|
On September 27 2011 01:11 Drazerk wrote: ##vote: Palmar
We're not letting another scum claim third party and troll their way to victory.
How does this even make sense...He didn't claim third party and why would mafia so such a thing, much less by someone that pretty much led the iGrok lynch and has almost 0 suspicions on him.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 27 2011 00:15 Palmar wrote: Well here is a thing.
If it was day 2, and you actually looked like a townie, I would never ask you. But it's day 4, you put in some ridiculous restrictions on iGrok instead of just wanting to lynch him on day 2.
Don't paint me as the guy who was trying to save iGrok. On day two, I voted jackal because he was scummy and it fit his scum meta and I certainly wasn't alone. If I really wanted to play it safe, I could have easily just thrown a vote on igrok since the lynch wasn't even close by days end. On day 3, I saw chaoser kill somebody, which obviously made him my main target. When people finally stopped buying into his bogus claim and agreed to lynch him down the line, I happily switched over to iGrok, relatively early in the day.
On September 27 2011 00:15 Palmar wrote: And excuse me, but you're a veteran, and I can't believe you'd be so incredibly dumb as to let him live on day 2, and then try it AGAIN on day 3 without being scum. I just think you're smarter than that. Newbies are excused because they don't realize how ridiculous the claim is, and they don't know me/syllo/sandroba well enough to just assume that when we all agree that we're right.
Greymist - newbie chaoser - SK (he's not this stupid as town, and his claim makes no sense) Radfield - Scum Drazerk - newbie raynpelikoneet - newbie jcarlsoniv - ???? (but to be fair he thought I was scum because I trolled him) TranceStorm - newbie OriginalName - ???? kitaman - ????
You see. there are two names on this list of people who should really not have fallen for this bullshit, it's you and ON.
Since when is being a newbie an excuse to being ignored? Just because I've played more games than others, doesn't mean I should be automatically lynched for being wrong on jackal day two. I'll post my thoughts on who should be considered tonight (I'm at work on lunch at the moment).
On September 27 2011 00:15 Palmar wrote: List all the players you have tracked so far in the game. Don't tell us if they had a night action or not, just list them.
On September 27 2011 00:59 jcarlsoniv wrote: Right now, you're intentionally holding information from town. Town is not in a very good position right now. Not terrible, but not great. We got screwed over first two days by radfield on last minute lynches that shouldn't have happened (hindsight 20/20 and all that).
We need information. Who did you track night 1?
I also want to know more about chaoser's target last night. But I can somewhat understand why he wouldn't reveal that. If you are town, you need to help town, Kita.
Yes, I am intentionally holding information from town, yet you can't say it has scum motivations. Not revealing who may or may not have a night action does help town, as it limits the information given to mafia to decide their hits. If I tracked person X, who is about to get lynched and saw them doing a pro-town action, I'll confirm their role if necessary.
On September 27 2011 00:30 GreYMisT wrote: Is palmar actually claiming golum? I know to a sane person that doesn't make any sense but I read WaW2 and he also claimed conspirator right off the bat in that as well.
Well we know from the night post that Golum probably obtained the ring. Perhaps it makes him insane and give him a post restriction? Palmar, are you claiming Golum?
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
On September 27 2011 01:40 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2011 01:11 Drazerk wrote: ##vote: Palmar
We're not letting another scum claim third party and troll their way to victory. How does this even make sense...He didn't claim third party and why would mafia so such a thing, much less by someone that pretty much led the iGrok lynch and has almost 0 suspicions on him.
Filter him... he's been faking gollum since day 1
|
Pretty sure heist needs to go.
He called out DrH as a terrible lynch on day 1, defended Drazerk to the death then voted for him, called out iGrok as a terrible lynch, was on the original name train.
Low activity, atrocious voting, defends scum then disappears. Heist needs to go. Vote for heist.
|
On September 27 2011 03:09 Archon_Toilet wrote: Pretty sure heist needs to go.
He called out DrH as a terrible lynch on day 1, defended Drazerk to the death then voted for him, called out iGrok as a terrible lynch, was on the original name train.
Low activity, atrocious voting, defends scum then disappears. Heist needs to go. Vote for heist.
Low activity and atrocious voting? Sounds much like someone I know... That is the very first time you have mentioned heist all game.
|
Archon while your here, what's your opinion on Palmar?
|
On September 27 2011 03:16 Cyber_Cheese wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2011 03:09 Archon_Toilet wrote: Pretty sure heist needs to go.
He called out DrH as a terrible lynch on day 1, defended Drazerk to the death then voted for him, called out iGrok as a terrible lynch, was on the original name train.
Low activity, atrocious voting, defends scum then disappears. Heist needs to go. Vote for heist. Low activity and atrocious voting? Sounds much like someone I know... That is the very first time you have mentioned heist all game.
What is your actual opinion on him (Heist) though?
|
On September 27 2011 01:53 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2011 01:40 chaoser wrote:On September 27 2011 01:11 Drazerk wrote: ##vote: Palmar
We're not letting another scum claim third party and troll their way to victory. How does this even make sense...He didn't claim third party and why would mafia so such a thing, much less by someone that pretty much led the iGrok lynch and has almost 0 suspicions on him. Filter him... he's been faking gollum since day 1
So you're saying he's been bussing almost every single one of his teammate since day one? He was literally the first one to call out bullshit on iGrok and he mentions DrH as scummy way before anyone else.
Look at kita, his actions toward iGrok and me are entirely different. Both of us he thinks (or thought in the case of iGrok) were third party. For iGrok he gave him very limiting restrictions but then wanted to just let him live. Even after iGrok clearly did not follow his guidelines, kitaman voted for me to be lynched first over iGrok. How does that make sense?
Finally, I have a question for Drazerk, you say you're a medic and that you got shot but survived and you don't know how. You also protected both me and prplhz even though he died. So you're saying you protected and have some sort of vet/bulletproof power?
|
On September 27 2011 03:43 GreYMisT wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2011 03:16 Cyber_Cheese wrote:On September 27 2011 03:09 Archon_Toilet wrote: Pretty sure heist needs to go.
He called out DrH as a terrible lynch on day 1, defended Drazerk to the death then voted for him, called out iGrok as a terrible lynch, was on the original name train.
Low activity, atrocious voting, defends scum then disappears. Heist needs to go. Vote for heist. Low activity and atrocious voting? Sounds much like someone I know... That is the very first time you have mentioned heist all game. What is your actual opinion on him (Heist) though?
He seems town to me, he's asked for people to give well thought out reasons to vote and didn't follow the Radfield wagon. Scum or not, DocH wasn't the best choice for a day 1 lynch, and that was very evident in that he never became a major candidate. I don't think that should be used against him. I would like to hear some of his current thoughts since the flip. I'm on the fence about his 2 candidate policy, it's situational whether two candidates is better or worse than one. Moreover, the voting for people other than iGrok I believe to have been a mafia bus. so he seems to be a townie to me at the moment.
For as long as I'm asking people, what is your opinion on Palmar?
|
On September 27 2011 04:06 chaoser wrote: Finally, I have a question for Drazerk, you say you're a medic and that you got shot but survived and you don't know how. You also protected both me and prplhz even though he died. So you're saying you protected and have some sort of vet/bulletproof power?
Here's something else I don't understand. Even if mafia shot you, your protection would have gone through. You say you talked about being about to know who the roleblocker so mafia wouldn't roleblock you and hit you instead. But you being dead would mean it didn't matter if you knew. So why didn't they roleblock you and also shoot you, making it safer for them to shoot others since there's no protection to be afraid of. Instead, they roleblocked me.
Curu, would you ever explain why someone died in PMs if you were asked? (ex. he was double stacked, he was unblockable shot,etc.)
|
EDIT: You say you talked about being able to know who the roleblocker so mafia wouldn't roleblock you and hit you instead
|
On September 27 2011 03:16 Cyber_Cheese wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2011 03:09 Archon_Toilet wrote: Pretty sure heist needs to go.
He called out DrH as a terrible lynch on day 1, defended Drazerk to the death then voted for him, called out iGrok as a terrible lynch, was on the original name train.
Low activity, atrocious voting, defends scum then disappears. Heist needs to go. Vote for heist. Low activity and atrocious voting? Sounds much like someone I know... That is the very first time you have mentioned heist all game. I voted iGrok 2 nights out of 3. That's better than your record mate.
It is the first time iv mentioned heist, so? I think he's mafia.
|
On September 27 2011 03:22 Cyber_Cheese wrote: Archon while your here, what's your opinion on Palmar? Palmar went out of his way to get iGrok lynched. He spearheaded it like there was no tomorrow, including on day 2.
If he's mafia then he's a mafia traitor again.
|
On September 27 2011 04:45 chaoser wrote: Curu, would you ever explain why someone died in PMs if you were asked? (ex. he was double stacked, he was unblockable shot,etc.)
So curu just answered me on Skype and he said no
[3:44:00 PM] Chaoser: would you tell someone [3:44:05 PM] Chaoser: that someone got hit twice [3:44:10 PM] Chaoser: instead of an unblockable soht? [3:44:23 PM] Chaoser: i guess the question is, would you ever explain why someone died [3:44:23 PM] Chaoser: in pms [3:44:25 PM] Chaoser: PMs [3:57:08 PM] Charles Suo: no
##Vote: Drazerk
|
On September 27 2011 04:45 chaoser wrote: Curu, would you ever explain why someone died in PMs if you were asked? (ex. he was double stacked, he was unblockable shot,etc.)
So curu just answered me on Skype and he said no
[3:44:00 PM] Chaoser: would you tell someone [3:44:05 PM] Chaoser: that someone got hit twice [3:44:10 PM] Chaoser: instead of an unblockable soht? [3:44:23 PM] Chaoser: i guess the question is, would you ever explain why someone died [3:44:23 PM] Chaoser: in pms [3:44:25 PM] Chaoser: PMs [3:57:08 PM] Charles Suo: no
##Vote: Drazerk
On September 26 2011 09:15 Drazerk wrote: Curu just confirmed that prplhz took more than one hit last night.
|
Ok there's a lot of confusion. A Medic will be told if their protection target took a hit. If under any circumstance a Medic is able to protect two people and one of them takes a hit, I will specify for the Medic which one of their protected targets took a hit. They will not be told anything else.
|
LOL, so basically Drazerk lied his ass off.
On September 26 2011 08:59 Drazerk wrote:Show nested quote +On September 26 2011 08:56 raynpelikoneet wrote: Btw. Drazerk, you were not RB, so who did you protect? prplhz and chaoser at least one took a hit last night but I don't know which.more likely that prplhz was double stacked though
|
On September 27 2011 01:37 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On September 27 2011 01:11 Drazerk wrote: ##vote: Palmar
We're not letting another scum claim third party and troll their way to victory. town (psst... where did I claim gollum?)
You didn't directly claim it, but you definitely pulled some heavy WBG bullshit.
|
I forgot to specify to the Medic, whoever it might be, which of their targets was hit until a while after the daypost. I PMed them the name later.
|
rofl, I guess draz really is a medic.
|
|
|
|