Lord of the Rings Mafia - Page 18
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
6. GGQ 30. TranceStorm 28. Drazerk 23. chaoser 27. heist Town has three confirmed. Tomorrow there will probably be two confirmed since mafia still has role blocker. Medics, protect only between me and the both of you, don't protect anyone outside that. Lynch GGQ first. He posts minimally and is always on the right side of the flip. He wanted iGrok lynched and Radfield told iGrok to kill GGQ. Obviously that never would happen since both of them were on mafia team. This was done to give GGQ ton cred, that makes him seem very townie. Except when you look over his posts you'll notice that he talks about almost nothing. The actual reason I jumped around a lot was to confuse mafia on where I was going to land on and also who I suspected. I also lied in the beginning of day about seeing GGQ as townie to make it seem like it was choice between TS and Cyber_cheese. That was to draw out the final mafia, Kitaman. You notice that he talks about how TS is a better lynch than cyber_cheese because he "might be roleblocker". Except that wouldn't have mattered at all if kita was actually what he says he is, a blue role since we would have already had all three mafia (GGQ, Cyber, TS) caught. What does it matter if a roleblocker gets lynched over a regular mafia? We'd just lynch them down in a row and win. If you all remember, cyber_cheese was being pushed as a lynch target on the previous day as well and all of a sudden in the middle of the day, Kita, who agreed that cyber was mafia, all of a sudden starts up a lynch on Pyo. He misdirected it to save Cyber. Also, he was very upset with Drazerk when I got protected over him and I survived a hit even though he should have been happy mafia wasted a hit. I know Drazerk would follow me to the ends of the earth, do I have everyone else's (heist, TS) agreement that we're going to vote off GGQ and then kita? I suggest mafia forfeit. You lost when you couldn't snipe the second mafia and I got saved by razerk (high five) | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
But ya, ggq tomorrow and then we can yell at each other at the final LYLO I suppose. Or we can start tomorrow though I know I'm not going to die this night =]. Gotta kill one of the two medics so it's not two confirmed medics v one mafia huh? | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On October 04 2011 10:33 kitaman27 wrote: Right, morning shift, aka Serial Killing spree. ![]() Obviously if I was SK I'd kill you so I wouldn't have to spend time and energy arguing. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
Look, we both agree iGrok can't be allowed to live to engame. If he gets lynched today, then that's fine by me. If there is a chance he is scum, not survivor, it might even be a better choice to kill him first. However, there is no doubt in my mind that chaoser is not town. On day one he took a hit. On day two, he got caught red handed killing someone. On day three, he comes up with an extremely convienent role that explains both the hit and the killing. The fact that you believe there is a town aligned bulletproof compulsive vig just blows my mid. chaoser is probably going to shoot me tonight. The only "conditions" his shots have is that the person has to be a threat to him. He can't be allowed to laugh his merry way to victory as a "Boromir", when it is beyond obvious that he is not. He said that. I was roleblocked that night too btw. On September 25 2011 07:45 kitaman27 wrote: You calling me scum now so you can try to justify shooting me tonight for revealing your identity? :p He clearly thinks I'm going to shoot him that night. If he wasn't mafia, why would mafia roleblock me if everyone thought I was probably going to shoot him that night? I would have killed a "blue role" and then mafia could have swooped in and gotten me lynched. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On October 04 2011 21:58 kitaman27 wrote: umm how about the obvious shot in igrok? o.O I see how it is. LOLOL You're totally wrong. iGrok was lynched the previous day. On September 25 2011 08:00 Mig wrote: Ugly ugly iGrok lynched! Send all night actions to me and curu! On September 23 2011 08:07 Drazerk wrote: Never mind I was role blocked >.< Drazerk was roleblocked that day. (Day 3, so roleblocked on Night 2) I was roleblocked the next day (Day 4, so roleblocked on Night 3), the day AFTER you claimed you were tracker and tracked me to a kill. On September 26 2011 08:08 chaoser wrote: I was roleblocked Day 3: Vain, syllogism, sandroba, Radfield dead !<- On the day iGrok got lynched you claim you tracked me (Sept 23-25) Night 3: iGrok lynched! Day 4: supersoft, prplhz dead! <- I'm roleblocked (Sept 26-28) | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On September 23 2011 22:17 kitaman27 wrote: sup chaoser, I saw you return to your house with blood on your hands. Which kill are you claiming? Sincerely, Your number one stalker. Claimed Tracker On September 25 2011 08:00 Mig wrote: Ugly ugly iGrok lynched! iGrok lynched On September 26 2011 08:08 chaoser wrote: I was roleblocked I was roleblocked. The only person that I was against that day that hasn't flipped yet, is you. The only person in danger of being shot that day that hasn't flipped yet, is you. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On October 04 2011 22:28 kitaman27 wrote: Fine you're right, iGrok had already died by then. Ask Trance or GGQ why they stopped you're shot, I'm not sure. There is still the fact that I've confirmed myself as a tracker and have confirmed myself as Radfield's mason target. Wrong, you never confirmed yourself as a tracker, you merely said you saw me kill someone. Seeing how bold the rest of the mafia has been with its moves and interactions with each other in the thread, this is not a surprising thing to happen. And you're not confirmed as Radfield's mason target since Radfield would have obviously posted a paraphrased copy of his conversation with his target in the mafia QT and you had all day to change it around a bit and throw it out last minute (literally 10 minutes before lynch) to get a swing. You could have thrown it out earlier but you didn't cause you wanted there to be last minute chaos. You said it was a "trap" and yet you never mention it again as proof of catching anyone and it hasn't caught anyone that is mafia. We were all perfectly content with a vote on Cyber_cheese Day 5 but you come in mid cycle ith a case on Pyo even though you said you thought cyber_cheese was mafia and was completely fine with lynching him. You didn't even try to justify the change as "I think Pyo is the roleblocker". On September 30 2011 06:16 heist wrote: ##vote: cyber_cheese You vote him and then later bring up a class on Pyo and switch the vote over. Finally, on the previous day, you say: The fact that cheese completely shut down on his case on trace once we hit LYLO and came out with a weird claim, essentially jumping on the lynch makes me think trance is more likely to be the roleblocker than cheese, but either one is going to give us a red flip. You mention that you think TS is the roleblocker, implying you think he's the better lynch even though that would mean NOTHING if you were actually blue. If we can lynch whoever is the roleblocker, we've essentially won the game, as our medics can protect eachother and mafia can never break the double protection with 1 kp. We don't need to "lynch the roleblocker" to essentially win the game. We would have already have won if you were actually blue. If you WERE actually blue you would have just said "lol, game won. I'm blue, heist, Drazerk, and chaoser are confirmed, obviously we just lynch down the line for the last three there." | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
We don't need to "lynch the roleblocker" to essentially win the game. We would have already have won if you were actually blue. If you WERE actually blue you would have just said "lol, game won. I'm blue, heist, Drazerk, and chaoser are confirmed, obviously we just lynch down the line for the last three there." The reason you didn't say that, btw, was because you got greedy and wanted to win the game that day. You took my bait that I was willing to lynch TS cause all you need is one wrong vote on LYLO to win the game. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On September 30 2011 07:14 kitaman27 wrote: ##vote: cyber_cheese On September 30 2011 10:33 kitaman27 wrote: So after reading through pyo's posts, I really think he is our best bet at this point. Comes in 3 hours later to write up a post on Pyo | ||
| ||