EPTTL Mafia XXVIII - Page 83
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
Seems like we've just blindly accepted Tricode's claim as fact here. But BC could be lying, and so could Tricode. I guess that would be risky though since the real vig could counter-claim. | ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
two people on the line. | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On July 23 2010 17:59 youngminii wrote: Wait so you hit him for the sake of your own personal desire to one day kill BC? If this is true I'd so totally ban you right now if this were my game. read aces mafia world. Fishball did it to me that game knowing full well nothign was gained in killing me but personal satisfaction. You may not like the reason but tricode has openly said he'd kill me from the getgo for many many games lol. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On July 22 2010 16:39 Tricode wrote: Thank you. I am glade you are impressed. I hope this post also impresses you. On July 22 2010 16:35 Pandain wrote: Omg you right. His new post "Why?" has earned him the long coveted award of 7 posts. I tip my hat to you sir. On July 22 2010 17:02 Subversion wrote: I want night because I'm tired ^_^ Was a hectic mafia day lolz. I hope you all choke on your spam. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On July 23 2010 14:28 BloodyC0bbler wrote: That would be my guess. No idea which one hit me, but regardless, I was. You could have been hit by mafia....Or vig... Unconfirmed. Suicide bomb is impossible, a red would have died. Now...If the vig would like to step forward given that he is now a regular townie and say who he hit.... | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On July 23 2010 14:35 youngminii wrote: The real question is why would vigilante hit any of these three? It makes no sense. There was no spotlight on any of them and they didn't really shine a spotlight at anyone (well BC said some things a while back). Roffles wasn't posting, I would of hit him. I also would of hit BC myself. So....Eh? | ||
|
BloodyC0bbler
Canada7876 Posts
On July 23 2010 19:46 ~OpZ~ wrote: You could have been hit by mafia....Or vig... Unconfirmed. Suicide bomb is impossible, a red would have died. Now...If the vig would like to step forward given that he is now a regular townie and say who he hit.... Your a bit behind now, a vig did step forward.... | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On July 23 2010 14:46 youngminii wrote: I don't think B) is true. It's extremely unlikely that there is a Vigilante that is bad enough to waste their kill so early in the game with such little evidence. I have my own reservations on whether or not I believe your claim but A) seems to be the most likely at this point in time. Citizen regularly day vigs people randomly ruining scum plans at day 2/3....So....Don't say that...Lol... | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
 | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
 ##Vote: Double Lynch | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On July 23 2010 19:47 BloodyC0bbler wrote: Your a bit behind now, a vig did step forward.... Aye...I was sifting through spam BC. -_- Well atleast we know it was someone who holds a petty grudge against you also! =D Anyway....Yea... ##Vote Abstain Vote: Double Lynch should be 4 confirmed people (if DT's didn't check same people, but then we'd have 2 connected DT's) + 2 DT's + Tricode, That's seven confirmed (semi concerning Tri-Code). Game should be wrapping up soon. p.s. DT's, oh how I'd love you to waste your time and check me, but don't bother. I'd rather you get someone more useful into the circles. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On July 23 2010 09:00 Subversion wrote: I voted for DTA, but I didn't want to. I made several posts saying that I believe him to be town, that I believe all 3 top candidates to be town, and that we should change targets entirely. I only voted for him because, to be honest, it was him or me, and voting me out would have been bad for town. I have been up front about that fact all along. Means nothing subversion. It further points out that you voted for him for a decent reason, but I don't care if he's town or mafia when it comes to your reason. Don't be sheep. Sheep is bad. Anyone saying you voted for DTA in bad intentions can go shove it. Unless Tree.Hugger is DT and checked you, I don't want shit. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
On July 23 2010 14:48 chaoser wrote: I do however know that a Vigi hit SOMEONE tonight. That Vigi should claim since they are regular townie now and say who they hit and why. Mafia doesn't gain anything from them claiming, I think. Also, if it's a false claim, real Vigi can always claim as well and then we have a 1 v 1. Either way, one mafia is dying if they fake claim. I'm also going to go to sleep but I feel I have enough evidence to compile a case against someone by tomorrow morning Softclaim medic? Or you in contact with vigi? On July 23 2010 15:27 d3_crescentia wrote: I actually disagree here. If 2 scum step up and counterclaim it exposes them in the open under public scrutiny. We can lynch the first claimant (the one who fired the shot) and see if he told the truth. Then we can have the other two shoot each other during the night with their vigi shots. If neither of them dies then we know they're both lying. Vigi only gets one shot. So....read first post, and realize how the role works in this game. On July 22 2010 12:59 youngminii wrote: Also, you do not base your votes on whether or not you lynch a green or a blue. You base your votes on whether or not you lynch a red or a town. All the good townies vote to lynch greens!! Stop giving him shit. I've voted to save myself before knowing I'd lynch a town. I'm sure you would too. You base your votes on attempting to lynch a red. | ||
|
~OpZ~
United States3652 Posts
| ||
|
zeks
Canada1068 Posts
BC has been praised a bit this game so not a huge huge surprise that he got protected. Don't think this whole situation was planned by scum but rather a series of unfortunate events. Don't know if this has been clarified: Detective - You may, during the game, ask for the role of a specific player at night. You will get back their role/alignment unless they are the miller/godfather. So is that one rolecheck or infinite rolechecks? If infinite we need to buy more time for DTs ##Vote Double Lynch ##Vote Abstain | ||
|
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
| ||
|
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 17:58 Subversion wrote: Also, isn't there a situation where Tricode and BC could BOTH be lying? Seems like we've just blindly accepted Tricode's claim as fact here. But BC could be lying, and so could Tricode. I guess that would be risky though since the real vig could counter-claim. On July 23 2010 15:54 chaoser wrote: Vigi should 100% claim. Let's first look at the facts: 1) Two real hits went down last night, one on Roffles, one on Jayme 2) BC says he got hit 3) The only way that can happen is through Vigi Two cases can happen: BC is lying BC is telling the truth In that first case, the only way it would work is if a fake vigi claims. If no real vigi claims then we know BC is 100% lying. If a fake vigi does claim,,then both BC and Vigi who claims are both liars, they are now 100% linked to each other. Now, they both can't be GF and in this situation, the vigi will be GF because, like you said, he will be checked next night. So we check BC instead. If he's red, both go down. Even in the case BC is GF, they have no idea who we're going to check, it's a 50/50 risk for them that we will find out. That's not a risk they probably want to take. The final reason mafia wouldn't do this is because I don't care about using the vigi as a confirmed townie, I just want information on what happened like night, which two the mafia actually hit, and which one was hit by vigi. Now, on to the BC tells truth. Well in that case, a fake vigi can claim first or a real one can. If the real one does first, then that's that. If the fake one does, the real one can just claim and there will be a 1 v 1. Even if the real one claims first and then a fake one claims, we're still left with a 1v1 and a dead mafia sooner or later. for all other counter claims. people ready stated it: I actually do feel like I left something out so if anyone else can think of it, please help, I'm suppose to be asleep right now, if my parents catch me up i'm fucked. I'll write more tomorrow I talked about it already | ||
| ||
