EPTTL Mafia XLVIII - Page 28
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On December 06 2011 02:08 redFF wrote: why didn't you specify who you thought he should shoot in your previous post? i at least didnt expect him to shoot that fast. palmar mentioned drazerk | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On December 06 2011 02:11 Drazerk wrote: oh and I liked you. Now your just being retarded Dude sorry, but you were chosen by fate. but now v7 ruined it. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On December 06 2011 02:12 Palmar wrote: Dude sorry, but you were chosen by fate. but now v7 ruined it. Really? Your're really going to claim that was RNG? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On December 06 2011 02:13 Drazerk wrote: Really? Your're really going to claim that was RNG? My homeboy said it was RNG, I trust him. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
I don't think a town dayvig would just shoot so rashly like that and then into a guy he has no read on. Palmar said that you needed to shoot a scum and then you just shoot a random useless lurker. Why didn't you wait for other people to show up and support you against Palmar? This all seems like you felt vulnerable and threatened and like you needed to get your shot off in a hurry and that you didn't care if it hit a townie, even though you were asked to hit a scum. I already found you suspicious and this didn't help at all. | ||
|
vaderseven
United States2556 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Please stop being an idiot and actually contribute rather than getting our reactions this is exactly how the bandwagon formed so easily in XLVII | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
vaderseven
United States2556 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
TruthBringer
United States578 Posts
On December 05 2011 17:23 prplhz wrote: @TruthBringer You said that "Sometimes it's better doing nothing than something." what makes you think that it is better to do nothing than it is to do something in the situation we are in right now? Do you think, right now, that no-lynch is a better option than lynching somebody? If you had to lynch somebody right now who would it be and why? What kind of information do you think we'd have day2 that we wouldn't have day1 if we didn't lynch? Do you think the only thing to gain from a lynch is a flip and a vote list? Why don't you think you can read any of us? Is it because you don't know how we usually play or is it because you haven't played mafia for a while and you don't feel confident about your abilities right now? You also never answered my question; when you played before, did town often rely on power roles instead of analysis? I think in this situation it is better to hang someone on day 1 than to not do so. The situation has changed since I originally posted that. A lot more has been said, this has been a very active day 1. Right now, I would lynch Palmar. His posts have almost entirely been fluff. Very little strategic analysis. Very little player analysis. Very troll-like. He proposed RNG for first day hanging. He seems to be trying to direct rather than participate. I know there is the argument that as a good guy he can stay alive longer if the mafia think his head is near the chopping block, but to me he seems to be trying to seem town without posting anything worthwhile at all. I don't think I can read many of the players here because I don't know how sophisticated each person's play is. For instance, although I suspect Palmar right now, I even have an explanation for how he can be doing what he is doing as a townie. Is Palmar the type of player who would act mafia in order to keep mafia from killing him? I don't know. Does prplhz pay close attention to detail? Why did it take me calling him out TWICE before he voted for me in the voting thread? Was he "blue-claiming" so the town wouldn't hang him? I am under the impression that the town has abilities at night allowing them to check for bad guys and that there are clues given in the death sequences. (When incognito describes the kills, he leaves hints behind pointing at particular mafia members.) I can read suspicious behaviour just fine, I just don't know the players well enough to read them. Behaviour may be suspicious, but is it suspicious for Palmar/prplhz, etc.? When I played before, town relied heavily on analysis of the death-script to determine who the mafia were, so the longer the game lasted and the more death-scripts there were, the better the town's chances were. The blue roles were also important, especially the one that allowed vote-list checking. That really allowed the town analysts to hone in on who to check the death-script clues against. | ||
|
vaderseven
United States2556 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On December 06 2011 02:19 vaderseven wrote: I claimed cuz I feared being shot. I shot because I had claimed and I don't like being a liar like some. That's a horrible reason to role claim... and I should know I am the king of bad role claims | ||
|
TruthBringer
United States578 Posts
| ||
|
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
On December 06 2011 02:16 Palmar wrote: I had already claimed I was lying. On November 24 2011 18:23 Palmar wrote: I will be running a strict Lynch-All-Liars policy (LAL) and will push hard to enforce it. With a game this big we cannot afford townies running amok with some ridiculous plans of how lying will somehow benefit town. Do not lie, you will be held accountable. | ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On December 06 2011 02:23 TruthBringer wrote: WIFOM = ? Wine in front of me + Show Spoiler [Like this...] + | ||
|
TruthBringer
United States578 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On December 06 2011 02:29 TruthBringer wrote: ##vote Palmar As much as I dislike Palmar at the moment V7 is a better lynch and we will be able to get a better read on Palmar on day 2 | ||
| ||
