|
On August 17 2011 21:48 Jackal58 wrote:
My vote was on Pandain before you voted Pandain and then moved it to Bum. I didn't jump on anything. I think both are gong to end up being town. I think I'd rather see one of the 7 lurkers get lynched.
You're never going to build a good enough case against one of the lurkers to get them lynched. You should be taking a stance on this lynch here.
Like, I'm obviously going all-in with this, I'm just 100% certain bumatlarge is scum. He needs to hang.
Read Bum's posts again, there is no motivation for posting like he does as town, but maybe trying to convince you is futile.
|
On August 17 2011 21:59 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 17 2011 21:48 Jackal58 wrote:
My vote was on Pandain before you voted Pandain and then moved it to Bum. I didn't jump on anything. I think both are gong to end up being town. I think I'd rather see one of the 7 lurkers get lynched. You're never going to build a good enough case against one of the lurkers to get them lynched. You should be taking a stance on this lynch here. Like, I'm obviously going all-in with this, I'm just 100% certain bumatlarge is scum. He needs to hang. Read Bum's posts again, there is no motivation for posting like he does as town, but maybe trying to convince you is futile.
I honestly think that there is no possible way mafia would waste a Day Vig on kavdragon. I can't think of any situation where it makes sense.
Having the whole blue/green thing sorted out somewhat, I am less suspicious of Pandain as well, and I honestly don't think either of them are scum. Both are bad lynches for today.
I'd like to make a case against Mig, but I feel its too late in the day to try and swing the votes. Bum getting lynched is better than a no lynch, and he has 9/14 votes already.
|
his ability was triggered through typing ##Nuke in the thread, we'd always know who set off the nuke, so it makes no sense for scum to nuke a very pro-town player.
The only way to use such an ability is to nuke a scummy town/spammer/lurker and then try to brush it off as a pro-town move. He just underestimated the sentiment in the town that Kav wasn't scum.
|
On August 17 2011 22:35 Palmar wrote:
his ability was triggered through typing ##Nuke in the thread, we'd always know who set off the nuke, so it makes no sense for scum to nuke a very pro-town player.
The only way to use such an ability is to nuke a scummy town/spammer/lurker and then try to brush it off as a pro-town move. He just underestimated the sentiment in the town that Kav wasn't scum.
I agree that kav was almost guaranteed town, so it doesn't make sense either way for bum to nuke him, However a mafia Day Vig is just so mindbogglingly good, why use it on Day 2, and on kavdragon of all people  He had done nothing useful all game, and it didn't look like that was going to change.
|
Bum just voted for himself.
|
Do you have any particular reason for voting yourself Bum?
|
|
|
|
|
I have no qualms about lynching Bum, and since it's majority lynch anyway, might as well consolidate our lynch.
|
No Im not a VI, but if people are really that dead set on me and the pandain lynch isnt picking up, then its better off that I'm dealt with now. I just messed some stuff up.
|
On August 18 2011 00:35 bumatlarge wrote:
No Im not a VI, but if people are really that dead set on me and the pandain lynch isnt picking up, then its better off that I'm dealt with now. I just messed some stuff up.
This sounds like a mafia giving up.
##VOTE: Bum
|
My ignore list is empty, so as the greatest player of all time I got a great idea and added Icognito to my invisible list. I have my reasons for doing so and it should be pretty easy to figure out
Invisible list
Kurimurry
Kavdragon
Aidnai
Icognito
|
Just do me a favor an vig pandain once I pop town 
|
On August 18 2011 00:49 bumatlarge wrote:Just do me a favor an vig pandain once I pop town
What do you suggest we do if you flip scum?
|
Hey if, hypothetically, we were to have a list checker, and I'm not crazy about lynching bum, would it make sense for me to vote pandain so that the list checker can have a better list of people to check, depending on bum's flip? Or should I vote bum to make it easier?
|
tnked, generally smaller lists are better, If I had a lynch with 16 people and another vote with 6 people, I would check the list with 6.
|
tnkted, I don't think we should worry about a hypothetical list checker and moving our votes around, until we actually get enough votes on Bum to form a majority. If we can get something over the limit for lynching, then maybe we can try to get a couple people to move their votes onto someone else, but I don't want to get screwed by a no-lynch because we have trouble organizing people onto lists and not enough left over to vote to lynch scum.
|
I am going to tell you all right now, both are bad lynches and a no lynch would be preferable. On that note, I will be voting for someone random right now.
|
On August 18 2011 02:19 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
I am going to tell you all right now, both are bad lynches and a no lynch would be preferable. On that note, I will be voting for someone random right now.
So you somehow know the results of every lynch (today and yesterday), while contributing nothing to suggest a better target or anything?
Can we lynch RoL instead?
|
I'd be down with lynching LSB instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
