EPTThree Kingdoms Mafia (三国演义) - Page 21
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
On May 20 2010 04:28 Hesmyrr wrote: Caller clarification time :p Can you publicly state which player will be mod-killed before Radfield has to make his decision? im not modkilling anyone | ||
|
Abenson
Canada4122 Posts
So does that mean no modkills in this game or you're not gonna kill... I can't remember who. | ||
|
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
Of course, it's Caller, so he could have just changed his mind, but that makes the most sense to me. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
there are probably 4 faction leaders, so I am assuming at least 3 of them can give armies. Unless I am missing something, L has yet to give his armies to anyone or keep them for himself. Could it possibly be that he CAN'T? Perhaps that's a flaw, besides the one of them all dying when they try to recruit Cao Cao, of being the yellow turban leader. Since they get the advantage of not being able to be recruited, they need something to counter-balance it a bit more. Perhaps it's that their armies are automatically donated for the yellow turban cause. This could explain why L has yet to donate his armies: He is the yellow turban leader. Unless he clarifies his position on this, or donates his army, I will be very suspicious of him | ||
|
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
On May 19 2010 12:16 Caller wrote: Day ends in 18 hours Well, he's only got about 2 hours to clear his name, if my math is correct. So we will see soon. | ||
|
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
| ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
| ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
Korynne
Canada990 Posts
Oh and no lynching. Dude, that sounds kind of fun actually, I think I might make a game like that later. Thanks BM for the inspiration. xP | ||
|
Caller
Poland8075 Posts
On May 20 2010 05:08 Korynne wrote: Haha, makes me want to see a game where all townies can dayvig one person, and mafia can only kill at night. So then everyone dayvig their way through day 1 to prove that they are townie with like half the people left. xP Oh and no lynching. Dude, that sounds kind of fun actually, I think I might make a game like that later. Thanks BM for the inspiration. xP i already made one -_- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=114591 | ||
|
BrownBear
United States6894 Posts
On May 20 2010 05:11 Caller wrote: i already made one -_- http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=114591 Oh my god someone please remake that. That's amazing. | ||
|
Tricode
United States538 Posts
On May 20 2010 04:08 Hesmyrr wrote: By the way, the day is almost over. Everyone should be posting their opinions about who the Radfield should lynch so he have better idea of what to do. I agree with below post: + Show Spoiler + On May 19 2010 19:24 Radfield wrote: We all seem to be assuming that there is a Yellow Turban 'Leader'. This is really all the rules say about the YT's. Nothing at all about a leader, which would kinda make sense if the YT's started with more then 1 person. They're more like mafia, collectively making decisions. Anyways, who at this point is most likely to be a Yellow Turban? I think for starters we should look at the people who are voting for me. Why me? For starters because a bandwagon started up on me, and second because I indicated I would simply vote off whomever was being inactive. No threat at all to a Yellow Turban, and a great place to hide. So lets see who voted for me(minus myself): Johnnyspazz Brownbear Hesmyrr Abenson DarthTheinAn TwoToneTerran Falcynn Last Romantic Tricode Xelin Trezguet Jugan Last Romantic hasn't actually posted in the thread. Darththeinan and TwoToneTerran have contributed basically nothing. I don't really feel like examining the rest, as I'm not particularly motivated to search out the YT's or Faction Leaders at this point. But I think it's likely that there are a couple faction leaders and a couple yellow turbans in this bunch, possibly all of them. Thoughts anyone? Does this seem likely? Or am I reading too much into this? Post # DarthThienAn 3 Falcynn 4 Last Romantic 0 Tricode 4 I will agree with death of either one of the above. Opinions? I don't understand this reasoning of that list and my post counts. I have yet to see anything significant occur, other then the need to vote (which bandwagon or not makes no difference since who ever Radfield or who ever else kills someone will not matter to you at the time being even if someone is a YT in the voting area). The only time it will matter is if its a faction leader that is killed then that's one less annoyance to worry about and GJ. In this game so far I agree about killing an inactive (which I posted about before, since it's really no harm to any active person trying to have a fun game). I have just been refreshing and reading every chance I get hoping someone will say something vaguely intriguing into where I would be like "Hey I should listen to that guy" or "He makes a good point". In which case I have no idea where this game is going yet so it's hard to just do either of those. Thus my lack of any true activity that I would actually put into the game. Also a good portion of you want to kill Yellow Turbans, but have no real method of how to do so even in later game. I don't even know how to respond to most of the things said in the thread, nor do I care since they have yet to be any significant value to me or in my opinion the game (other then Fishballs questions about how recruiting works). To be honest, I'm just waiting for the next day to come and hoping a little more action occurs where there can be more involvement in what we can do. Also just to let you know, we all most likely will be recruited (I don't think we have a say) so the way I see it, we should aim to simplify the game by aiming at faction leaders before they can recruit a majority of us. Get it down to 2 factions and thus the game becomes simplified. How to do so? I'll leave that to you guys to figure it out (make alliances or something with people who might have an ability to do such things if there are some). | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
 | ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
Fishball's pretty much spamming while saying he doesn't want to play. Given he and I have had altercations in the past I'm wondering if that's intentionally done to make it look like he doesn't have a power role, or whether or not he is indeed a leader. Brownbear, by contrast reacted a bit too emotionally to being called out as the YT leader so it probably isn't him. He might be a grunt if they start with grunts. Given that it makes sense But I'm most interested by LunarDestiny. Low post count. Very little commentary besides trying to drive wedges between people, no real contributions. If Radfield's right we're in more trouble than we originally imagined: Nothing at all about a leader, which would kinda make sense if the YT's started with more then 1 person. They're more like mafia, collectively making decisions. What this also means is that we can't kill the YT in one shot; YT's going to recruit a person per day, then even if we kill them, they're going to recruit more like some retarded hydra metaphor. This leads me to believe that if YT is indeed a group as such that there are multiple DT/vig roles in the game and that the YT is probably starting with 1 or 2 members. For the purposes of our analysis, if the YT starts very small there won't be much in the way of them trying to play off each other or secure early votes. What's more, radfield, by putting up this fact noted something that a non-leader based YT would NOT want told to the public, so i'll give him my brofist armies for today. On the topic of the neutral plan: if we don't kill a leader with this kill or tomorrow the plan's essentially over. we'd have 8+4 people on teams, and even chain kills from that point would have another 3+2+1 people recruited for a total of 18 players, unless recruitments overlap, which they will. | ||
|
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
| ||
|
L
Canada4732 Posts
| ||
|
Fishball
Canada4788 Posts
On May 20 2010 04:46 Bill Murray wrote: You don't want a victory for the neutrals? I don't feel like pulling the reading comprehension card again from Mini Mafia-1... Read again, I never said "I don't want". | ||
|
Tricode
United States538 Posts
On May 20 2010 05:19 Bill Murray wrote: tricode: pretty much cleared yourself off the lynch list right there. good job. I some how doubt that, but I don't care really. I'm just gonna go along with the ride until the game solidifies more and contribute as best as I can to me winning or w/e faction I'm in by force. | ||
| ||
