|
United States22154 Posts
5. This game follows Extended Majority Lynch Rules. Majority = #of players remaining in the game/2) + 1 (round down). Unlike in traditional majority lynch, the lynch is NOT decided the moment majority is reached. Instead, only the final vote count matters. If there is no majority at the deadline, the day ends with a no lynch. Non-voters will be modkilled for failure to vote.
Just a reminder. Activity levels have been highly disappointing, to say the least.
|
so we need to have 6 votes on 1 guy, or more, to actually lynch him and so far the most we got is 2? I'm going to stay awake to get this going, and switch votes if someone turns out to get a couple.
Not really a question, more a "come on guys, we got some hours left, start voting"
|
On September 29 2011 03:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: I'll be voting a lurker aswell, at least now.
## Vote Edwin5
I might aswell say i'm not gonna be here when the day is over (it's 5 AM here then, and i have to go to work tomorrow), so i pretty much need to make up my mind in a couple of hours.
Since he said he's not going to be here when day ends I'm switching to Edwin5 as well, that way we got 2 on someone, ciryandor was posting a little while ago, too, so we might get 3 if he switches too. If the rest shows up we might get enough to get a lynch going and not have 6 guys modkilled
## Vote Edwin5
|
##vote edwin5 to make sure someone dies I guess.
|
Edwin5 hasn't even posted anywhere else, so I'd rather call him as absent than as lurking.
And SERIOUSLY, why are we going to jump on him? I would really recommend pushing on someone who we are sure has at least shown activity after the game started. Let the GM do the modkill on him if he isn't active.
I'll switch to Edwin only if you can convince me of why we're voting him off instead of letting a mod-kill happen.
|
Given the lynch rules, we can let the mod-kill occur because given the abysmal activity level, it's unlikely we'll get enough votes for a proper lynch today even if I switch to Edwin, and if the mod-kill goes to Edwin, we still see his flip.
|
Well damn it, just saw zany's vote, maybe voting Edwin isn't such a waste after all.
## Unvote ## Vote Edwin5
|
My point was that we're having serious trouble getting 6 votes on someone and every vote counts. If there's going to be 6 modkills and we got 3 votes on someone else it's still a wasted day because we don't get a lynch at all. Then I guess if that's going to happen we don't even have the chance to change that.
To sum it up it's something like this: We're pretty screwed right now with only 6 guys voting, however if 2 or three guys more show up we might get something done and even in that case it's going to be hard to get 6 guys voting for the same. The guy I quoted said he's not online => he's not going to change. If we get 6 modkills we won't get a majority anyway, however if we don't that one vote might make a difference. In my opinion it's the only way to not screw up day1 for town, although it's probably still not enough.
|
To everyone reading, my vote means we have 4 on Edwin5, two more and we get him lynched. I would still like explanations/excuses for inactivity from Thnikkaman47, JoshKirby, Sknowman and jish17.
Also, I'll take this opportunity to FoS zany_001 tomorrow.
|
United States22154 Posts
I won't be around for the night post, sinani206 will though.
|
On September 29 2011 10:24 Toadesstern wrote: My point was that we're having serious trouble getting 6 votes on someone and every vote counts. If there's going to be 6 modkills and we got 3 votes on someone else it's still a wasted day because we don't get a lynch at all. Then I guess if that's going to happen we don't even have the chance to change that.
To sum it up it's something like this: We're pretty screwed right now with only 6 guys voting, however if 2 or three guys more show up we might get something done and even in that case it's going to be hard to get 6 guys voting for the same. The guy I quoted said he's not online => he's not going to change. If we get 6 modkills we won't get a majority anyway, however if we don't that one vote might make a difference. In my opinion it's the only way to not screw up day1 for town, although it's probably still not enough. Six modkills = GG for town if all were VTs, if 1 was scum, then we're barely alive. two scum there means it's still a toss-up; but I see your point in removing as many mod-kills as possible by forcing people to bandwagon someone; I just don't think it's a very good idea to gain info on who's acting scummy; zany already seems to act like that to say the least.
|
Just to make it right, asked a coach if I have to write unvote because I forgot to do so and he said yes, so here's a proper version
## Unvote ## Vote Edwin5
|
On September 29 2011 10:28 Ciryandor wrote:Show nested quote +On September 29 2011 10:24 Toadesstern wrote: My point was that we're having serious trouble getting 6 votes on someone and every vote counts. If there's going to be 6 modkills and we got 3 votes on someone else it's still a wasted day because we don't get a lynch at all. Then I guess if that's going to happen we don't even have the chance to change that.
To sum it up it's something like this: We're pretty screwed right now with only 6 guys voting, however if 2 or three guys more show up we might get something done and even in that case it's going to be hard to get 6 guys voting for the same. The guy I quoted said he's not online => he's not going to change. If we get 6 modkills we won't get a majority anyway, however if we don't that one vote might make a difference. In my opinion it's the only way to not screw up day1 for town, although it's probably still not enough. Six modkills = GG for town if all were VTs, if 1 was scum, then we're barely alive. two scum there means it's still a toss-up; but I see your point in removing as many mod-kills as possible by forcing people to bandwagon someone; I just don't think it's a very good idea to gain info on who's acting scummy; zany already seems to act like that to say the least.
yeah, just came to my mind as well. The real problem here is that it's np for mafia to just act like they're town as well. I mean we got 6 guys voting, even if edwin was mafia they'd have no problem switching a couple votes on edwin because hell. At least that's what I'd do if I where mafia (talking about us 4 right now, obviously now I'd not get more votes on him if I where mafia) As mentioned we got pretty much zero info right now except for one statement that sounds stupid in a noob game. I might be doing this right now, just like you could or zany, knowing that 6 guys aren't here voting and there's probably not going to be a lynch on day 1.
So I am questioning this right now, because it makes it realy easy for mafia on day1 looking like they care about getting a lynch. Than again I can't think of something better right now. Surely giving up on day1 sounds no good to me as well.
|
just to clear things, give up meant "give up the lynch on day 1" :D
|
On September 29 2011 10:39 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On September 29 2011 10:28 Ciryandor wrote:On September 29 2011 10:24 Toadesstern wrote: My point was that we're having serious trouble getting 6 votes on someone and every vote counts. If there's going to be 6 modkills and we got 3 votes on someone else it's still a wasted day because we don't get a lynch at all. Then I guess if that's going to happen we don't even have the chance to change that.
To sum it up it's something like this: We're pretty screwed right now with only 6 guys voting, however if 2 or three guys more show up we might get something done and even in that case it's going to be hard to get 6 guys voting for the same. The guy I quoted said he's not online => he's not going to change. If we get 6 modkills we won't get a majority anyway, however if we don't that one vote might make a difference. In my opinion it's the only way to not screw up day1 for town, although it's probably still not enough. Six modkills = GG for town if all were VTs, if 1 was scum, then we're barely alive. two scum there means it's still a toss-up; but I see your point in removing as many mod-kills as possible by forcing people to bandwagon someone; I just don't think it's a very good idea to gain info on who's acting scummy; zany already seems to act like that to say the least. yeah, just came to my mind as well. The real problem here is that it's np for mafia to just act like they're town as well. I mean we got 6 guys voting, even if edwin was mafia they'd have no problem switching a couple votes on edwin because hell. At least that's what I'd do if I where mafia (talking about us 4 right now, obviously now I'd not get more votes on him if I where mafia) As mentioned we got pretty much zero info right now except for one statement that sounds stupid in a noob game. I might be doing this right now, just like you could or zany, knowing that 6 guys aren't here voting and there's probably not going to be a lynch on day 1. So I am questioning this right now, because it makes it realy easy for mafia on day1 looking like they care about getting a lynch. Than again I can't think of something better right now. Surely giving up on day1 sounds no good to me as well. You have a point that it looks like a scum trying to act pro-town, but if I were scum I wouldn't be calling out anyone on not being active and arguing that people trying to hide despite being able to read the thread/lurk are a better choice than a complete no-show as a policy lynch. In any case, at least you and rayn are making an effort to act for town, it just makes me question you for a moment on why you would deem the blatantly pro-town activity I've done as a scum trying to run the "obvious townie" play.
|
yeah I really was just talking about that vote-for-edwin-move out of context thinking it's a standard for both mafia and town right now. We'll see more after night post.
|
Sorry, have had minimal opportunity to internet.
## Vote Edwin5
|
On September 29 2011 11:50 Toadesstern wrote: yeah I really was just talking about that vote-for-edwin-move out of context thinking it's a standard for both mafia and town right now. We'll see more after night post. I just have a feeling I'm gonna get shanked by scum with what I'm doing, but if it forces them to kill me just so they aren't forced to reveal their play, then it gives us a LOT of info.
|
On September 29 2011 10:25 Ciryandor wrote: I would still like explanations/excuses for inactivity from [...] JoshKirby
Work + Gym. I'm finally back home at ~10 PM. Gonna vote now before dinner. Afterwards I'll see if there's anything I can add. ## Vote Edwin5
|
Day 1 Votecount jish17 (1) zany_001
Toadesstern (1) Zanfada
Sknowman (1) FranzP
With 12 players alive, it is 7 to lynch. Only 3 people have voted and the day ends in 22 hours, and GMarshal and I wouldn't want to modkill anyone. (or would we... hehe) Please format your votes correctly or else they will not be on this list. I am ctrl-f-ing "##Vote"
|
|
|
|