EPTSurprisingly Normal Mini Mafia VII - Page 57
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
ZBot
194 Posts
Current votes: EchelonTee (2): rgTheSchworz, Steveling Not voting: Alderan, Mattchew, slOosh, NightFury, trackd00r, EchelonTee, zelblade, gumshoe The Day deadline is at 2012-02-25 09:00:00. (That's approximately 1:13:24 from now.) | ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
Why arent the votes on mattchew being counted...? | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
##Vote: Steveling I encourage everyone to look over steve's filter, he's not the cleanest shade of red but he seems a bit too hostile for a first time player/townie. He was confident in MG's innocence until matts big play came along and it no longer suited him to defend mg. Also placing his vote on me day one seemed like he was either causing a train or trying to contribute to a no lynch. I cant say he's a sure thing, but he's not that far from it. | ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
On February 25 2012 03:54 rgTheSchworz wrote: One, Zellblade discredits Matt, and his case, and then he proceeds to say that: TK and Trackdoor are on his lynch list. Which coincidentally are also on matt´s case. And he sticks to the easy lynches far too much for my liking. Lol this is complete lack of reading comprehension. I say that his case is weak, but that doesnt mean that his targerts are wrong. I agreed with half of his targets, but I felt (and still feel) that the basis for that case is weak, and that it is not a valid point against them. I see bullshit, I call bullshit. The Dimmuklok lynch was to avoid a no-lynch, and was the best candidate. The DYH lynch everyone was on, and I agreed with the case presented against him. | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Steveling (1): gumshoe Nightfury (1): Alderan Mattchew (4): EchelonTee, SloOsh, zelblade, trackd00r EchelonTee (3): Mattchew, rgthesworz, steveling Not Voting: NightFury | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
I've pointed out how Mattchew has shown favoritism toward Steveling and that his "town" read is bogus. That being said, look at Steveling's interaction with Mattchew. There is absolutely no discord at all between the two of them. Mattchew soft defends him several times and names him a most likely town read without good reasoning, and tries to take me off of him when I pressure voted him. Steveling has been sheeping Mattchew hard and never actually talks to Mattchew himself. It makes more sense to vote Mattchew before Steveling because 1) ET voted Mattchew already and might not be back. We have to consolidate votes 2) We go into tomorrow with 1 less townie to deal with the rest of mafia. Mattchew's abilities to disrupt and confuse are more formidable than Steveling's. It is safer to do it this way. ##Vote: Mattchew | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
##Unvote: Steveling ##Vote: Mattchew Night mind voting for matt? | ||
|
NightFury
Canada114 Posts
##Vote Mattchew | ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
I heavily doubt that both ET & sloosh are scum. Mattchew is still most likely scum. Im also sure on trackdoor. Just look at his filter. As soon as the pressure is off him, he immediatedly stops producing any sort of content. If this isnt scum I dont know wtf it is. Alderan has been pushing hawkins so hard ... chainsaw defense? How Steve has been sheeping matt so hard has been really suspisious too. Since the vote on page 3 hsant been updated ill just revote in case. ##vote: Mattchew We need to hit scum today or we lose. Im fairly confident that Matt fits the bill perfectly. Night please vote for him if you are town. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Ps if my decision is rash WTF is slosh and et's... Who made their decisions directly after I called out them | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
On February 25 2012 08:23 Mattchew wrote: I've said gumshoes been playing bad this whole game... He doesn't cease to amaze ... Everyone ready their gg buttons if I get lynched... Ps if my decision is rash WTF is slosh and et's... Who made their decisions directly after I called out them Never said it was a good decicion, I stopped caring about the time that both null votes came back into the game, this is too much of a headache to navigate. gg, unless, hell who knows matt you might actually be scum. | ||
|
trackd00r
Chile284 Posts
By the way Zelblade, I've read your reply to my read on you. You covered most points, but you didn't address your logic on getting town reads from Alderan and Steveling in that moment. Could you tell me why? | ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
1) He is on matt. 2) And you have nothing to say? 3) I felt that they were more likely town than scum after their interactions with you, who I felt was 100% scum. I didnt have town reads on them, in fact I had scum reads on them. What I wanted to point out was that these reads were not as strong as my read on you or matt. | ||
|
zelblade
Australia901 Posts
| ||
|
Alderan
United States463 Posts
##Vote: EchelonTee | ||
| ||
