|
*Addition* Not only that, but tree.hugger says many reputations lie on it. My argument is against tree.hugger, because his reasoning is weak, but he chose to defend you and not subversion. WHich is why I'm voting to lynch you (not to mention you're play this game is annoying). He said youngmini defended subversion so it gives us insight into how mini is aligned, BUT mini defended you too...so how can he argue that? He can't.
I'd be happy with Tree.Hugger's death too.
|
There seems to be enough of us online to change votes. I'm fine with BC or Tree.Hugger dying. BC's too deadly, and Tree.Hugger...well...He defended Darth in a bull shit no information and false information way, and jumped on Subversion with shitty logic. That is all.
AND he PM'd me, which is a no no. I only want PM's when I'm checked and saved.
|
Well...if BC is mafia...his vote on Amber is quite interesting....who was it on previously guys?
|
On July 22 2010 16:39 Tricode wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 16:35 Pandain wrote:On July 22 2010 16:29 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:On July 22 2010 16:10 Pandain wrote:On July 22 2010 16:05 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: Hmm I tried searching "Jayme" in both the username bar and the keyword bar, and in the username bar with mafia in the keyword bar and it didn't work.
Oh when you search only put the name it in the Username bar. And then make sure you have "content only" Ok thanks. Looks like way more posts than six. Omg you right. His new post "Why?" has earned him the long coveted award of 7 posts. I tip my hat to you sir. Thank you. I am glade you are impressed. I hope this post also impresses you.
On July 22 2010 16:31 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 16:30 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On July 22 2010 16:27 Subversion wrote: when is night?? right now I WIN.
On July 22 2010 16:35 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 16:29 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:On July 22 2010 16:10 Pandain wrote:On July 22 2010 16:05 Pyrrhuloxia wrote: Hmm I tried searching "Jayme" in both the username bar and the keyword bar, and in the username bar with mafia in the keyword bar and it didn't work.
Oh when you search only put the name it in the Username bar. And then make sure you have "content only" Ok thanks. Looks like way more posts than six. Omg you right. His new post "Why?" has earned him the long coveted award of 7 posts. I tip my hat to you sir.
On July 22 2010 17:02 Subversion wrote: I want night because I'm tired ^_^
Was a hectic mafia day lolz. I hope you all choke on your spam.
|
On July 23 2010 14:28 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 14:27 Pandain wrote:On July 23 2010 14:26 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Before this day turns into a giant flame fest like the last few pages.
I took a hit last night. Holy crud. This is the info I was talking about. Wait a second... then how did two people die. and a third got hit? Was there a vigilante? That would be my guess. No idea which one hit me, but regardless, I was. You could have been hit by mafia....Or vig...
Unconfirmed. Suicide bomb is impossible, a red would have died. Now...If the vig would like to step forward given that he is now a regular townie and say who he hit....
|
On July 23 2010 14:35 youngminii wrote: The real question is why would vigilante hit any of these three? It makes no sense. There was no spotlight on any of them and they didn't really shine a spotlight at anyone (well BC said some things a while back). Roffles wasn't posting, I would of hit him. I also would of hit BC myself. So....Eh?
|
On July 23 2010 14:46 youngminii wrote: I don't think B) is true. It's extremely unlikely that there is a Vigilante that is bad enough to waste their kill so early in the game with such little evidence. I have my own reservations on whether or not I believe your claim but A) seems to be the most likely at this point in time. Citizen regularly day vigs people randomly ruining scum plans at day 2/3....So....Don't say that...Lol...
|
On July 23 2010 19:47 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 19:46 ~OpZ~ wrote:On July 23 2010 14:28 BloodyC0bbler wrote:On July 23 2010 14:27 Pandain wrote:On July 23 2010 14:26 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Before this day turns into a giant flame fest like the last few pages.
I took a hit last night. Holy crud. This is the info I was talking about. Wait a second... then how did two people die. and a third got hit? Was there a vigilante? That would be my guess. No idea which one hit me, but regardless, I was. You could have been hit by mafia....Or vig... Unconfirmed. Suicide bomb is impossible, a red would have died. Now...If the vig would like to step forward given that he is now a regular townie and say who he hit.... Your a bit behind now, a vig did step forward.... Aye...I was sifting through spam BC.
-_- Well atleast we know it was someone who holds a petty grudge against you also! =D
Anyway....Yea... ##Vote Abstain Vote: Double Lynch
should be 4 confirmed people (if DT's didn't check same people, but then we'd have 2 connected DT's) + 2 DT's + Tricode, That's seven confirmed (semi concerning Tri-Code).
Game should be wrapping up soon.
p.s. DT's, oh how I'd love you to waste your time and check me, but don't bother. I'd rather you get someone more useful into the circles.
|
Eh...Like I said, I was sifting through the ass load of spam, and posted similar to how Pandain posted after tricode stepped forward. Got about five other tabs of things I would reply to...
On July 23 2010 09:00 Subversion wrote: I voted for DTA, but I didn't want to.
I made several posts saying that I believe him to be town, that I believe all 3 top candidates to be town, and that we should change targets entirely.
I only voted for him because, to be honest, it was him or me, and voting me out would have been bad for town.
I have been up front about that fact all along. Means nothing subversion. It further points out that you voted for him for a decent reason, but I don't care if he's town or mafia when it comes to your reason. Don't be sheep. Sheep is bad. Anyone saying you voted for DTA in bad intentions can go shove it.
Unless Tree.Hugger is DT and checked you, I don't want shit.
|
On July 23 2010 14:48 chaoser wrote: I do however know that a Vigi hit SOMEONE tonight. That Vigi should claim since they are regular townie now and say who they hit and why. Mafia doesn't gain anything from them claiming, I think. Also, if it's a false claim, real Vigi can always claim as well and then we have a 1 v 1. Either way, one mafia is dying if they fake claim. I'm also going to go to sleep but I feel I have enough evidence to compile a case against someone by tomorrow morning Softclaim medic? Or you in contact with vigi?
On July 23 2010 15:27 d3_crescentia wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 14:50 youngminii wrote:On July 23 2010 14:48 chaoser wrote: I do however know that a Vigi hit SOMEONE tonight. That Vigi should claim since they are regular townie now and say who they hit and why. Mafia doesn't gain anything from them claiming, I think. Also, if it's a false claim, real Vigi can always claim as well and then we have a 1 v 1. Either way, one mafia is dying if they fake claim. I'm also going to go to sleep but I feel I have enough evidence to compile a case against someone by tomorrow morning There's no way of us knowing whether or not the claim is true or false. There may or may not be one or two Vigis and even then 2 scum can step up and counter claim. I actually disagree here. If 2 scum step up and counterclaim it exposes them in the open under public scrutiny. We can lynch the first claimant (the one who fired the shot) and see if he told the truth. Then we can have the other two shoot each other during the night with their vigi shots. If neither of them dies then we know they're both lying.
Vigi only gets one shot. So....read first post, and realize how the role works in this game.
On July 22 2010 12:59 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 12:51 Subversion wrote:Yeah sure. But the general consensus seems to be they're both town Which brings up why we lynch either anyways But DTA has claimed green, chaoser hasn't claimed at all. I'm working on the assumption that we believe both are town ^_^ If we don't work off that assumption, the argument obv makes no sense. Also, you do not base your votes on whether or not you lynch a green or a blue. You base your votes on whether or not you lynch a red or a town. All the good townies vote to lynch greens!!
Stop giving him shit. I've voted to save myself before knowing I'd lynch a town. I'm sure you would too. You base your votes on attempting to lynch a red.
|
Also, I'm going to work at 8Am EST, I wasn't on the schedule though, so I'm not sure when I'll be back....Yay...Tired as fuck....><
|
On July 25 2010 21:37 zeks wrote: Double Lynch List (18/13): Siniquity, BrownBear, Protactinium, zeks, ~OpZ~, rastaban, bumatlarge, chaoser, tree.hugger, LaXerCannon, Pandain, lakrismamma, XeliN, citi.zen, youngminii, pyrrhuloxia, amber[light], Divinek
Who is missing? Tree.hugger, BC, SouthRawrea, Infundibulum, Misder, Tricode, Subversion
youngminii's red list: BC, SouthRawrea, Chaoser, Infundibulum, Pandain, Amber[Light], Tree.hugger
Seems like a decent list...
|
So....I'm realizing a lot of new players feel like blues are god awful important.....-_-
|
And now I'm realizing we vote to kill several people who voted for citizen....YEAAAAAAAAAAA oh lets do it...
|
On July 25 2010 09:39 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Only one phrase really sums up citizens post
Lynch all Liars Voting for you shortly =D
|
On July 25 2010 10:30 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2010 10:27 youngminii wrote:On July 25 2010 10:25 chaoser wrote:You can hit me if you want, I'mma flip green. Either way, I'mma go get my popcorn cause youngminii is hellbent on killing me This is exactly what I am hellbent on doing. I'm just going to be spamming the list until this game ends. BC SouthRawrea Chaoser Infundibuxdlgxcubum Pandain (Claimed DT) Amber[Light] (Pandain claimed to have checkd him) Tree.hugger (moved tree.hugger to the bottom 'cause it's likely he's just bad town) Young, you know that if South is blue, the mafia spread their votes across both lists and let the town fight over the lynch. The problem is Citizen's DT knows who the Mad Hatter is. Citizen claimed MH to solidify his claim as confirmed and knew the real MH wouldn't counter claim. So South or Tricode are mafia. Tricode mroe likely imo.
|
I'm taking Zeks claim at face value. Fuck everyone elses.
|
Oh...Um....BM, I just thought of something about your majority lynch thing....If you end day at majority....what happens if majority happens way before the 48 hours is up? Am I then modkilled? (seems like it will, and I'm not going to sheep....and yes, I could just abstain because I'm here, but I would like to know)
|
Yea....But Bill seemed to of changed it away...I thought this game had modkills for not voting....
|
....You guys talk a lot...I was going to vote you BC, and I promised to long before this bandwagon began....And I've done it already once this game....But it's far to early for the day to end, so I would like some suspects and analysis. You can do some on me if you'd like, I'm pretty thoroughly scummy looking. But the point is, I would like something to analyze after you die. Remember sir, death brings knowledge and truth. So please, at least help us out with that. Uncooperative actions now will just further your scum appearance, and whats more important, you living, or the town winning. Besides, you might sway enough votes.
|
|
|
|