| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
On September 18 2011 12:20 OriginalName wrote: I meant that Drazerk was beneath DrH, not you. Ahh then I'm sorry for the tone of that, well to that I'll say that again what they said was different, the fact that he was dropping a third vote with no justification made him stand out, and his responses have not helped him while Dr. H has acted in my eyes fairly townie. | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
##Vote pphlz Ciryandor has done nice little soft defends of him at least twice now, the first time saying that pphlz is a "good guy" the second he tries to use his inactive lynch idea to divert attention specifically from pphlz, so I say we lynch pphlz, then if he flips red we've got another definite red in Ciryandor. | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
On September 19 2011 01:13 kitaman27 wrote: prplhz hasn't really stood out to me one way or another. He used his first few posts to talk about flavor, but so has half the other players in the game. The only thing that gives me bad vibes is that when he posted his list of candidates, he included nav based on others arguments rather than sharing his own opinion. nav opened the game with that "rage" vt role claim, but then he followed up with his name claim, which I'm not sure scum would so willingly give up. I don't like the fact that he is trying to show that he is bad at the game, however. To be honest, this post right above me might be his biggest fault. The fact that he spends an entire post about Ciryandor and then manages to squeeze a prplhz vote right in the middle without giving a reason other than "I can't get him lynched". TranceStorm is guilty for the same thing a few posts earlier. chaoser, what is your opinion on nav? Are you still sticking to prplhz? JeeJee and Radfield dropping off the face of the earth makes me uneasy and Erandorr, I'd like to hear more of your opinion rather than you asking others for theirs. Well to clarify I squeezed the prplhz vote for a few reasons, first I don't like either of the other major candidates -especially Jackal but more on that in a sec- but I also don't want to vote for a candidate that has no shot at getting lynched, as I pointed out that's a pretty scummy thing to do and more importantly gives no help to the town. So that's my reason 1. Then I actually think that he's a good candidate he has been acting very scummy, basically what everyone else who voted for him said. So that's reason 2. Also, though this is smaller, he's one of the votes on Jackal and I just think that whole wagon is very suspicious, Jackal has generally been lurking and acting no different from a few other lurkers, but a wagon just seemed to appear on him, this is a wagon that scum would really want because it's a lurker lynch which is easy for them to go on and Jackal if he's town is someone they'd want particularly out of the way (also I just realized his other vote was on Dr. H, talk about going after vets) So that's my smaller reason 3. Finally Reason 4 which was my explicit one is that I'm getting very suspicious of Ciryandor and he's linked nicely to pplhz so that actually works out great, I lynch my biggest target, stay within the main candidates so scum cant throw the vote in random directions, AND get specific info on someone I'm quite suspicious of. On September 19 2011 01:16 jcarlsoniv wrote: Yeah navi, it was something I was going to bring up later on. Seems as if he's just trying to not take a stance and avoid offending anyone. Those who's votes are not on the main lynch candidates need to get them on the (at least) 3 main targets. The more scattered the votes are, the more beneficial for the scum. It looks like WBG, prpl, and jackal are the front runners. It worries me how quickly the votes for jackal piled up, although he was inactive until recently. So cyber, JeeJee, GGQ, drh, cir...could you put your votes in a place where they will be useful? Now that I think about it, we haven't ears for drh or radfield in a while. Yeah so I just want to emphasize again, jackal's vote is very weird, I would look hard at everyone that jumped on him so quickly. | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
| ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
On September 19 2011 01:54 Ciryandor wrote: You know what, if prplhz gets lynched today, I'm definitely voting Nav for being a blathering senile dwarf with more delusions of grandeur than common sense who's tunneling on me straight through Moria for trying to feel out people on Day 1. Getting people off their asses and fishing for reactions should be our Day 1 goal, NOT giving some schmuck who barely scrapes by the anti-lurker guidelines a free pass to winning the game as a deadweight scum or hanging by the coat-tails townie, while the people who are yakking it up and that we have more of a profile of on their desirability for town get targeted just because they're non-committal or obnoxiously loud. Sorry for the triple post but just saw this too. First I'm an elf not a dwarf. Second this is just confirming my suspicions more and more, I FOS him and he jumps on me with a really REALLy angry OMGUS. And third, please stay civil, if you are town (something I'm doubting more and more by the second) then you really shouldn't be essentially trying to start a fight, making things personal only helps scum. | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
On September 19 2011 03:01 Mig wrote: Updated Day 1 Votecount Greymist Drazerk Navillus TranceStorm Cyber_cheese wherebugsgo DoctorHelvetica Drazerk iGrok Pyo Jackal58 Erandorr prplhz chaoser Greymist raynpelikoneet jcarlsoniv navillus iGrok GGQ Archon_Toilet DoctorHelvetica JeeJee JeeJee GGQ Archon_Toilet wherebugsgo Jackal58 syllogism heist prplhz ciryandor About 5 hours left in the day. WBG in the lead with 6 votes Oh woops I forgot to unvote drazerk, fixed now. | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
On September 19 2011 02:37 Ciryandor wrote: Conversely, if none of their posts and their connections point to lurkers, what happens to these lurkers? We are left completely in the dark to their choices and motives then. What can be achieved by winnowing out the chaff is that lynching one active guy in a later day yields much much more information regarding them than lynching them on Day 1 would have been. Simply put, more activity equals more material to work with, and the easier to unravel the patterns and connections that everyone would have with one another without us losing more townies than absolutely necessary to the lynch or night shots. Just think about it, a scum-team with a mix of active and inactive players can exploit silent townies who have no idea where to go or target by sacrificing them late in the game as potential scum while they can focus on killing off power roles. Forcing all of them to be active deprives them of one level of camouflage and forces them to either expose their gameplan or cover their tracks. Both yield information on who we have to end up killing. And don't tell me I'm being personal, Navi started it by poking at my non-committal Day 1 play-style because he thought it was too indecisive. So the first problem here is that you're assuming that we can just stop all lurking from lynching a lurker day1, that's just false lurkers gonna lurk, it's a fact of life, sure you might be able to get it to lower degrees by lynching one or two, of course by then we've lynched a couple townies have no good scum reads and have nearly lost. You don't waste lynches on policy or information, you lynch scum. When you do lynch for inactivity scum will not get hit. Ever. Because you have no idea which inactive to lynch and scum will point you to a town one, preferably a townie that will be useful to town later i.e. Jackal. Additionally how do we know when we've stopped them from lurking? You do this and the scum will stop lurking but we'll be ignoring the scummy things they say because we'll keep lynching that people that still are lurking, that is, townies. We should be just going for the scummy things we have now... you and prplhz. Finally I didn't start anything I was calling you out for being indecisive which looked and looks scummy I was not calling you a blathering senile dwarf with more delusions of grandeur than common sense or a elf with a hard-on for dwarven quarrying every moment you do so In short, you and prplhz need to die. | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
On September 19 2011 03:10 jcarlsoniv wrote: EBWOP: navi, you ninja voted under my nose lol I think I posted it in thread, I forgot to unvote drazerk but I fixed it now :\ | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
| ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
| ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
| ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
| ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
Also ciryandor and WBG himself need to vote, just so it doesn't look like i skipped them on purpose | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
 | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
| ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
| ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
I need to start my homework  | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
heck I'm even hitting that little round arrow to refresh PLEASSSE | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
can we lynch prplhz now? | ||
|
Navillus
United States1188 Posts
for you... time to die | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
OSC
Solar vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Krystianer
Spirit vs TBD
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
OSC
OSC
IPSL
Dewalt vs Bonyth
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
Patches Events
|
|
|
EPT
