was not going to be lynched. Your vote was at 11:50 and you voted for Pandain who had two votes at the time. It was obvious that only Sandroba or Misder were possible candidates because everyone had already placed their votes. Yours was last. You effectively chose Misder over Sandroba without saying so.
Explain.
Paperscraps
I can't find your vote on Palmar. What the hell happened with your vote, the only thing I see in your filter is a vote for decon. Am I missing something?
Adam
You were at a wedding yesterday so I expected you to be absent like myself (I tried to be around). But you posted at 1:30 before deadline when most votes had already been placed. So you had the information available to make a choice for a candidate who had the possibility of being lynched. You voted for Palmar when it was clear he was not a possible candidate. I can't find Paperscraps' vote so right now you effectively voted on your own. Nice way to avoid taking responsibility for a lynch. Explain.
Bluelightz
As explained in my previous post about you. What the fuck dude?
These four had votes for people who clearly had little to no chance of being lynched. Now doubt you are all scum but I am sure that at least one of you is. What easier way to avoid taking responsibility for your vote then by placing it on someone who will not be lynched. I've done that as scum successfully in the past.
|
Oh yeah, that is a mod error. I voted for Deconduo. I don't know that happened.
|
Uh. My bad lol. Incorrect mod count
|
On March 04 2012 07:49 Probulous wrote:
Adam
You were at a wedding yesterday so I expected you to be absent like myself (I tried to be around). But you posted at 1:30 before deadline when most votes had already been placed. So you had the information available to make a choice for a candidate who had the possibility of being lynched. You voted for Palmar when it was clear he was not a possible candidate. I can't find Paperscraps' vote so right now you effectively voted on your own. Nice way to avoid taking responsibility for a lynch. Explain.
These four had votes for people who clearly had little to no chance of being lynched. Now doubt you are all scum but I am sure that at least one of you is. What easier way to avoid taking responsibility for your vote then by placing it on someone who will not be lynched. I've done that as scum successfully in the past.
I didn't support either of the 'main' lynches yesterday and considering the votes ended up being split 3-3 in favour of your two main candidates, neither did most other people.
I was not avoiding responsibility by not voting for Misder, go read my filter, I didn't think he was scum. Lazy, yes. scum, no. I also didn't vote for sandroba on similar reasons, I think he is being lazy or just plain doesn't give a shit, which is not indicative of his alignment to me.
So I was presented with the 'choice' of voting for two people, neither of which I find overly scummy. So I decided to provoke Palmar, partly because I feel his play is different to what I expect from town Palmar, partly to gain a better read on him in case I am wrong and he is town.
The result is I still don't know what his alignment is. I asked him to produce more content (in the form of a case on me), but he refused as he was hell-bent on only focusing on sandroba yesterday, so I don't know what to make of him.
|
I was sleeping bro, I'm gonna get on my comp first though to explain it.
|
On March 04 2012 09:05 Adam4167 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 04 2012 07:49 Probulous wrote:
Adam
You were at a wedding yesterday so I expected you to be absent like myself (I tried to be around). But you posted at 1:30 before deadline when most votes had already been placed. So you had the information available to make a choice for a candidate who had the possibility of being lynched. You voted for Palmar when it was clear he was not a possible candidate. I can't find Paperscraps' vote so right now you effectively voted on your own. Nice way to avoid taking responsibility for a lynch. Explain.
These four had votes for people who clearly had little to no chance of being lynched. Now doubt you are all scum but I am sure that at least one of you is. What easier way to avoid taking responsibility for your vote then by placing it on someone who will not be lynched. I've done that as scum successfully in the past. I didn't support either of the 'main' lynches yesterday and considering the votes ended up being split 3-3 in favour of your two main candidates, neither did most other people. I was not avoiding responsibility by not voting for Misder, go read my filter, I didn't think he was scum. Lazy, yes. scum, no. I also didn't vote for sandroba on similar reasons, I think he is being lazy or just plain doesn't give a shit, which is not indicative of his alignment to me. So I was presented with the 'choice' of voting for two people, neither of which I find overly scummy. So I decided to provoke Palmar, partly because I feel his play is different to what I expect from town Palmar, partly to gain a better read on him in case I am wrong and he is town. The result is I still don't know what his alignment is . I asked him to produce more content (in the form of a case on me), but he refused as he was hell-bent on only focusing on sandroba yesterday, so I don't know what to make of him.
This is my biggest problem with him too.
|
Alright, at the time I didnt believe either Sandroba or Misder was scum.
At the time I already said I wouldnt be there for the deadline so I couldnt change it.\
I voted rgTS like I said, he had the highest chance of flipping scum to me.
|
Day 2: The Voyage Continues![[image loading]](http://tagdigitalphotography.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Malibu-Ocean-1_small.jpg)
rgTheSchworz was leaning on the railing of the ship, sipping rum from a canteen. He was supposed to be on night lookout, watching for any suspicious activities, to avoid a reapeat of what had happened to Foolishness, but he didn't take his task too seriously. He instead opted to spend the night swigging rum and reminiscing about old times on the ship. He liked the Captain, he was the one who made sure they had rum and other luxuries; he took care of the crew. rgTheSchworz smiled, and stood up unsteadily from the railing, to walk around the ship. He had to at least look like he was doing his job.
That was when a pair of strong hands suddenly took hold of him from behind. In his drunkenness, he was too slow to react, as they pushed him back to the railing, and toppled him over into the sea.
rgTheSchworz the Townie has been lost at sea!
Day 2 has begun! The deadline for Day 2 is 12 KST 49 hours from now!
|
Cant say i'm surprised with that.
Id like to hear something worthwhile out of sandroba or jackal today, skating by doing nothing is a lame effort from vets.
|
AKCT visited rhtheschworz last night.
|
On March 04 2012 13:29 Pandain wrote:
AKCT visited rhtheschworz last night.
Well well, isn't that interesting.
Since you've claimed blue already, can you tell me if you Tracked AKCT or if you Watched rgTheSchworz? I assume its the latter, but id like to know for sure.
|
If AKCT flips scum Pandain is confirmed town. also, wrong read on rgTS .
I agree Adam I'd also like to see more from the vets.
|
On March 04 2012 13:29 Pandain wrote:
AKCT visited rhtheschworz last night.
Honestly this is very believable. AKCT has played a scummy game so far. AKCT needs to claim a role though, before we proceed with anything.
|
I don't actually care what AKCT claims.
##Vote A killer cuppa tea
|
GG, guys, hope what I planned works.
|
Meh gonna vote
##Vote: A Killer Cuppa Tea
|
|
|
There is no sensible reason to disbelieve pandain's claim, so AKCT is going to have to claim. Now, he can't really claim medic because the chances of scum double stacking rgTS on night 1 seem very slim.
If he claims vig we lynch him, because that shot was beyond stupid.
so what's left are the tracker and the watcher. I just don't think we have multiple of those in such a small setup. He can't exactly claim watcher either because that way he'd know who visited rgTS, so I guess he's going to counterclaim tracker or something? Or try to make us believe we have more than one?
For this reason I am going to disbelieve any claim he claims. The only reasonable claim for him from a balance/viability standpoint i claiming watcher and point to a random townie and getting that player lynched, but in this case we lynch him anyway, and before we lynch the guy he points a finger at.
|
On March 04 2012 12:28 Adam4167 wrote:
Cant say i'm surprised with that.
Id like to hear something worthwhile out of sandroba or jackal today, skating by doing nothing is a lame effort from vets.
You will. This is the one of the very few day 2s I've seen in a long time. Now it's worth playing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
