EPTTL Mafia XLVII - Page 56
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On November 26 2011 01:31 annul wrote: risk.nuke is a smurf of some sort i guess Nope, but he's a promising newbie. Seems to be pretty good, or at least willing to attempt to be pretty good. I've seen him in 2 other games. | ||
|
minus_human
4784 Posts
On November 25 2011 04:59 xtfftc wrote: And, just in case minushuman and the bunny missed my enquiries of all the EBWOP-ing: | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On November 26 2011 01:36 annul wrote: likely someone who wanted to clear his meta and rerolled Doubt it, first off, his account is created back in may 2010, and second, I don't think a re-rolling mafia player would be dirty enough to sign up for a newbie game. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
still not sure how this guy knows me though if hes a newb | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On November 26 2011 01:40 annul wrote: i suppose the first part is a good argument against it, but if he rerolled and played two games past, it does make sense for him to play the general game too -- why wouldnt he, if this is his new "character?" still not sure how this guy knows me though if hes a newb lol, what's this. I'm having my integrity brought into question? I don't know you, you were just messing up the thread mate. (use pm's) | ||
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On November 26 2011 01:43 risk.nuke wrote: lol, what's this. I'm having my integrity brought into question? I don't know you, you were just messing up the thread mate. (use pm's) PMs are banned in this game though... On November 26 2011 01:29 xtfftc wrote: :/ How is it helpful to town to have a clearly defined course of action if this course of action is bad on its own? All it does is give the newbies a fake sense of security: they're heading somewhere, so it must be good, right? I don't see it as a bad plan though. There have been mentions of it wasting potential vigi hits as well as DT checks at the start. But with the number of new players, there is a strong change of that happening anyway. | ||
|
annul
United States2841 Posts
also PMs are NOT allowed in this game. | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES51129 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
xtfftc
United Kingdom2343 Posts
On November 25 2011 15:32 Nokarot wrote: Usually when I'm allowed to edit posts, I edit sentences to get rid of all typography widows. The above post will haunt me forever. off topic sry Get used to it. ^^ On November 25 2011 16:54 redFF wrote: http://www.mediafire.com/?l6t68yibu3li068 thats a link to an html file of the first 50 pages, it will help you control f people for their filter among other things. Thanks, that's actually useful. On November 25 2011 10:05 redFF wrote: Greymist number 1 lynch candidate right now? same question to everyone else running. He hasn't posted a lot of actual content but he provided some reads (on Sandroba and YM) and hasn't been disruptive. I wouldn't call him a lynch candidate at the moment. What made you think that he is mafia? | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
Reading 15 pages of this thread, yay \o/ So if something directed something at me for whatever reason please give me like an hour to catch up and you'll have it. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
DTs, disregard everything Palmar and BC has said. Any 'plan' to check your sanity is unfeasible. The scum is just trying to control you and confuse you and everyone else, which will happen. I will gladly be a sacrifice if it means you people will stop being sheep, I told you again and again Palmar will convince you to do anything he wants, scum or not. BC scum4lyfe | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On November 26 2011 01:49 BLinD-RawR wrote: I'm off to bed,will also be missing the first few hours of n1 too. You completely ignored my inquiry about the current situation of the game. You claim youngminii is your scumread, yet you support sandroba who has defended youngminii, over me who has pledged to lynch youngminii. Your play is disappointing at best, scummy at worst. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
Alternatively: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?key=0Aolx7msuf_IvdDNsN1dIbnNWcXJVaEFzU1AwN05sdUE&output=html This is a document with links to the filters of all players in the game. | ||
|
xtfftc
United Kingdom2343 Posts
It would do you a lot of good if you put your thoughts into words instead of simply bolding some quotes. | ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 26 2011 01:53 Toadesstern wrote: I'm back. Fucking trains, noone likes trains... Reading 15 pages of this thread, yay \o/ So if something directed something at me for whatever reason please give me like an hour to catch up and you'll have it. | ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
|
xtfftc
United Kingdom2343 Posts
On November 26 2011 01:47 Hassybaby wrote: I don't see it as a bad plan though. There have been mentions of it wasting potential vigi hits as well as DT checks at the start. But with the number of new players, there is a strong change of that happening anyway. Okay, let's clarify something. Sandroba and Syllogism point out why the plan is bad. You counter with "Okay, but all you're providing is criticisms and we need a plan". I pointed out that a bad plan is worse than no plan. And you come back with "I don't think it's a bad plan". If you don't think that it's a bad plan, why go for the "but you're not offering an alternative" instead of actually pointing out why it's not bad? | ||
| ||
