Sleeper Cell Mafia - Page 14

On April 27 2011 02:13 Zorkmid wrote:
EBWOP:
Another thought Maybe Tkdted is seeking the protection of a possible medic role?

On April 27 2011 01:04 GMarshal wrote:


Weigh in then please, who do you think is mafia? Why? Lynch is in less than 10 hours, who would you like to see dead?

While I'm throwing questions around, if you were a DT who would you check tonight? If you were a busdriver what two people would you swap? why?

On April 27 2011 02:20 darmousseh wrote:


It's pretty obvious what he is, but apparently calling out people when they make themselves too obvious to the mafia is frowned upon. People need to stop making so many tells, seriously.

On April 27 2011 02:26 Ace wrote:
Tkdted never made a role claim or hinted at one. You guys are reading something that isn't there. He "breadcrumbed" which while it wasn't even a bread crumb isn't a RC.

Since no one has any solid analysis and are pretty much much reading posts trying to make them look scummy instead of reading people there isn't a good lynch yet. I'd say we should unvote or get rid of inactive but that seems silly. This notion that Scum may be trying to play low activity so they are contacted by the cell leader is absolute nonsense. The Cell Leader already knows the Agent's identities so activity level doesn't matter.

On April 27 2011 02:32 Jackal58 wrote:

+ Show Spoiler +
????

I'd also like to know the point of your exercise.

On April 27 2011 02:37 Impervious wrote:
Ok, between this "secret plan", this recent slipup, and defending someone who is currently suspicious, is anyone else getting a weird vibe from Ace?

On April 27 2011 02:38 Ace wrote:


and where's the role claim or the hint of his role?

Thanks for playing.

On April 27 2011 02:42 Zorkmid wrote:


He basically claims that he isn't ANY of the listed roles IMO.

On April 27 2011 02:23 Zorkmid wrote:


Not obvious to me. I think that the only roles that qualify as "weird" by definition would be the ones unspecified in the OP.

On April 26 2011 08:19 Impervious wrote:

It's not funny, its smart play by them.

On April 26 2011 07:55 Impervious wrote:
I thought pretty hard about how I'd play each of the positions before the game actually started.....

On April 26 2011 08:17 Impervious wrote:

I did.

On April 26 2011 07:48 Impervious wrote:
Oh, and I can think of a way of letting them know who the GF at the same time.....

On April 26 2011 07:45 Impervious wrote:

It is doable in 5 words..... Regardless of how many members are on the team.....

On April 26 2011 09:33 Impervious wrote:
I don't see any real info yet either.....

Btw, in case you guys are watching how people behave/how often they post - I have an exam on Wednesday, and I'm in the middle of moving from one place to another, so my posting may be erratic, without actually being caused by any game changing information that I may come across.....

On April 25 2011 22:38 Impervious wrote:
Guys, this talk about breadcrumbing is nice and all, but I don't see it going much further at the moment. We should probably wait a while before bringing this up, so we can catch a slip up. Especially if they are trying to hide their posting in the thread.

I think we should talk about the pros and cons of of double-checking anyone who gets the result of "insufficient analysis", to make it easier on the DT.

The pros of double checking are that you are more sure of the result. The cons are that you could be checking someone else instead, therefore checking more people. I really think the cons outweigh the pros in this case.

Thoughts?

On April 25 2011 21:41 sandroba wrote:
I think this discussion about breadcrumbs is not productive at all, specially if you reveal your strategy before you put it in practice. Doing what you are suggesting is going to make scumhunting more difficult imo. Also I don't think that's the way mafia is going to identify each other, as there are several other more obvious ways I can think of.

On April 25 2011 11:41 Vain wrote:


Hey, i'm still here too. Am going to bed now BECAUSE ITS 5 AM HERE

btw, maby dt's should double check if they get that not info sufficient thingy if they have enough time and the player looks trusted. oh well, we'll see how it plays out. Goodnight!

On April 27 2011 02:40 Ace wrote:


what is he suspicious of? Saying he might role claim? That isn't a suspicious action at all. You guys are looking for things that aren't there.

If someone says hey I have a pretty good role/strange role/interesting role and I might claim then show me how that is scummy behavior.

On April 08 2011 14:51 iGrok wrote:
This is a semi-closed setup. Some Roles and their abilities will be disclosed, however role counts will not be. There is at least one of every Roles below. There may be other Roles not listed.

On April 27 2011 02:55 Impervious wrote:

Well, unless we get some kind of confirmation that there are indeed roles not listed in the OP that are in play, his actions are definitely suspicious. Nobody in either of the two blue roles would even dream of bringing that much attention to themselves at this point in the game.

Also, I await the revealing of your plan.

On April 08 2011 14:51 iGrok wrote:
[center]ROLES

This is a semi-closed setup. Some Roles and their abilities will be disclosed, however role counts will not be. There is at least one of every Roles below. There may be other Roles not listed.

On April 27 2011 02:52 Ace wrote:
Jackal care to explain yourself when you quoted that post?

On April 27 2011 02:43 tnkted wrote:


It's not specified in the OP. Now can we please stop talking about this? I'll claim day2 if you people are seriously so freaked out. Yes, we're freaked out over it. Especially since I'm not aware of any non-listed roles at the moment. And that's not a good thing, because its also possible that the Reds have unlisted roles/abilities as well..... So I'd like to find out one way or another.

And yes, zork, it should be extremely obvious what I am and why I'm acting this way. NO MORE CLUES.

You guys are spelling my name wrong btw, its TNK not TDK lol.

Now, as for my vote: it's Impervious

He's had almost nothing but one liners.











Oneliners. Every time. Then he has this gem, reiterating an excuse already given by several people for inactivity: Yes, because oneliners are definitely a scumtell.....


Several other people had brought this excuse up already. Wiggles, for example. Trying to blend in? Isnt it better to claim this shit ahead of time, rather than claim it after the fact? Or would you rather discover my behavior changes after a couple of days, and then I claim both the move and the exams as excuses for it?

If it would have been better to claim it after the fact, then I guess I'll do that next time I play a game of Mafia.

Then we get an actual post of substance:


Now, I agree with not focusing on breadcrumbing this game, because its almost impossible for us to catch scum at it. But this post talks about doublechecking people. Now this isn't a scumtell in and of itself, but what is interesting is that he steals the entire content of his post from two other players: I thought both were important things to do.

If we're going to try to outsmart the people with red roles, then we need to catch them before their plan (whatever it is) is fully formed..... By giving away the methods we'd expect them to use, they'll know what to avoid doing..... Frankly, it was really dumb to go so in-depth on that subject.

And making sure the DT knows what he should be doing is always going to be a good thing. I'm not sure if what you initially said was a major blunder, and you're simply trying to cover it up, or if you genuinely have a non-disclosed role. Part of me wants to actually lynch you tonight, to confirm it either way (seeing as you'll probably be a top target for the mafia). Of course, this could bite us in the ass if you really do have a useful role for the town. And I don't want to waste a check on you to find out either way.

First, Sandroba saying "talking breadcrumbs is a waste of time."


Then vain suggesting doublechecks.


Convinced? I am, at least enough for a day1 lynch.

#vote Impervious

On April 27 2011 03:01 Ace wrote:





The OP makes it quite clear that the possibility exists.

Still waiting on more people to post. Really need more activity before I reveal my plan.