|
On February 28 2012 08:54 prplhz wrote:
##Vote wherebugsgo
Funny thing is, I don't even need to make a case.
Burden of proof and all that shit.
LOL
I love this game
|
I can't justify leaving my vote on Toad when prplhz and VE essentially just outted themselves.
##unvote Toadesstern
##vote Visceraeyes
|
On February 28 2012 08:59 prplhz wrote:
I hope you love getting lynched too.
nice try scum
|
On February 28 2012 09:02 prplhz wrote:
Can you quickly reiterate your problems with VisceraEyes?
1-contradicted himself on logic; calls me scum for one thing when he's done it himself at least 6 times
2-pushes responsibility for day 2 lynch onto me despite supposedly agreeing with the sentiment
3-2 day hole in activity from yesterday, says he'll post before lynch but doesn't
4-makes shit case on me based on my first post and the fact that I can be manipulative as scum
5th and most importantly: talks to people as if he already knows their alignment
|
also if you're town you've stooped to a new level of bad. you've done fuck all and now you sheep the worst case in the game
maybe I'm quick to call you scum just based on that, but my god that's bad
|
On February 28 2012 09:07 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:00 wherebugsgo wrote:
I can't justify leaving my vote on Toad when prplhz and VE essentially just outted themselves.
##unvote Toadesstern
##vote Visceraeyes why not prplhz instead? Why not RoL instead? We basicly tried to lynch RoL from d2 (or even d1?), he said nothing, basicly claimed mafia recently and we're still not able to lynch him.
why not prpl-I only have one vote
why not RoL-I only have one vote, and VE is more likely to be scum because the case extends beyond simple meta. In fact as of now we may actually be wrong about RoL and he might just be bored inactive town. Why kill someone who's done almost nothing alignment indicative as opposed to someone who is contradicting himself in logic and flailing around in thread?
If VE flips scum we should certainly look at both prpl and RoL.
If I'm wrong about you (which certainly seems possible now that prpl's shown his ugly face) then there's also some 4th scum out there. I've been asking myself, why did risk.nuke get replaced, in a game with no replacements? We haven't been able to lynch him either, and that's made me wonder for a while.
|
On February 28 2012 09:11 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:06 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:02 prplhz wrote:
Can you quickly reiterate your problems with VisceraEyes? 1-contradicted himself on logic; calls me scum for one thing when he's done it himself at least 6 times 2-pushes responsibility for day 2 lynch onto me despite supposedly agreeing with the sentiment 3-2 day hole in activity from yesterday, says he'll post before lynch but doesn't 4-makes shit case on me based on my first post and the fact that I can be manipulative as scum 5th and most importantly: talks to people as if he already knows their alignment Do you think these are indicative of VisceraEyes being scum?
yes, because he as a town player has improved drastically recently; this is something even Palmar has pointed out, and something I've agreed with.
I don't think a town VE would disappear for 2 days and then come back and flail around trying to kill me based on a shitty case.
Also why the fuck have you not done anything? The fact that you are asking me questions now is confusing me further. I didn't even realize you were playing until kita said you were his #1 scumread
|
On February 28 2012 09:13 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:06 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:02 prplhz wrote:
Can you quickly reiterate your problems with VisceraEyes? 1-contradicted himself on logic; calls me scum for one thing when he's done it himself at least 6 times 2-pushes responsibility for day 2 lynch onto me despite supposedly agreeing with the sentiment 3-2 day hole in activity from yesterday, says he'll post before lynch but doesn't 4-makes shit case on me based on my first post and the fact that I can be manipulative as scum 5th and most importantly: talks to people as if he already knows their alignment 1) I've already explained why the first instance of this you brought up is a completely different thing, which you've not only failed to comment on or refute, but have maliciously tried to discredit simply by saying "he's making shit up"
You didn't explain shit, you just kept asserting that I'm wrong and you're right with no logical basis for either assertion.
I'm not maliciously discrediting you, I'm showing that you're contradicting yourself by calling me scum for things you yourself have repeatedly done.
In fact, the whole point is that what I did is in no way a scum tell for any player. Of course it's ludicrous to call someone scum because they asked another player an opinion. That's the whole point!
On February 28 2012 09:13 VisceraEyes wrote:
2) I didn't push responsibility on you for shit - you pushed for Blazinghand, and I said I was with you - this in NO way indicates that I thought you were leading the lynch, only that you pushed it yourself and that at the time I agreed with you. You're scummily trying to twist my words into something you can call scummy, and it's not going to work.
Actually you did, by saying that I was going with town sentiment.
I showed I wasn't going with town sentiment day 2; I led that lynch. Yet, you bring up BH's name in the list of things I've apparently sheeped town with.
Not only is that wrong, it's indicative of you knowing what town sentiment is.
Scummily trying to twist words into something I can call scummy, good one, genius.
On February 28 2012 09:13 VisceraEyes wrote:
3) Not indicative of alignment. You know this shit bro.
Inactivity by itself isn't, but saying you'll do something and then not doing it is.
That's the entire fucking case on RoL, scum.
On February 28 2012 09:13 VisceraEyes wrote:
4) My case was good, the whole thing was NOT based on your first post. It's was based on your manipulative behavior as a whole on D1. I could make a similar case for D2 and D3, but I feel like this is enough to get you lynched.
LOL only a third of it was, right? rofl.
Another third was calling me manipulative and the last third was based on me changing my mind on redFF. Which you yourself were guilty of 3 times.
On February 28 2012 09:13 VisceraEyes wrote:
5) I'm not speaking to anyone as if I know their alignment. Do you know something about DocH that I don't? I'm talking to him assuming he's town because regardless of his alignment, that's the alignment he'd have me believe he is. I'm talking to you like scum because I have a case on you and you're ignoring it - but I similarly don't know your alignment.
Good, so you admit you're assuming he's town.
Thank you, thank you for proving my point that you apparently know he's town already.
Also thank you for giving me information I didn't have before; now I can trust Dr. H.
|
On February 28 2012 09:17 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:13 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:07 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:00 wherebugsgo wrote:
I can't justify leaving my vote on Toad when prplhz and VE essentially just outted themselves.
##unvote Toadesstern
##vote Visceraeyes why not prplhz instead? Why not RoL instead? We basicly tried to lynch RoL from d2 (or even d1?), he said nothing, basicly claimed mafia recently and we're still not able to lynch him. why not prpl-I only have one vote why not RoL-I only have one vote, and VE is more likely to be scum because the case extends beyond simple meta. In fact as of now we may actually be wrong about RoL and he might just be bored inactive town. Why kill someone who's done almost nothing alignment indicative as opposed to someone who is contradicting himself in logic and flailing around in thread? If VE flips scum we should certainly look at both prpl and RoL. If I'm wrong about you (which certainly seems possible now that prpl's shown his ugly face) then there's also some 4th scum out there. I've been asking myself, why did risk.nuke get replaced, in a game with no replacements? We haven't been able to lynch him either, and that's made me wonder for a while. How does prpl showing up have anything to do with my alignment?
bc it is extremely unlikely that all 3 of you are scum, IMO.
I guess it's possible that the entire scum team is something like you, prpl, RoL, and VE. In fact I wouldn't be shocked, seeing as I feel like there's no one helping me.
However, I think risk.nuke is more likely to be scum based on the replacement and if prpl is scum you can't be.
|
On February 28 2012 09:23 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:13 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:07 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:00 wherebugsgo wrote:
I can't justify leaving my vote on Toad when prplhz and VE essentially just outted themselves.
##unvote Toadesstern
##vote Visceraeyes why not prplhz instead? Why not RoL instead? We basicly tried to lynch RoL from d2 (or even d1?), he said nothing, basicly claimed mafia recently and we're still not able to lynch him. why not prpl-I only have one vote why not RoL-I only have one vote, and VE is more likely to be scum because the case extends beyond simple meta. In fact as of now we may actually be wrong about RoL and he might just be bored inactive town. Why kill someone who's done almost nothing alignment indicative as opposed to someone who is contradicting himself in logic and flailing around in thread? If VE flips scum we should certainly look at both prpl and RoL. If I'm wrong about you (which certainly seems possible now that prpl's shown his ugly face) then there's also some 4th scum out there. I've been asking myself, why did risk.nuke get replaced, in a game with no replacements? We haven't been able to lynch him either, and that's made me wonder for a while. How does prpl showing up have anything to do with my alignment? uhuh, wait don't answer that one! I found the answer myself: Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 07:33 kitaman27 wrote:Here are my scum power rankings!(anything past 5 may be completely arbitrary) + Show Spoiler [unimportant right now] +1.) prplhz:On February 23 2012 03:38 prplhz wrote:
What the fuck are you talking about. I complained about the redFF lynch and pushed the BloodyC0bbler lynch. On February 24 2012 13:02 prplhz wrote:
I pushed BloodyC0bbler around the time I said that so it's not true when you say that I didn't provide an alternative. On day one, prpl hard defends redff from the lynch, without providing an alternate candidate. He claims to have pushed the BC lynch. Lets take a closer look: On February 23 2012 03:17 prplhz wrote:
I think BloodyC0bbler is more scummy, but I think there might be better targets today that I'm more comfortable with. This is like Responsibility Mafia! where BloodyC0bbler was just gone, but he has been scummy so far. On February 23 2012 03:49 prplhz wrote:
Since we have dropped the BloodyC0bbler lynch I think that Blazinghand is a good lynch for town, especially if I'm the alternative. On February 23 2012 03:54 prplhz wrote:
If BloodyC0bbler is a possiblity then I'm more up for that than anything else. I'm a little unsure of him but he's a ton better than lynching me. On February 23 2012 03:56 prplhz wrote:
Like, I think BloodyC0bbler is scummy but I'm always kinda unsure about my reads (because, allegedly, I'm bad). On February 23 2012 05:24 prplhz wrote:
I really doubt that BloodyC0bbler is going to attract enough votes don't you think there are other alternatives that are more likely to flip scum than redFF and more likely to pick up enough votes than BloodyC0bbler? Is this honestly what prpl considers pushing? A bunch of wishy-washy statements without providing any actual reasoning? He constantly brings up how bad he is as if he is trying to downplay his abilities. Now lets move on to day two: He starts off by voting RoL. Towards the end of the day he changes to blazing. His reasoning: On February 25 2012 18:20 prplhz wrote:
Going to vote Blazinghand. I don't see any reason to believe his claim.
##Vote: Blazinghand The entire game, the strongest reason prpl has believed someone to be scum is because of a Floridian claim. Not once does he even reference his actual posts or behavior. Looking back to day one, prpl was willing to defend red because the claim made sense to him. The next day, a similar claim is provided and he has no reason to believe it. The entire game prpl has responded poorly to pressure and would be a fine lynch candidate. 2.) RebirthOfLeGenD: You can't get frustrated at peoples concerns if they are legitimate points. You've spent more time defending yourself than contributing. You say you're busy. I can understand that, but the game started a week ago and we're still waiting. The only legitimate case you've given us was on DrH. Is there a reason you chose to ignore my concerns with the case? 3.) chaoser: Tough to make a case on someone who hasn't posted since part way through day one. 4.) BloodyC0bbler: As far as I can tell, the only reason people think you are town is because the day one lynch was close. Is this the same day one lynch whose results were covered? Your voting patterns so far have been extremely opportunistic. Rather than commit to a certain scum suspect, you've waited for the bandwagon to become strong and then jump on quoting a random post that suddenly changes your mind. Maybe you could point me towards what makes you town? 5.) wherebugsgo: lol you seriously didn't roll mafia yet again did you? First BH claims scum and now this? On February 28 2012 04:41 wherebugsgo wrote:
@RoL: you're fucking lucky Toad scumslipped so hard, or I'd be pushing you like there's no tomorrow. All you do is lurk lurk lurk and then make excuses for your inactivity. That's exactly what you did when we were teammates in Couples Therapy and it's what you did (IIRC) in Purgatory as well. "gosh darnnit, I'd really love to vote for you RoL, but all these townies are just so easy to push"+ Show Spoiler [unimportant right now] +6.) risk.nuke: Moderately less scummy because his name isn't chaoser. His replacement has a lot of work to do to salvage the game. 7.) dirkzor: On February 23 2012 07:05 Dirkzor wrote:
Hahahahahahahhahahaha... Fuck that was a hilarious "flip" :D Haha: "lol that's annoying" Hahaha: "lol that's really annoying" Hahahahahahahhahahaha: "I didn't have anything to do with that. I swear." 8.) DrH: He has been reasonable in the main thread and questionable in the voting thread. I was really surprised to read that he actually voted for Blazinghand. Looking through his filter, I'm really having trouble find the reasoning for his switch. Could you please point me in the direction? What happened to RoL? You're dropping him for today as well? Why are you ignoring your reads and pushing whoever happens to be the flavor of the day? I'd put you higher if the slots weren't already taken. 9.) VisceraEyes: I'm not reading through his filter. You can't make me. Lets go with 9th. 10.) Toadesstern: Appears to be putting more effort in than any other player. I'll take him to lylo any day. 11.) Tyrran: I'm having trouble finding a scum player out of the newer players. I liked how his opinion on blazing changed from day one to day two. Needs to be more helpful if we wants town to win however. 12.) layabout: I read through his filter last and 12 was the only spot remaining. Congrats. 13.) Jitsu: Seems to be looking for things with a town mindframe. Not really pushing his reads very hard though. 14.) kitaman27: lol the scum team isn't even bothering to try to make this guy look bad. Did they fail a hit on him or something?
nope kita's just wrong.
anyway I'm not going to get lynched today, and if scum tries it's going to be hilarious.
I have secrets  so go ahead VE, try to lynch me. Really, I feel sorry for you since you have 0 idea what's coming.
|
On February 28 2012 09:26 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 08:43 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 28 2012 08:35 wherebugsgo wrote:Hey VE, according to your logic based on me talking to syllo, this post makes you scum: On February 25 2012 10:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
BC - is this DocH's normal play? It looks to me like he's pouring on the "Hey guys, watch me pressure these noobs!" a little thick... asking BC for his reads subtly hinting Dr. H is scum. today, talks to Dr. H as if he's knowingly talking to a townie, trying to convince him I'm scum. sup scum logic What I did: subtly poke an inactive-ish player (BloodyC0bbler) a specific question with clear motivation (is this scummy? are you going to contribute?) regarding a controversial player (DocH) who's absolutely NOT a lynch candidate. What you did: ask an active player (syllogism) a vague question (what are your thoughts) with unclear motivations (you've already said redFF was bad, you hadn't noted any change of opinion as of this post) of a player who's given his opinion on the player you're asking about (RedFF) who was already a lynch candidate. They're not the same things. Try again scum. THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THINGS! REFUTE THIS OR SHUT THE HELL UP WBG!
u mad bro?
again, you make the assumption that my question to syllo was purely to find out what syllo thought of redFF, and then use that opinion to find out what to do.
SO IF THAT'S TRUE, WHY DID I NOT AGREE WITH SYLLO? Jesus Christ.
I asked syllo what he thought about redFF because I wanted to see how syllo would answer (if at all.) In fact, I already had made up my mind. I used the opportunity to get an early read on syllo. If syllo chose not to answer, he was automatically scum. If he answered and disagreed with my already formed opinion, but for good reasons (which he subsequently did) he was likely to be town. If he answered and agreed, again for good reasons, probably town.
If he did anything and used shitty logic, he was less likely to be town.
So what was the purpose of me asking syllo what he thought? It was to determine syllo's alignment and at the same time, if I thought he was town, what he thought of redFF. Clearly we disagreed about him. That doesn't mean anything though, just means we had different opinions.
So again, what's scummy about this? absolutely nothing. Asking someone a question isn't scummy at all.
Yet, since VE chose to call me scum for this, I chose to take his own logic and point out how it applies to him 6 times over.
So, VE, what about this post?
On February 21 2012 11:59 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 11:49 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On February 21 2012 11:42 Jackal58 wrote:
Dear redFF and WBG
You both suck.
Sincerely,
Jackal58 I endorse this statement fully and from the bottom of my heart I thank you for letting me know I am not insane. Why are we debating Policy lynches this early into the day? Seriously? This isn't a game with a player like 2010 bill murray who spams while being a dick, this isn't a game with a mod hating spammer named showtime. Instead we have for the most part a fairly solid crew devoid of spammy trolls. If you want to lynch someone for being bad, wait till they start being bad / scumlike, dont lynch them for shits and giggles. Policy lynching people on retarded reasoning is worse than RNG votes for early discussion. Cut the nonsense out. Anyone who keeps talking about it from this post on be warned. as a side note, VE since you are making moderate sense for the first time ever I have to give you props for impressing me two games in a row. /salute What are your thoughts on redFF BC? I'm almost convinced that he's just bad and not scum, but I'd like your thoughts before I act on it.
basically same thing I said;
I asked syllo his opinion on redFF prior to voting him, saying 'I think I was wrong" and you do the exact same thing with BC.(well opposite, you go from scum to town)
But I'm scummy for talking to syllo and you're not for talking to BC? Nice double standard, eh?
or this:
On February 21 2012 17:15 VisceraEyes wrote:Syllo what do you think about the back and forth between chaoser and WBG? It seems genuine, so I doubt it's scum v scum - I can't decide if I think one of them is scum or if they're both town 
can't decide, wants syllo's opinion.
Hey, now you can't say you were poking an inactive player! It's the same player I asked a question to!
On February 22 2012 04:09 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 04:04 redFF wrote:
I don't really care about chaoser at this stage, haven't paid much attention to him tbh.
Layabout is bad because he berated dirkzor for not finding 3+scum and hasn't stated a read all game. The fact that you haven't paid much attention to chaoser is....interesting. Wouldn't you say that's interesting syllo?
or this one. You don't even say your read, you call it "interesting" and then ask syllo!
you make me laugh.
On February 28 2012 09:28 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:26 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:23 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:13 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:07 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:00 wherebugsgo wrote:
I can't justify leaving my vote on Toad when prplhz and VE essentially just outted themselves.
##unvote Toadesstern
##vote Visceraeyes why not prplhz instead? Why not RoL instead? We basicly tried to lynch RoL from d2 (or even d1?), he said nothing, basicly claimed mafia recently and we're still not able to lynch him. why not prpl-I only have one vote why not RoL-I only have one vote, and VE is more likely to be scum because the case extends beyond simple meta. In fact as of now we may actually be wrong about RoL and he might just be bored inactive town. Why kill someone who's done almost nothing alignment indicative as opposed to someone who is contradicting himself in logic and flailing around in thread? If VE flips scum we should certainly look at both prpl and RoL. If I'm wrong about you (which certainly seems possible now that prpl's shown his ugly face) then there's also some 4th scum out there. I've been asking myself, why did risk.nuke get replaced, in a game with no replacements? We haven't been able to lynch him either, and that's made me wonder for a while. How does prpl showing up have anything to do with my alignment? uhuh, wait don't answer that one! I found the answer myself: On February 28 2012 07:33 kitaman27 wrote:Here are my scum power rankings!(anything past 5 may be completely arbitrary) + Show Spoiler [unimportant right now] +1.) prplhz:On February 23 2012 03:38 prplhz wrote:
What the fuck are you talking about. I complained about the redFF lynch and pushed the BloodyC0bbler lynch. On February 24 2012 13:02 prplhz wrote:
I pushed BloodyC0bbler around the time I said that so it's not true when you say that I didn't provide an alternative. On day one, prpl hard defends redff from the lynch, without providing an alternate candidate. He claims to have pushed the BC lynch. Lets take a closer look: On February 23 2012 03:17 prplhz wrote:
I think BloodyC0bbler is more scummy, but I think there might be better targets today that I'm more comfortable with. This is like Responsibility Mafia! where BloodyC0bbler was just gone, but he has been scummy so far. On February 23 2012 03:49 prplhz wrote:
Since we have dropped the BloodyC0bbler lynch I think that Blazinghand is a good lynch for town, especially if I'm the alternative. On February 23 2012 03:54 prplhz wrote:
If BloodyC0bbler is a possiblity then I'm more up for that than anything else. I'm a little unsure of him but he's a ton better than lynching me. On February 23 2012 03:56 prplhz wrote:
Like, I think BloodyC0bbler is scummy but I'm always kinda unsure about my reads (because, allegedly, I'm bad). On February 23 2012 05:24 prplhz wrote:
I really doubt that BloodyC0bbler is going to attract enough votes don't you think there are other alternatives that are more likely to flip scum than redFF and more likely to pick up enough votes than BloodyC0bbler? Is this honestly what prpl considers pushing? A bunch of wishy-washy statements without providing any actual reasoning? He constantly brings up how bad he is as if he is trying to downplay his abilities. Now lets move on to day two: He starts off by voting RoL. Towards the end of the day he changes to blazing. His reasoning: On February 25 2012 18:20 prplhz wrote:
Going to vote Blazinghand. I don't see any reason to believe his claim.
##Vote: Blazinghand The entire game, the strongest reason prpl has believed someone to be scum is because of a Floridian claim. Not once does he even reference his actual posts or behavior. Looking back to day one, prpl was willing to defend red because the claim made sense to him. The next day, a similar claim is provided and he has no reason to believe it. The entire game prpl has responded poorly to pressure and would be a fine lynch candidate. 2.) RebirthOfLeGenD: You can't get frustrated at peoples concerns if they are legitimate points. You've spent more time defending yourself than contributing. You say you're busy. I can understand that, but the game started a week ago and we're still waiting. The only legitimate case you've given us was on DrH. Is there a reason you chose to ignore my concerns with the case? 3.) chaoser: Tough to make a case on someone who hasn't posted since part way through day one. 4.) BloodyC0bbler: As far as I can tell, the only reason people think you are town is because the day one lynch was close. Is this the same day one lynch whose results were covered? Your voting patterns so far have been extremely opportunistic. Rather than commit to a certain scum suspect, you've waited for the bandwagon to become strong and then jump on quoting a random post that suddenly changes your mind. Maybe you could point me towards what makes you town? 5.) wherebugsgo: lol you seriously didn't roll mafia yet again did you? First BH claims scum and now this? On February 28 2012 04:41 wherebugsgo wrote:
@RoL: you're fucking lucky Toad scumslipped so hard, or I'd be pushing you like there's no tomorrow. All you do is lurk lurk lurk and then make excuses for your inactivity. That's exactly what you did when we were teammates in Couples Therapy and it's what you did (IIRC) in Purgatory as well. "gosh darnnit, I'd really love to vote for you RoL, but all these townies are just so easy to push"+ Show Spoiler [unimportant right now] +6.) risk.nuke: Moderately less scummy because his name isn't chaoser. His replacement has a lot of work to do to salvage the game. 7.) dirkzor: On February 23 2012 07:05 Dirkzor wrote:
Hahahahahahahhahahaha... Fuck that was a hilarious "flip" :D Haha: "lol that's annoying" Hahaha: "lol that's really annoying" Hahahahahahahhahahaha: "I didn't have anything to do with that. I swear." 8.) DrH: He has been reasonable in the main thread and questionable in the voting thread. I was really surprised to read that he actually voted for Blazinghand. Looking through his filter, I'm really having trouble find the reasoning for his switch. Could you please point me in the direction? What happened to RoL? You're dropping him for today as well? Why are you ignoring your reads and pushing whoever happens to be the flavor of the day? I'd put you higher if the slots weren't already taken. 9.) VisceraEyes: I'm not reading through his filter. You can't make me. Lets go with 9th. 10.) Toadesstern: Appears to be putting more effort in than any other player. I'll take him to lylo any day. 11.) Tyrran: I'm having trouble finding a scum player out of the newer players. I liked how his opinion on blazing changed from day one to day two. Needs to be more helpful if we wants town to win however. 12.) layabout: I read through his filter last and 12 was the only spot remaining. Congrats. 13.) Jitsu: Seems to be looking for things with a town mindframe. Not really pushing his reads very hard though. 14.) kitaman27: lol the scum team isn't even bothering to try to make this guy look bad. Did they fail a hit on him or something? nope kita's just wrong. anyway I'm not going to get lynched today, and if scum tries it's going to be hilarious. I have secrets so go ahead VE, try to lynch me. Really, I feel sorry for you since you have 0 idea what's coming. Come on WBG - COME ON. You really think I have ZERO idea what's coming? You're ass is going to fake-claim something retarded, claiming scum in the process and you're going to get lynched. Give me a hard one.
LOL
yep, you have 0 idea.
|
On February 28 2012 09:30 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:24 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:17 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:13 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:07 Toadesstern wrote:On February 28 2012 09:00 wherebugsgo wrote:
I can't justify leaving my vote on Toad when prplhz and VE essentially just outted themselves.
##unvote Toadesstern
##vote Visceraeyes why not prplhz instead? Why not RoL instead? We basicly tried to lynch RoL from d2 (or even d1?), he said nothing, basicly claimed mafia recently and we're still not able to lynch him. why not prpl-I only have one vote why not RoL-I only have one vote, and VE is more likely to be scum because the case extends beyond simple meta. In fact as of now we may actually be wrong about RoL and he might just be bored inactive town. Why kill someone who's done almost nothing alignment indicative as opposed to someone who is contradicting himself in logic and flailing around in thread? If VE flips scum we should certainly look at both prpl and RoL. If I'm wrong about you (which certainly seems possible now that prpl's shown his ugly face) then there's also some 4th scum out there. I've been asking myself, why did risk.nuke get replaced, in a game with no replacements? We haven't been able to lynch him either, and that's made me wonder for a while. How does prpl showing up have anything to do with my alignment? bc it is extremely unlikely that all 3 of you are scum, IMO. I guess it's possible that the entire scum team is something like you, prpl, RoL, and VE. In fact I wouldn't be shocked, seeing as I feel like there's no one helping me. However, I think risk.nuke is more likely to be scum based on the replacement and if prpl is scum you can't be. I actually stopped pushing risk because of the replacement.
I've been watching risk because I've been told to watch risk.
Disagreements, you know. They tend to work in funny ways.
|
On February 28 2012 09:39 Toadesstern wrote:I still like a RoL lynch the most 
he's a pretty fucking easy lynch, let's be honest.
I'd rather kill VE because I'm 100% certain he's scum based on the way he's pushing me. He's not this dumb.
|
On February 28 2012 09:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Toades - I actually like a BC lynch more than a RoL lynch if we're talking about scummy lurkers. If we're talking about dangerous scum, my preference is a WBG lynch. BC will become dangerous when he starts "contributing" to town if he's scum - while he's lurking, I feel like WBG is doing far more harm to town.
You're calling people scum based on how potentially dangerous they are if they were scum.
This is fucking fearmongering and it isn't even scumhunting. It operates on the basis of the assumption that myself and BC are mafia.
Basically you're saying "these two players are dangerous as scum, so that means they're scum"
good fucking god
|
On February 28 2012 09:46 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 09:45 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:44 VisceraEyes wrote:
Toades - I actually like a BC lynch more than a RoL lynch if we're talking about scummy lurkers. If we're talking about dangerous scum, my preference is a WBG lynch. BC will become dangerous when he starts "contributing" to town if he's scum - while he's lurking, I feel like WBG is doing far more harm to town. You're calling people scum based on how potentially dangerous they are if they were scum. This is fucking fearmongering and it isn't even scumhunting. It operates on the basis of the assumption that myself and BC are mafia. Basically you're saying "these two players are dangerous as scum, so that means they're scum" good fucking god Nah, I have reasoning for thinking BC is scum. I'm just getting you lynched today. One at a time bro.
no you don't, you haven't had a proper reason for calling anyone scum all game.
|
Kitaman already knows what I'm talking about, he drank the good stuff.
|
On February 28 2012 09:56 Toadesstern wrote:
let's just assume you're town for a second wbg:
Doesn't townie wbg think I am not capable to find mafia?
Doesn't townie wbg think VE isn't capable to find mafia?
Yet you say VE is 100% mafia because of his bullshit case?
his case isn't dumb like his normal wrong cases are.
His case is MALICIOUSLY wrong. He's stretching to call me scum and he's not backing off when met with reason. He's fallen victim to his own misuse of logic, yet he continues pushing my lynch; which tells me that it isn't bad townie VE, it's scum VE.
|
On February 28 2012 10:02 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 10:01 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 28 2012 09:56 Toadesstern wrote:
let's just assume you're town for a second wbg:
Doesn't townie wbg think I am not capable to find mafia?
Doesn't townie wbg think VE isn't capable to find mafia?
Yet you say VE is 100% mafia because of his bullshit case? his case isn't dumb like his normal wrong cases are. His case is MALICIOUSLY wrong. He's stretching to call me scum and he's not backing off when met with reason. He's fallen victim to his own misuse of logic, yet he continues pushing my lynch; which tells me that it isn't bad townie VE, it's scum VE. Didn't you say the exact same thing about me? I recall you saying I am stretching extremly and being wrong and that as well.
which is why I voted you.
It's also why I'm confused right now, because between you and prpl I don't believe you can both be scum.
On February 28 2012 10:03 prplhz wrote:
@wherebugsgo
I'm not really sheeping. This thread is in a bad state and I'm blaming you. You're pushing left and right for bad reasons and your contributions all seem to be pretty irrelevant. I think there's something off about your behavior.
I'm not really worried about how you're claiming alchemist, probably just means that BloodyC0bbler is going to vote you. Why did you send a potion to kitaman27? I doubt he drank any unless he's your scum buddy.
You're blaming me for no one posting? Good one.
It's totally my fault that you've done jack shit all game. It's totally my fault that VE disappeared for two days and then decided to shit up the thread by forging a case on me.
Yeah, totally my fault.
I'm not claiming alchemist you moron.
|
actually in retrospect I think it's hilarious that VE said he'd lynch me for claiming, since all the claimers have been lynched.
|
On February 28 2012 10:10 VisceraEyes wrote:
I didn't say I'd lynch you for claiming - I'll lynch you regardless. I said TOWN would lynch you for claiming - which as you've pointed out, has a pretty decent track-record.
you need more than one scumbuddy to lynch me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
