EPT
. How much time do we have left befdore the end of the day ? ( i'm really bad with the time zone stuff )Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46) - Page 48
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Tyrran
France777 Posts
. How much time do we have left befdore the end of the day ? ( i'm really bad with the time zone stuff ) | ||
|
GreYMisT
United States6736 Posts
Back to writing my paper... | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On November 18 2011 06:36 Tyrran wrote: I would gladly make a Node graph, but no image allowed . How much time do we have left befdore the end of the day ? ( i'm really bad with the time zone stuff )I was joking 201 used to make node graphs, brag about making them and then never show them town. | ||
|
hyshes
Belgium428 Posts
| ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
On November 17 2011 23:19 Zephirdd wrote: Not that much related, it's just that Kenpachi defended chaoser and chaoser defended Kenpachi to death; Kenpachi's flip has more to do with Lanaia tbh. Again, I'll back off for now; given enough votes and arguments, however, I'm willing to lynch someone else IF I consider it to be the right choice(aka. people convince me). when? | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
DCLXVI
United States729 Posts
On November 18 2011 06:55 Kenpachi wrote: what my flip does: It softconfirms Lanaia. that is all well I think that I will know a lot about chaoser when you flip | ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
On November 17 2011 10:20 Palmar wrote: I'm rolefishing you. Thing is, I think you happen to have one of those roles mentioned by Zona that are somehow connected with how votes are casted, I think that would actually explain your liberal voting early on. This is the reason I believe you're lying about being vanilla townie, but since you claimed that and stand by it, it's making me believe you're scum. Because you're not bad at mafia, you know that senseless throwing votes around is generally not a good strategy, you are probably fully aware of this. This is why I wanted so badly for you to explain your rash voting pattern this game. Like, I'm trying in my mind to put together your play and just a random vanilla town. And I'm sorry to say I can't actually find any reasonable explanation to your early voting that stems from just you reading the thread with a townie mindset. Alright, so I just can't wrap my head around this. Palmar thinks Chaoser is a scum power role related to voting...and then he spends most of the day with his vote on 5 different people? Palmar, I would be quite interested in hearing how your votes made sense along with your worries about Chaoser's role. Chaoser To whoever it was that asked what everyone's current position on the Chaoser case is...I think he looks more like a town that was trying to aggressively force reactions early than scum trying to disrupt the thread. Also, to Cyber, Palmar, and WBG, you seem to all be pushing the Chaoser lynch pretty hard and have been for awhile. Now, if you assume he is scum and that no scum will vote for him, that means the 3 of you have convinced only 2 of the remaining 18 townies. I'd suggest either trying to put together a better/more coherent argument, or allow us to look at some of the other current vote getters rather than hammering the same points that don't seem to be convincing much of anyone. Drazerk That being said, I'd like Drazerk to be lynched today. A quick look at his filter should make it apparent why. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=282366&user=107918 His best defense seems to be that he plays anti-town whether or not he is actually scum...which I don't see how that is a defense at all. He also seems to be claiming lynch proof, and I am certainly willing to test that claim. Unlike you I will never be lynched though Probably because I am not scum and will never be lynched even if they try LSB It has been mentioned a few times, but I think LSB also deserves a closer look and some more pressure. He starts off making tons of policy related posts, especially about going after lurkers, and then has two short non-policy posts: + Show Spoiler + On November 16 2011 12:45 LSB wrote: You are saying that Chaoser is scum because he doesn't tunnel and doesn't play like you? hmm... Wait, what's so bad about this attack http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=282366¤tpage=18#348? Or the other attacks, I'm having difficulty following your generalizations right now On November 17 2011 13:54 LSB wrote: Sorry guys I'm sick and sleep deprived and I have so much to do. But a quick glance through. Before we lynch Lanaia, we should at least see how Kenpachi fllps. A lot of analysis has been "Kenpachi is scum so Lanaia is scum", yet we don't know 100% if Kenpachi is scum ##Vote: sinani206 Since in reality he hasn't said anything besides "xxx is obvscum" ##Vote: LSB I am also fine with sinani206 getting lynched and would be willing to vote him if it is deemed necessary, but I'd rather have Drazerk lynched today, and I don't really want to mess around with placing tons of votes or having tons of lynches, so I will not vote him for now. | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:03 DCLXVI wrote: well I think that I will know a lot about chaoser when you flip His posts have been complete null tells to me | ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 17 2011 09:13 Lanaia wrote: As I write this, I am currently reading page 32 but I felt explanation has priority over my reading at this moment in time. I was most definitely aware it would show my anti-vote when I submitted it. He just felt more town to me than some of the other people in game.I felt trying to save someone I'd thought was town was a good idea, at least at that point in time. I knew it would appear in the votelist with my name attached, yes. I took it back because people got all pissy at me. And people getting pissy at me frustrates me. I've already said I'm terrible at convincing people. And if I were trying to lynch him, I'd have a vote on him, no? And no, I am not mafia trying to save my ass because that would not be the best way to go about it. I was most definitely aware it would show my anti-vote when I submitted it. I don't care if you don't believe me. Now I am going to finish reading the game. On November 17 2011 09:21 Lanaia wrote: OH, And for the record, I didn't remove it until it was evident everyone had seen it and I'd clearly done something effing stupid. I'm sorry. Oh, and I didn't consult with town because that would essentially mean a full role claim d1- not something I wanted to do. CLEARLY I SCREWED SOMETHING UP. LaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaL | ||
|
Kenpachi
United States9908 Posts
| ||
|
Drazerk
United Kingdom31255 Posts
Personally I don't think we will learn anything significant about chaoser from kenpachi's flip | ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:03 DCLXVI wrote: well I think that I will know a lot about chaoser when you flip Chaoser defended Kenpachi, Kenpachi did not defend Chaoser. Either town or scum could defend Kenpachi. Scum defending a town they think will get lynched anyway is a way to try to gain free town cred. If they don't get lynched, you can always have a scum-buddy bring them up later to divert attention if needed, as people were suspicious before, and likely still are. A townie could just think that lynching him was a poor idea because they didn't read them as being scum. I don't see how you will gain any knowledge of Chaoser from Kenpachi's flip. Care to elaborate? | ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
|
HarbingerOfDoom
United States508 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:09 sinani206 wrote: LaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaLaL Do you know the full extent/limitations of Lanaia's role? How did she full role claim by anti-voting Kenpachi? We still don't know if she can double vote, how many times it can be used, etc etc. | ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On November 18 2011 07:17 HarbingerOfDoom wrote: Do you know the full extent/limitations of Lanaia's role? How did she full role claim by anti-voting Kenpachi? We still don't know if she can double vote, how many times it can be used, etc etc. i doubt thats not her full role. if it isnt then she is scum because anything else would be too powerful for town. | ||
|
Tyrran
France777 Posts
First of all, Sinani was a big partisan of dividing our attention . Quite amusingly he used the divide and conquer analogy, where as pointed by WBG, you are suppose to divide you enemy. Meaning we town are the enemy? He Bandwagoned against Lanaia, which as i explained before, is something that is very pro-mafia. Just look at his post just before, when we already established that Lanaia should not be lynched. Both his votes are given without any explanation other than "its obvious". He is either scum or an extremely bad town. Even Drazerk looks good in comparison. I dont think town needs him. ##Vote Sinani206 | ||
| ||
