Purgatory Mafia - Page 19
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
On January 15 2012 07:00 Grackaroni wrote: I'm looking through his filter, can you point me to where he claimed VT, that in itself would be more than enough reason to lynch. YOU'RE RIGHT HE CLAIMED VT WHEN HE MADE HIS RETARDED PLAN. lynch him. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
On January 08 2012 23:40 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Well that pretty much sums up my plan, all critiques are welcome but I think I covered pretty much all dynamics in the game that interact with it. So I claim townie. I have work in a little while but will more than happily defend my position in around 6-7 hours from this post, but if you can't glaring problems with it remember that as soon as the night phase ends this plan is over. The first day cycle is the only time where blue roles cannot be faked. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
On December 28 2011 15:42 ZBot wrote: Vote count for the Day 3 Lynch. With 13 alive, 7 votes are required to lynch. Current votes: RebirthOfLeGenD (5): HarbingerOfDoom (3): Spaackle (1): Bluelightz (1): Jackal58 Blazinghand (0): The Day 3 deadline is at January 15 2012 10:00 KST. (That's approximately 2:59:09 from now.) | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
On January 15 2012 07:09 syllogism wrote: If the channeler is alive (which he is), send HarbingerOfDoom into purgatory tonight I second this motion and move to have it sent to the chamber floor. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
On January 15 2012 07:09 Zephirdd wrote: Actually, they may have not had time to cancel the conceal. Imagine if they had "RoL gets lynched and we enjoy the chaos"(or whatever the reason for concealing is) and just right before his lynch he goes "IM CHANNELER GUUUUYS" and then suddenly the concealer wasted a conceal. Whether RoL was the channeler or not, that was a good thing for town as the conceal was basically wasted. Oh, that's true. Bad, unlucky, whatever, it's good for is :D | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
On January 15 2012 08:24 Bluelightz wrote: Hmm, sorry I didn't vote I was asleep ![]() Don't worry BL your play has been so good an active this game I give you rain check | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
Perhaps I'm the wrong person to say this, but if you have too much noise you cloud out the signal, you see? I'd condense your post to your chief suspect and the other scum people you think are scum. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
We've got 3 and a half hours left. | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
So here's xsksc's solitary post: On January 04 2012 23:24 xsksc wrote: Hi guys. First multi-factional game for me as well, not really sure how we should proceed strategy-wise. Lynching an angel day 1 would obviously be ideal, although getting a demon is definitely better than a townie. Yeah, and then he went on to be one of the only useful townies that actually read the game and used his brain. Syllo, if Palmar does decide to mess around on day one again, would it not be better to wait and see how he behaves later on (like in TLXVIII), rather than just lynching him? A meaningless post and a half-assed defense of Palmar. I can't read anything off this. At this point Spaackle comes in and misses the Erandorr lynch. He defends Palmar and attacks risk. He attacks RoL's plana t night then makes the following statements: On January 09 2012 05:51 Spaackle wrote: @Jackal Hypothetically, let's say I'm a complete noob and I don't know how to play this game. Explain to me: why is it obvious? Could you please give a little bit more reasoning, even if it is things that others have already pointed out? I don't like people calling themselves noobs. IT creates excuses and excuses shouldn't exist. On January 09 2012 11:22 Spaackle wrote: Well, now that we know that Palmar is scum, we should take a look at a post the he made earlier: I'll bet we find Palmar's scumbuddies in the list of the people that he declared as townies. This is dumb. This is like straight-up WIFOM. So here's where I don't like Spaackle. He says some stuff about RoL and then some more stuff then he's unvoting: On January 10 2012 13:02 Spaackle wrote: I'm with you on this one, BH. At first I thought that the RoL plan was merely just an ill-thought out plan, but after your and Mr Wiggles' arguments against it, now I see that the RoL plan isn't just bad, but that it seems to be intentionally anti-town. I want to see a defense from RoL, but until then: ##vote RebirthOfLegend So this is like, a bandwagon hop. Let's see where this goes: On January 11 2012 14:31 Spaackle wrote: So, after a bit more of BH and RoL duking it out, I've decided to Unvote RoL for now. RoL has spent a long time and a lot of effort defending it, and a scum Probably would have dropped it long ago. RoL is still pretty null to me, though. Give me a bit more time to finish catching up on the thread and reading some filter, and I'll have an analysis for both Tyrran and risk.nuke The pressure gets on, and Spaackle bails the hell out. Ok, maybe he thought RoL is null. but let's do more digging, ladies and gentlemen. Well at this point he's hanging out a little later so I pressure him: On January 13 2012 08:40 Blazinghand wrote: I got a good one for you Mr Spaacks. Check it. OK Wow, way to bail for no reason What do you think about RoL now? >.> Explain your flip-flopping, mr. flip-flopper. I ask him to explain his flip-flopping. He responds: On January 13 2012 08:50 Spaackle wrote: When I moved off of RoL, it was because the argument between you and him had gotten kind of silly and was filling up the thread. I looked at both risk and RoL, and risk looked like thebetter lynch. I would have voted him, but he was hammered before I could. This is inconsistent. I want to catch him red-handed, though, so I ask him to elaborate: On January 13 2012 08:54 Blazinghand wrote: So when you moved off RoL, you thought he was still a decent lynch, but risk was better? He responds with a sidestep / lie: On January 13 2012 09:01 Spaackle wrote: @BH I partially used my RoL vote to get him to come out in the open. I think he is a good lynch, and I did when I voted him, but risk was still better to me. On January 13 2012 09:04 Blazinghand wrote: You dodged my question. when you moved off RoL, did you think he was a decent lynch, but risk was better? Answer. More pressure from me, then: On January 13 2012 09:10 Spaackle wrote: I'm pretty sure I did answer your question, BH. I said that yes, when I moved off RoL I thought risk was the better lynch. Bam there's the lie. On January 13 2012 09:12 Blazinghand wrote: So when you moved off RoL, you though RoL was scum, but you were more sure about risk? Of course I confirm. On January 13 2012 09:15 Spaackle wrote: @ BH: yes. I point out his inconsistency: On January 13 2012 09:16 Blazinghand wrote: That's weird I thought he was pretty null to you Grack notices as well: On January 13 2012 09:16 Grackaroni wrote: Whoa, what I gathered from your filter was that you were no longer sure that RoL was scum and had a null read on him when you removed your vote. On January 13 2012 09:20 Spaackle wrote: Except that since then I've been pushing for his lynch. He looked a bit null to me at the moment, but I still suspected him as a scum. I just wanted to concentrate more on getting rid of risk at the moment. hmm waffles are so delicious On January 13 2012 09:23 Blazinghand wrote: Oh man Spaackle from January 13 you sound like you thought he was scum I wonder who can argue with you??? let me ask spaackle from January 11 huh thats weird I wonder which spaackle is right Then Spaackle bails the fuck out and doesn't respond. He comes back later to interact with the thread in a normal fashion but otherwise is basically bailing super hard. On January 14 2012 15:45 Spaackle wrote: EBWOP: expected because we ran into a few problems. All of this was completely outside of my control. Lynching me will be just as good for the town as was lynching Erandorr and risk. While I may not be as active as I could be, lynching me is still a mislynch. HoDs claim is interesting. Everyone should back their votes off him and focus on a much safer lynch, like RoL. However, leaving breadcrumbs like that is still something that a scum could do, and fall back on if it looks like he'd be lynched. But this is too much WIFOM for right now. Let's just play it safe and back off. What the dicks is this. This is not a defense. In any case, Spaackle lied and has been largely unhelpful. He's on my scumlist unless he starts being useful. Coming up next: My case on Bluelightz | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
| ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25552 Posts
![]() Camt wait for the day post | ||
| ||