EPTSurprisingly Normal Mini Mafia VII - Page 45
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
MidnightGladius
China1214 Posts
GG GL! | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
| ||
|
gumshoe
Canada3602 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
I did have him as least scummy of my 4 but I really don't know if that even matters. Idk if we change the course I would like to hear all your thoughts on this | ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
Despite that midnight turned green I still think the cases we have on trackdoor and hawkings are strong enough to carry their own weight. The most logical thing to do is push these 2 now. Pls start talking and sharing immediately. Gg midnight and janaan, gl next game. T_T | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
I think ... we should lynch Steveling. On February 18 2012 21:25 Steveling wrote: Anyway,my pro town reads so far are trackd00r and sloosh. On February 21 2012 19:49 Steveling wrote: Um, ok regarding my thoughts on trackdoor. You know how I like to find little clues here and there and prove them wrong, right? That's my scumhunting tactic. Well after examining trackdoors filter I found out there's not even one and I mean zero, nada posts with substance. It's 100% fluff. He made 3 big posts in this exact manner. On February 18 2012 01:59 trackd00r wrote: On February 18 2012 06:28 trackd00r wrote: On February 18 2012 11:39 trackd00r wrote: If you read the time stamps - he somehow got a pro town read at Feb 18, 21:25. Then he posts why track is so suspicious, and the "3 big posts" he refers to were all before Feb 18, 21:25. This being said, he shouldn't have ever come to his initial conclusion that trackd00r is a pro town read. ##Vote: Steveling | ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
On February 18 2012 21:25 Steveling wrote: Well after examining trackdoors filter On February 18 2012 21:25 Steveling wrote: Well after examining trackdoors On February 18 2012 21:25 Steveling wrote: Well after examining On February 18 2012 21:25 Steveling wrote: Well after On February 18 2012 21:25 Steveling wrote: AFTER If you are gonna go all DYH on me too, I don't know what else to say. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
trackd00r
Chile284 Posts
I'm not in the best shape to discuss, but this is what is going to happen. We are 4/6 mafia/town right now. There are two possible ways for the mafia to win this game right now. 1) Rushing and hoping to kill a townie at night 3. When they see a no-way-back target to lynch, they will jump to it and just wait for the kill. They'll try to keep all their effort to secure the mis lynch by leaving the target unable to defend himself back, such as ignoring any alternative candidates or keeping the focus closed. If they choose this way to end, surely they will be very active for a while, and suddenly escape out of the radar when they accomplished their goal. 2) Waiting an(-) extra day(s). Why do they do that you would ask? Mafia can't easily pull off their votes to a single target when there are multiple cases. The sudden jump on one of them will draw a notorious amount of suspicion by us and leave them exposed. So, they'll try to extend their voting range to many suspects with the following goals: a) Not providing a proper direction to lynches. b) Causing a no-lynch in order to disorganize us even more. c) Leaving them with a cleaner background when switching votes the following days. With this plan, they will probably be depending of night kills, so the medic in this case is crucial. 3) Sacrificing one of their members this night. It will give them credibility to push their agendas to secure a mislynch the next day, granted they made a successful kill the night before. I think that this possibility is the less probable to happen. I feel that we need to watch out for every dangerous behavior present here that we can be facing. In (1) is constant pressure by them trying to get a lynch. In (2), it would be undecided voters and unclear opinions. (3) would be simply trying to find scumslips and contradictions. Well, those are my thoughts right now. Comments? Oh wait. I forgot how many of you are convinced that I'm mafia, so I'm not expecting a good feedback from all this. sigh. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On February 23 2012 11:04 trackd00r wrote: Oh God... What a nightmare... I'm not in the best shape to discuss, but this is what is going to happen. We are 4/6 mafia/town right now. There are two possible ways for the mafia to win this game right now. 1) Rushing and hoping to kill a townie at night 3. When they see a no-way-back target to lynch, they will jump to it and just wait for the kill. They'll try to keep all their effort to secure the mis lynch by leaving the target unable to defend himself back, such as ignoring any alternative candidates or keeping the focus closed. If they choose this way to end, surely they will be very active for a while, and suddenly escape out of the radar when they accomplished their goal. 2) Waiting an(-) extra day(s). Why do they do that you would ask? Mafia can't easily pull off their votes to a single target when there are multiple cases. The sudden jump on one of them will draw a notorious amount of suspicion by us and leave them exposed. So, they'll try to extend their voting range to many suspects with the following goals: a) Not providing a proper direction to lynches. b) Causing a no-lynch in order to disorganize us even more. c) Leaving them with a cleaner background when switching votes the following days. With this plan, they will probably be depending of night kills, so the medic in this case is crucial. 3) Sacrificing one of their members this night. It will give them credibility to push their agendas to secure a mislynch the next day, granted they made a successful kill the night before. I think that this possibility is the less probable to happen. I feel that we need to watch out for every dangerous behavior present here that we can be facing. In (1) is constant pressure by them trying to get a lynch. In (2), it would be undecided voters and unclear opinions. (3) would be simply trying to find scumslips and contradictions. Well, those are my thoughts right now. Comments? Oh wait. I forgot how many of you are convinced that I'm mafia, so I'm not expecting a good feedback from all this. sigh. setup discussion isnt very helpful right now without any analysis on players | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
| ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
I hadn't yet filtered him obviously. I just had the impression of pro-town posting behavior. I made this case AFTER I filtered him and seen each post individually. And anyway,besides that, how on earth are you ignoring trackdoors and hawkings cases to turn on me? What's the reason behind this turn? I'm calling to your reasoning, you didn't listen to it on DYH case for which you said you took full responsibility and I didn't hold you accountable for that, because I reasoned things out. Do the same. | ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
Meaning scum can bus and kill 0 - 3 straight nights and if we mislynch 1 time of those they win... meaning there are a lot of possibilities track I think we need to lynch certain scum and I think the only 2 I am still sure of is tkhawk and zelbade TKhawk is because of his completely terrible attitude to getting accused. He looks for pure sympathy to not be lynched and never provides any actual reason why he shouldn't Zelblade rages hard at me which is funny cause he is raging at me for being too aggressive. Its contradictory. I think sloosh you may have something with steveling but I believe in these 2 more. Steveling is a little risky to me to lynch today for a couple reasons.I like this post and I like this post. Both say that he is unsure of MG making me unsure of him. | ||
| ||
