EPTAh, wbg is here, awesome.
I'm remembering why I stopped playing here a couple months ago lol.
Storm Mafia - Page 10
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
Ah, wbg is here, awesome. I'm remembering why I stopped playing here a couple months ago lol. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On February 21 2012 10:14 redFF wrote: I don't see how I'm pushing scum agendas. What does that even mean? Ah, wbg is here, awesome. I'm remembering why I stopped playing here a couple months ago lol. Wait, you can dish it but you can't take it red? WTF? You were trying to PL Tyrran for being "so bad he's bad for town"...but now that you're on the chopping block you "remember why you stopped playing here a couple moths ago"? Get over yourself sir. You're all about stirring up some shit, don't get all bent out of shape when it bites you in the ass. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On February 21 2012 10:14 VisceraEyes wrote: Ho boy, this is good play here. GOOD play. Let me count the ways. 1) Throwing out random insults. While I can appreciate the occasional well-deserved jibe, just saying someone "sucks" is...not productive. 2) Buddying up to chaoser. Apparently I suck - but I don't know why and Bugs' post does nothing to explain it. But chaoser is the only one NOT sucking - let's explore that. chaoser was the first one to jump on-board redFF's PL of Tyrran, and besides red himself has been the first one to jump off it as well. Furthermore, chaoser has spent a fair amount of time defending redFF against my accusations by agreeing with him that I am being 'hypocritical'....except, as it turns out this was based on faulty information that stems from APPARENTLY misreading the thread (thinking I said something DocH actually said). So as it turns out, chaoser is doing MORE sucking than several others in-thread already. 3) "I have to program for a few hours so I'll bbl." - WBG I guess this means he wasn't programming before, but is now? So where has he been during all this time? Why not stop by and tell me what a dick I am BEFORE I called him out for not being in-thread yet? Why not come in and defend redFF if my case was so bad last page? Your guess is obviously as good as mine, but I suspect his has something to do with sharing an alignment with a certain someone the last page has been discussing. 4) "...since the last page has made my eyes bleed." - WBG So....I guess he thinks redFF is town or something? Or he just thinks my argument is shit? Or he thinks the last page is some kind of stigmata? I have no idea. He's just tossing doubt around as if he's some kind of authority. Guess what guys - THIS IS HIS FIRST POST. HE HASN'T EARNED THE RIGHT TO CALL ANYONE BAD YET IN THIS GAME BECAUSE HE HASN'T DONE SHIT HIMSELF. 5) (and most importantly) ......NO U Re-posted because it got page-shoved. Plus I like looking at WBG contradict himself. ^^ | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On February 21 2012 10:14 VisceraEyes wrote: Ho boy, this is good play here. GOOD play. Let me count the ways. 1) Throwing out random insults. While I can appreciate the occasional well-deserved jibe, just saying someone "sucks" is...not productive. 2) Buddying up to chaoser. Apparently I suck - but I don't know why and Bugs' post does nothing to explain it. But chaoser is the only one NOT sucking - let's explore that. chaoser was the first one to jump on-board redFF's PL of Tyrran, and besides red himself has been the first one to jump off it as well. Furthermore, chaoser has spent a fair amount of time defending redFF against my accusations by agreeing with him that I am being 'hypocritical'....except, as it turns out this was based on faulty information that stems from APPARENTLY misreading the thread (thinking I said something DocH actually said). So as it turns out, chaoser is doing MORE sucking than several others in-thread already. 3) "I have to program for a few hours so I'll bbl." - WBG I guess this means he wasn't programming before, but is now? So where has he been during all this time? Why not stop by and tell me what a dick I am BEFORE I called him out for not being in-thread yet? Why not come in and defend redFF if my case was so bad last page? Your guess is obviously as good as mine, but I suspect his has something to do with sharing an alignment with a certain someone the last page has been discussing. 4) "...since the last page has made my eyes bleed." - WBG So....I guess he thinks redFF is town or something? Or he just thinks my argument is shit? Or he thinks the last page is some kind of stigmata? I have no idea. He's just tossing doubt around as if he's some kind of authority. Guess what guys - THIS IS HIS FIRST POST. HE HASN'T EARNED THE RIGHT TO CALL ANYONE BAD YET IN THIS GAME BECAUSE HE HASN'T DONE SHIT HIMSELF. 5) (and most importantly) ......NO U <3 you don't suck anymore Anyway in all seriousness (as serious as I can be atm hahahaha) I should stop procrastinating. + Show Spoiler + but it's sooo hard While I'm gone, VE, give me some work to do. Who do you think is scum? Why? What do you think of redFF, chaoser, and Dr. H? The last page DOESN'T make your eyes bleed? What do you like about the current state of the game? If you desire any clarification go ahead and ask, but as I play this game on a need to know basis you have no guarantee I'll actually give you an answer you'll like. Unless, of course, I feel like there's a good reason to tell you (and by extension everyone else in this thread) On February 21 2012 10:14 redFF wrote: I don't see how I'm pushing scum agendas. What does that even mean? Ah, wbg is here, awesome. I'm remembering why I stopped playing here a couple months ago lol. you stopped playing here because you realized you were so bad? Man, that's comedy gold right there. I really enjoy how you can call Tyrran bad for no reason whatsoever and then play the victim card when someone else does the exact same thing. Since I'm not your psychiatrist I have no interest in asking you how it feels. Though, I find it hilarious as hell. | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
Only scum watch Knicks games. redFF and WBG are twin brothers of different mothers. (Probably share the same paternity) I'm drunk and better than Zeph. I thought this started at 8. My bad. I'll post more when I can no longer read. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On February 21 2012 09:43 VisceraEyes wrote: Ho boy, the thread died fast. That worries me a little, but that could just be paranoia. chaoser - so by your correction and apology, should I assume that you're no longer agreeing with red's assessment that I'm being a hypocrite? kitaman27 - what are your thoughts on chaoser? Jackal, BC, syllo, WBG, you guys care to weigh in on this? I mean, it's early but I'd have expected to hear what an idiot I am at least twice between those 4 players. yes. i take it back, i misread. I dunno why WBG is buddying me though. I think I'm playing decently well though, but I think you're doing better (aka I think you're townine ATM). | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On February 21 2012 10:33 chaoser wrote: yes. i take it back, i misread. I dunno why WBG is buddying me though. I think I'm playing decently well though, but I think you're doing better (aka I think you're townine ATM). Buddying Attempt #1 (apologizing for misreading the thread): Successful. Buddying Attempt #2 (saying you think I'm townie ATM): FAILED.  To clarify, when I said you're doing "MORE sucking than several others in-thread", I meant only to imply that your alignment is more in question than others in-thread. I still think u a baus. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On February 21 2012 10:33 chaoser wrote: yes. i take it back, i misread. I dunno why WBG is buddying me though. I think I'm playing decently well though, but I think you're doing better (aka I think you're townine ATM). sup ##vote chaoser | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Ho boy, what are YOUR thoughts on redFF Bugs? I see you're now offended by chaoser's play in spite of him "doing the least sucking"...you completely ignore my case on redFF and stick a vote on the guy doing "the least sucking" in-thread? Something is..........not right here. Maybe I need a break from the thread for a bit. | ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
also, i am watching the knicks game, why am i not scum jackal =[ | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On February 21 2012 10:48 chaoser wrote: i'm not buddying you? I'm giving a town read. I didn't realize giving out town reads was buddying. we can argue about the usefulness of giving out town reads though. also, i am watching the knicks game, why am i not scum jackal =[ I know, it was a joke bro. Remember those? I know, in this day and age of endless OMGUS and terrible play that joking has become almost taboo - but humor DOES exist in some parts of Liquidia.  | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On February 21 2012 10:47 VisceraEyes wrote: Ho boy, what are YOUR thoughts on redFF Bugs? I see you're now offended by chaoser's play in spite of him "doing the least sucking"...you completely ignore my case on redFF and stick a vote on the guy doing "the least sucking" in-thread? Something is..........not right here. Maybe I need a break from the thread for a bit. redFF=bad=I have no idea what his alignment is atm. If you want a general idea of how I deal with redFF, look at Resurrection (in which I call him bad repeatedly and then actually defend him from the onslaught of Ace) or at XLVII where I completely ignore him. He was opposite alignment in those two games and honestly I could barely tell the difference. I guess part of that stems from not wanting to read/decipher his posts. Since I believe redFF is going to be comparatively unreadable to some of the other players here (read: syllo, kita, chaoser, you, RoL, Jackal, Toad, risk) I think it's more fruitful for us to be pushing players who will react in ways we expect them to react depending on their alignments. As of now, yes, that means I think chaoser is scummy because he called it strange for me to buddy him and then turned around and buddied you in the next sentence. Remember: need to know basis. Why does anyone need to know chaoser's town reads? | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On February 21 2012 10:48 chaoser wrote: i'm not buddying you? I'm giving a town read. I didn't realize giving out town reads was buddying. we can argue about the usefulness of giving out town reads though. also, i am watching the knicks game, why am i not scum jackal =[ giving out town reads is bad and you know that. So why are you doing it? | ||
|
Jackal58
United States4264 Posts
On February 21 2012 10:54 wherebugsgo wrote: redFF=bad=I have no idea what his alignment is atm. If you want a general idea of how I deal with redFF, look at Resurrection (in which I call him bad repeatedly and then actually defend him from the onslaught of Ace) or at XLVII where I completely ignore him. He was opposite alignment in those two games and honestly I could barely tell the difference. I guess part of that stems from not wanting to read/decipher his posts. Since I believe redFF is going to be comparatively unreadable to some of the other players here (read: syllo, kita, chaoser, you, RoL, Jackal, Toad, risk) I think it's more fruitful for us to be pushing players who will react in ways we expect them to react depending on their alignments. As of now, yes, that means I think chaoser is scummy because he called it strange for me to buddy him and then turned around and buddied you in the next sentence. Remember: need to know basis. Why does anyone need to know chaoser's town reads? I know red better than you ever will. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On February 21 2012 10:54 wherebugsgo wrote: redFF=bad=I have no idea what his alignment is atm. If you want a general idea of how I deal with redFF, look at Resurrection (in which I call him bad repeatedly and then actually defend him from the onslaught of Ace) or at XLVII where I completely ignore him. He was opposite alignment in those two games and honestly I could barely tell the difference. I guess part of that stems from not wanting to read/decipher his posts. Since I believe redFF is going to be comparatively unreadable to some of the other players here (read: syllo, kita, chaoser, you, RoL, Jackal, Toad, risk) I think it's more fruitful for us to be pushing players who will react in ways we expect them to react depending on their alignments. As of now, yes, that means I think chaoser is scummy because he called it strange for me to buddy him and then turned around and buddied you in the next sentence. Remember: need to know basis. Why does anyone need to know chaoser's town reads? And now we're getting somewhere. I guess I have a few questions for you regarding redFF if this is your stance on him. 1) Do you think redFF actually believed in a Policy Lynch of Tyrran based on his posts? 1a) If no, do you think he's used the information he's gained from "generating discussion" effectively? 1b) If yes, what do you think of his sudden unvote of Tyrran based on 1 post he made? 2) You said it yourself - he's "playing the victim" with his latest post. Is this something you'd expect scum to do regardless of skill-level or readability? 2a) If no, then why did you bring it up? 2b) If yes, then why would you NOT vote for redFF considering there's already support for his lynch and there's a (good) case against him? | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On February 21 2012 08:49 redFF wrote: I'm fairly sure carelessness is a towntell if anything, so thanks for saying im acting like town? Yeah that's why I said if you're not scum you're acting really careless. Regardless making terrible arguments, misrepresenting other players, and being antagonistic as a defensive action are not helping you here. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
votes tyrran in his first post of the game. Attacks me for pushing a policy lynch(which he is on) when i called them bad 4 months ago. thinks he's caught me in a mafia meta contradiction when really my policy regarding policy lynches has just changed. He was also grilling me for a few posts before stopping and going back to pointless fluff, while placing a vote on me without announcing it in thread. so erm ##vote kita For a moment I want everyone voting me to think about why scum would do what I have done this game, then get back to me. | ||
|
Jitsu
United States929 Posts
On February 21 2012 10:33 chaoser wrote: yes. i take it back, i misread. I dunno why WBG is buddying me though. I think I'm playing decently well though, but I think you're doing better (aka I think you're townine ATM). This screams at me. Not too hot, not too cold, but luke warm. And this isn't the only time you are staying "luke warm." What's with all the apologies and filler? I think people, by now, would know that there is a voting thread. You obviously thought it was a good idea to get the ball rolling by going with redFF on a "policy lynch" vote. What was YOU'RE reasoning to do it? Bugs. In the period of two pages, you go from calling out VE for sucking, and telling him to stfu, to saying that he doesn't suck anymore. wat. | ||
| ||
