TL Mafia XLVII - Page 251

On December 02 2011 16:31 Blazinghand wrote:
mcht (becomes marserblood)
verdict: terrible townie
He makes three posts total.

First post is wishwash, dodging, noncommmital, claiming on analysis is flawed.


Second and third Posts are both utterly worthless one-liners.

Normally, I'd say this is scum. However, it was his first game, and he literally posted all his game posts in the span of 20 minutes before leaving, never to be seen again. He's just terrible and never played before. When he comes back as MarserBlood he makes this post:

Stalling for a lurk excuse, or typical noob? looks like typical noob to me.

Terrible Townie

On December 03 2011 03:02 Blazinghand wrote:
Player: Soap
Verdict: Scum

Soap is a first-time player. He opens with
+ Show Spoiler +

Worthless posts. Note how he's trying to appear helpful without actually adding anything to the discussion. WBG and Palmer call him out for this. WBG mostly says he's a useless lurker. His responses:
+ Show Spoiler +
Excuses, no commitment, and most of all, no real attempts to do anything useful.

And then, he's silent for a couple of days, before the "lol everyone swap votes at the last minute" debacle. He did not swap votes at the last minute, but he voted ahead of time, and this was he votes for Risen and WBG, 3 hours before deadline. He made no posts in the discussion thread at this point. In the aftermath of the voteswitch...



So let's think about this for a moment. Worthless, spam votes hidden in 3rd and 4th-placing people. Complete lack of any attempt at discussion. Explaining his "internet outage" as the reason for his voting pattern, WHILE AT THE SAME TIME ADMITTING HE WAS PLANNING ON A LAST MINUTE VOTE CHANGE...

One more thing. Soap's internet was not broken on the night of Wednesday, November the 30th. No, not at all. If it was, it must have been broken for a very narrow timeframe.

It was working the night before at 8 pm:

And it was working on the December 1st at 3 am:


What this indicates to me is that Soap's internet was working just fine. Why's that? Look at his post. This isn't a "I literally just logged in and wrote this" post. This is a "I was doing something, found a link that was broken, and decided to write about it over here" post. Soap, my friends, was active and online that night. If, in fact, Soap's internet was broken, it was broken for an extremely short period of time-- starting sometime within a couple hours before the deadline and stretching until just after.

After being, well, characteristically helpful, Soap returns to the thread:



Soap is either scum and trying to subvert our vote, or lying about having read the thread, or he'd be voting the way everyone else is. HE claims that he's been voting "for the lulz" and that he's lurking, and that those of us who contribute are scum and he is silent because he's not.

I don't buy it. My body is not a sturdy cardboard cylinder. My head is not made out of hard, sweetened candy.

I am not a sucker.

Soap is scum.

On December 03 2011 03:58 Blazinghand wrote:
One more thing. Soap's internet was not broken on the night of Wednesday, November the 30th. No, not at all. If it was, it must have been broken for a very narrow timeframe.

It was working the night before at 8 pm:

On November 30 2011 08:42 Soap wrote:




I unvoted Hier, not wbg

##Unvote: Ace
##Vote: Risen

On December 03 2011 04:40 Soap wrote:


Pro analysis there bro.

On December 03 2011 04:43 Blazinghand wrote:


Ah, good point-- european times. I was mistake, and withdraw that portion of my analysis.

However, you still were on at 3 am, weren't you? Did your internet come back online? Although there's now a larger window beforehand, the window afterwards is still less than 4 hours.

On the other hand, can you explain your current votes? Or your inactivity and lack of any attempts at meaningful analysis?

On December 03 2011 04:58 Soap wrote:


The deadline was Nov 30 12:00 KST, that's Dec 01 03:56 KST, almost 16 hours later.

Today's vote is decided. Please don't expect me to hold to your standards of analysis.

On December 03 2011 05:00 Blazinghand wrote:


Today's vote is decided... so you're gonna make worthless votes and give the mafia a chance at swinging the vote? Other people I've addressed on this issue have stepped in line. It's awfully scummy to make worthless votes, including trying to get rid of our double-lynches (what? are you serious) and refuse to even try to help.

I'm not holding you to my standards of analysis-- i'm holding you to make LITERALLY ANY USEFUL ANALYSIS AT ALL.