EPT/in
World at War 2 Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
/in | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
I'm going to go flip through the last WaW game because I have no clue how the nuclear phase works at all from the description given :x | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
On July 05 2011 17:13 sandroba wrote: ???? My plan is bad because you KNOW it's not gonna work? How exactly? If people fire nukes not following my plan they get lynched, not nuked back. Alright, so someone decides they're too good for your plan and nukes a guy. Nukes fly everywhere. Now that we have a handful of people who either started firing or fired reactively... gee, that's a lot of lynches to get through. That'd be a lot of wasted time for town, strictly sticking to lynches like that. And if the lynches aren't going to be stuck to in such a way, then where's the discouragement to fire the nuke in the first place once they're already flying? On July 05 2011 17:13 sandroba wrote: OK so you are saying nuke is going to be a cluster fuck and nothing can be done. If you are town why don't you conceed already then? Or maybe that's what you want because you are mafia. I agree with you that if we don't actively try to control this shit that's what most likely is going to happen. Ask yourselves the question: Which is better: a fuckton of dayvigs nuking randomly or 2 neat lynches per day? I don't think this shit can be actively controlled at all tbh. Honestly I have no clue how this game will go! What I do think is a bad idea is encouraging people to use nukes *at all*, in any general sense. I'd love to be convinced otherwise, since it is potentially a very powerful tool (and I haven't read the last game yet so I don't know how that one went), but I just don't like pushing the killfest forward any. And that second bit, is that even a question? Of course two neat lynches per day would be idea. My point is, I don't think that's what'll happen in the slightest. | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
People seem to be ignoring that the nuke-killing one will take two days, meaning we don't get a choice in what to do tomorrow. Extra lives are good, being able to do something tomorrow is good. Also, now that it's time to vote for lynches and such, has everyone forgotten about this? On July 05 2011 19:00 Curu wrote: How do you know Mafia has KP of 1? It wasn't in the OP and it's a closed setup.? Assumption from last game or something more? :o | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
 | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
On July 06 2011 13:59 Coagulation wrote: Wasnt like the point of all those plans to take care of shit like this. what happen to nuke = lynched ? Why is everyone not lynching Palmer now or shooting him with a fucking nuke at least. Seems like at worst he's just trying to prove that he doesn't have any nukes. At best it was a joke and he didn't realize how the nuke mechanic worked exactly. On July 06 2011 11:50 sandroba wrote: I like that no one comented ON MY HUGE FUCKING CASE on palmar that proves he is scum, then vote for me for something I already explained. First of all you are calling that scum slip (it's a mistake btw, based on previous games knowledge) before we even know how many fucking kp mafia actually has. Good job. Also anyone that agreed to my plan should be voting to lynch palmar regardless since he broke the no nukes rule, shorttened the day and possibly took away an extra life from another player for no reason. He didn't even follow his own plan. God knows if he has nukes or not. Use your head and vote for palmar. He is 100% scum. I really disagree with your reasoning and don't like how fiercely you're pushing this. He clearly didn't break the no nukes rules since he didn't actually fire a nuke. His plan is different than yours, yeah, but it certainly has its merits. I'm not sold your plan will work like you lay it out myself, but nearly all of town onboard it should definitely be given a shot. Saying palmar is '100% scum' because he changed his mind and you disagree with his plan isn't helpful. Anyway, we have a lynch target for today that should be clear: ##Vote: Mataza I like your style, but it's one we can't allow in this game! | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
Anyway, when does day end and what's going on? I need to vote for someone. | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
I'm with decon on this, at this point keeping another clusterfuck like this from happening tomorrow is the best bet  | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
Anyway, I feel like sand's death isn't something we should really be after. From his super-outspokenness early on and willingness to argue his point, yell at people, and generally paint a huge target on his back, I strongly feel he's town. I think his actions during the armageddon yesterday were more those of a player frustrated to see his (admittedly unrealistic!) plan pretty much falling apart because people couldn't help themselves. uhh... there are a lot of people playing in really weird confusing ways and I don't really know what's going on other than that. | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
I'm all for nuking YM just because the claim he made seems to be fake. | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
On July 09 2011 14:19 heist wrote: What I don't understand is why Chaos did nothing when someone else roleclaimed as him. I support the nuke option but wait till more people weigh in. On July 09 2011 00:23 chaos13 wrote: Oh and to the conversation that's been going on: Don't trust roleclaims. His first post after YM's claim. Anyway, which campaign won yesterday? There's no note in the night post, but from the voting thread it looks like Dunkirk won-- since chaos was Boreritish, I guess that means that campaigns start the day *after* they get voted for instead of right as they win? Something everyone should be aware of, I suppose. | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
On July 10 2011 12:49 Ciryandor wrote: This bro was wondering where Eiii is as well; he hasn't posted for a while... Aw, so nice to know you people still care about me <3 My schedule only really allows me to be active in the evenings for a few more days. Anyway: Operation ultra is the best option we have, but we should consider it a night of mafia having... I guess kind of muted night actions. It gives them the ability to use the night actions that aren't the kill to fuck with us, basically, and it may force them to choose nonideal targets for all of their actions. dunno what to think about the lynch tbh. Opz doesn't seem scummy to me, certainly not from his recent defense, I don't know why people are staying on him other than pure laziness/bandwagoning. I'm really tempted to lynch sand just because I can't imagine that zombies are just nukeproof dudes that win with town :/ Luckily there's a lot more time left in the day to make decisions | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
| ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
not really sure how that happened, sorry gm. Can't go back on a decision like that now though! | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
On July 10 2011 18:57 Kurumi wrote: Eiii was lurking and I want to get rid of lurkers, since I will die ##nuke Eiii Well, let's hope this game won't end in some kind of lurker mylo woah hey, that's not very nice | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
I'm Bromar Bradley! I'm basically a CPR doc with some flavor text about alcohol, and I have three nukes! that's all. | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
On July 11 2011 05:53 kitaman27 wrote: If you're a cpr doc, who did you shoot/save last night? no one :B | ||
|
Eiii
United States2566 Posts
On July 10 2011 13:47 Eiii wrote: Aw, so nice to know you people still care about me <3 I kind of tried to breadcrumb this earlier, though I suppose I should have done a better job-- if you quote the post (that I made, not ciry), there's extra spacing around 'bro' that I added. | ||
| ||
