|
Unfortunately, there was absolutely no way for me to convince anyone of it. Well done to mafia for setting it up, but ultimately it was towns stupidity that won the game for mafia. Town is WAAAYYYY too dependent on blue powers.
Using TL Mafia Meta to win the game! YAYYYY. Yes I did plan for a fake blue claim since day one. That's why I bussed mig. In TL Mafia games, person with some town cred+blue claim=amazingly hard to convince people to lynch =]
|
I got so angry reading this game past the first few days. No one attempted to figure out the motives, or at least it took way too long, behind these bad claims and the obvious mafia Chaoser got a free pass. Varpulis knew that he personally was almost certainly a sane DT, and yet didn't find Chaoser's sane DT claim dubious. It's quite unlikely that the setup includes 2 sane DTs + 2 vigs + Watcher + at least 1 medic (these were the "known" roles at the time). With sanities and the aforementioned blues present, it's likely that if there is a sane DT, there is also a naive or paranoid one. Not guaranteed obviously, and it was still possible that mafia had more power roles than typically, but I think the above was a reasonable assumption. Meanwhile Pyo's obvious naive DT claim, or just a fake claim, which he likely did only to attract a hit, was considered scummy. The claim makes very little sense for mafia, given the timing, the current lynch candidates and the content of his post.
Chaoser's DT claim was extremely suspicious even not knowing that there is another sane DT. He claimed 6 minutes after day post, immediately after "getting" his check back, supposedly because foolishness died and because he "feared for his life", despite there already being an almost confirmed mafia to lynch. If he really was a DT, he would have attempted to push for his lynch first without claiming, or just claimed right before the next day post. He didn't even consider the possibility of Vain being framed or being a miller and initially pushed for his lynch over Nard's, only to backpedal soon after, thus invalidating his reason to claim in the first place. Moreover, what kind of DT knows foolishness is going to die and uses that as an excuse to claim immediately after the day post? Or did everyone find it plausible that it took him less than 6 minutes to reach the conclusion that now is a good time to claim? Him checking foolishness on day 2 to "confirm" his sanity was quite unlikely as well as it's dumb to waste a check like that when you can just check someone uncertain, but who will likely to flip soon if not red. He didn't even push for Mig's lynch hard despite supposedly getting a red check on day 1. Oh and then he doesn't get hit OR EVEN ROLE BLOCKED on the following night and no one cares or just mentions it in passing.
I will have to, however, admit that there is one somewhat compelling reason for believing his claim; it was a ridiculously bad move after foolishness outed a mafia right before the day post. Obviously they didn't account for that when the plan was devised, but he should have known better to go ahead with it.
Interestingly Pyo's not so well executed DT claim actually potentially provided some useful of information when mafia decided not to RB him on the night after. Admittedly it's possible mafia just didn't believe that a real DT would claim like that, but I think it's more likely they figured out that he is a naive DT and thus didn't bother. How? Because at least one person he checked was red.
It didn't appear anyone bothered to re-read Varpulis' posts following his DT flip either. Not that there was that much to see, but it would have at least made it quite clear that Varpulis got a red check on Bum at some point.
|
On September 08 2011 13:39 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2011 13:16 bumatlarge wrote: Anyone see that epic framer bait i left for chaoser when vain died? Never framed vain :D wat
Thought I told you? The vain vote you picked up on was meant to be for when vain popped green. Chaoser could bus the vote onto me by explaining that vain had been framed and it was apparent in my posting. You jumped on it, so I was kinda happy to get lynched and town was too comfortable to call chaoser scum, along with his good play, until the endgame. All those silly connections got you in the end, when it was really just mig and myself going down for the team.
Congrats us and good work team! Curu could have probably won it by himself.
|
On September 08 2011 13:55 bumatlarge wrote:Show nested quote +On September 08 2011 13:39 wherebugsgo wrote:On September 08 2011 13:16 bumatlarge wrote: Anyone see that epic framer bait i left for chaoser when vain died? Never framed vain :D wat Thought I told you? The vain vote you picked up on was meant to be for when vain popped green. Chaoser could bus the vote onto me by explaining that vain had been framed and it was apparent in my posting. You jumped on it, so I was kinda happy to get lynched and town was too comfortable to call chaoser scum, along with his good play, until the endgame. All those silly connections got you in the end, when it was really just mig and myself going down for the team. Congrats us and good work team! Curu could have probably won it by himself.
I jumped on it because I thought vain would certainly get lynched that day.
Also part of my mistake was not making it clear that I felt chaoser was suspicious and that he was linked to you; it seemed weird that you would frame vain on the same night he supposedly checked him. I was going to make it very explicit that, if chaoser lived, he would be mafia.
Of course I was retarded and I didn't post that before the night ended, Everything afterward that screwed down was a combination of additional bad play, inattention, and modkills.
Town lost this one for ourselves, we were in a strong position at several points in the game to just dominate mafia. We have no one to blame but ourselves for that.
|
|
Also part of my mistake was not making it clear that I felt chaoser was suspicious and that he was linked to you; it seemed weird that you would frame vain on the same night he supposedly checked him. I was going to make it very explicit that, if chaoser lived, he would be mafia .
Ok I didn't understand this logic...this is how a framer is SUPPOSE to work, they're hoping for a DT check on the person they framed. How is that weird?
|
Curu scumslipped like a boss and no one noticed but me, thankfully mafia had Kurumi on their side. I guess I have been spoiled by playing with good town players who bother to work for their victory instead of expecting to be carried, and thus I thought it didn't matter how I acted, because people would most certainly be able to tell the difference anyway.
This was not the case during this game, people were stuck with their heads up their asses and did not want to read objectively, and thus it's my own failure not to adapt my play to the bad logic that worked with this town.
Here is the list I wrote on day 2, remember that later during the day foolishness and dropbear got "confirmed"
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&hl=en_US&key=0Aolx7msuf_IvdHZoc05pSE9neVFWOWU2RTVYWWpBRmc&output=html
But this game was different, people simply did not want to work for it, and I completely failed to adapt my playstyle to this much more naive town than before.
On August 24 2011 07:47 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 07:44 Curu wrote: I'm kind of glad I never had to play Town with you past day 1 before this. You are ridiculously stubborn and annoying to deal with. I form opinions, and I then try to objectively read the thread after that, but it's hard. I'm not afraid of being wrong, and I've quite often been right. Maybe this is the game where I'm wrong on all accounts, but I expect others to be able to pick that up. Also, why do you basically declare me town? Do you know my alignment?
The only person on town's side that had decent reads early was Foolishness, other people like xtf and wbg played alright-ish once they got the chance to pull their heads out of their asses, but that was just too late.
Personally I have a huge issue with people who seemingly don't care enough to put any thought into their playing. I had major confusion issues with chaos13 this game, because I couldn't simply write off his terrible reads as nooby, because he's not a noob, he's actually pretty good at this game, but this game everything was so off I simply couldn't imagine any other reason but him being wrong intentionally, while the truth was he simply failed to read the thread.
I'm going to bold this, because I failed to do this once when I was a newbie, and you all need to learn this lesson.
Whenever a townie dies or gets confirmed, especially through a lynch or vig shot, re-read the entire thread with this new information in hand.
Foolishness died and had so many nuggets of wisdom. I died and left you with basically the entire mafia team uncovered, but still you lynched people who were obviously not scum. It's so important to read the thread and not focus on looking for "scummy things" or "scumtells". That's what gets uncareful townies lynched, like Hiro and Sevryn. Anyone should've been able to tell they were town, it is how I initially pinned Curu as scum, he's very good at mafia and thus couldn't possibly think the Hiro and Sevryn lynches were good ideas. It was also the case against Mig.
This game is just the pinnacle of what happens when you mix pride with lazyness, you end up with a shitty, shitty town that's unable to do anything constructive. On day one we had a mafia against the wall, but we lynched a very, very obvious townie (like, what mafia would so blatantly bandwagon me?) because I was too proud to change my approach, and town was too proud and lazy to listen to my arguments and actually read Sevryn's posts and deduce the mindset he was in when he made those.
Thing is, I'll admit it, I'm getting more lazy with posting in a political way, by now I expect people to just listen to what I say, when I'm town and they do it usually ends up very well for town, but sometimes people just don't, and it's hard having to convince the same people every game. Some of us are just never going to be any useful anyway, VisceraEyes has almost never had a correct read, yet he seems unwilling to step back and reassess his approach. Kurumi is a troublemaker in his own, and giving him a gun was the worst thing that could happen to town. chaos13 has been having a streak of terrible reads (cosmic horror, xliv etc) but he'll bounce back once he lets go of his pride, because he's actually good.
I think both xtf and wbg have the potential to be good players, same with supersoft, and if hiro protagonist plays town like this again he can easily elevate himself to a good player too.
And then there's of course balance to consider, with DropBear and chaos13 derping like mad, who were supposed to be some of town's best and most experienced players there was very little to work with for town.
Mafia had 4 really good players, Curu, Mig, BrownBear and chaoser, while town really only had three, Jackal, Foolishness and me.
Anyway, I guess this game can act as a collective lesson to us all. So many new or new-ish people got their first taste of being completely fucking wrong time and time again this game, so I hope it allows them to break down and re-build their approach to play better mafia in the future, loads of fairly new players in this game that can go on to be good.
As for myself, I'll never again take being listened to for granted, I thought Foolishness's "If Palmar is mafia he's on drugs" would be enough, but again, head in ass syndrome ruined reads for town. Whenever someone like Foolishness says something like that, and then becomes confirmed, people better fucking listen.
Well played mafia, and again, sorry for my own performance this game.
GG
|
On September 08 2011 14:49 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +Also part of my mistake was not making it clear that I felt chaoser was suspicious and that he was linked to you; it seemed weird that you would frame vain on the same night he supposedly checked him. I was going to make it very explicit that, if chaoser lived, he would be mafia . Ok I didn't understand this logic...this is how a framer is SUPPOSE to work, they're hoping for a DT check on the person they framed. How is that weird?
It wasn't weird by itself.
Remember I asked you why the hell you claimed so early?
There were a bunch of small things that just made me go "huh wtf?" and I didn't put you on my scumlist right away because my priority at the time was lynching nard and then bum.
|
I should've pushed harder on chaoser... I was suspicious of him from the start but I didn't push hard enough because of being in london, if I'd pushed harder at least we would've gotten him... But I'd lost so much credibility by the time chaoser claimed that I'd have needed a miracle to persuade town anyway =_=
|
On September 08 2011 14:53 Palmar wrote:Curu scumslipped like a boss and no one noticed but me, thankfully mafia had Kurumi on their side. I guess I have been spoiled by playing with good town players who bother to work for their victory instead of expecting to be carried, and thus I thought it didn't matter how I acted, because people would most certainly be able to tell the difference anyway. This was not the case during this game, people were stuck with their heads up their asses and did not want to read objectively, and thus it's my own failure not to adapt my play to the bad logic that worked with this town. Here is the list I wrote on day 2, remember that later during the day foolishness and dropbear got "confirmed" https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&hl=en_US&key=0Aolx7msuf_IvdHZoc05pSE9neVFWOWU2RTVYWWpBRmc&output=htmlBut this game was different, people simply did not want to work for it, and I completely failed to adapt my playstyle to this much more naive town than before. Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 07:47 Palmar wrote:On August 24 2011 07:44 Curu wrote: I'm kind of glad I never had to play Town with you past day 1 before this. You are ridiculously stubborn and annoying to deal with. I form opinions, and I then try to objectively read the thread after that, but it's hard. I'm not afraid of being wrong, and I've quite often been right. Maybe this is the game where I'm wrong on all accounts, but I expect others to be able to pick that up. Also, why do you basically declare me town? Do you know my alignment? The only person on town's side that had decent reads early was Foolishness, other people like xtf and wbg played alright-ish once they got the chance to pull their heads out of their asses, but that was just too late. Personally I have a huge issue with people who seemingly don't care enough to put any thought into their playing. I had major confusion issues with chaos13 this game, because I couldn't simply write off his terrible reads as nooby, because he's not a noob, he's actually pretty good at this game, but this game everything was so off I simply couldn't imagine any other reason but him being wrong intentionally, while the truth was he simply failed to read the thread. I'm going to bold this, because I failed to do this once when I was a newbie, and you all need to learn this lesson. Whenever a townie dies or gets confirmed, especially through a lynch or vig shot, re-read the entire thread with this new information in hand.Foolishness died and had so many nuggets of wisdom. I died and left you with basically the entire mafia team uncovered, but still you lynched people who were obviously not scum. It's so important to read the thread and not focus on looking for "scummy things" or "scumtells". That's what gets uncareful townies lynched, like Hiro and Sevryn. Anyone should've been able to tell they were town, it is how I initially pinned Curu as scum, he's very good at mafia and thus couldn't possibly think the Hiro and Sevryn lynches were good ideas. It was also the case against Mig. This game is just the pinnacle of what happens when you mix pride with lazyness, you end up with a shitty, shitty town that's unable to do anything constructive. On day one we had a mafia against the wall, but we lynched a very, very obvious townie (like, what mafia would so blatantly bandwagon me?) because I was too proud to change my approach, and town was too proud and lazy to listen to my arguments and actually read Sevryn's posts and deduce the mindset he was in when he made those. Thing is, I'll admit it, I'm getting more lazy with posting in a political way, by now I expect people to just listen to what I say, when I'm town and they do it usually ends up very well for town, but sometimes people just don't, and it's hard having to convince the same people every game. Some of us are just never going to be any useful anyway, VisceraEyes has almost never had a correct read, yet he seems unwilling to step back and reassess his approach. Kurumi is a troublemaker in his own, and giving him a gun was the worst thing that could happen to town. chaos13 has been having a streak of terrible reads (cosmic horror, xliv etc) but he'll bounce back once he lets go of his pride, because he's actually good. I think both xtf and wbg have the potential to be good players, same with supersoft, and if hiro protagonist plays town like this again he can easily elevate himself to a good player too. And then there's of course balance to consider, with DropBear and chaos13 derping like mad, who were supposed to be some of town's best and most experienced players there was very little to work with for town. Mafia had 4 really good players, Curu, Mig, BrownBear and chaoser, while town really only had three, Jackal, Foolishness and me. Anyway, I guess this game can act as a collective lesson to us all. So many new or new-ish people got their first taste of being completely fucking wrong time and time again this game, so I hope it allows them to break down and re-build their approach to play better mafia in the future, loads of fairly new players in this game that can go on to be good. As for myself, I'll never again take being listened to for granted, I thought Foolishness's "If Palmar is mafia he's on drugs" would be enough, but again, head in ass syndrome ruined reads for town. Whenever someone like Foolishness says something like that, and then becomes confirmed, people better fucking listen. Well played mafia, and again, sorry for my own performance this game. GG
My shitty play on days 1 and 2 was due to it being my first game.
After hiro got lynched and I raged for a bit I began to play more clearly and I thought more objectively.
Problem was I still made some really dumb mistakes with respect to what I revealed and when I revealed it.
|
i was suspicious of curu, because he was still alive :D
+ Show Spoiler +On August 24 2011 19:45 supersoft wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 19:43 wherebugsgo wrote: You put some thinking/effort into the game?
If you're so much smarter than us why don't you share your brilliant analysis with the town every once in a while?
Oh right, cause you're scum and you don't actually vote based on evidence...just preknowledge. hahahahaha, I will remind you of this post at the end of the game.
lul sorry for that. all in all i played poorly. i didnt see chaoser being scum :-/ for me this BB framed vain thing just made perfect sense. wp it was nearly impossible for us to win at the end. rayzor smd pyo couldnt convince me and kurumi. they even thought we were scum... erandorr was pretty confirmed scum. we should have lynched him first.
|
On August 23 2011 12:38 Foolishness wrote: I spent last night rereading through all of chaoser's past games and all of brownbear's past games. It should be fairly obvious why I did this. I will defend chaoser to the grave if I have to, he's most certainly town.
My New Profile Quote =D
|
wp Mafia :O You suck town! ( Especially me D: )
After Pyo I would've gone for Erandorr and chaoser, but never in a million years for Curu. MVP for sure.
|
On September 08 2011 14:53 Palmar wrote:Curu scumslipped like a boss and no one noticed but me, thankfully mafia had Kurumi on their side. I guess I have been spoiled by playing with good town players who bother to work for their victory instead of expecting to be carried, and thus I thought it didn't matter how I acted, because people would most certainly be able to tell the difference anyway. This was not the case during this game, people were stuck with their heads up their asses and did not want to read objectively, and thus it's my own failure not to adapt my play to the bad logic that worked with this town. Here is the list I wrote on day 2, remember that later during the day foolishness and dropbear got "confirmed" https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/pub?hl=en_US&hl=en_US&key=0Aolx7msuf_IvdHZoc05pSE9neVFWOWU2RTVYWWpBRmc&output=htmlBut this game was different, people simply did not want to work for it, and I completely failed to adapt my playstyle to this much more naive town than before. Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 07:47 Palmar wrote:On August 24 2011 07:44 Curu wrote: I'm kind of glad I never had to play Town with you past day 1 before this. You are ridiculously stubborn and annoying to deal with. I form opinions, and I then try to objectively read the thread after that, but it's hard. I'm not afraid of being wrong, and I've quite often been right. Maybe this is the game where I'm wrong on all accounts, but I expect others to be able to pick that up. Also, why do you basically declare me town? Do you know my alignment? The only person on town's side that had decent reads early was Foolishness, other people like xtf and wbg played alright-ish once they got the chance to pull their heads out of their asses, but that was just too late. Personally I have a huge issue with people who seemingly don't care enough to put any thought into their playing. I had major confusion issues with chaos13 this game, because I couldn't simply write off his terrible reads as nooby, because he's not a noob, he's actually pretty good at this game, but this game everything was so off I simply couldn't imagine any other reason but him being wrong intentionally, while the truth was he simply failed to read the thread. I'm going to bold this, because I failed to do this once when I was a newbie, and you all need to learn this lesson. Whenever a townie dies or gets confirmed, especially through a lynch or vig shot, re-read the entire thread with this new information in hand.Foolishness died and had so many nuggets of wisdom. I died and left you with basically the entire mafia team uncovered, but still you lynched people who were obviously not scum. It's so important to read the thread and not focus on looking for "scummy things" or "scumtells". That's what gets uncareful townies lynched, like Hiro and Sevryn. Anyone should've been able to tell they were town, it is how I initially pinned Curu as scum, he's very good at mafia and thus couldn't possibly think the Hiro and Sevryn lynches were good ideas. It was also the case against Mig. This game is just the pinnacle of what happens when you mix pride with lazyness, you end up with a shitty, shitty town that's unable to do anything constructive. On day one we had a mafia against the wall, but we lynched a very, very obvious townie (like, what mafia would so blatantly bandwagon me?) because I was too proud to change my approach, and town was too proud and lazy to listen to my arguments and actually read Sevryn's posts and deduce the mindset he was in when he made those. Thing is, I'll admit it, I'm getting more lazy with posting in a political way, by now I expect people to just listen to what I say, when I'm town and they do it usually ends up very well for town, but sometimes people just don't, and it's hard having to convince the same people every game. Some of us are just never going to be any useful anyway, VisceraEyes has almost never had a correct read, yet he seems unwilling to step back and reassess his approach. Kurumi is a troublemaker in his own, and giving him a gun was the worst thing that could happen to town. chaos13 has been having a streak of terrible reads (cosmic horror, xliv etc) but he'll bounce back once he lets go of his pride, because he's actually good. I think both xtf and wbg have the potential to be good players, same with supersoft, and if hiro protagonist plays town like this again he can easily elevate himself to a good player too. And then there's of course balance to consider, with DropBear and chaos13 derping like mad, who were supposed to be some of town's best and most experienced players there was very little to work with for town. Mafia had 4 really good players, Curu, Mig, BrownBear and chaoser, while town really only had three, Jackal, Foolishness and me. Anyway, I guess this game can act as a collective lesson to us all. So many new or new-ish people got their first taste of being completely fucking wrong time and time again this game, so I hope it allows them to break down and re-build their approach to play better mafia in the future, loads of fairly new players in this game that can go on to be good. As for myself, I'll never again take being listened to for granted, I thought Foolishness's "If Palmar is mafia he's on drugs" would be enough, but again, head in ass syndrome ruined reads for town. Whenever someone like Foolishness says something like that, and then becomes confirmed, people better fucking listen. Well played mafia, and again, sorry for my own performance this game. GG
The timing of this game (and the last few) coincided with a few issues in my life, as well as being very busy at work, so I wasn't quite prepared for it, and I really do apologize for both my play in this game and my disrespect towards you. I just didn't have the time or motivation to be doing more than skimming until around the time I died unfortunately.
With that said, I still have an issue with your play style this game - it was spammy as hell. Now that the game is over and I'm able to look at it from a more objective perspective, I can see a little more easily how it works, but I still feel it causes more problems than it solves. When the entire town is making random accusations and jumping on bandwagons, mafia can feel free to do the same without fear of any repercussions. Not only that, but posts without real content become the norm, and proper analysis starts to disappear. In a situation like this I suppose it is up to myself individually to ignore all that and not become part of it, but I allowed myself to become irritated and my play suffered greatly as a result.
Regardless of the beginnings of my newfound understanding, I don't quite see how an atmosphere like this really benefits the town. How is this better than a game where everyone is calm, logical, and analytical, doesn't spam, and pays complete attention to scumhunting?
|
Palmar , from a Scum perspective it was actually not that bad to have you in the game because you kept shitting the thread up better than any of us could. "Its not what you know , its what you can people make believe " . And honestly your whole gameplan is based on the assumption that everything should revolve around YOU. Town atmosphere does not matter when you can do it all by yourself , right? To speak very bluntly , if you behave in this agressive manner and lets be honest like abit of a dick, people , especially newer ones, will not listing to you. If you read through the earlier parts of the game you ignored everyone except maybe foolish and shattered any common goals in town play because you ignored any other opinions instead of answering in a calm manner that would have helped town get victory pretty early. I just reread some earlier parts of the game where xt came under suspicion. You just said " Xt is not scum" instead of explaining why and forcing the conversation in the right direction again . If you play like that you cant honestly belive that people will follow you, it even went so far as that people started to ignore some of your really good analysis , just because they were fed up with the way you played. And then after you died by the hands of hero Kurumi you could no longer explain those great reads you had and left town in a very awkward spot and through the modkills every bit of fun was taken out of the lategame.
|
@Chaos13 - yeah, as I repeatedly said I'm not going to (and I haven't) repeated this same style of play. It's very easy to pick out mafia like this,but it's terrible for making other people read the thread. Let's call it an experiment. I think I've found a more balanced way of pushing my ideas, and I'm using those in more recent games. It's slightly harder to find scum, but it also doesn't destroy town atmosphere.
I am fully aware of the shortcomings of this approach, which is why this is the only game I employed it and the only game I will employ it. This does not work as an excuse for people who didn't read the thread though.
And to answer your last point chaos13, is that when everyone is cool, calculated and logical, the mafia can be exactly the same. It's very, very easy to fake an analytical mistake, but it's surprisingly hard to fake an emotional response. By stirring things up, if you're able to then disconnect you from the situation, you can get miles better read on people, because things posted fast like 1-liners, arguments, shouting etc, is a lot less thought out than analysis, and thus much easier to read the true motivations, as they cannot be properly hidden in the time-frame it takes to respond to this emotional style of play.
Erandorr, thanks for telling me things I know.
|
On September 08 2011 21:30 Palmar wrote: @Chaos13 - yeah, as I repeatedly said I'm not going to (and I haven't) repeated this same style of play. It's very easy to pick out mafia like this,but it's terrible for making other people read the thread. Let's call it an experiment. I think I've found a more balanced way of pushing my ideas, and I'm using those in more recent games. It's slightly harder to find scum, but it also doesn't destroy town atmosphere.
I am fully aware of the shortcomings of this approach, which is why this is the only game I employed it and the only game I will employ it. This does not work as an excuse for people who didn't read the thread though.
And to answer your last point chaos13, is that when everyone is cool, calculated and logical, the mafia can be exactly the same. It's very, very easy to fake an analytical mistake, but it's surprisingly hard to fake an emotional response. By stirring things up, if you're able to then disconnect you from the situation, you can get miles better read on people, because things posted fast like 1-liners, arguments, shouting etc, is a lot less thought out than analysis, and thus much easier to read the true motivations, as they cannot be properly hidden in the time-frame it takes to respond to this emotional style of play.
Erandorr, thanks for telling me things I know.
Youre welcome !
|
(NOTE: when sending out role PM's sandroba went through and capitalized all the "You"'s)
!
|
Wp Mafia, sorry everyone about my day 2 silliness, especially to you supersoft.
|
Jeez Palmar you're starting to sound like Ace.
And I didn't like the majority lynch thing either. Thanks for hosting though Marsh
|
|
|
|