|
On May 05 2011 08:33 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2011 08:30 Forumite wrote:On May 05 2011 08:24 Beneather wrote:On May 05 2011 08:22 Forumite wrote:
Of these three, I think we have the least to go on with AirbladeOrange, because he´s only got 4 posts so far. He looks more like a slow poster that made a few scumtells. Could you analyze these posts. So that we can see the scumtells you are telling us. We can't just bandwagon a guy just you say he has 4 posts and had a few scumtells. We need a little more than that. I looked at his longest post. The other 3 are mostly oneliners. One thinks Chaoser is suspicious for doing an analysis early, the others looks like they are asking Irish questions, or asking questions about Irish. You know post count and length have nothing to do with actual scumminess right? Foolishness when he plays rarely posts but he makes his posts count when he does. You said AO posted four times only. At least he's taking stances in his posts. Kurumi hasn't taken a real stance at all. He said he was suspicious of Punk and then voted WITH Punk as soon as Punk started the AO wagon. I'm inclined to look at behavior, not post count or post length. Go read previous games please. You'll see that focusing on these issues do nothing to further the town agenda. I don't know if it's because you are a new player or what but I've got my eye on you.
Does this mean you think AO is scummy and I´m wrong in my analysis as I missed that, or that you only object to the way I look at posts? I don´t focus on short posts, but I still read them.
|
It's kind of funny how extreme you're acting, because of a simple misunderstanding. Quick to accuse and very stubborn about it.
|
|
|
On May 05 2011 08:48 Cthsazsa wrote:
It's kind of funny how extreme you're acting, because of a simple misunderstanding. Quick to accuse and very stubborn about it.
Ya I kinda have a reputation around here for that. I'm also well above 60% in accuracy.
You're scum.
|
On May 05 2011 08:50 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2011 08:48 Cthsazsa wrote:
It's kind of funny how extreme you're acting, because of a simple misunderstanding. Quick to accuse and very stubborn about it. Ya I kinda have a reputation around here for that. I'm also well above 60% in accuracy. You're scum.
Yes, you've stated that numerous times already. I don't know if your trying to get an irrational response from me or just trying to get people to side with you.
|
On May 05 2011 08:48 Forumite wrote:
Does this mean you think AO is scummy and I´m wrong in my analysis as I missed that, or that you only object to the way I look at posts? I don´t focus on short posts, but I still read them.
What? I don't think AO is scummy, where do I say that in my post? I said your analysis is FLAWED. You're trying to spin a sweater out of a tiny piece of yarn. Out of the three, AO, Kurumi, and Irish_Punk, the latter two have acted way more scummy in both singular posts and behaviorally. Irish says he'll contribute but he always say "after I deal with this other game". He posts a weak argument against as heat starts to appear on Kumuri and immediately Kurumi votes with Irish even though he had previously said he thought Irish was mafia. Kurumi also tried to stop actual discussion over the topic of me, trying to buddy up to me. How is AO's posts WORSE than all that put together?
|
On May 05 2011 08:50 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2011 08:48 Cthsazsa wrote:
It's kind of funny how extreme you're acting, because of a simple misunderstanding. Quick to accuse and very stubborn about it. Ya I kinda have a reputation around here for that. I'm also well above 60% in accuracy. You're scum.
I'm also wondering why you haven't voted me yet.
|
On May 05 2011 08:53 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2011 08:48 Forumite wrote:
Does this mean you think AO is scummy and I´m wrong in my analysis as I missed that, or that you only object to the way I look at posts? I don´t focus on short posts, but I still read them. What? I don't think AO is scummy, where do I say that in my post? I said your analysis is FLAWED. You're trying to spin a sweater out of a tiny piece of yarn. Out of the three, AO, Kurumi, and Irish_Punk, the latter two have acted way more scummy in both singular posts and behaviorally. Irish says he'll contribute but he always say "after I deal with this other game". He posts a weak argument against as heat starts to appear on Kumuri and immediately Kurumi votes with Irish even though he had previously said he thought Irish was mafia. Kurumi also tried to stop actual discussion over the topic of me, trying to buddy up to me. How is AO's posts WORSE than all that put together?
Wait a minute, I thought I was defending AO, where do I try to make him out to be more scummy than the others?
|
wait, sorry, was I reading someone else's posts and totally responding to the wrong person? lol
|
On May 05 2011 08:22 Forumite wrote:
Of these three, I think we have the least to go on with AirbladeOrange, because he´s only got 4 posts so far. He looks more like a slow poster that made a few scumtells.
Ohhhh, my bad dude, I thought you said he had the MOST to go on. 4 hours of sleep = eyes blurred lol
|
On May 05 2011 08:56 Cthsazsa wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2011 08:50 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 08:48 Cthsazsa wrote:
It's kind of funny how extreme you're acting, because of a simple misunderstanding. Quick to accuse and very stubborn about it. Ya I kinda have a reputation around here for that. I'm also well above 60% in accuracy. You're scum. I'm also wondering why you haven't voted me yet.
Because we have 30 hours left. Much more fun to keep you squirming.
|
On May 05 2011 09:00 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2011 08:56 Cthsazsa wrote:On May 05 2011 08:50 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 08:48 Cthsazsa wrote:
It's kind of funny how extreme you're acting, because of a simple misunderstanding. Quick to accuse and very stubborn about it. Ya I kinda have a reputation around here for that. I'm also well above 60% in accuracy. You're scum. I'm also wondering why you haven't voted me yet. Because we have 30 hours left. Much more fun to keep you squirming.
I bet that's very entertaining.
|
On May 05 2011 08:59 chaoser wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2011 08:22 Forumite wrote:
Of these three, I think we have the least to go on with AirbladeOrange, because he´s only got 4 posts so far. He looks more like a slow poster that made a few scumtells. Ohhhh, my bad dude, I thought you said he had the MOST to go on. 4 hours of sleep = eyes blurred lol
No problem, with 30 people, confusing them is easy. I will quote properly in my EBWOPs in the future, might help prevent some confusion.
|
On May 05 2011 09:09 Cthsazsa wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2011 09:00 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 08:56 Cthsazsa wrote:On May 05 2011 08:50 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 08:48 Cthsazsa wrote:
It's kind of funny how extreme you're acting, because of a simple misunderstanding. Quick to accuse and very stubborn about it. Ya I kinda have a reputation around here for that. I'm also well above 60% in accuracy. You're scum. I'm also wondering why you haven't voted me yet. Because we have 30 hours left. Much more fun to keep you squirming. I bet that's very entertaining.
Your response to being called scum is almost identical to CubEdin's response in 35.
Nonchalant. A prove it kind of attitude. Work on it. Right now you're scum dude.
|
On May 05 2011 09:19 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2011 09:09 Cthsazsa wrote:On May 05 2011 09:00 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 08:56 Cthsazsa wrote:On May 05 2011 08:50 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 08:48 Cthsazsa wrote:
It's kind of funny how extreme you're acting, because of a simple misunderstanding. Quick to accuse and very stubborn about it. Ya I kinda have a reputation around here for that. I'm also well above 60% in accuracy. You're scum. I'm also wondering why you haven't voted me yet. Because we have 30 hours left. Much more fun to keep you squirming. I bet that's very entertaining. Your response to being called scum is almost identical to CubEdin's response in 35. Nonchalant. A prove it kind of attitude. Work on it. Right now you're scum dude.
Except there's nothing to prove. It was a misunderstanding between the meaning of inactive and lurking.
You can quit trolling me now.
|
On May 05 2011 09:22 Cthsazsa wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2011 09:19 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 09:09 Cthsazsa wrote:On May 05 2011 09:00 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 08:56 Cthsazsa wrote:On May 05 2011 08:50 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 08:48 Cthsazsa wrote:
It's kind of funny how extreme you're acting, because of a simple misunderstanding. Quick to accuse and very stubborn about it. Ya I kinda have a reputation around here for that. I'm also well above 60% in accuracy. You're scum. I'm also wondering why you haven't voted me yet. Because we have 30 hours left. Much more fun to keep you squirming. I bet that's very entertaining. Your response to being called scum is almost identical to CubEdin's response in 35. Nonchalant. A prove it kind of attitude. Work on it. Right now you're scum dude. Except there's nothing to prove. It was a misunderstanding between the meaning of inactive and lurking. You can quit trolling me now.
I'm not trolling you. And it has nothing to do with your definition of lurking/inactive. It's all about your assertion that we have nothing to fear from inactive/lurking scum.
Scummy.
|
One day I hope I get to be tunneled by Jackal lol
|
On May 05 2011 09:26 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2011 09:22 Cthsazsa wrote:On May 05 2011 09:19 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 09:09 Cthsazsa wrote:On May 05 2011 09:00 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 08:56 Cthsazsa wrote:On May 05 2011 08:50 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 08:48 Cthsazsa wrote:
It's kind of funny how extreme you're acting, because of a simple misunderstanding. Quick to accuse and very stubborn about it. Ya I kinda have a reputation around here for that. I'm also well above 60% in accuracy. You're scum. I'm also wondering why you haven't voted me yet. Because we have 30 hours left. Much more fun to keep you squirming. I bet that's very entertaining. Your response to being called scum is almost identical to CubEdin's response in 35. Nonchalant. A prove it kind of attitude. Work on it. Right now you're scum dude. Except there's nothing to prove. It was a misunderstanding between the meaning of inactive and lurking. You can quit trolling me now. I'm not trolling you. And it has nothing to do with your definition of lurking/inactive. It's all about your assertion that we have nothing to fear from inactive/lurking scum. Scummy.
Your overarching amount of ego amuses me to no end.
|
United States4714 Posts
Here are some of my thoughts about everything.
The chaoser/redtooth long posts- I don't really have an opinion on whether the posts are scummy or not but a big part of why kavdragon was lynched last game for similar posts was because those were pretty much all he posted. He posted very little actual analysis and the analysis he did post wasn't very good. So as long as red/chaoser post some good analysis I don't think there is a problem with them trying to help out the newer players.
AO/Irish/Karumi- I don't find AO that suspicious other than him saying chaoser was suspicious without giving any reasoning. Irish/karumi seem by far the most suspicious to me. Irish saying karumi had made a lot of great posts is either him defending a teammate or he hadn't actually read anything karumi had written. Almost every post of karumi's has had almost no content and has been confusing. I don't know why a townie trying to win would play like him, other than to try and get reactions out of people. But if that's the case I would like to see some more reasonable posts from him. His one analysis post was better but didn't actually have much analysis in it.
Cthsazsa- I think the scum slip jackal is going on about is way overblown. It seems a lot more likely to just be a mistake than his attempt to run some mafia agenda of protecting lurkers, especially when hes being pretty active himself. I would be more suspicious of beneather who didn't post at all then instantly jumped on the supposed scum slip.
Anyway I guess if I had to vote right now I would vote karumi but I will wait for more information to officially decide.
|
On May 05 2011 09:26 Jackal58 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 05 2011 09:22 Cthsazsa wrote:On May 05 2011 09:19 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 09:09 Cthsazsa wrote:On May 05 2011 09:00 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 08:56 Cthsazsa wrote:On May 05 2011 08:50 Jackal58 wrote:On May 05 2011 08:48 Cthsazsa wrote:
It's kind of funny how extreme you're acting, because of a simple misunderstanding. Quick to accuse and very stubborn about it. Ya I kinda have a reputation around here for that. I'm also well above 60% in accuracy. You're scum. I'm also wondering why you haven't voted me yet. Because we have 30 hours left. Much more fun to keep you squirming. I bet that's very entertaining. Your response to being called scum is almost identical to CubEdin's response in 35. Nonchalant. A prove it kind of attitude. Work on it. Right now you're scum dude. Except there's nothing to prove. It was a misunderstanding between the meaning of inactive and lurking. You can quit trolling me now. I'm not trolling you. And it has nothing to do with your definition of lurking/inactive. It's all about your assertion that we have nothing to fear from inactive/lurking scum. Scummy.
If you say so big guy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
