EPT
Haunted Mafia - Page 90
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
| ||
|
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
Anyway, Voted for Veldril a while ago. Sorry mate, no better option! | ||
|
Glasse
Canada1237 Posts
| ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
brownbear getting lynched wouldnt tell us much if he popped red.. bill on the otherhand.... | ||
|
Glasse
Canada1237 Posts
On October 16 2010 11:02 Coagulation wrote: we would uncover much more information by lynching bill or orgo brownbear getting lynched wouldnt tell us much if he popped red.. bill on the otherhand.... true, true. I guess those are much better ideas I'm going to keep an eye on our little brown bear though | ||
|
jodogohoo
Canada2533 Posts
<3 x 100 | ||
|
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
| ||
|
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
| ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On October 16 2010 11:13 CubEdIn wrote: (I need to know if I should stay up or go to bed, it's 5:14 am here) 1 hour and 45 minutes. | ||
|
ghrur
United States3786 Posts
| ||
|
orgolove
Vatican City State1650 Posts
On October 16 2010 11:02 Coagulation wrote: we would uncover much more information by lynching bill or orgo brownbear getting lynched wouldnt tell us much if he popped red.. bill on the otherhand.... Daww, did I hurt your feelings? it's pretty funny that you're including me in every suspicion list you can just because I've been pointing out obvious signs that you might be a red. Lol even you can't list any benefit to the town by lynching me. You've never actually responded to any of my questions, by the way - the suspicions hold, and you won't be able to sidestep answering it forever. You were pretty suspicious from the beginning and tried to "joke" about voting against yourself, and bandwagoned at the first opportunity against anyone who was currently being suspected at the time. On October 11 2010 14:35 Coagulation wrote: why the hell everyone voting to kill me already? theres hasnt been a single clue relevent to me mentioned at all. jeez. On October 11 2010 14:56 Coagulation wrote: omg i found incriminating evidence against myself DoctorHelvetica was sitting at his desk deep within the Liquidvania jail. The jail used to be a dungeon when Dracula was in power and there were still bloodstains on the old stone walls. He heard footsteps coming down the hall, assuming it was the deputy warden coming to do his rounds he didn't even look back but just absorbed himself in his book on zombie history. The door creaked open and the footsteps stopped. DoctorHelvetica looked back at the open doorway but saw no one. better post let the guys know On October 11 2010 14:58 Coagulation wrote: NO i think we should all stop analysing and just keep voting for coag for no reason On October 13 2010 11:52 Coagulation wrote: PANDAIN IS MAFIA BILL IS VAMPIRE On October 13 2010 07:06 Coagulation wrote: i think masq would be our best bet for lynch. And how much of an idiot are you, to roleclaim as a zombie ON THE FIRST DAY and expect to believe that shit? On October 12 2010 06:04 Coagulation wrote: well fuck. I had no idea so what exactly is the point of being zombie then? everyone else gets actions and stuff to influence/control the game. and i get the cannon fodder role? lame. Finally, there's that matter of the voting patterns of seraph and coagulation. + Show Spoiler + On October 14 2010 12:14 Kpyolysis32 wrote: You pick up terms and stuff so fast if you read the guides on the basics of how to play If coagulation really read the basics of how to play, he would have clearly avoided what's listed as one of the most common tells of non-townies: JEEP's Tells for Finding Mafia Voting each other while FOSing (Finger of Suspicion) a non-mafia. This is very common. link: http://mafiascum.net/wiki/index.php?title=JEEP's_Tells_for_Finding_Mafia Look at the history between seraph and coagulation. First, their voting: seRapH On October 11 2010 13:48 seRapH wrote: coagulation. hang the terrorist! On October 12 2010 23:36 seRapH wrote: ##Unvote Coagulation ##Vote Masq Coagulation On October 11 2010 17:17 Coagulation wrote: seraPh On October 13 2010 05:05 Coagulation wrote: unvote seraph vote masq Both of them voted against each other, and only changed their votes towards the very end when a lynch was becoming apparent. Despite his vote, coagulation showed no effort towards bringing suspicion on seraph, and in fact has stopped mentioning him altogether in his posts after the first 12 hour period. Instead he's been pointing fingers left and right: On October 13 2010 11:52 Coagulation wrote: PANDAIN IS MAFIA BILL IS VAMPIRE On October 13 2010 07:06 Coagulation wrote: i think masq would be our best bet for lynch. What's even more damning is seraph also has -zero- posts where he mentions coagulation beyond his last comment, where he shows he really didn't have any good reason to vote for coagulation: On October 11 2010 15:15 seRapH wrote: because you're a terrorist. i'm sorry, i'm american and react badly to terrorists. give me a reason to trust you (such as contributing a valuable analysis) and maybe i'll change my mind. Go ahead, look through their posts. I can wait. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
im accusing you because you crammed your fucking spreadsheet down everyones face like 75% of the game and when people pointed out that there are mistakes all over it you ignored them. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
orgolove
Vatican City State1650 Posts
| ||
|
Nemesis
Canada2568 Posts
| ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
|
orgolove
Vatican City State1650 Posts
Am I writing about your use of mafia jargon? l2read please. What people disagreed with me was my pointing out of you claiming to be a noob yet using those words fluently. So I'm not talking about that anymore. There's still countless other suspicions that can be raised against you which people didn't "go over." On October 16 2010 11:28 Coagulation wrote: we already went over this and everyone told you to stop it remember? But yes, I just got a few PMs about treating you "nice." I'll leave it at that - you're not informed enough to pull off such a scheme. Let me give you a hint - if you don't have anything useful to say, stay quiet and you'll at least go halfway. | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On October 16 2010 11:32 Nemesis wrote: Just wondering it seems people keep using WIFOM, what does that mean? basically, just any analysis which is based on what your opponet "might do", based on what you "might do," but then what would he do in response? Like reverse reverse psycholog. More broadly, just any analysis that's not grounded in behavior, but speculation. | ||
|
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
could be wrong. | ||
|
CubEdIn
Romania5359 Posts
| ||
| ||
