night ends in an hour and twenty-three minutes
TL Mafia XXVIII - Page 74
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
night ends in an hour and twenty-three minutes | ||
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
I think we fucked up day 2 badly. I said this DURING day 2. None of the top candidates, are imo, mafia. I think we need to take this in a whole new direction, and start looking at another group of players. If we keep on looking at me, BB, chaoser etc I feel the mafia can just sit back and watch us off ourselves. And I STILL don't understand where this me and youngminii ultimate alliance idea has come from. I really don't feel like we have any kind of connection whatsoever. | ||
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On July 23 2010 07:44 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: ebwop: i mean, if i knew as much as this as you did, i'd be strongly suspecting tree.hugger of being mafia right now. but you don't suspect him. why? If you would read the thread once in a while, you would've read my reasoning earlier. It's okay, I'm kind enough to explain it again. There's no reason for scum to pin me along with Subversion. If Subversion is scum, then tree.hugger wouldn't be lynching him (unless it's epically bad bussing). If Subversion's isn't scum, then what's the point of 'pinning' me to Subversion? It makes no logical sense. Anyway, what's wrong with you people. You lynch DTA and say 'we fucked up' and 'we didn't learn anything'? I'll come back when I have some free time and lay down a solid argument against chaoser. Until then, have fun. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 12:05 youngminii wrote: If you would read the thread once in a while, you would've read my reasoning earlier. It's okay, I'm kind enough to explain it again. There's no reason for scum to pin me along with Subversion. If Subversion is scum, then tree.hugger wouldn't be lynching him (unless it's epically bad bussing). If Subversion's isn't scum, then what's the point of 'pinning' me to Subversion? It makes no logical sense. Anyway, what's wrong with you people. You lynch DTA and say 'we fucked up' and 'we didn't learn anything'? I'll come back when I have some free time and lay down a solid argument against chaoser. Until then, have fun. Still on me huh? I've got something on you too =p | ||
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
On July 23 2010 12:05 youngminii wrote: If you would read the thread once in a while, you would've read my reasoning earlier. It's okay, I'm kind enough to explain it again. There's no reason for scum to pin me along with Subversion. If Subversion is scum, then tree.hugger wouldn't be lynching him (unless it's epically bad bussing). If Subversion's isn't scum, then what's the point of 'pinning' me to Subversion? It makes no logical sense. Anyway, what's wrong with you people. You lynch DTA and say 'we fucked up' and 'we didn't learn anything'? I'll come back when I have some free time and lay down a solid argument against chaoser. Until then, have fun. I don't think you really answered my question | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
| ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 12:37 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: ? am i just misreading it? how is what he said an answer for "why don't you think tree.hugger is red, given all the sketchy shit you say he's doing?" nah, I totally agree, he's dodging | ||
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
And start the discussion in earnest AFTER someone gets offed. That gives us more info. | ||
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
even tho i really think it might be me, lolz. | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 12:51 Subversion wrote: so excited to see who died. even tho i really think it might be me, lolz. what a scummy thing to say... | ||
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
Really? don't see why so. Just think its me due to me claiming blue. Although, scum may think I have a good chance of being voted off neway, so may go after sum1 else. guess we'll see. | ||
![]()
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
I am scum! | ||
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
##Vote: Cutiepie :3 | ||
Pandain
United States12984 Posts
I hope thats joking, cause if your not THATS a scummy thing to say. | ||
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
[QUOTE]On July 23 2010 07:44 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: There's no reason for scum to pin me along with Subversion. If Subversion is scum, then tree.hugger wouldn't be lynching him (unless it's epically bad bussing). If Subversion's isn't scum, then what's the point of 'pinning' me to Subversion? It makes no logical sense.[/QUOTE] Are you two blind or are my initial suspicions correct that you're both scum? Jesus. | ||
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
| ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
As it is right now, you are 1) dodging the question 2) becoming hostile I was not hostile - the post you made about tree huggers PM's is actually pretty important and I didn't really follow your thought process. You obviously know a lot about tree hugger, yet you are refusing to share this information with the town. Why? I looked back in the thread and didn't see the clarifying post you mentioned before. I don't understand why you're so uncooperative. Like I said, if i was in your position, i would be thinking pretty hard about tree hugger being scum, especially since he'd been pushing for Subversions lynch over chaoser - someone who you thought (think) was red. But you don't think he's scum. I asked why, a reasonable question, and you haven't answered. Why are you dodging the questions? | ||
chaoser
United States5541 Posts
On July 23 2010 13:07 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: Or, youngminii, you could answer the question and clarify your position for the rest of the town. As it is right now, you are 1) dodging the question 2) becoming hostile I was not hostile - the post you made about tree huggers PM's is actually pretty important and I didn't really follow your thought process. You obviously know a lot about tree hugger, yet you are refusing to share this information with the town. Why? I looked back in the thread and didn't see the clarifying post you mentioned before. I don't understand why you're so uncooperative. Like I said, if i was in your position, i would be thinking pretty hard about tree hugger being scum, especially since he'd been pushing for Subversions lynch over chaoser - someone who you thought (think) was red. But you don't think he's scum. I asked why, a reasonable question, and you haven't answered. Why are you dodging the questions? he's pushing me hard too | ||
| ||