EPTTeam Melee Mini Mafia - Couples Therapy - Page 32
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
Day 2 ![[image loading]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/12/article-1227236-07316ED0000005DC-748_468x394.jpg) As the couples woke up the next morning, they noticed that one couple was missing! iGrok and Bumatlarge were found dead in each other's arms! It's pretty sad. They died of something called acid reflux disease, according to OriginalName Team Switzerland - Vanilla Town - Has been murdered It is now Day 2, it will end Monday, Nov 07 10:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00). With 7 alive it takes 4 votes to achieve a lynch | ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
| ||
|
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
 GGs, looking forward to this! | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
On November 06 2011 06:59 sandroba wrote: Honestly I didn't want anyone lynched ytd, especially after you claimed parity cop. i can't believe you still think a 9p2scum nolynch is superior to a lynch lol. its 7p 2 scum today, we are lynching, nobody should be even attempting to debate this. | ||
|
Forumite
Sweden3280 Posts
On November 06 2011 07:38 iGrok wrote: Here, have some popcorn, I made extra! Popcornocolypse? GGs, looking forward to this!  | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
Erandorr
2283 Posts
mine is far cheaper ! | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On November 06 2011 08:25 supersoft wrote: its bum and iGrok right? k lol. should learn to read. i am not at home :o | ||
|
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + so is the average size of the mafia's wiener :D | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
Lets get talking people, we need to figure out who we are going to lynch today, and we need to hit scum, sitting here twiddling our thumbs isn't going to get us anywhere. So, Sandroba and Radfield, who would you guys like to lynch today? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 04 2011 04:30 Radfield wrote: GMan, you don't get off that easy though. You built a case on Prp, then wibble-wobbled at the end of it. Your next post basically says the same thing: he might be scum, but he might not. Yet, you're vote remains squarely on Team Viking(Prp & Forumite). Do you think Team Viking is worthy of lynching right now? No, I don't, I fully admit my case was extremely weak, I was merely stirring up things to see how people reacted and try to get a better read on the situation. I voted for them with a relatively weak case because I felt like there was no real progress being made in the thread, and I wanted to open a new avenue of attack. [/QUOTE] GM, after your case on me and red fell through, you said you were going to "reevaluate things", yet you never returned to the thread. Earlier in the day you said Team Viking was not worthy of a lynch and that your case on them was "extremely weak", yet without any further explanation your team votes to lynch them. What happened to change your mind? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 04 2011 20:31 GMarshal wrote: [/QUOTE]No, I don't, I fully admit my case was extremely weak, I was merely stirring up things to see how people reacted and try to get a better read on the situation. I voted for them with a relatively weak case because I felt like there was no real progress being made in the thread, and I wanted to open a new avenue of attack. GM, after your case on me and red fell through, you said you were going to "reevaluate things", yet you never returned to the thread. Earlier in the day you said Team Viking was not worthy of a lynch and that your case on them was "extremely weak", yet without any further explanation your team votes to lynch them. What happened to change your mind? EBWOP | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Sandroba, you haven't done anything to make me think you are town. You mentioned that your no lynch plan was an attempt to get reactions from people and that people made some very good points that you agreed with, yet at the end still advocates a no lynch. You said it was because we claimed as PC. Could you explain how that makes any sense at all? The only reason for a no lynch was to hide the identify of the PC. RoL, are you aware the game started? | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On November 06 2011 10:44 kitaman27 wrote: GM, after your case on me and red fell through, you said you were going to "reevaluate things", yet you never returned to the thread. Earlier in the day you said Team Viking was not worthy of a lynch and that your case on them was "extremely weak", yet without any further explanation your team votes to lynch them. What happened to change your mind? EBWOP[/QUOTE] I didn't change my mind. My partner made a last minute call to avoid a no lynch, and I think it was a good call, I still don't think there was a good case on team viking, and would have rather lynched team edward out of the choices when the day ended yesterday. Still we avoided a no-lynch, which is crucial. | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
responding to kita (its not like the thread is so active that I need to quote so you see who I am talking to): I didn't change my mind. My partner made a last minute call to avoid a no lynch, and I think it was a good call, I still don't think there was a good case on team viking, and would have rather lynched team edward out of the choices when the day ended yesterday. Still we avoided a no-lynch, which is crucial. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On November 06 2011 10:55 kitaman27 wrote: Radfield and bugs, you both indicated that you were against the idea of no lynch, but your absence from the thread would have lead to a no lynch had it not been for the last minute lynch of team viking. You casually mention team edward is the best lynch, but put in no effort pushing it. Why is that? Sandroba, you haven't done anything to make me think you are town. You mentioned that your no lynch plan was an attempt to get reactions from people and that people made some very good points that you agreed with, yet at the end still advocates a no lynch. You said it was because we claimed as PC. Could you explain how that makes any sense at all? The only reason for a no lynch was to hide the identify of the PC. RoL, are you aware the game started? Stop being dumb/thick and start reading the thread. It'll answer at least half your questions. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 06 2011 11:25 GMarshal wrote: I didn't change my mind. My partner made a last minute call to avoid a no lynch, and I think it was a good call, I still don't think there was a good case on team viking, and would have rather lynched team edward out of the choices when the day ended yesterday. Still we avoided a no-lynch, which is crucial. You never mentioned edward in the thread? If he was your preferred lynch, was there a reason you didn't state so? Is he still your preferred lynch and if so, why is that? On November 06 2011 11:36 wherebugsgo wrote: Stop being dumb/thick and start reading the thread. It'll answer at least half your questions. Hmm? | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
On November 06 2011 10:55 kitaman27 wrote: [/b]Radfield and bugs, you both indicated that you were against the idea of no lynch, but ]b]your absence from the thread would have lead to a no lynch had it not been for the last minute lynch of team viking. You casually mention team edward is the best lynch, but put in no effort pushing it. Why is that? Absence was already explained (several times) Second bolded part is a straight up lie. We didn't "casually" mention it. The reason team edward didn't get lynched is because team Edward started the bandwagon on team viking, GM started the pressure on you/red, (which led us to wasting a whole bunch of time) So, for the last time, it isn't our fault that this town is dumb and team Edward did not get lynched. | ||
| ||
