|
On January 16 2012 09:47 kingjames01 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2012 16:40 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Vote for BC, vote for accountable and vocal leadership. We should be holding BC accountable for Palmar's lynch. BC has been engaging in discussions with sandroba behind the scenes. Because of this, they have formed some sort of agreement. Show nested quote +On January 15 2012 06:05 sandroba wrote: I'll vote BC since we came to a compromise in pms. Gotta roll. ##Vote: BloodyC0bbler I can infer that the choice to lynch Palmar was also a topic of discussion between them. We should scrutinize their relationship so that we can judge for ourselves whether BC or sandroba was the spearhead of this lynch. BloodyC0bbler: be accountable for your lynch. Summarize for us what you and sandroba have been discussing.
Why should we have it summarized? Wouldn't posting the logs be better? Since there is discussion of all the Mason's doing it, why not have all the Mason's do it?
|
On January 16 2012 10:31 Mr. Wiggles wrote: Masons can only talk to someone for 1 cycle when they mason them, and never again. So, they can't harass someone for three days straight, like you want them to. The longest they can try to get information out of someone is one cycle, which is barely long at all. Making a circle lets them talk to the same people for multiple days, though.
Three real days = one game day.
|
RE: Nisani
The only thing I have against you're case is the very beginning. Remember that Palmar had called Ciry pretty quickly as well, and he was right. It's strong otherwise. However...
RE: Macpo
Yes, it's tunneling. Yes, I will reiterate that I feel that the guy is mafia. I went back and looked at his posts again. He's too well-informed to be a newb, yet says he's newb. I'm going to sit back seeing the little train forming on Macpo, and re-evaluate. Possible he is true a newb and not used to playing Forum mafia...but I just need to be really convinced otherwise. The one saving grace is Protact calling him Mafia, but more on that below.
RE: Sheth
Already blew it for today, mang. Sorry.
RE: WBG
I'll wait to see what you say about Protact. You we're really convinced me at the end of the Day yesterday, and I'd like to see you post all you're information about you're thoughts. I had pretty fair feelings that Palmar was acting townish.
RE: Sandroba
I have reservations about Sandroba. Two things that stick out to me are what was brought up in his PM's with BC, about the switching back and forth from Palmar within 15 lines. I don't think the Mason mass claim is anything to look at earlier. Than in the thread, he goes from saying that he doesn't want anyone to die to wanting to kill him in the PM. Just a little iffy too me.
Right now, I'm having negative vibes from both Macpo and Sandroba.
|
On January 17 2012 11:21 Foolishness wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2012 11:19 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:On January 17 2012 11:15 Foolishness wrote:On January 17 2012 11:05 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: EBWOP: I forgot to add Macpo to the FoS list. Pretty interesting how you just mentioned Macpo now and decided to (almost) ignore him completely from the start of the game. In fact I find it very very very interesting that you make a lot of posts like these... On January 17 2012 07:44 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Nope hiro, we're lynching GGQ today. You don't have a very strong case against sandroba and neither do any of the other jubjubs calling for his death right now. We lynch GGQ today, tomorrow we lynch any of the people who have popped out of the woodwork to defend him.
Also for those viewers who are keeping track back home, I'm working my way through the filters of the players I talked about in my post last night, I should have something on who is who in a few hours. ...while choosing to ignore a lynch candidate who is under attack from arguably the 2 best scumhunters in this game. Hey Incog, I found another mafia! Hey look who decided to show up! Does it matter when I call people out? The entire list I made from a few posts ago was composed of people I had ignored from the start of the game. Is there a set time when I'm allowed to call people out? And if by "choosing to ignore a lynch candidate who is under attack from arguably the 2 best scumhunters in this game" you mean sandroba than I don't have much faith in "the 2 best scumhunters." I'm referring to Macpo...you know the guy who myself and Incog called out on day 1 and then came in with a hilariously bad defense post, and has since gone afk?
I'll bet you money that Macpo will be back within the next page to defend himself again.
|
|
@BC/OpZ,
Have you guys mason'd someone this round?
|
@BC, are you back yet, bro? Did you mason up yet?
|
Fuck it.
##Vote: Macpo
It's pretty obvious i'm not the only one suspicious of him, and as of right now, he's my closet thing on my sheet to a scum.
|
On January 17 2012 20:47 Cyber_Cheese wrote:Show nested quote +On January 17 2012 20:22 Adam4167 wrote: So cheese, while you're around:
-You still think VE is scum? or just a townie that did dumb shit? -What are your thoughts on Kenpachi and kingjames? -Finally, what are your thoughts on me and Ech? VE, I'm not sure. It was either a really clever scum move, or a really dumb town one. I'm leaning on the latter. Kenpachi is an unreadable lurker at the moment. He was this useless in Steamship too as a VT. Kingjames, I haven't really considered him often, I have a relatively weak town read. He's prodding the elected officials, which I like. You and Echelon fall more or less into the same bucket, I've kinda seen your posts here and there, but not really considered them. I don't think there's enough content on either of you to come to any conclusions yet.
Oh yeah, as scum I'd never had more fun in my life than that mislynch poor guy
But alright- ##Unvote ##Vote Macpo
What? Are you willing to vote to lynch a person you think is townie?
On January 17 2012 19:45 Adam4167 wrote:Oh come on, that was fun ^^ Lets consolidate on Macpo for now, deal with Chaosquo at a later date. ##Vote: Macpo
Same to you - Do you think Macpo is scum? Why?
On January 17 2012 22:34 Toadesstern wrote: Ok I'm awake / re.
As mentioned, sandroba has not enough supporters so I'm switching votes. I still don't see how sandroba is NOT fitting foolish's analysis as well but I won't get you on sandroba at this point so I'd might just help you lynch macpo and lynch you all afterwards if this turns out to be wrong.
Ok, so let's review. You tunnel Sandroba endlessly. You make a post that's longer than any other post in you're eight pages of filter, to push Sandroba's filter. When it's fairly obvious, you jump off the bandwagon and say that you will lynch Macpo.
In turn to agreeing to lynch Macpo, it seems you are essentially try to rid yourself of all of responsibility of the lynch. Why? To not draw attention? What is you're reasoning for doing this? What if it turns out to be red? Do we have the go-ahead to kill you outright?
Give a good reason why you are voting for Macpo.
On January 17 2012 23:26 jaj22 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 14 2012 05:39 Jitsu wrote: RE: Macpo
Why are you pointing out that you are such a newb? In the post I recall, you really try to drive home the fact that you are a newb and that you wish people pardon you're small mistakes! Take responsibility for you're actions. I feel that you are being wishy-washy. Don't be wishy-washy.
Could be a coincidence, but Macpo appears to be following this advice to the letter.
What are you insinuating?
|
6 people have jumped on the bandwagon in the Voting Thread. I don't think I've seen any analysis from any of those guys on Macpo.
|
C_C, you said in you're post:
On January 17 2012 19:49 Cyber_Cheese wrote:Oh yeah, as scum I'd never had more fun in my life than that mislynch  poor guy But alright- ##Unvote##Vote Macpo
I might have read it wrong. Can you elaborate?
|
On January 18 2012 01:30 Cyber_Cheese wrote:I just realised, you conveniently left out the context. No wonder I don't remember thinking Macpo was town.
Ohhhhhh, nevermind.
I didn't know you were referencing back to another game. I thought you we're saying something else. My bad.
Also, leave the bolded out. It achieves nothing.
|
Bam, got 'em. Knew it.
GJ town. Going to bed.
|
And my Axe!
[had too]
VE: in the interest of time, who else accused you of being scum? Just wondering. I'll go back and look if its not on the top of your head.
|
On January 19 2012 20:31 VisceraEyes wrote: I'd like to hear Jitsu's take on the night-kills, actually. Jitsu what are your thoughts on what happened overnight?
On January 19 2012 12:03 jcarlsoniv wrote:
L the Mafia Godfather (would check as Medic) has been killed. Liquid`Sheth the Vigilante has been killed. Adam4167 the Vigilante has been killed.
Usually I don't look at night kills; it's too WIFOM to really garner that much information, I think.
As far as that goes, though, I think it should take a benefit to look at OpZ again. He was starting to garner some interest in his play, than when he was called out, he showed up, than disappeared again. I haven't seen him in awhile. Sheth posted a huge thing on him.
Sup OpZ? Where you been?
Not sure of BM's claim. If he really is the Mad Hatter, where is the negative to him waiting one more night to plant his last bomb? Death triggers his KP, so why not just lynch him tomorrow and focus our attention on other players?
|
On January 20 2012 00:24 jaj22 wrote: @Lanaia: You want Bill to blow up two of Foolishness/Protact/BC?
Hmmm..Are you suggesting he is Mafia? Or that he is just going to kill two of those three, willy-nilly?
Mafia has no Mad Hatter role.
|
Home from class. Just read thread. Interesting to see Supersoft flip scum as well.
Toad, I have a question. Hypothetical question; you are the Mad Hatter. You have two bombs. Who would you plant them on right now and why? One thing that bugs me. It seems like you are purposefully trying to take as much credit as possible to buy town-cred by saying all you're reads we're accurate.
From a town point of view: I could give less of a shit who gets credit for a kill in a game as long as the mafia player is dead. I was suspicious of Macpo pretty damn early, but everyone assumed there was a slew of over players involved in it, so I gave zero fucks.
From a Mafia point of view: "Hmmmm, if I can accuse alot of people early, than I can look more town if they eventually do get lynched! Yeah!"
Do you think this reasoning if flawed? Do you think you are acting opposite of this?
Also, BC - did you use you're mason ability yet? I really need to talk to you, but I already blew mine.
|
If the majority of the thread wants me to post logs, I will post them. Not because simply one non-determined aligned player asked. Why are you so interested in them anyway? Are you looking for anything in particular? Also, sensitive information was given to me, so a post might be edited out.
What do I think of BM? I think the jury is still out. Part of me thinks some of his actions are town, and part of me thinks some of his actions are scummy. There are things on both sides of the fence, and I find it hard it determine one or the other. One thing in particular that struck me was he said that he simply wants to wait until tomorrow to plant the second bomb. And than his most recent post almost dictates that he is looking FORWARD to it. But when I was talking to him, he said he liked to get closer to LYLO and build cases along to the way and than come out with all the information at the end.
I don't know exactly why someone would want to wait until Lynch or Lose. When I was playing football, I hating winning games 13-10. I would much rather have a large, decisive victory. Why would you want to cut it so close in a game of Mafia, where one miss-lynch loses the game? Build cases and end the game earlier.
Bill?
|
On January 20 2012 11:03 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2012 10:56 Jitsu wrote: Home from class. Just read thread. Interesting to see Supersoft flip scum as well.
LOL WUT
LOL meant Mason. Cool you're shit.
|
On January 20 2012 11:14 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Also jitsu, do not out the pm where bm outed the bgs, that doesn't need to be in the thread.
Of course not. I'm not that bad. Lol
|
|
|
|