|
On July 23 2010 13:24 chaoser wrote:
Also, where have you EVER heard someone say "I'm excited about the kills"? This is the same person who said "mafia made no mistakes so far". Gloating as mafia/being excited for kills (WHICH NO TOWNIE SHOULD BE SINCE DEATHS=LESS OF US) is VERY SCUMMY
I would like you to find the post in which I said "mafia made no mistakes so far". I also do not recall saying "I'm excited about the kills", but I sure am excited to see Day 3 and what happened on Night 2.
Please don't pull things out of your ass and please stop coming to false conclusions. Thanks.
|
On July 23 2010 13:27 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 13:23 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:On July 23 2010 13:09 youngminii wrote:
How am I dodging the question? Do I seriously have to quote it again? The answer's right there.
What am I refusing to share? Obviously I'm going to be hostile when my scum suspects are ganging up on me, no shit. Why don't you stop dodging MY question and answer how am I dodging the question? How am I refusing to share information? How am I being uncooperative? Look, this is every post you made between the Tree Hugger PM post and the post where you answered me saying you had "already answered the question: + Show Spoiler [posts] +On July 22 2010 14:09 youngminii wrote:
Oh yeah, I forgot the most important part: the question. Pretty much, why are you doing this via PM when you can just do it publicly in the thread? Is it because you're avoiding any counter arguments so that your PM recipients will have an easier time believing/trusting you or is it something else? On July 22 2010 14:12 youngminii wrote:
Ya I'd have asked for protection too but that's literally giving suicide bomber free medic kills. On July 22 2010 14:31 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 14:27 Roffles wrote:On July 22 2010 14:05 youngminii wrote:
You know, I have a question and I think this should be public information. My sources tell me that tree.hugger has been spreading misinformation to at least 3 different people via PM and instructing them to vote for certain people. However, I do not believe he's scum.
Tree.hugger, stop PMing others and post it here for everyone to see. Don't just say 'vote for this person' and 'vote for that person', tell them who you're suspicious of and ask them who they're suspicious of. Do not go around giving orders. It also seems as if you're targeting newer players (although I'm not sure about this). Yawn, you can count me in on that as well. I however don't pay much attention to PMs and I kinda just said screw it to what he wanted me to do. I don't understand why he's doing that. I just, I don't even... On July 22 2010 14:54 youngminii wrote:
I dunno I feel as if I'll get NK'd tonight. My spidey senses are tingling. On July 22 2010 14:58 youngminii wrote:
Don't want to bring back the useless debate, ignoring your post. On July 22 2010 15:25 youngminii wrote: I hope you enjoy reading. On July 23 2010 09:01 youngminii wrote:
Don't edit at all in any situation for any reason without BM's approval. On July 23 2010 10:37 youngminii wrote:
He didn't tell anyone different things if my assumptions are correct. He said something like "we lynch subversion and we've got youngminii, we lynch DTA and we've got nothing"
Which is such a fucking stupid argument, might I add, and spreading this misinformation via PMs being a horrible way to play. Like I said, the answer wasn't in there even though you said it was. If you'll notice this game I have never once said I thought you were red. I have been asking you questions, because you've been making some out of the ordinary posts. Your reactions to these questions have generally been hostile, uncooperative (see: the reply I am quoting) and overall it seems like you think I don't like you or something. Which personally, I don't understand. I'm a pretty friendly guy. But when my questions are met with you saying things like "this is the scummiest post ever," or "you are fucking bad," - which are things you have actually typed in this thread, paraphrased - is it any wonder why I don't think you're meeting me on equal grounds here? Now, maybe I really am a fucking idiot, but that explanation you gave previously didn't make any sense to me and I and probably several others would like it if you could just be clear about things instead of saying "I'm not dodging the question" while continuing to dodge the question! Look, if you really are town, your abrasive reactions aren't helping you at all and will help you get lynched more than anything I could ever muster. And there really hasn't been that much pressure on you at all this game, so I'd hate to see you react under actual intense scrutiny. Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 12:05 youngminii wrote:On July 23 2010 07:44 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:
ebwop: i mean, if i knew as much as this as you did, i'd be strongly suspecting tree.hugger of being mafia right now. but you don't suspect him. why? There's no reason for scum to pin me along with Subversion. If Subversion is scum, then tree.hugger wouldn't be lynching him (unless it's epically bad bussing). If Subversion's isn't scum, then what's the point of 'pinning' me to Subversion? It makes no logical sense. Now I'm just getting annoyed because you seem to be fucking blind. I've said this three times already. Go read the mafia manifesto or something.
Youngminii post response generator v 0.89b
Output: you are the scummiest bad player ever, can you even read? Your play is so awful I don't understand?
Accept output [y/n]
|
On July 23 2010 13:27 chaoser wrote:
By the way, I was on top of the lynch list for a VERY long time while Subversion slowly moved down to 6 VOTES while me and DTA were up at 9 ish. At the end he moves to 8. That's what I mean when I say would mafia leave it so damn close. If i was mafia, I'd be as safe as Subversion. One vote my way from DTA's group would have killed me.
Weak argument. Endless possibilities.
All mafia were stacked on DTA's group and hence could not help you.
Mafia are noob and do not want to be exposed as mafia so they purposely do not help you since DTA is still leading the vote list.
Mafia are AFK.
etc.
|
On July 23 2010 13:29 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 13:24 chaoser wrote:
Also, where have you EVER heard someone say "I'm excited about the kills"? This is the same person who said "mafia made no mistakes so far". Gloating as mafia/being excited for kills (WHICH NO TOWNIE SHOULD BE SINCE DEATHS=LESS OF US) is VERY SCUMMY I would like you to find the post in which I said "mafia made no mistakes so far". I also do not recall saying "I'm excited about the kills", but I sure am excited to see Day 3 and what happened on Night 2. Please don't pull things out of your ass and please stop coming to false conclusions. Thanks.
Nah Youngmini both of these things happened.
But it doesn't matter because Chaoser is totally drawing huge speculations from these sentences. I mean, I'm excited about the kills too. He thinks he was killed, why wouldn't he be excited?
|
On July 23 2010 13:30 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 13:27 youngminii wrote:On July 23 2010 13:23 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:On July 23 2010 13:09 youngminii wrote:
How am I dodging the question? Do I seriously have to quote it again? The answer's right there.
What am I refusing to share? Obviously I'm going to be hostile when my scum suspects are ganging up on me, no shit. Why don't you stop dodging MY question and answer how am I dodging the question? How am I refusing to share information? How am I being uncooperative? Look, this is every post you made between the Tree Hugger PM post and the post where you answered me saying you had "already answered the question: + Show Spoiler [posts] +On July 22 2010 14:09 youngminii wrote:
Oh yeah, I forgot the most important part: the question. Pretty much, why are you doing this via PM when you can just do it publicly in the thread? Is it because you're avoiding any counter arguments so that your PM recipients will have an easier time believing/trusting you or is it something else? On July 22 2010 14:12 youngminii wrote:
Ya I'd have asked for protection too but that's literally giving suicide bomber free medic kills. On July 22 2010 14:31 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 14:27 Roffles wrote:On July 22 2010 14:05 youngminii wrote:
You know, I have a question and I think this should be public information. My sources tell me that tree.hugger has been spreading misinformation to at least 3 different people via PM and instructing them to vote for certain people. However, I do not believe he's scum.
Tree.hugger, stop PMing others and post it here for everyone to see. Don't just say 'vote for this person' and 'vote for that person', tell them who you're suspicious of and ask them who they're suspicious of. Do not go around giving orders. It also seems as if you're targeting newer players (although I'm not sure about this). Yawn, you can count me in on that as well. I however don't pay much attention to PMs and I kinda just said screw it to what he wanted me to do. I don't understand why he's doing that. I just, I don't even... On July 22 2010 14:54 youngminii wrote:
I dunno I feel as if I'll get NK'd tonight. My spidey senses are tingling. On July 22 2010 14:58 youngminii wrote:
Don't want to bring back the useless debate, ignoring your post. On July 22 2010 15:25 youngminii wrote: I hope you enjoy reading. On July 23 2010 09:01 youngminii wrote:
Don't edit at all in any situation for any reason without BM's approval. On July 23 2010 10:37 youngminii wrote:
He didn't tell anyone different things if my assumptions are correct. He said something like "we lynch subversion and we've got youngminii, we lynch DTA and we've got nothing"
Which is such a fucking stupid argument, might I add, and spreading this misinformation via PMs being a horrible way to play. Like I said, the answer wasn't in there even though you said it was. If you'll notice this game I have never once said I thought you were red. I have been asking you questions, because you've been making some out of the ordinary posts. Your reactions to these questions have generally been hostile, uncooperative (see: the reply I am quoting) and overall it seems like you think I don't like you or something. Which personally, I don't understand. I'm a pretty friendly guy. But when my questions are met with you saying things like "this is the scummiest post ever," or "you are fucking bad," - which are things you have actually typed in this thread, paraphrased - is it any wonder why I don't think you're meeting me on equal grounds here? Now, maybe I really am a fucking idiot, but that explanation you gave previously didn't make any sense to me and I and probably several others would like it if you could just be clear about things instead of saying "I'm not dodging the question" while continuing to dodge the question! Look, if you really are town, your abrasive reactions aren't helping you at all and will help you get lynched more than anything I could ever muster. And there really hasn't been that much pressure on you at all this game, so I'd hate to see you react under actual intense scrutiny. On July 23 2010 12:05 youngminii wrote:On July 23 2010 07:44 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:
ebwop: i mean, if i knew as much as this as you did, i'd be strongly suspecting tree.hugger of being mafia right now. but you don't suspect him. why? There's no reason for scum to pin me along with Subversion. If Subversion is scum, then tree.hugger wouldn't be lynching him (unless it's epically bad bussing). If Subversion's isn't scum, then what's the point of 'pinning' me to Subversion? It makes no logical sense. Now I'm just getting annoyed because you seem to be fucking blind. I've said this three times already. Go read the mafia manifesto or something. Youngminii post response generator v 0.89bOutput: you are the scummiest bad player ever, can you even read? Your play is so awful I don't understand? Accept output [y/n]
I would like to ask you the same question. Please read my post at least 3 times carefully and then wisely respond.
|
On July 23 2010 13:31 Pandain wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 13:29 youngminii wrote:On July 23 2010 13:24 chaoser wrote:
Also, where have you EVER heard someone say "I'm excited about the kills"? This is the same person who said "mafia made no mistakes so far". Gloating as mafia/being excited for kills (WHICH NO TOWNIE SHOULD BE SINCE DEATHS=LESS OF US) is VERY SCUMMY I would like you to find the post in which I said "mafia made no mistakes so far". I also do not recall saying "I'm excited about the kills", but I sure am excited to see Day 3 and what happened on Night 2. Please don't pull things out of your ass and please stop coming to false conclusions. Thanks. Nah Youngmini both of these things happened. But it doesn't matter because Chaoser is totally drawing huge speculations from these sentences. I mean, I'm excited about the kills too. He thinks he was killed, why wouldn't he be excited?
Okay now you're getting me quite annoyed. I have never said mafia made no mistakes so far. Plus even if I did it doesn't mean anything, thanks.
|
On July 23 2010 13:29 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 13:24 chaoser wrote:
Also, where have you EVER heard someone say "I'm excited about the kills"? This is the same person who said "mafia made no mistakes so far". Gloating as mafia/being excited for kills (WHICH NO TOWNIE SHOULD BE SINCE DEATHS=LESS OF US) is VERY SCUMMY I would like you to find the post in which I said "mafia made no mistakes so far". I also do not recall saying "I'm excited about the kills", but I sure am excited to see Day 3 and what happened on Night 2. Please don't pull things out of your ass and please stop coming to false conclusions. Thanks.
wasn't talking about you, was talking about subversion
|
On July 23 2010 13:32 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 13:31 Pandain wrote:On July 23 2010 13:29 youngminii wrote:On July 23 2010 13:24 chaoser wrote:
Also, where have you EVER heard someone say "I'm excited about the kills"? This is the same person who said "mafia made no mistakes so far". Gloating as mafia/being excited for kills (WHICH NO TOWNIE SHOULD BE SINCE DEATHS=LESS OF US) is VERY SCUMMY I would like you to find the post in which I said "mafia made no mistakes so far". I also do not recall saying "I'm excited about the kills", but I sure am excited to see Day 3 and what happened on Night 2. Please don't pull things out of your ass and please stop coming to false conclusions. Thanks. Nah Youngmini both of these things happened. But it doesn't matter because Chaoser is totally drawing huge speculations from these sentences. I mean, I'm excited about the kills too. He thinks he was killed, why wouldn't he be excited? Okay now you're getting me quite annoyed. I have never said mafia made no mistakes so far. Plus even if I did it doesn't mean anything, thanks.
Heh take a breather youngmini. Honestly think it would help you. Subversion said both those things. We're talking about Subversion there.  .
Take 5 man and come back. No harm will happen. I'll defend you while he rampantly speculates.
|
On July 23 2010 13:32 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 13:31 Pandain wrote:On July 23 2010 13:29 youngminii wrote:On July 23 2010 13:24 chaoser wrote:
Also, where have you EVER heard someone say "I'm excited about the kills"? This is the same person who said "mafia made no mistakes so far". Gloating as mafia/being excited for kills (WHICH NO TOWNIE SHOULD BE SINCE DEATHS=LESS OF US) is VERY SCUMMY I would like you to find the post in which I said "mafia made no mistakes so far". I also do not recall saying "I'm excited about the kills", but I sure am excited to see Day 3 and what happened on Night 2. Please don't pull things out of your ass and please stop coming to false conclusions. Thanks. Nah Youngmini both of these things happened. But it doesn't matter because Chaoser is totally drawing huge speculations from these sentences. I mean, I'm excited about the kills too. He thinks he was killed, why wouldn't he be excited? Okay now you're getting me quite annoyed. I have never said mafia made no mistakes so far. Plus even if I did it doesn't mean anything, thanks.
|
|
|
On July 23 2010 13:32 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 13:31 Pandain wrote:On July 23 2010 13:29 youngminii wrote:On July 23 2010 13:24 chaoser wrote:
Also, where have you EVER heard someone say "I'm excited about the kills"? This is the same person who said "mafia made no mistakes so far". Gloating as mafia/being excited for kills (WHICH NO TOWNIE SHOULD BE SINCE DEATHS=LESS OF US) is VERY SCUMMY I would like you to find the post in which I said "mafia made no mistakes so far". I also do not recall saying "I'm excited about the kills", but I sure am excited to see Day 3 and what happened on Night 2. Please don't pull things out of your ass and please stop coming to false conclusions. Thanks. Nah Youngmini both of these things happened. But it doesn't matter because Chaoser is totally drawing huge speculations from these sentences. I mean, I'm excited about the kills too. He thinks he was killed, why wouldn't he be excited? Okay now you're getting me quite annoyed. I have never said mafia made no mistakes so far. Plus even if I did it doesn't mean anything, thanks.
those were things subversion said ffs
|
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
Yo dudes, calm down. Seriously, yo...
|
On July 23 2010 12:51 Subversion wrote:
so excited to see who died.
even tho i really think it might be me, lolz.
that one don't change it to make people think i'm talking about you, I was clearly referring to this. It's a page back for christ's sake.
Also, all those possibilities you listed, what's more likely? mafia playing badly? them all being AFK when people generated about 5 pages of discussion in the last 2 hours? or them flaming the flames on a couple townies killing each other?
|
That's so dumb holy fucking Christ. Apologies for the mess I made.
Anyway, back to chaoser. Why are you bringing up subversion?
Also, where have you EVER heard someone say "I'm excited about the kills"? This is the same person who said "mafia made no mistakes so far". Gloating as mafia/being excited for kills (WHICH NO TOWNIE SHOULD BE SINCE DEATHS=LESS OF US) is VERY SCUMMY
I don't see what this has to do with anything we were talking about. Subversion's scumness doesn't have a thing to do with what I said previously.
|
Everyone calm the Fuzzle Down
Honestly, the way things are going a bandwagon is going to happen any second. And people are just getting a bit personal now.
I'd suggest postponing debate until we get the night post. You can think up ideas of course, but I'm just highly cautious of a THIRD bandwagon happening(more than 3 probably).
It won't be that long for the night post to come out. I suggest we wait until we have that information.
|
I have to ask, why is everyone saying calm down?
Nothing's personal, no one's 'attacked' anyone verbally, the only things that have been happening are accusations and argumentative responses. The only thing I can see that may be seen as offensive is where infundiblxublxjum and I said read our posts, which isn't offensive at all, considering we didn't say anything like 'read my posts you fuckin dumb blind moron' or anything.
This is mafia. This is a game of deceiving and lying and scumhunting. Aggression is a style of play and I don't see why we're being told to tone it down.
|
i like to think that i've been the most civil one here 
|
On July 23 2010 13:37 youngminii wrote:That's so dumb holy fucking Christ. Apologies for the mess I made. Anyway, back to chaoser. Why are you bringing up subversion? Show nested quote +Also, where have you EVER heard someone say "I'm excited about the kills"? This is the same person who said "mafia made no mistakes so far". Gloating as mafia/being excited for kills (WHICH NO TOWNIE SHOULD BE SINCE DEATHS=LESS OF US) is VERY SCUMMY I don't see what this has to do with anything we were talking about. Subversion's scumness doesn't have a thing to do with what I said previously.
not to fan the flames anymore, but if you'll notice, in that message, i quoted pandain. not you. he said that he had problems with my saying that subversion was scummy. I was explaining to him why I said it. Thanks, and hope we all calm down.
|
On July 23 2010 13:32 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 23 2010 13:30 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:On July 23 2010 13:27 youngminii wrote:On July 23 2010 13:23 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:On July 23 2010 13:09 youngminii wrote:
How am I dodging the question? Do I seriously have to quote it again? The answer's right there.
What am I refusing to share? Obviously I'm going to be hostile when my scum suspects are ganging up on me, no shit. Why don't you stop dodging MY question and answer how am I dodging the question? How am I refusing to share information? How am I being uncooperative? Look, this is every post you made between the Tree Hugger PM post and the post where you answered me saying you had "already answered the question: + Show Spoiler [posts] +On July 22 2010 14:09 youngminii wrote:
Oh yeah, I forgot the most important part: the question. Pretty much, why are you doing this via PM when you can just do it publicly in the thread? Is it because you're avoiding any counter arguments so that your PM recipients will have an easier time believing/trusting you or is it something else? On July 22 2010 14:12 youngminii wrote:
Ya I'd have asked for protection too but that's literally giving suicide bomber free medic kills. On July 22 2010 14:31 youngminii wrote:Show nested quote +On July 22 2010 14:27 Roffles wrote:On July 22 2010 14:05 youngminii wrote:
You know, I have a question and I think this should be public information. My sources tell me that tree.hugger has been spreading misinformation to at least 3 different people via PM and instructing them to vote for certain people. However, I do not believe he's scum.
Tree.hugger, stop PMing others and post it here for everyone to see. Don't just say 'vote for this person' and 'vote for that person', tell them who you're suspicious of and ask them who they're suspicious of. Do not go around giving orders. It also seems as if you're targeting newer players (although I'm not sure about this). Yawn, you can count me in on that as well. I however don't pay much attention to PMs and I kinda just said screw it to what he wanted me to do. I don't understand why he's doing that. I just, I don't even... On July 22 2010 14:54 youngminii wrote:
I dunno I feel as if I'll get NK'd tonight. My spidey senses are tingling. On July 22 2010 14:58 youngminii wrote:
Don't want to bring back the useless debate, ignoring your post. On July 22 2010 15:25 youngminii wrote: I hope you enjoy reading. On July 23 2010 09:01 youngminii wrote:
Don't edit at all in any situation for any reason without BM's approval. On July 23 2010 10:37 youngminii wrote:
He didn't tell anyone different things if my assumptions are correct. He said something like "we lynch subversion and we've got youngminii, we lynch DTA and we've got nothing"
Which is such a fucking stupid argument, might I add, and spreading this misinformation via PMs being a horrible way to play. Like I said, the answer wasn't in there even though you said it was. If you'll notice this game I have never once said I thought you were red. I have been asking you questions, because you've been making some out of the ordinary posts. Your reactions to these questions have generally been hostile, uncooperative (see: the reply I am quoting) and overall it seems like you think I don't like you or something. Which personally, I don't understand. I'm a pretty friendly guy. But when my questions are met with you saying things like "this is the scummiest post ever," or "you are fucking bad," - which are things you have actually typed in this thread, paraphrased - is it any wonder why I don't think you're meeting me on equal grounds here? Now, maybe I really am a fucking idiot, but that explanation you gave previously didn't make any sense to me and I and probably several others would like it if you could just be clear about things instead of saying "I'm not dodging the question" while continuing to dodge the question! Look, if you really are town, your abrasive reactions aren't helping you at all and will help you get lynched more than anything I could ever muster. And there really hasn't been that much pressure on you at all this game, so I'd hate to see you react under actual intense scrutiny. On July 23 2010 12:05 youngminii wrote:On July 23 2010 07:44 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote:
ebwop: i mean, if i knew as much as this as you did, i'd be strongly suspecting tree.hugger of being mafia right now. but you don't suspect him. why? There's no reason for scum to pin me along with Subversion. If Subversion is scum, then tree.hugger wouldn't be lynching him (unless it's epically bad bussing). If Subversion's isn't scum, then what's the point of 'pinning' me to Subversion? It makes no logical sense. Now I'm just getting annoyed because you seem to be fucking blind. I've said this three times already. Go read the mafia manifesto or something. Youngminii post response generator v 0.89bOutput: you are the scummiest bad player ever, can you even read? Your play is so awful I don't understand? Accept output [y/n] I would like to ask you the same question. Please read my post at least 3 times carefully and then wisely respond.
i'm still working out the bugs in the code
|
On July 23 2010 13:42 youngminii wrote:
I have to ask, why is everyone saying calm down?
Nothing's personal, no one's 'attacked' anyone verbally, the only things that have been happening are accusations and argumentative responses. The only thing I can see that may be seen as offensive is where infundiblxublxjum and I said read our posts, which isn't offensive at all, considering we didn't say anything like 'read my posts you fuckin dumb blind moron' or anything.
This is mafia. This is a game of deceiving and lying and scumhunting. Aggression is a style of play and I don't see why we're being told to tone it down.
The problem is no one's going to answer anything reasonably well if everyone's on the edge of killing each other.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
