EPTTL Mafia Ban List - Page 114
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
On December 16 2011 03:42 sinani206 wrote: Since Student is now over, do I still have to sit out 2 more games? I wanna play in L. Ask your host. L's also on delay. | ||
|
Zona
40426 Posts
I also don't like the concept where some rules are arbitrarily deemed less important than others. My rules are clearly stated in the OPs, which I make sure I do not edit once the game begins, so there's no excuse. Student Mafia: Starshard and Hassybaby were both involuntarily replaced for inactivity. As newcomers to TL mafia, I would like warnings for them. xsksc notified me about having an emergency. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
Starshard and Hassybaby have been given warnings. sinani206 now has two games left. | ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
Am I allowed to do that? | ||
|
Qatol
United States3165 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On December 18 2011 16:17 Qatol wrote: 1.5 years! Clearly the new policy is to wait 2 years. 6 months to go! Actually, flamewheel told me that 5 months from now it's going to be extended to 3 years. 18 months to go! | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22631 Posts
On December 17 2011 13:03 Zona wrote: I also don't like the concept where some rules are arbitrarily deemed less important than others. My rules are clearly stated in the OPs, which I make sure I do not edit once the game begins, so there's no excuse. I'm not talking about this specific incident because it has been done. However, I do feel like there is a difference between policy rules (spamming, posting popcorn after death etc) and anti-cheating rules (posting game info after death, pm-ing in a non-pm game etc). One is simply a misconduct, while the other sabotages games. I feel the most important question when discussing bans should be "how did the breaking of the rules impact the game". If the answer is "not at all" then it was probably a minor issue, while if the answer is "It ruined the game" then I wouldn't want to play with that person again. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
On December 18 2011 16:36 Foolishness wrote: Actually, flamewheel told me that 5 months from now it's going to be extended to 3 years. 18 months to go! wait what no really did i? | ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
| ||
|
sinani206
United States1959 Posts
On December 18 2011 16:36 Foolishness wrote: Actually, flamewheel told me that 5 months from now it's going to be extended to 3 years. 18 months to go! You're forgetting the grandfather clause in the fine print. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
| ||
|
Incognito
United States2071 Posts
Warning for Corrupt for inactivity. On December 12 2011 16:04 kingjames01 wrote: Refallen: What is the exact name of your role? I am inclined to give kingjames a warning for ignoring the explicitly stated rule against comparing role PM wording. same for annul, quoting the role PM in response to vaderseven's question On December 14 2011 07:35 vaderseven wrote: Thats the abilities I have in the correct order. This is the one I have the most trouble with. Basically, a bunch of posts were devoted to discussing the ordering of abilities from the role PM, which is definitely against the rules. I'm leaning ban for vaderseven, warning for annul, but im not sure. Feel free to discuss. | ||
|
wherebugsgo
Japan10647 Posts
As such I think a warning is good, and any future violations of this rule on the part of any of these players should result in a 2-3 game ban. | ||
|
redFF
United States3910 Posts
nothing for all of them | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
| ||
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On December 20 2011 08:11 wherebugsgo wrote: I would say warning for all; more or less vader was punished enough for the humiliation in post game for the attempted use of the role PM to confirm alignment. He also hasn't played on the forum very long, so it's certainly possible he wasn't aware of how that rule works. Indeed, he expressed genuine remorse and said it was not his intention. As such I think a warning is good, and any future violations of this rule on the part of any of these players should result in a 2-3 game ban. That. Warning should be plenty. | ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
| ||
|
flamewheel
FREEAGLELAND26780 Posts
| ||
| ||
