|
blazinghand and I am the only ones really discussing at all in this thread until now and tbh it's only math ![](/mirror/smilies/frown.gif) You two guys (zona and palmar) did your first posts right now and Rad is not posting at all while I still have to decide not only if I like the two guys he picks but also if I want a mission that involvs himself. Rads "group 2" didn't post at all. VE, Jackal and Greymist are all sitting on basicly nothing right now...
|
On December 27 2011 07:12 Toadesstern wrote:blazinghand and I am the only ones really discussing at all in this thread until now and tbh it's only math ![](/mirror/smilies/frown.gif) You two guys (zona and palmar) did your first posts right now and Rad is not posting at all while I still have to decide not only if I like the two guys he picks but also if I want a mission that involvs himself. Rads "group 2" didn't post at all. VE, Jackal and Greymist are all sitting on basicly nothing right now...
I've posted....
|
Im sure most of us are busy with post-christmas stuffs. Personally I think that until radfield puts forth his team, not much can be said. I'll wit till he does so, but i hope that at least happens in the next couple of hours so we can have time to comment on it.
|
I'll unvote.
I am still skeptical that I'll get a read on anyone on day 1. I am thinking of this is as more of a logic game than a behavioral analysis game, but on the small chance I can get a tell from someone, I'll withhold my vote at least until Radfield comes up with his team.
|
On December 27 2011 07:26 GreYMisT wrote: Im sure most of us are busy with post-christmas stuffs. Personally I think that until radfield puts forth his team, not much can be said. I'll wit till he does so, but i hope that at least happens in the next couple of hours so we can have time to comment on it.
yeah I know that's the reason I'm only mentioning it and I'm not really calling someone out because of it. Because as you said post christmas stuff atm and without radfield posting there's very little we can talk about. I know you posted but it's just not very much to go with right now. I've got a feeling radfield doesn't want to post a lot right now so he can judge people better but that's making it hard for me to judge him. We're 24 hours in the game and I don't have a slight clue what the first team might be like. I know this is a 72 hours day but I'd like to not have to vote yay on radfields team simply because he proposes his team on the last day...
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
OK, I'm just going to propose a team then.
Myself Palmar Blazinghand
It obviously goes against my initial post, but that first post was really just to get things kicking.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
What's your reasoning for this team? You note it goes against your initial reasoning but you don't offer any new reasoning.
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
yay or nay.
Here is my reasoning.
Palmar's only post, while brief, is an important piece of advice and not one I had even considered.
Blazinghand seems townish and willing to reason out and his posting is sound.
I know myself to be town. Honestly, any Day 1 leader who DID NOT put themselves into the first mission would be auto-scum as far as I can tell. It would be blatantly playing against your win-con. In fact, it seems like leaders at every stage of mission will be putting themselves in. No?
|
Not necessarily. If we succeed on night 2, regardless of who the leader is on day 3, he should do the same squad on night 3 as succeeded on night 2.
Otherwise though, yes, I agree the leader should put himself in the squad.
|
I have once again voted to accept Radfield's picks. Palmar and blazinghand are no more nor no less suspicious to me than anyone else.
|
I don't really agree with blazinghand and palmar is just a null for me...
|
I agree with palmar, blazinghand is a null to me as well, but I have no reason to disagree with these picks as of right now.
|
I'm okay with Radfield's suggestions, and have voted thusly.
|
Well as mentioned, blazinghand is one of the two people I'd not like to send on a mission right now so it's a nay for me
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On December 27 2011 12:51 Toadesstern wrote: Well as mentioned, blazinghand is one of the two people I'd not like to send on a mission right now so it's a nay for me
why not?
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On December 27 2011 13:00 Radfield wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2011 12:51 Toadesstern wrote: Well as mentioned, blazinghand is one of the two people I'd not like to send on a mission right now so it's a nay for me why not?
I think it's fairly clear-- I've been talking a lot. I'm not actually sure "talking a lot on d1" is a town move in this game. Contrast "person who talks a lot", who might be slipping messages or hints to his scum alies (remember no mafia QT this game) and someone who straight-up hasn't been talking much at all, and therefore is likely town.
I will be voting Nay on this team because I'm suspicious of Radfield.
|
On December 27 2011 13:00 Radfield wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2011 12:51 Toadesstern wrote: Well as mentioned, blazinghand is one of the two people I'd not like to send on a mission right now so it's a nay for me why not?
you said what he said sounds townish and he's open for discussion. I still think he contradicted himself saying (all under the assumption that your group theory is right and you really are town) tha we should send palmar or zona as well because.
|
oh and no the fact that you're talking a lot is not the reason I voted nay because I'm talking quite a lot as well and yeah seems like noone is talking at all o.O
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On December 27 2011 13:52 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On December 27 2011 13:00 Radfield wrote:On December 27 2011 12:51 Toadesstern wrote: Well as mentioned, blazinghand is one of the two people I'd not like to send on a mission right now so it's a nay for me why not? you said what he said sounds townish and he's open for discussion. I still think he contradicted himself saying (all under the assumption that your group theory is right and you really are town) tha we should send palmar or zona as well because. ?
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On December 27 2011 13:53 Toadesstern wrote: oh and no the fact that you're talking a lot is not the reason I voted nay because I'm talking quite a lot as well and yeah seems like noone is talking at all o.O
you're talking a lot and not contributing much. It sounds to me like you could be slipping messages to your mafia allies here.
|
|
|
|