EPTNormal Mini Mafia I - Page 37
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On February 14 2012 12:24 EchelonTee wrote: Imperial Stormtrooper glad you have reading comprehension this time I call bullshit. ##Unvote ##Vote: EchelonTee It would have been ideal for scum to use delay last night, and that's probably what he did. You guys can lynch me today but tomorrow you better be lynching Echelon. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On February 14 2012 12:05 Nisani201 wrote: ##Vote: Bluelightz Pretty please don't kill me. Ok. On February 14 2012 12:44 Nisani201 wrote: I call bullshit. ##Unvote ##Vote: EchelonTee It would have been ideal for scum to use delay last night, and that's probably what he did. You guys can lynch me today but tomorrow you better be lynching Echelon. This is my response: | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
##Vote Nisani201 | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
| ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
On February 14 2012 12:53 EchelonTee wrote: You don't even make sense lol... if you're so sure that I'm scum and delayed, why say "you guys can lynch me"? The 2KP plus your lynch would mean town loses. you're just trying to make it seem like you got nothing to lose. ##Vote Nisani201 No, you're wrong. If I get lynched today and scum uses 2KP tomorrow, there would be 3 remaining players (with one scum) in LyLo. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
Then I saw these: On February 08 2012 06:51 mderg wrote: Nisani: He didn´t post much let alone much content. He also didn´t give reasons for his votes by himself, we often had to ask for this. He voted for timeaisis on day 1 and insisted on voting sentinel whom he had attacked from the beginning of the game already. (also without much reasoning). IMO he hasn´t played pro-town at all. He didn´t post very much, so I couldn´t get many reads out of his posts but his lurking alone would already make him suspicious. BaronFel: Same as nisani he hasn´t contributed much. Other than nisani he gave reasons for his votes like in this post: + Show Spoiler + On February 04 2012 09:16 BaronFel wrote: After reading through the thread (sorry for "lurking", I'll try to post more), I am leaning towards Sinensis not being scum, but I think he's still dangerous with his ideas. (I personally feel his logic is sometimes faulty), but as you said it may just be extreme newness to the game. ##Unvote: Sinensis I think we should vote, but I'm not fully sold on Sentinal being scum just yet... and prplhz has been making stronger arguments since his rough start... ##Vote: Timeaisis For now (He has been acting odd, and I think playing up the "Im new" card a bit too much), although I'm still watching prplhz (for having such a surprising turn around of character) and Sinensis (for some questionable logic, which even as a townie, is dangerous). But he often refers to others posts and opinions and always went with the majority which makes it seem like he isn´t rying to find scum himself. BaronFel is a possible scum as he was lurking and not bringing in his own arguments. But he isn´t the main suspect because his play didn´t seem blatantly anti-town on the first 2 days. ^Second to last full post before he bit it On February 03 2012 08:22 Vilonis wrote: Nisani201. Started this whole bandwagon discussion. IMO, it is too early to start claiming bandwagons. We are not close to a vote, there were not many people, and the 'bandwagon' was probably the best candidate to be lynched anyway. As far as I can see it, this is only really preventing pressure on players that deserve it, as having 3 votes on you is nowhere as demanding that you make a post as having 7+ votes on you would be. Also, "You guys make this too easy" with an explanation-less vote, followed by claiming a few people voting on suspicions are a bandwagon. Stop make a virtue out of keeping you options open. You should vote on suspicion. It makes your opinions and intentions clear. It makes you (somewhat) committed. Suspicious Prplhz (anyone else read this name as Purple Haze, then have the Jimmy Hendrix song stuck in their head?). Lots of votes, not many posts. Short, mostly useless posts. Probably a time zone thing, but I would like to see more discussion from him. Who is probably scum? My vote is for Nisani201. And as I think you should put your vote where your suspicions are... ##Vote: Nisani201 He did eventually change his vote to Time for D1, but kept his suspicions on Nisani. Isn't it interesting that the two players who suspected BF and Nisani early got killed first? This ain't looking good for you Nisani. | ||
|
Nisani201
United States1400 Posts
| ||
|
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
On February 14 2012 12:30 prplhz wrote: I'm Yorrick or something like that, too lazy to browse back through PM history to find it. You have that many PMs huh? Since what you mostly do is play Mafia, I think you pretty much just admitted to being scum in one of the games you currently have going. Also...... I have no idea which way to vote today. Not sure it matters since you only need a majority of 3 I believe. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
##Vote: Nisani201 I do feel like claiming :3 if you need me to claim just say it. | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On February 14 2012 14:46 Nisani201 wrote: I'm not going to bother defending myself because I know I'm going to get lynched anyways. But I will say that you guys like using WIFOM a lot. your entire case on me is WIFOM On February 14 2012 15:07 TheToast wrote: Also...... I have no idea which way to vote today. Not sure it matters since you only need a majority of 3 I believe. don't commit your vote too late, lest vote switch shenanigans occur | ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
On February 14 2012 16:41 Bluelightz wrote: Nisani has been contributing little. ##Vote: Nisani201 I do feel like claiming :3 if you need me to claim just say it. weren't you the one who suggested a mass blue claim D2? make your own judgement whether you think it would help at this point. | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
|
EchelonTee
United States5245 Posts
no rly tho, I thought you might've been some non-investigative blue role which is why I didn't say "claim now"; I presumed that if you had any information that could insta-win this game, you would've come out with it already. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
On February 14 2012 15:07 TheToast wrote: You have that many PMs huh? Since what you mostly do is play Mafia, I think you pretty much just admitted to being scum in one of the games you currently have going. Also...... I have no idea which way to vote today. Not sure it matters since you only need a majority of 3 I believe. I'm very dissatisfied with how you are actively inferring things about my alignment, publicly, for a game that you are not in. | ||
|
TheToast
United States4808 Posts
On February 14 2012 19:03 prplhz wrote: I'm very dissatisfied with how you are actively inferring things about my alignment, publicly, for a game that you are not in. Just testing  Is it just me or is Zbot not counting the votes properly? | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On February 14 2012 23:10 TheToast wrote: Just testing Is it just me or is Zbot not counting the votes properly? I haven't spoken to GM in a while and I dunno how to set it up. Votecount coming from me. | ||
| ||
