|
Ummm.....
On September 21 2011 23:50 wherebugsgo wrote:
WTF? he goes from honesty to generosity?
That is NOT an honest mistake. (rofl pun) sounds like a scumslip gone wrong to me.
Wtf? This coming from the guy who took a HUGE amount of heat the other day for misclaiming his pm timing?
On September 21 2011 23:50 Erandorr wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2011 23:47 Nisani201 wrote:
fuck
fuck
fuck
shit
I am an idiot.
I have the element of generosity, not honesty.
And now I'm going to get lynched.
Uhh, shit.
##Unvote
##Vote: Cyber_cheese
So who wants it. Give that thing to anyone other that jackal or tnkted (for obvious reasons) and then we take it from there
Why anyone other than us? I don't see any obvious reasons at all.
|
Wtf?
I want to point out the fact that, having been caught on this scumslip his only choice is to give away the piece.
Him giving away the piece is NOT AN INDICATOR OF ALIGNMENT
|
On September 21 2011 23:53 tnkted wrote:Ummm..... Show nested quote +On September 21 2011 23:50 wherebugsgo wrote:
WTF? he goes from honesty to generosity?
That is NOT an honest mistake. (rofl pun) sounds like a scumslip gone wrong to me. Wtf? This coming from the guy who took a HUGE amount of heat the other day for misclaiming his pm timing? Show nested quote +On September 21 2011 23:50 Erandorr wrote:On September 21 2011 23:47 Nisani201 wrote:
fuck
fuck
fuck
shit
I am an idiot.
I have the element of generosity, not honesty.
And now I'm going to get lynched.
Uhh, shit.
##Unvote
##Vote: Cyber_cheese
So who wants it. Give that thing to anyone other that jackal or tnkted (for obvious reasons) and then we take it from there Why anyone other than us? I don't see any obvious reasons at all.
1. My mistake was honest and it had no bearing on anyone else. I know Forumite thought it could've been malicious but it was not. Tell me, does my behavior fit with that type of mistake?
2. I wasn't under pressure at the time. This is a good indication of whether the slip is genuinely a scumslip or if it's a town derp.
3. This guy has been acting scum since Day 1. Now he does all of this stuff (including changing his vote rapidly in OMGUS when under pressure.) behaviour alone should tell you enough whether to believe his claim or not.
|
WBG, I was under just as much pressure as you when I mistakenly claimed having Honesty. You keep spewing out more bullshit, it's actually quite amazing.
|
Once tnkted gets the element, we can all live in happy bunny land and you guys (especially WBG) can shut up.
|
I can't drink enough to make this shit make sense.
|
At this point I'm pretty sure everypony is scum besides me.
|
On September 21 2011 23:59 Nisani201 wrote:
WBG, I was under just as much pressure as you when I mistakenly claimed having Honesty. You keep spewing out more bullshit, it's actually quite amazing.
AFAIK there wasn't someone blatantly calling me out for LYING when I came out myself and said I mistakenly claimed n1.
No one pressured me into saying that, I honestly admitted I had made a mistake. I could've kept quiet about it but as a townie I decided full disclosure was proper.
You, on the other hand, only claimed it was a mistake after you'd received 2 votes from Jackal and Forumite on your outright lie that you had the honesty piece (as both Forumite and I had given them to tnkted yesterday)
This also proves you wern't readin the thread at all, you were focused blindly on tunneling me for a mislynch. Had you actually read what me and Forumite were doing you might even have been able to get away with your little gambit!
|
On September 22 2011 00:00 Jackal58 wrote:
I can't drink enough to make this shit make sense.
Drink more. At some point it will all make sense. And then you get lynched . And then you reread what you wrote the next morning and probably laugh.
|
No, I realized my mistake when I checked my PM box and realized that I was claiming the wrong element.
You're trying really hard to turn this thing into evidence against me. Just give up, it's not working.
|
On September 21 2011 23:53 wherebugsgo wrote:
Wtf?
I want to point out the fact that, having been caught on this scumslip his only choice is to give away the piece.
Him giving away the piece is NOT AN INDICATOR OF ALIGNMENT
No its not but it is an indicator that his 'scumslip' was an honest mistake and not a scumslip at all. Which makes him look more town.
I'll remind you that I felt the same way about you until I recieved the pieces of honesty from yall, which made me feel that YOU were more town. People who have lived in glass houses and who have had stones thrown at them shouldn't throw stones at their neighbors on glass street.
Er, my metaphor kind of ran away from me there, but you get the point.
And alright nisani, we just have to wait for GM to send me a PM telling me what's what. In the meantime, ##Unvote.
While we wait though, I want jackal's opinion on scum and on what we should do tonight with the items.
I propose that (since we can't communicate at night) we use wifom to keep mafia from hitting us. It worked last night, since greymyst died instead of one of the two of us. Mafia knows that we can either protect the other one, or ourselves, and that we will probably do one of them. If mafia hits either of us then town knows that mafia knew who was going to be protected, so they knew it was safe to hit that person. Town then lynches the other one for revealing whats what.
So we are probably safe. Just to make sure, and to make sure that scum can't roleblock or steal from the person WITH the items, I propose that we use the same principle of wifom to switch the items around. Let do something like, if by a certain time I don't send you my items, you send yours to me. Mafia won't know which one of us has them since we didn't post anything in thread, but the two of us will know. Then, right before the nightpost, one of us posts what happend.
Thoughts?
|
N, you're full of horse.
You even FAKE BREADCRUMBED with the word "honesty". It seems like all you did was take my breadcrumb ("let's be honest about this") and didn't even bother to change the word!
Even if you didn't check your PM box, you should've been reading the thread. Just by reading the thread you'd know that getting the honesty piece is impossible unless the whole element is give to you by tnkted/jackal (which they both deny doing)
|
On September 22 2011 00:09 tnkted wrote:Show nested quote +On September 21 2011 23:53 wherebugsgo wrote:
Wtf?
I want to point out the fact that, having been caught on this scumslip his only choice is to give away the piece.
Him giving away the piece is NOT AN INDICATOR OF ALIGNMENT No its not but it is an indicator that his 'scumslip' was an honest mistake and not a scumslip at all. Which makes him look more town. I'll remind you that I felt the same way about you until I recieved the pieces of honesty from yall, which made me feel that YOU were more town. People who have lived in glass houses and who have had stones thrown at them shouldn't throw stones at their neighbors on glass street. Er, my metaphor kind of ran away from me there, but you get the point. And alright nisani, we just have to wait for GM to send me a PM telling me what's what. In the meantime, ##Unvote. While we wait though, I want jackal's opinion on scum and on what we should do tonight with the items. I propose that (since we can't communicate at night) we use wifom to keep mafia from hitting us. It worked last night, since greymyst died instead of one of the two of us. Mafia knows that we can either protect the other one, or ourselves, and that we will probably do one of them. If mafia hits either of us then town knows that mafia knew who was going to be protected, so they knew it was safe to hit that person. Town then lynches the other one for revealing whats what. So we are probably safe. Just to make sure, and to make sure that scum can't roleblock or steal from the person WITH the items, I propose that we use the same principle of wifom to switch the items around. Let do something like, if by a certain time I don't send you my items, you send yours to me. Mafia won't know which one of us has them since we didn't post anything in thread, but the two of us will know. Then, right before the nightpost, one of us posts what happend. Thoughts?
Why on EARTH would you keep alive someone who clearly has not been reading the thread?
If he had claimed anything else it would be believable, but he chose HONESTY. think about that.
|
Bugs, what about this aren't you getting? We're about to find out if he was lying or not. We are putting your theory to the test. How is that not a good thing for town?
|
On September 22 2011 00:14 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2011 00:09 tnkted wrote:On September 21 2011 23:53 wherebugsgo wrote:
Wtf?
I want to point out the fact that, having been caught on this scumslip his only choice is to give away the piece.
Him giving away the piece is NOT AN INDICATOR OF ALIGNMENT No its not but it is an indicator that his 'scumslip' was an honest mistake and not a scumslip at all. Which makes him look more town. I'll remind you that I felt the same way about you until I recieved the pieces of honesty from yall, which made me feel that YOU were more town. People who have lived in glass houses and who have had stones thrown at them shouldn't throw stones at their neighbors on glass street. Er, my metaphor kind of ran away from me there, but you get the point. And alright nisani, we just have to wait for GM to send me a PM telling me what's what. In the meantime, ##Unvote. While we wait though, I want jackal's opinion on scum and on what we should do tonight with the items. I propose that (since we can't communicate at night) we use wifom to keep mafia from hitting us. It worked last night, since greymyst died instead of one of the two of us. Mafia knows that we can either protect the other one, or ourselves, and that we will probably do one of them. If mafia hits either of us then town knows that mafia knew who was going to be protected, so they knew it was safe to hit that person. Town then lynches the other one for revealing whats what. So we are probably safe. Just to make sure, and to make sure that scum can't roleblock or steal from the person WITH the items, I propose that we use the same principle of wifom to switch the items around. Let do something like, if by a certain time I don't send you my items, you send yours to me. Mafia won't know which one of us has them since we didn't post anything in thread, but the two of us will know. Then, right before the nightpost, one of us posts what happend. Thoughts? Why on EARTH would you keep alive someone who clearly has not been reading the thread? If he had claimed anything else it would be believable, but he chose HONESTY. think about that.
the fuck are you doing right now, bugs?
|
OK, I've had enough of this. WBG is being anti-town by criticizing EVERYTHING that's happening. Even if he is not scum, he still needs to die for his hostile behavior.
##Unvote
##Vote: wherebugsgo
|
On September 22 2011 00:18 tnkted wrote:
Bugs, what about this aren't you getting? We're about to find out if he was lying or not. We are putting your theory to the test. How is that not a good thing for town?
I just explained to you why him giving you a piece is not an indicator of alignment.
Think about it from a mafia perspective. He's been caught lying, fake breadcrumbing, and not reading the thread. His only chance not to get lynched is to take another gambit and send you the piece.
I would say the worst, in fact, is the not reading the thread. That means he has no vested interest in scumhunting, just THINK about that before being so ready to believe his claim just because you receive a piece from him.
|
On September 22 2011 00:19 Nisani201 wrote:
OK, I've had enough of this. WBG is being anti-town by criticizing EVERYTHING that's happening. Even if he is not scum, he still needs to die for his hostile behavior.
##Unvote
##Vote: wherebugsgo
I'm criticizing your terrible scum play so you say I'm criticizing everything?
Dude what are you on? You're just butt hurt we caught you lying your face off. You've done nothing all game but tunnel me, and it's clear you've had no interest in reading the thread or scum hunting.
Just look at your own filter. It's full of nothing but terrible one liners and even worse votes coupled with a fake claim that screams anti town.
|
Anyway I'm done with this for now, I'm going to class.
Everyone who is town and still sane in this game FOR GODS SAKE LYNCH NISANI
|
On September 22 2011 00:21 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2011 00:18 tnkted wrote:
Bugs, what about this aren't you getting? We're about to find out if he was lying or not. We are putting your theory to the test. How is that not a good thing for town? I just explained to you why him giving you a piece is not an indicator of alignment. Think about it from a mafia perspective. He's been caught lying, fake breadcrumbing, and not reading the thread. His only chance not to get lynched is to take another gambit and send you the piece. I would say the worst, in fact, is the not reading the thread. That means he has no vested interest in scumhunting, just THINK about that before being so ready to believe his claim just because you receive a piece from him.
Yes, but if the piece he sends me is truely the element of generosity, then he wasn't caught lying, fake breadcrumbing, OR not reading the thread. He was caught making a mistake.
YOU DID THE SAME THING EARLIER THIS GAME, HOW CAN YOU GIVE HIM SHIT FOR IT?!
Am I out of my mind? What the hell is happening? Am I not explaining this correctly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
