|
On February 23 2012 19:01 Jayjay54 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 18:58 Forumite wrote:On February 23 2012 18:54 Tunkeg wrote:
LOL @ scum being allowed to discuss the riddlergame in their QT. Pretty much make The Riddler game the most antitown bluerole in the game... This doesn´t sound right. The riddler game is a solo situation. I hope they didn´t reveal the phone booth QT to eachother too. the riddler role states no discussion in thread or phonebooth. It doesn't mention scum talking about it.... also, bugs (I think) asked BC and yes he was allowed to share the phone booth. We weren't allowed to post though. There was really nothing to take away from the phone qt... e: and again, only one person got out of it...so it was not really that much of a deal...
It doesn´t matter if you didn´t gain that much from it, you could solve your riddle faster and get an advantage over town in the riddler game. That´s what makes it cheating, and cheating is not tolerated.
|
Of course it was a big deal
|
about the riddler game.
The first question was something like:
Riddle Me This:
1 cup sugar
1/4 cup milk
1 teaspoon baking powder
1 cup flour
1 tablespoons butter (A full stick for my good friend Oswald)
3 severed corpses
Bake at 400 degrees for 30 minutes.
What am I?
So I just thought "well who gives a fuck" and swapped out the severed corpses for eggs, cause that kinda made sense.
And I just decided to bake the fucking thing, this is the end result:
![[image loading]](http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23162170/IMAG0040.jpg)
It was okay, but a bit too sweet and sponge-like for my taste.
|
Yeah being able to discuss the Riddle was OP.
|
On February 23 2012 19:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, once you were confirmed as Batman we had to roleblock you every night. You're too dangerous to scum teams. And while it was in your best interest to hit Joker first, I felt like the longer that took, the better the chances of town paranoia setting in.
I figured you had decided to do it that way, that's why I had to get radfield lynched. I knew he was talia, but she's immune to my kills and can roleblock
|
I should note that I pulled it out after 25-ish minutes. Seemed ready by then.
|
On February 23 2012 19:06 Palmar wrote:about the riddler game. The first question was something like: Show nested quote +Riddle Me This:
1 cup sugar
1/4 cup milk
1 teaspoon baking powder
1 cup flour
1 tablespoons butter (A full stick for my good friend Oswald)
3 severed corpses
Bake at 400 degrees for 30 minutes.
What am I? So I just thought "well who gives a fuck" and swapped out the severed corpses for eggs, cause that kinda made sense. And I just decided to bake the fucking thing, this is the end result: It was okay, but a bit too sweet and sponge-like for my taste.
I literally love you for actually baking that. I read that and said 'this doesn't bake anything without eggs.'
|
Huge thanks to BloodyC0bbler for hosting this game! You're such a baller!
|
On February 23 2012 19:07 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 19:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, once you were confirmed as Batman we had to roleblock you every night. You're too dangerous to scum teams. And while it was in your best interest to hit Joker first, I felt like the longer that took, the better the chances of town paranoia setting in. I figured you had decided to do it that way, that's why I had to get radfield lynched. I knew he was talia, but she's immune to my kills and can roleblock
If you hadn't gotten Radfield lynched, what was your plan the next day? Try again? Because I had intended to suggest Rad out Kurumi as Ras the next day, essentially confirming him as DT - lynching Rad was about to become impossible.
|
On February 23 2012 19:05 Forumite wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 19:01 Jayjay54 wrote:On February 23 2012 18:58 Forumite wrote:On February 23 2012 18:54 Tunkeg wrote:
LOL @ scum being allowed to discuss the riddlergame in their QT. Pretty much make The Riddler game the most antitown bluerole in the game... This doesn´t sound right. The riddler game is a solo situation. I hope they didn´t reveal the phone booth QT to eachother too. the riddler role states no discussion in thread or phonebooth. It doesn't mention scum talking about it.... also, bugs (I think) asked BC and yes he was allowed to share the phone booth. We weren't allowed to post though. There was really nothing to take away from the phone qt... e: and again, only one person got out of it...so it was not really that much of a deal... It doesn´t matter if you didn´t gain that much from it, you could solve your riddle faster and get an advantage over town in the riddler game. That´s what makes it cheating, and cheating is not tolerated.
it is not cheating.
It is time for an announcement. The riddle game has begun, lucky contestants chosen to join the game have fun. It is now time to have a battle of wits with the Riddler. All who were included in the riddle game must play if they wish to be removed from it. Failure means death. No discussing in thread or in the zsasz QT if you happen to be in it and invited.
maybe the rules were wrong or poorly stated. But it explicitly says not IN THREAD or ZASZ QT. we did neither. So no cheating. The role was just off.
|
It is clearly against the spirit of the role though and you could have asked BC whether it is allowed.
|
Wait, I was under the impression we did clarify that it was okay 
|
On February 23 2012 19:15 syllogism wrote:
It is clearly against the spirit of the role though and you could have asked BC whether it is allowed.
I believe we did:
Rad
02-09-2012
10:36 AM ET (US)
Ah I just read this:
It is time for an announcement. The riddle game has begun, lucky contestants chosen to join the game have fun. It is now time to have a battle of wits with the Riddler. All who were included in the riddle game must play if they wish to be removed from it. Failure means death. No discussing in thread or in the zsasz QT if you happen to be in it and invited.
It doesn't actually say we can't discuss it here in our QT, but I'll double check for confirmation.
e: also, BC frequently read our topic, he surely would have intervented long before we figured out the Bloody Cobbler riddle.
|
On February 23 2012 19:18 Jayjay54 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 19:15 syllogism wrote:
It is clearly against the spirit of the role though and you could have asked BC whether it is allowed. I believe we did: Show nested quote +Rad
02-09-2012
10:36 AM ET (US)
Ah I just read this:
It is time for an announcement. The riddle game has begun, lucky contestants chosen to join the game have fun. It is now time to have a battle of wits with the Riddler. All who were included in the riddle game must play if they wish to be removed from it. Failure means death. No discussing in thread or in the zsasz QT if you happen to be in it and invited.
It doesn't actually say we can't discuss it here in our QT, but I'll double check for confirmation. e: also, BC frequently read our topic, he surely would have intervented long before we figured out the Bloody Cobbler riddle.
It´s not expressly forbidden, that doesn´t mean it´s allowed. You should have checked with BC. Saying it´s his responsibility to stop you from cheating is low, he´s got enough to deal with in this game.
|
On February 23 2012 19:13 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 19:07 Palmar wrote:On February 23 2012 19:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, once you were confirmed as Batman we had to roleblock you every night. You're too dangerous to scum teams. And while it was in your best interest to hit Joker first, I felt like the longer that took, the better the chances of town paranoia setting in. I figured you had decided to do it that way, that's why I had to get radfield lynched. I knew he was talia, but she's immune to my kills and can roleblock If you hadn't gotten Radfield lynched, what was your plan the next day? Try again? Because I had intended to suggest Rad out Kurumi as Ras the next day, essentially confirming him as DT - lynching Rad was about to become impossible.
I never assume I fail, because I never fail.
|
On February 23 2012 19:22 Forumite wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 19:18 Jayjay54 wrote:On February 23 2012 19:15 syllogism wrote:
It is clearly against the spirit of the role though and you could have asked BC whether it is allowed. I believe we did: Rad
02-09-2012
10:36 AM ET (US)
Ah I just read this:
It is time for an announcement. The riddle game has begun, lucky contestants chosen to join the game have fun. It is now time to have a battle of wits with the Riddler. All who were included in the riddle game must play if they wish to be removed from it. Failure means death. No discussing in thread or in the zsasz QT if you happen to be in it and invited.
It doesn't actually say we can't discuss it here in our QT, but I'll double check for confirmation. e: also, BC frequently read our topic, he surely would have intervented long before we figured out the Bloody Cobbler riddle. It´s not expressly forbidden, that doesn´t mean it´s allowed. You should have checked with BC.
Like I said, I believe Rad did. Moreover, after we started discussing a bit BC posted this in the QT:
YulathPerson was signed in when posted 02-09-2012 01:18 PM ET (US) Why? I did not confirm a players role. I merely clarified on things you have already said in here. I don't want to see people discouraged on setup based reasons. It also isn't just helping you as both third parties have asked if they could be roleblocked and know they can be -_- As for the riddle stuff, before making generalized comments talk to the people within said game to find out what answers they have been given by me to figure out how the game works. The more questions asked the more information they receive 
So I am really sure, that this was, in fact allowed. as you see, he even encouraged talking about it...
|
On February 23 2012 19:26 Jayjay54 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 19:22 Forumite wrote:On February 23 2012 19:18 Jayjay54 wrote:On February 23 2012 19:15 syllogism wrote:
It is clearly against the spirit of the role though and you could have asked BC whether it is allowed. I believe we did: Rad
02-09-2012
10:36 AM ET (US)
Ah I just read this:
It is time for an announcement. The riddle game has begun, lucky contestants chosen to join the game have fun. It is now time to have a battle of wits with the Riddler. All who were included in the riddle game must play if they wish to be removed from it. Failure means death. No discussing in thread or in the zsasz QT if you happen to be in it and invited.
It doesn't actually say we can't discuss it here in our QT, but I'll double check for confirmation. e: also, BC frequently read our topic, he surely would have intervented long before we figured out the Bloody Cobbler riddle. It´s not expressly forbidden, that doesn´t mean it´s allowed. You should have checked with BC. Like I said, I believe Rad did. Moreover, after we started discussing a bit BC posted this in the QT: Show nested quote +YulathPerson was signed in when posted 02-09-2012 01:18 PM ET (US) Why? I did not confirm a players role. I merely clarified on things you have already said in here. I don't want to see people discouraged on setup based reasons. It also isn't just helping you as both third parties have asked if they could be roleblocked and know they can be -_- As for the riddle stuff, before making generalized comments talk to the people within said game to find out what answers they have been given by me to figure out how the game works. The more questions asked the more information they receive So I am really sure, that this was, in fact allowed. as you see, he even encouraged talking about it...
Really? When wondering about the Riddler game, you should talk to eachother to get answers, but Town should shut up about it and figure it out themselves? You don´t find that odd?
|
On February 23 2012 19:28 Forumite wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 19:26 Jayjay54 wrote:On February 23 2012 19:22 Forumite wrote:On February 23 2012 19:18 Jayjay54 wrote:On February 23 2012 19:15 syllogism wrote:
It is clearly against the spirit of the role though and you could have asked BC whether it is allowed. I believe we did: Rad
02-09-2012
10:36 AM ET (US)
Ah I just read this:
It is time for an announcement. The riddle game has begun, lucky contestants chosen to join the game have fun. It is now time to have a battle of wits with the Riddler. All who were included in the riddle game must play if they wish to be removed from it. Failure means death. No discussing in thread or in the zsasz QT if you happen to be in it and invited.
It doesn't actually say we can't discuss it here in our QT, but I'll double check for confirmation. e: also, BC frequently read our topic, he surely would have intervented long before we figured out the Bloody Cobbler riddle. It´s not expressly forbidden, that doesn´t mean it´s allowed. You should have checked with BC. Like I said, I believe Rad did. Moreover, after we started discussing a bit BC posted this in the QT: YulathPerson was signed in when posted 02-09-2012 01:18 PM ET (US) Why? I did not confirm a players role. I merely clarified on things you have already said in here. I don't want to see people discouraged on setup based reasons. It also isn't just helping you as both third parties have asked if they could be roleblocked and know they can be -_- As for the riddle stuff, before making generalized comments talk to the people within said game to find out what answers they have been given by me to figure out how the game works. The more questions asked the more information they receive So I am really sure, that this was, in fact allowed. as you see, he even encouraged talking about it... Really? When wondering about the Riddler game, you should talk to eachother to get answers, but Town should shut up about it and figure it out themselves? You don´t find that odd?
yes. I do find it odd. Like I already posted, designed like this, the Riddler is really anti-town.
But if the host of the game encourages you to discuss, wouldn't you? Or do you believe that this wasn't BC???
|
On February 23 2012 19:25 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 19:13 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 23 2012 19:07 Palmar wrote:On February 23 2012 19:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, once you were confirmed as Batman we had to roleblock you every night. You're too dangerous to scum teams. And while it was in your best interest to hit Joker first, I felt like the longer that took, the better the chances of town paranoia setting in. I figured you had decided to do it that way, that's why I had to get radfield lynched. I knew he was talia, but she's immune to my kills and can roleblock If you hadn't gotten Radfield lynched, what was your plan the next day? Try again? Because I had intended to suggest Rad out Kurumi as Ras the next day, essentially confirming him as DT - lynching Rad was about to become impossible. I never assume I fail, because I never fail.
##Fistpound
|
On February 23 2012 19:32 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On February 23 2012 19:25 Palmar wrote:On February 23 2012 19:13 VisceraEyes wrote:On February 23 2012 19:07 Palmar wrote:On February 23 2012 19:01 VisceraEyes wrote:
Palmar, once you were confirmed as Batman we had to roleblock you every night. You're too dangerous to scum teams. And while it was in your best interest to hit Joker first, I felt like the longer that took, the better the chances of town paranoia setting in. I figured you had decided to do it that way, that's why I had to get radfield lynched. I knew he was talia, but she's immune to my kills and can roleblock If you hadn't gotten Radfield lynched, what was your plan the next day? Try again? Because I had intended to suggest Rad out Kurumi as Ras the next day, essentially confirming him as DT - lynching Rad was about to become impossible. I never assume I fail, because I never fail. ##Fistpound
one of the best 2000th post ever VE 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
