|
On February 26 2012 10:59 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 26 2012 10:48 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 26 2012 10:43 Toadesstern wrote:On February 26 2012 10:40 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 26 2012 10:38 Toadesstern wrote:On February 26 2012 10:31 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 26 2012 10:25 Toadesstern wrote:On February 26 2012 10:07 wherebugsgo wrote:
We should 100% kill RoL if he is alive by morning.
He's continually promised more and his promise of more was just a shitty case on Dr. H.
Right now I'm fairly tired of reading and/or responding to retarded posts that I pretty much know are being made by townies, since it's just a waste of time. So from now on I'm just going to ignore that stuff and focus on things I find scummy. are you at least telling me if that's me, DocH or Tyrran you're referring to if you're not willing to talk about it? What are you suggesting we do with people like Risk and Chaoser? Clearly they have no interest in proving that they're town. half of your posts are not worth responding to, ones like this are okay. I'm fine with killing chaoser, but risk.nuke I'm not so sure about because he's done some weird things that I don't think a scum would do. I think he's one of the dumber townies. Why are you okay with killing chaoser but not risk? Chaoser said he was busy and will start posting soon ( tm) while risk is doing that on purpose. replace "chaoser" with RoL and tell me why we shouldn't kill him. Never said we should ignore him. I'm justs not mentioning him because I never played with him and therefore don't know what he's usually playing like. anyway here's what I want you to do: read risk's filter, and tell me what you find in there that shows you that he's scum. Nothing because there's not much in there. There's also nothing that makes him look townish. Leaves us with a nullread who refuses to play protown. Yes I am very much willing to lynch people who refuse to play this game and / or refuse to play protown if it's apparent that it's not lack of time that's getting in the way.
so why did you have such a problem with lynching BH?
On February 26 2012 10:59 Toadesstern wrote:That's btw the reason I'd have done that one: Show nested quote +On February 26 2012 10:31 wherebugsgo wrote:
I'm fine with killing chaoser, but risk.nuke I'm not so sure about. the other way around. Yes I know you are referring to his posts like the one if the giv and the fact that he is playing boldly. Remember what you said in the little discussion about my claim in AC a couple days ago when I said that's something a mafia player would not do? You said that's wifom becaus there are players that would take the risk to get shot by CW as mafia knowing that it will look townish. How is it that you think that's possible but at the same time think that just because of posts like the one with that gif you think he has to be town?
The caveat is that I think experienced mafia would do it. I would do it.
No offense to risk as I've never actually seen his scum play, but judging from his overall understanding of the game I seriously doubt he'd be good enough at scum to troll and be so bold.
|
wat
You have fewer posts than I do
|
all the scum dodging this thread
|
@Jitsu stop spouting nonsense, syllo was 100% the only person who was playing with any sense. By talking about other hits you're just begging to speculate about scum goals. Which, unless you are scum this game, you have zero ideas about.
On February 28 2012 04:16 DoctorHelvetica wrote:I think Dirkzor/Toadesstern are mafia Show nested quote +BC's town hasn't been impressive this game at all. Yes he is (according to everyone else here) a semi-god who plays a sick mafia but his townplay so far has not impressed me at all. Neither did it in L. Not saying it's bad, just not what I expected after everyone yelling "omfg BC top 3 players on TL" (or whatever). Assumption that BC is town. This either means that he knows BC's alignment is town (meaning scum or DT) or that they are both scum and Toades is afraid to say anything suspicious of BC. Dunno. I've actually seen RoL play this badly as town before. I think he ragequit Salem after someone accused him of being scum. It made him so angry that he flamed the shit out of the guy (idr who it was) then roleclaimed and left the game.
100% agree with you, on Toad, that is a massive scumslip.
Toad already "knows" BC is town wtf. He'd be a great alternative to a RoL lynch.
Dirkzor, however, I have no read on. I don't really know what his meta is and I don't see anything particularly of note in his filter. Can't say much there.
@Kita: you've been awful quiet all game. Care to explain what you think right now?
@RoL: you're fucking lucky Toad scumslipped so hard, or I'd be pushing you like there's no tomorrow. All you do is lurk lurk lurk and then make excuses for your inactivity. That's exactly what you did when we were teammates in Couples Therapy and it's what you did (IIRC) in Purgatory as well.
@VE: You're going on a posting spree because you were inactive for 48 hours, not because you actually want to find scum. The fact that you consider me scum after having played on the same team as me in BC's game is indicative of you having malicious goals. You're not town this game and you need to die as well.
TL;DR: kill Toad, RoL, VE.
If we ensure that the votes stay between these 3 players I'm confident we will hit only scum today.
##vote Toadesstern
|
Most damning about Toad is that he's trying to twist BC's well-known SCUM META into well-known all-around (which just isn't true.)
I pointed this out specifically earlier in the game to see who is actually reading the thread; BC's town play, in comparison to his scum play, is awful. Just look at XLVII where he tunneled Palmar for 2 goddamn days. Toad either deliberately ignored this, or he's not reading the thread: neither of these things tell me we have a town Toad.
He should know all of this without me even saying anything, but yet he still asserts the opposite, which suggests he is scum. Why would any townie try to assert something they should know is completely untrue? Right now he's riding the line between BC being scum and town, which is suspiciously indicative of him trying to make an accusation that will stick with some player in the game.
|
LOL I have a big ego so I'm scum, okay.
And no, I'm not ruling out the possibility that any of you are town. I just consider it too implausible considering the things you and VE have said and the things RoL hasn't.
I'm not surprised you would try to shed doubt on my position like that. It's what I'd expect scared scum to do, anyway.
I'll be back after class (~5 hours from now)
|
rofl Toad
I should be doing lab but you're stretching sooo hard right now
|
On February 28 2012 05:56 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 05:39 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Oh wait it was scara who got modkilled in Salem right? I got him confused with RoL.
@Toades
It isn't a scumslip to say he's pretty sure these 3 guys are scum. You're grasping at straws defensively, it's really obvious to me now. It's not about what he says but what he clearly leaves out. He says those 3 guys are mafia. He votes me. He says we should keep our votes between those 3 people. He DOES NOT SAY that we need to focus on one guy to not give mafia a chance to manipulate this vote. He simpyl votes me, leaving you with the choice of what to do now. There is no way Town-WBG would do such a thing.
No way I would do that as town? Clearly you have no interest in conveying the truth, or, for that matter, even finding it.
Look at any game I've played of this size and you'll see that my strategy as town is nearly identical every game: make a list of players I find scummy, and then focus town into killing them all. I don't focus on one player in bigger games because townies dissent so much that it's too hard. Instead, I call out the people not voting for those players and force them into contributing.
Granted, I don't have the presence or activity this game to do all of that, because of school, but my mindset is still the same.
Proof:
XLV: I make lists of people I'm fine with killing, harass people in PMs about people on my list, scrutinize Mig's list, etc. I didn't play well, but that's basically how it went.
Steamship: I push chaoser/nisani day 1 and then say we should lynch all the people who voted on the three town wagons on day 1 and 2. I basically pushed for the lynch of like four people at once.
XLVII: This is probably the most obvious one, since the game was huge. I made a list of TEN people day 1 and told town "kill any of them." And I continually updated this list throughout the game.
Mafia L: I don't remember what I did here other than tunnel Palmar day 1 and then troll when I had no impact. I didn't play well.
Point 1 : the fact that you are misrepresenting my town play is indicative of you stretching to find an argument to call me scum.
On February 28 2012 06:08 Toadesstern wrote:Ok here's what's strange about wbg in one big post instead of 4 scattered posts: Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 09:59 wherebugsgo wrote:
VE stfu you suck
Everyone else sucks marginally less ATM. Mostly chaoser is doing the least sucking.
Blazinghand learn to play
I have to program for a few hours so I'll bbl. Till then I suggest you all brush up on Ver's guide since the last page has made my eyes bleed. That is essentually the wbg we all now. Yes he's a bit rough but he usually does that to get some reactions and see what people think about each other. He loves to do posts like that as town because a lot of people get offended and therefore repeat to a post like that. Keep that in mind. That's his very first post and that is Town-WBG, but we got several posts that are nothing like his usual town style. Also keep in mind impersonating that kind of style is pretty easy because you only need to know how to be a dick, you don't actually have to say something of use.
This is my first post in the game and is in no way indicative of my alignment, unless you're clairvoyant.
In fact, I was actually trolling VE because he said he was waiting for a bunch of people to come into the thread and tell him he sucks and to shut up. So I did.
Again, the fact that you are trying to make something out of nothing is indicative of extreme stretching. Yes, some of the things you're saying are true, but none of them help your argument at all.
On February 28 2012 06:08 Toadesstern wrote:Ok here's an impression from Chaoser: Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 10:33 chaoser wrote:On February 21 2012 09:43 VisceraEyes wrote:
Ho boy, the thread died fast. That worries me a little, but that could just be paranoia.
chaoser - so by your correction and apology, should I assume that you're no longer agreeing with red's assessment that I'm being a hypocrite?
kitaman27 - what are your thoughts on chaoser?
Jackal, BC, syllo, WBG, you guys care to weigh in on this? I mean, it's early but I'd have expected to hear what an idiot I am at least twice between those 4 players.
yes. i take it back, i misread. I dunno why WBG is buddying me though. I think I'm playing decently well though, but I think you're doing better (aka I think you're townine ATM). Here's a thing about wbg's Mafia style: He tries to impersonate the dick he is when playing town but from time to time buddies people or is brownnosing. Chaoser had that feeling, I had that feeling about him as well. WBG really isn't the kind of guy that tells people they're good within a game because of his immense ego. Never ever. + Show Spoiler [proof for ego] +On February 21 2012 10:54 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 10:47 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 21 2012 10:43 wherebugsgo wrote:On February 21 2012 10:33 chaoser wrote:On February 21 2012 09:43 VisceraEyes wrote:
Ho boy, the thread died fast. That worries me a little, but that could just be paranoia.
chaoser - so by your correction and apology, should I assume that you're no longer agreeing with red's assessment that I'm being a hypocrite?
kitaman27 - what are your thoughts on chaoser?
Jackal, BC, syllo, WBG, you guys care to weigh in on this? I mean, it's early but I'd have expected to hear what an idiot I am at least twice between those 4 players.
yes. i take it back, i misread. I dunno why WBG is buddying me though. I think I'm playing decently well though, but I think you're doing better (aka I think you're townine ATM). sup ##vote chaoser Ho boy, what are YOUR thoughts on redFF Bugs? I see you're now offended by chaoser's play in spite of him "doing the least sucking"...you completely ignore my case on redFF and stick a vote on the guy doing "the least sucking" in-thread? Something is..........not right here. Maybe I need a break from the thread for a bit. redFF=bad=I have no idea what his alignment is atm. If you want a general idea of how I deal with redFF, look at Resurrection (in which I call him bad repeatedly and then actually defend him from the onslaught of Ace) or at XLVII where I completely ignore him. He was opposite alignment in those two games and honestly I could barely tell the difference. I guess part of that stems from not wanting to read/decipher his posts. Since I believe redFF is going to be comparatively unreadable to some of the other players here (read: syllo, kita, chaoser, you, RoL, Jackal, Toad, risk) I think it's more fruitful for us to be pushing players who will react in ways we expect them to react depending on their alignments. As of now, yes, that means I think chaoser is scummy because he called it strange for me to buddy him and then turned around and buddied you in the next sentence. Remember: need to know basis. Why does anyone need to know chaoser's town reads? I mean come on. Yeah fine I get why you list myself and risk, but the rest? But that's not the point, he really thinks he's that awesome :p
So you're bringing up that chaoser thought I was buddying him, based on me reading 20 posts? rofl.
All that shows is that, at the time I posted that, I had read 20 posts. One page. And yet, you're trying to call me scum for it. Toad u 2 scummy bro
Why do I list the other players? Because I've played with them a lot and I know how to read them. Why the fuck do you think I never tried to lynch Jackal or syllo? I can read them more easily than others. Granted, Jackal is harder to read than some other players I've played with before.
Up until redFF called Jackal a good scumhunter I believed redFF was unreadable (I had completely ignored his posts.) I went back and reread and I strongly believed he was scum. So I decided it was best we kill him.
Also, as town I buddy people all the fucking time. I buddied Palmar super hard in Steamship and XLVII, I buddied a whole slew of townies in PYP:I, even on day 1. That was the game I pushed a relatively new Greymist for mayor because I thought he was town day 1. Granted, that was a PM game, but you get the idea.
However, this is all completely irrelevant because you're insinuating something that is untrue; you're saying I defended you, but I never did.
What follows is by far the scummiest thing anyone has done in this thread:
2) I already quoted that earlier and said that looks like mafia-wbg. No way wbg would post such a thing. He loves seeing people defend themselves. Sure I was asleep but town-wbg would not have posted a shit about it. Town wbg would have loved me to wake up the next morning and post something to defend MYSELF because wbg can judge me based on my defense. However, wbg does not need to judge people, he already knows my alignment.
Also I got the opinion he's buddying me. He saw me in AC and thought I'm not capable to find mafia and I'll agree my town play really i not the best so he figured I'm a nice buddy-target because telling people I'm town is no threat to mafia if he thinks I'm not capable to catch mafia.
Toad is referring to when I said he wouldn't respond because he's European.
I already explained why I did this, and this is not alignment indicative at all. I'm very aware of activity times because it helps shed light on whether a person is telling the truth or not. In fact, it's a great way to find out whether someone is lying scum, or scum pushing a townie.
Example: supersoft in PYP:I claimed something about having an exam in an hour and then posted during the time he should have been taking the exam. Auto-scum.
When people push others they know will not respond for a while, it's scummy. Pushing a person who is asleep counts. Why would I point out that Toad was asleep? Because I push people I know are asleep as scum. I already explained this once and again it's scummy that Toad is trying to make me look bad because of it. Out-of-game things like schedules are a good way to find scum but only if used correctly.
Keep in mind, last game I played as town I got lynched for not saying anything, when in reality it was impossible for me to say anything. Complete inactivity is not a scumtell.
Now, for whichever townies actually have an interest in winning this game, ask yourself this:
When did I actually call Toad town this game? How is saying "Toad is probably asleep" calling him town?
All I was saying was that Toad's lack of response is not alignment-indicative. That's not calling him town; that's getting the facts straight.
So then you see that, based on one thing I said, that said nothing about Toad's alignment, this shit:
Also I got the opinion he's buddying me. He saw me in AC and thought I'm not capable to find mafia and I'll agree my town play really i not the best so he figured I'm a nice buddy-target because telling people I'm town is no threat to mafia if he thinks I'm not capable to catch mafia.
is just scum stretching; saying I called him town when I did nothing of the sort.
And again here:
Again, why should he defend me like that? That's nothing like wbg.
Misconstruing what I was doing as defending. At no point have I ever defended Toad this game.
I haven't defended anyone this game apart from BC and redFF early in the game. Besides BC, only syllo was worth defending and syllo was never in any danger of being lynched, so there was no point in saying that I thought syllo was town.
This is nothing like my mafia game and I already mentioned it it's pretty easy to figure me out:
If there's noone willing to vote me you need to lynch me because I'm mafia.
If there's a bunch of random morons argueing about what I possibly meant with that one phrase, who are willing to vote me for saying something that never was intended to be interpreted that way I am townie because I'm to lazy to check what I typed.
The fuck?
so you're admitting you're mafia now? No one's been voting you despite you being scummy as shit all game. Syllo thought you were scum too, but focused on BH+RoL because they were more obvious. Ofc BH was just retarded and we have yet to see RoL flip, but you get the idea.
Lastly this is really convenient for you, because at any point (such as now) where you are mafia and taking votes you can defend yourself by saying as mafia you don't get votes...
which means you wouldn't get lynched. Real convenient, eh? You need to die now.
|
what the fuck prpl is playing this game?
|
Does the name Chezinu ring a bell to anyone?
If anyone knows what I'm talking about please quote the post I made this game that is relevant.
|
I'm jumping on town sentiment...how do you know what town sentiment is?
How am I jumping on anyone's sentiment when my vote is on Toad? Or that I think you're scum? Name another person who is agreeing with me about you right now, since it certainly seems like I'm playing a game with no support at all.
Where have you been the last 48 hours? Clearly not helping town win. And you come in now with a bullshit case, 1/3 of which is based on the first post I made, one which was half troll.
I'm done for a while, this is too frustrating. Now I know why syllo told me he wanted to die.
|
also, my first post indicative of me not reading the thread...no shit, that's how all my first posts are.
|
nope. You have no case on me and it's apparent because you cite my first post in order to call me scum. You and Toad are stretching super super hard. You have the audacity to call me scum and you even straight up say I'm leeching on town sentiment as if you already know what the town wants. You wouldn't know for sure what town sentiment is unless you're actually scum. How do you know town sentiment day 1 was redFF and not BC?
I pushed redFF at a time when everyone was UNVOTING HIM. Why the fuck would I do that as scum? That literally makes no sense, as scum if redFF was town that would just make me look bad.
Why the hell would I knowingly subject myself to that shit? I'm aware of my own play, it's not like I'm so bad at scum that I'd go back on everything I said about a player just because I thought town would lynch them. I rarely, if ever, change my mind as scum, because it's dangerous as fuck.
Your redFF push was a fucking joke bugs, and while I was with you on Blazinghand, your little "lynch-limiting" move where you can "guarantee hitting scum" is a fucking farce because I'm included in them and I know I'm fucking town.
Says the guy who called redFF scum for half of day 1.
And you admit that you agreed on Blazinghand but you are somehow not scum for that.
Real great, pushing responsibility for the BH lynch off yourself and onto me. Yeah, I really capitalized on town sentiment when I was the first fucking vote on BH.
Lastly, anyone and their mother can call themselves town, but in this game 4 of those players are liars.
Up until this point, wherebugsgo had only made one solid statement about redFF: he is bad. He makes it very clear to everyone that he wasn't calling red town or scum (because he's capable of being bad regardless of his alignment). So which part was he wrong about?
It implies, subtly, that he used to have a badTown-read on redFF, but that he's having second thoughts and wants a second opinion because he then goes on to vote for redFF because he's "scum".
But he was VERY clear about his stance on redFF: Just Bad. Interestingly enough, his very point on redFF proves that he's being manipulative in this post:
You accuse me of not reading the thread but are privy to it yourself.
Maybe next time you try to forge a case on a townie you could read so you don't make yourself look scum.
Up until this point, wherebugsgo had only made one solid statement about redFF: he is bad. He makes it very clear to everyone that he wasn't calling red town or scum (because he's capable of being bad regardless of his alignment). So which part was he wrong about?
You call me manipulative yet you're manipulating my words right here. I called him UNREADABLE BECAUSE HE WAS BAD. Not just bad. Unreadably bad.
Which part about it was I wrong? THAT HE WAS FUCKING UNREADABLE.
LOL how hard is this to comprehend? You can easily answer your own fucking question, but the reason you don't is because you're trying to make me look bad. fail.
It implies, subtly, that he used to have a badTown-read on redFF, but that he's having second thoughts and wants a second opinion because he then goes on to vote for redFF because he's "scum".
And here's the manipulation.
No, scum, it does not imply that I had a bad town read on redFF. It implies that I thought he was unreadable.
I asked syllo his thoughts yet I later rationalized my disagreement with syllo's opinion. If I were scum why the fuck would I choose to disagree with the best townie in the game?
But he was VERY clear about his stance on redFF: Just Bad. Interestingly enough, his very point on redFF proves that he's being manipulative in this post:
I was very clear, and yet you're trying to change what I said. LOL.
While it's true that "scum motivations" could feasibly explain some (all) of redFF's actions, it's equally feasible to explain them with simply "bad town play". I can absolutely see redFF playing that poorly as town, and anyone who says otherwise hasn't played many games with redFF. Regardless, he even throws in there that "he's too much of a liability to keep around" even if he's somehow mistaken in his "read" and redFF flips town.
So what I said was true.
But it wasn't true? the hell?
Lastly; why would I include, as scum, the caveat that you claim would make me look better in the case that redFF flips scum, if I'd know that he wouldn't flip? Presumably as scum I'd know redFF wouldn't flip, so why the fuck would I care?
This is just evidence from D1, and his manipulation only intensifies.
Translation:
this is all the stuff I've been able to fake from day 1, but if people don't believe me I can start bullshitting more stuff from day 2.But I won't now because I want to wait and see if anyone takes the bait.
And I'm the manipulative one. rofl.
|
On February 28 2012 08:22 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
WBG is pretty high on my list of people I think are scummy in this game but your analysis is bad and coupled with your play earlier in the game I'm inclined to think it's more likely that you're scum. I'm going to reread WBG's filter later but I really think we should lynch Toades today. You agree that it's scummy to vote based on town perception right? A main point in your analysis is WBG asking syllo for his opinion before pushing his case, thus implying WBG is more concerned about how town will view his opinions rather than his own instincts.
If I was scum and I asked syllo his read on redFF to make myself look better I would've chosen to agree with syllo.
Instead I completely disagreed with him and did the exact opposite. So how exactly was I voting according to the perception I got from syllo? If I was actually doing what VE is insinuating I was doing, I would have simply followed syllo's vote.
In fact, I think as scum that's actually a very viable strategy and I'd be more than willing to do it. I've seen sandro do it himself.
But again, I didn't do that...so what's the point here?
|
On February 28 2012 08:14 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 08:11 DoctorHelvetica wrote:
Let me get this straight VE. In order to be town you must be the first person to ever make a case on someone? I don't recall you doing much of that
if WBG was scum looking to kill RedFF (and had prior knowledge of the noflip) why would he pussyfoot around it when his scum meta is super confident?? DoctorHelvetica falling back on meta? Say it isn't so Doc. I don't know why - maybe he's aware of his 'super-confident' meta and wanted to subvert it? Maybe he thought redFF was the very best mislynch possible and didn't want to spook townies by building a wagon too fast? There are a lot of factors coming into play as scum - take your pick as to why he wouldn't "follow his scum-meta".
LOL
in the face of logic, VE resorts to speculation.
Your case is shit. Die now.
|
also I had a very good reason for not voting RoL yesterday; one that should be apparent for anyone who is closely reading my posts.
However, since the number of people who are closely reading my posts is either 0 or 1, I'll probably just have to say it at some point.
|
Hey VE,
according to your logic based on me talking to syllo, this post makes you scum:
On February 25 2012 10:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
BC - is this DocH's normal play? It looks to me like he's pouring on the "Hey guys, watch me pressure these noobs!" a little thick...
asking BC for his reads
subtly hinting Dr. H is scum.
today, talks to Dr. H as if he's knowingly talking to a townie, trying to convince him I'm scum.
sup scum logic
|
On February 28 2012 08:43 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 28 2012 08:35 wherebugsgo wrote:Hey VE, according to your logic based on me talking to syllo, this post makes you scum: On February 25 2012 10:58 VisceraEyes wrote:
BC - is this DocH's normal play? It looks to me like he's pouring on the "Hey guys, watch me pressure these noobs!" a little thick... asking BC for his reads subtly hinting Dr. H is scum. today, talks to Dr. H as if he's knowingly talking to a townie, trying to convince him I'm scum. sup scum logic What I did: subtly poke an inactive-ish player (BloodyC0bbler) a specific question with clear motivation (is this scummy? are you going to contribute?) regarding a controversial player (DocH) who's absolutely NOT a lynch candidate. What you did: ask an active player (syllogism) a vague question (what are your thoughts) with unclear motivations (you've already said redFF was bad, you hadn't noted any change of opinion as of this post) of a player who's given his opinion on the player you're asking about (RedFF) who was already a lynch candidate. They're not the same things. Try again scum.
trololol scum can't handle being owned on his own logic
now you're just making up shit
|
also still putting words in my mouth, as we can tell
|
alright, so here's my post, let's compare it to what VE has said:
On February 22 2012 06:37 wherebugsgo wrote:
syllo can you give me your opinion on redFF?
I think I was completely wrong about him.
Compare that to this shit:
On February 21 2012 11:59 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 21 2012 11:49 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On February 21 2012 11:42 Jackal58 wrote:
Dear redFF and WBG
You both suck.
Sincerely,
Jackal58 I endorse this statement fully and from the bottom of my heart I thank you for letting me know I am not insane. Why are we debating Policy lynches this early into the day? Seriously? This isn't a game with a player like 2010 bill murray who spams while being a dick, this isn't a game with a mod hating spammer named showtime. Instead we have for the most part a fairly solid crew devoid of spammy trolls. If you want to lynch someone for being bad, wait till they start being bad / scumlike, dont lynch them for shits and giggles. Policy lynching people on retarded reasoning is worse than RNG votes for early discussion. Cut the nonsense out. Anyone who keeps talking about it from this post on be warned. as a side note, VE since you are making moderate sense for the first time ever I have to give you props for impressing me two games in a row. /salute What are your thoughts on redFF BC? I'm almost convinced that he's just bad and not scum, but I'd like your thoughts before I act on it.
On February 21 2012 12:20 VisceraEyes wrote:
Re: Jackal
DAAAAYYYUUUUMMMM....
Nosrslytho, who's scum guy? I want drunk Jackal's opinion to compare it with sober Jackal's opinion later XD
On February 21 2012 17:15 VisceraEyes wrote:Syllo what do you think about the back and forth between chaoser and WBG? It seems genuine, so I doubt it's scum v scum - I can't decide if I think one of them is scum or if they're both town 
On February 22 2012 04:09 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 22 2012 04:04 redFF wrote:
I don't really care about chaoser at this stage, haven't paid much attention to him tbh.
Layabout is bad because he berated dirkzor for not finding 3+scum and hasn't stated a read all game. The fact that you haven't paid much attention to chaoser is....interesting. Wouldn't you say that's interesting syllo?
lastly, something slightly different but it gives you an idea of the angle VE is coming from:
On February 23 2012 10:11 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'm not sheeping you Doc or I would've voted redFF. I trusted you to do the right thing.
This comes from the person who voted redFF 3 different times on day 1.
This comes from the person who is claiming I am following town sentiment when he called at least (by my count) 8 people scum on day 1, trying to find what would stick.
This comes from the person who is trying to lynch me based on being manipulative yet is, without a doubt, trying to manipulate the lynch right now. Proof is above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
