Insane Mafia 2 - Page 5
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 26 2011 13:28 OriginalName wrote: Alright guys first off: Why are we scumhunting using role PMs? Sure a scum could conceivably slip when referencijg such a thing but using the to "confirm" yourself is stupid and honestly who knows if all the PMs were written the same, it just seems irrelevant. My second point is on the word "confirmed": The next person to used aforementioned word to describe another player especially if they are town should be lynched (and i realize ive used it too but when i think about i was being an idiot) nobody and I repeat NOBODY is "confirmed" until they're experiencing a bullet through the head or a short drop and a sudden stop. Do you know what happens when people are "confirmed" and they turn out to be GFs or Framed townies? We get ourselves into worse and worse situations. Just some reads: Tackster - Other than lurking seems standard newb Id really like to here IGs arguement within PMs LemonWalrus - Inactive spammy generally unhelpful. Insanious - Im actually thinking he is some sort of lover role with Tack rather than scum I mean he really hasnt posted anything outside Tack's defense that seems outright suspicous and its Insane Mafia who knows what crazy shit is around. Tnktd - This guy just seems batshit crazy with breadcrumbing PM and 'clearing' Annul really his play is confusing me. lol...this sounds like a mafia scared about tnkt's breadcrumbing plan. While it doesn't mean 100% confirmed just yet, it's possible to make it at least 90% confirmed via lynching and how people come down on votes/what they post in thread. Using it is 100% pro town. Just gotta do it with a small grain of salt. You being so against it makes me FoS you. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 26 2011 13:48 Insanious wrote: Btw, just to side with Bum... I am not a fan of tricking the scum like this. I want to win through scum hunting, and them slipping up, not by LSB/Kita giving people different alignment PMs. I'm not going to ruin your plan, but I still want to come out and say that it just doesn't feel right (not in the, this might be a scum plan, way... but in the I morally object to it way.) but if LSB and Kita says its ok... I agree with this but I also agree with tnkt's use everything possible attitude. If the hosts say we can use it, lets use it. Even if doesn't work the way it's intended to, it's getting a lot of responses (like OriginalName's that are...interesting to say the least) | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
So an almost certain green believes me to be town and a 50% scum 'team' say i'm scum... That person was annul btw I think Jackal mentioned | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 26 2011 14:25 Tackster wrote: @GMarshal thank you for at least considering the evidence before you made your mind up. I was worried that players here are just sheeping Jackal. I would like to point out something else important: I'm new to forum mafia. So barring the idea that I'm the devil and the ultimate scum surely if i'm behaving scummy people must be able to PROVE it.... If I am that devil btw how am I FOSsed when there can be no proof? Anyway notice how not one shred of evidence has been brought forward except for the pseudo-evidence that people in the mini-game think i'm scum without any evidence themselves... Of which by the way 2 consist of SCUM Hey! I called for more evidence too! | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 26 2011 15:23 Lanaia wrote: Okay, I take back what I said about iGrok playing to his town meta. He no longer is doing so from what I can tell. I don't think a celebratory hangover would cause him to completely forget PMs during gametime with people you aren't part of a group with aren't allowed. What lol, that statement is confusing. What do you mean? | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 26 2011 23:34 orgolove wrote: Sorry guys - still in the middle of a busy weekend here. I just want to point out how there's no one else that's coming up to defend Jackal. I don't know if that's because no one wants to be associated with him when he flips, or if he's really a townie and we're doing it wrong... 1) That is WIFOM and has almost no weight. 2) People did sort of defend him (coag, people in the IG, etc) 3) He's not in a mason circle...he's in the IG... | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
To vote for someone please write Votes: Name (LEAVE OUT THE ##) That way, we can see where the town falls on the issue | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 27 2011 01:01 Jackal58 wrote: You are a normal townie, sit tight, you'll get your role in 24 hours Townie is in green. Twinkle toes told me to look in role PMs Then said Oh sorry I meant alignment PMs. that's when I quit playing his game. It's bs any ways. Not copied - typed out. Sit tight while I nail your scummy ass to the wall. Seems the only thing you know is sit tight. And only sit tight. Do you know any of the other bread crumbs? | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:46 annul wrote: i would analyze the rest, but i think it is pointless until we see what happens in day and night 1 Isn't the point that we CAN'T wait? If we lynch town in the item game we're behind in it and there's a good chance we would lose? | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 27 2011 04:57 annul wrote: his final conclusion is "we need to kill in item game." cool, i agree, and this is what i have been saying from the get go. as for what to do in the future, let's see what the flip is Oh sorry, I thought his conclusion was we can't mess up our IG lynch --> more info for main thread from the IG game would be nice. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 27 2011 05:05 Mr. Wiggles wrote: My final conclusion is we need to kill in item game, but if we shoot town, we're relying completely on the actions of scum for whether we win or not. We have to try our hardest to kill scum on the first lynch, and how we're deciding the lynch now is just off the reads of the few people in the game. Scum will agree to any lynch that isn't them. Town will agree to any lynch they think is scum. Town will not agree to their own lynch. Scum will not agree to their own lynch. So, when you're basing the lynch off just a few players' decisions in the item game, if you picked wrong, you're going to get the support of two scum automatically, and then all they need to do is convince one more town, that's 4/6. This is why I'd really like to at least see some of the thought process behind what's going on here, because the whole town might get screwed based on the wrong decisions of just a couple people. Ok yeah, nvm, I was right lol | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On March 27 2011 06:36 Coagulation wrote: bullshit i have posted scummy PM's i got from him and analyzed them and showed people why i think they are scummy 2 times. go back and read the thread dont tell me i havnt found "ONE" scummy thing. Do you mean this one coag? Or is there more? Want to compile to view easier. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
Jackal approached Coag with a plan that will confirm each other to one another. Coag accepts that the plan is logical, foolproof, and will work. Since it is in the Item Game where there is only 1 red and 1 black, Coag reasons that MAFIA would never do this since mafia wouldn't want to confirm himself as red. This is why Coag is defending Jackal. Is that the reasoning coag? | ||
| ||