| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:16 sinani206 wrote: neither defended each other Yawn, if you guys really think kenpachi is a better lynch than sinani in regards to people trolling/lurking in the game then that's just sad. I don't mind getting lynched, but I'd rather kenpachi doesn't. So please explain how that isn't Chaoser defending Kenpachi. If it is him defending Kenpachi, should you be lynched under LaL? | ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:20 Tyrran wrote: So within four hours, we must focus on getting another lynch. We already have 2 people a 8 votes, i suggest we focus on them. Both look scummy, both are in my likely scum list, yet Drazerk voted for Sinani206 so its unlikely that both are scum. First of all, Sinani was a big partisan of dividing our attention . Quite amusingly he used the divide and conquer analogy, where as pointed by WBG, you are suppose to divide you enemy. Meaning we town are the enemy? He Bandwagoned against Lanaia, which as i explained before, is something that is very pro-mafia. Just look at his post just before, when we already established that Lanaia should not be lynched. Both his votes are given without any explanation other than "its obvious". He is either scum or an extremely bad town. Even Drazerk looks good in comparison. I dont think town needs him. ##Vote Sinani206 lololol hypocrite | ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: So please explain how that isn't Chaoser defending Kenpachi. If it is him defending Kenpachi, should you be lynched under LaL? oh didnt see that post lol | ||
|
Tyrran
France777 Posts
Great defense. I will remind you that I voted kenpachi only becaused i agreed with risk.nuke that this was the rigth way to proceed. And i will redirect you to This post where i explain why mafia would press charges on Lanaia, and thus why those who blindly voted for her are suspects. | ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:27 Tyrran wrote: Great defense. I will remind you that I voted kenpachi only becaused i agreed with risk.nuke that this was the rigth way to proceed. And i will redirect you to This post where i explain why mafia would press charges on Lanaia, and thus why those who blindly voted for her are suspects. your bandwagoning on me when you vote me for bandwagoning | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:27 Tyrran wrote: Great defense. I will remind you that I voted kenpachi only becaused i agreed with risk.nuke that this was the rigth way to proceed. And i will redirect you to This post where i explain why mafia would press charges on Lanaia, and thus why those who blindly voted for her are suspects. That post of you made totally wrong implications and assumptions. Read my respond to that. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On November 18 2011 04:16 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Well thats enough derping around, refreshing the page and wishing someone would post something. Anyone doing the same, who isn't currently voting on Chaoser, what is your stance on him and why? Similarly, anyone who's played with Prplhz/Sinani before and isn't voting them, what is your take on their current alignments? They both seem to do the same thing every game, and they are doing it We have currently killed someone for lurking. Personally I don't want a Sinani lynch to happen right now, but it's better than none. I feel like Chaosers flip will provide us with more information and a much higher chance of hitting scum than Prplhz flipping, based off both reputations and actions so far in game. Those are the three candidates I'm currently willing to consider, outside of making Drazerk prove his claim. As I've said before, more than three lynches is something I don't want to risk. Earlier I disliked the Chaoser lynch because it felt like everyone wanted it, it didn´t think it would look like that if he was scum. I´m not as sure now, because the pressure on him hasn´t risen since yesterday, I guess it depends on if he´s shaping up or scum don´t want to hammer one of their own. I still think we should keep him alive, because he HAS shaped up since the first random votes. Perhaps not by much. Either way I don´t think we should kill ALL our veterans before they get a chance to contribute, they can´t all be scum after all. When I posted and went offline, I had my eye on Bumatlarge. He´s been pointed out as scummy by several players, more than the 4 votes would suggest, unlike the Drazerk bandwagon that flared up over a few hours and have twice the number of votes now. Part of the reason I want him lynched is that I want to know how good Chaoser, Kenpachi and Palmar really are. ##Vote: bumatlarge I really don´t like Drazerk's hint that he is unlynchable, either it´s a stupid powerclaim or an arrogant scumclaim, none of which is very flattering to his ability. I haven´t looked closer at him than that yet. | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Tyrran
France777 Posts
On November 18 2011 01:45 hyshes wrote: bold text: no it does not.. lurkers are good for scum. Scum defending a lurker doesn't mean the lurker is scum. Okay, maybe you did not mean that, and did not push your reasonning far enough. Lanaia was not only defending a lurker, she was defending a lurker while telling us to vote for another lurker (Sinani201, who was lurking at the time, only making a couple post about his divide and conquer stuff). So whe clearly did not want to just save 'a' lurker, she wanted to save 'this' lurker. italic text: I did not say that. I said: This does not imply what you say. It would be weird if lanaia did this as scum knowing we would see the vote.. We can't be sure if she knew. Zona made a post on how the votes shown where working as intended. You just dont give a power to a scum without telling him that the town will be aware of when he used it. That makes no sense at all. That being said, i'm not voting for you rigth now. Your post are far less useless than Sinani's, you'll have plenty of time to convince me that you are town  | ||
|
Tyrran
France777 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:46 Kenpachi wrote: I have reasons to believe Sinani is town. leave Sinani alone! And I suppose you cant give us these reasons ? | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:49 Tyrran wrote: And I suppose you cant give us these reasons ? Hes playing exactly like me a while ago lol. Plus, his actions are too rash to be mafia anyways | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:20 Tyrran wrote: So within four hours, we must focus on getting another lynch. We already have 2 people a 8 votes, i suggest we focus on them. Both look scummy, both are in my likely scum list, yet Drazerk voted for Sinani206 so its unlikely that both are scum. I have 2 problems with this. First, if we wait until the last hour without lynching someone, then we will most likely get stressed and desperate to get another player lynched, and we are going to make mistakes. In the confusion Scum can easily sway Town and later blame the confusion for their anti-Town behavior. If there´s no other lynch an hour before lynch then we should let it be and be content. Second, if there are 5 Townvotes on two players, one Town and one Scum, then Scum are putting two of their own votes on the Town to push it to 7v5. Sinani206 and Drazerk are definetly suspicious, but I don´t want us to ignore Coagulation or bumatlarge, I think all 4 are worth looking at, and with 4 there´s a greater chance of a scum among them, forcing the others to speak up. | ||
|
Tyrran
France777 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
Can't we give ourselves one more chance Why can't we give love that one more chance Why can't we give love give love give love give love give love give love give love give love give love 'Cause love's such an old fashioned word And love dares you to care for The people on the edge of the night And loves dares you to change our way of Caring about ourselves This is our last dance This is our last dance This is ourselves Under pressure ##Vote Bumatlarge ##Vote Nisani201 ##Vote chaoser ##Vote Lemonwalrus ##Unvote Drazerk ##Unvote Coagulation | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On November 17 2011 09:11 Drazerk wrote: Either he is doing a careless and unnecessary blueclaim, or a careless and unneccessary scumclaim. Unlike you I will never be lynched though ##Vote: Drazerk I don´t know what he´s doing, taunting to make Chaoser slip, or just being irritating, but I don´t like the style. For some reason I often connect acting like this to scum. ##Vote: sinani206 On November 17 2011 20:24 Coagulation wrote: But you are not doing anything here, in this game. Shape up, please? If the please isn´t enough then perhaps pressure will help. Who the fuck you calling useless as town? I fucking snipe godfathers constantly. ##Vote: Coagulation | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
| ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
On November 18 2011 08:03 Palmar wrote: Insanity laughs under pressure we're cracking Can't we give ourselves one more chance Why can't we give love that one more chance Why can't we give love give love give love give love give love give love give love give love give love 'Cause love's such an old fashioned word And love dares you to care for The people on the edge of the night And loves dares you to change our way of Caring about ourselves This is our last dance This is our last dance This is ourselves Under pressure ##Vote Bumatlarge ##Vote Nisani201 ##Vote chaoser ##Vote Lemonwalrus ##Unvote Drazerk ##Unvote Coagulation Is concerned Chaoser has a vote-triggered ability. Votes for more people than anyone else. Makes perfect sense. | ||
|
Barbiero
Brazil5259 Posts
My bad. Chaoser defended Kenpachi, and that's it. My mind went "chaoser defend Kenpachi -> Kenpachi and chaoser have a connection", and I made that connection when I still had thoughts on Kenpachi being scum. Kenpachi's flip won't determine anything about chaoser, but his reaction to it will IMO. Which means Kenpachi's flip will only softclaim Lanaia, as he said. moving on; I'm really interested in Drazerk's claim that he can't be lynched. He either has the ability to stop lynches, or he is lynchproof, or he is lying. Either way, a lynch on him would determine whether he is lying or not, and I don't get the feeling he is. I'll place a vote on Drazerk for that, but I sincerely honestly hope that whoever has the ability to hammer it down think about it; I won't be here at the day cycle end, and I wouldn't be able to unvote given necessity. ##Vote: Drazerk Also... Insanity laughs under pressure we're cracking Can't we give ourselves one more chance Why can't we give love that one more chance Why can't we give love give love give love give love give love give love give love give love give love 'Cause love's such an old fashioned word And love dares you to care for The people on the edge of the night And loves dares you to change our way of Caring about ourselves This is our last dance This is our last dance This is ourselves Under pressure ##Vote Bumatlarge ##Vote Nisani201 ##Vote chaoser ##Vote Lemonwalrus ##Unvote Drazerk ##Unvote Coagulation WHAT THE FUCK? I've heard about the use of enigmas or stuff in forum Mafia games, but what the hell is that?! :O :confused: | ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
On November 18 2011 08:10 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Is concerned Chaoser has a vote-triggered ability. Votes for more people than anyone else. Makes perfect sense. EBWOP: Alright, so now Forumite has passed you in voting. You're only second. Same difference. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Calm Dota 2 5583Shuttle  1157Mini 308Horang2 245HiyA  147Pusan 87Mong 84Dewaltoss 70Liquid`Ret 68ToSsGirL 62[ Show more ] Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
GSL
OSC
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
IntoTheTV X SOOP
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
