|
On August 04 2012 20:48 sinii wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2012 20:42 Crushinator wrote:On August 04 2012 20:34 Aristodemus wrote:You know, these complaints keep popping up about the cycling (usually from French) but if you watched it all you saw teams getting restarts just for spinning their wheels (it is explained as sweat being mechanical reason) and Hinds had a much bigger problem. Nobody mentions this though because the other teams didnt smash the WR and the Frenchies data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a2ab/2a2ab74658533de3b3fa5b5f78fa2b9909d13585" alt="" As for rowing his seat broke and if it happens in the first 100m you get a restart. Mathew Pinsent explains here "The news is that the wheel of the bow seat came off. It was inside 100m. The British boat have been allowed to fix it and can race in the final which will begin again at 1221 BST." Yet you compare it to match fixing? Pfft. I think the rule is bad. Taking care of your equipment is part of any sport. The other athletes shouldn't be at a disadvantage, just because British people are terrible mechanics. Can't accuse them of cheating ofcourse, it is a rule afterall. The cycling thing is total bullshit, having a rego under false pretenses, just because it didnt go well is borderline cheating. If this is common in track cycling then that sport can fuck off. The rule in question reads: "THE RULE IN FULL FROM UCI - Cycling Regulations Team Sprint section 3.2.154 Qualifying rounds: In the event of a mishap, the team must restart at the end of the qualifying rounds. Any team which may have been hindered by a mishap to its opponents may, by decision of the commissaires' panel, be granted a restart at the end of the qualifying rounds. In the qualifying rounds a team may only be permitted two starts. I agree it probably needs more clarification, seems very unclear. However what happened to GB would clearly be described as a 'mishap'. So the result doesn't even need debating and it's frankly completely unfair to the athletes to question it.
It isn't unfair at all. If you are willing to ignore sportsmanship and and choose to abuse a rule, going completely against the rule's intent, then you deserve to have your honor questioned.
|
On August 04 2012 20:52 Crushinator wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2012 20:48 sinii wrote:On August 04 2012 20:42 Crushinator wrote:On August 04 2012 20:34 Aristodemus wrote:You know, these complaints keep popping up about the cycling (usually from French) but if you watched it all you saw teams getting restarts just for spinning their wheels (it is explained as sweat being mechanical reason) and Hinds had a much bigger problem. Nobody mentions this though because the other teams didnt smash the WR and the Frenchies data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a2ab/2a2ab74658533de3b3fa5b5f78fa2b9909d13585" alt="" As for rowing his seat broke and if it happens in the first 100m you get a restart. Mathew Pinsent explains here "The news is that the wheel of the bow seat came off. It was inside 100m. The British boat have been allowed to fix it and can race in the final which will begin again at 1221 BST." Yet you compare it to match fixing? Pfft. I think the rule is bad. Taking care of your equipment is part of any sport. The other athletes shouldn't be at a disadvantage, just because British people are terrible mechanics. Can't accuse them of cheating ofcourse, it is a rule afterall. The cycling thing is total bullshit, having a rego under false pretenses, just because it didnt go well is borderline cheating. If this is common in track cycling then that sport can fuck off. The rule in question reads: "THE RULE IN FULL FROM UCI - Cycling Regulations Team Sprint section 3.2.154 Qualifying rounds: In the event of a mishap, the team must restart at the end of the qualifying rounds. Any team which may have been hindered by a mishap to its opponents may, by decision of the commissaires' panel, be granted a restart at the end of the qualifying rounds. In the qualifying rounds a team may only be permitted two starts. I agree it probably needs more clarification, seems very unclear. However what happened to GB would clearly be described as a 'mishap'. So the result doesn't even need debating and it's frankly completely unfair to the athletes to question it. It isn't unfair at all. If you are willing to ignore sportsmanship and and choose to abuse a rule, going completely against the rule's intent, then you deserve to have your honor questioned. Dont question what you clearly dont understand.
|
On August 04 2012 20:53 Aristodemus wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2012 20:52 Crushinator wrote:On August 04 2012 20:48 sinii wrote:On August 04 2012 20:42 Crushinator wrote:On August 04 2012 20:34 Aristodemus wrote:You know, these complaints keep popping up about the cycling (usually from French) but if you watched it all you saw teams getting restarts just for spinning their wheels (it is explained as sweat being mechanical reason) and Hinds had a much bigger problem. Nobody mentions this though because the other teams didnt smash the WR and the Frenchies data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a2ab/2a2ab74658533de3b3fa5b5f78fa2b9909d13585" alt="" As for rowing his seat broke and if it happens in the first 100m you get a restart. Mathew Pinsent explains here "The news is that the wheel of the bow seat came off. It was inside 100m. The British boat have been allowed to fix it and can race in the final which will begin again at 1221 BST." Yet you compare it to match fixing? Pfft. I think the rule is bad. Taking care of your equipment is part of any sport. The other athletes shouldn't be at a disadvantage, just because British people are terrible mechanics. Can't accuse them of cheating ofcourse, it is a rule afterall. The cycling thing is total bullshit, having a rego under false pretenses, just because it didnt go well is borderline cheating. If this is common in track cycling then that sport can fuck off. The rule in question reads: "THE RULE IN FULL FROM UCI - Cycling Regulations Team Sprint section 3.2.154 Qualifying rounds: In the event of a mishap, the team must restart at the end of the qualifying rounds. Any team which may have been hindered by a mishap to its opponents may, by decision of the commissaires' panel, be granted a restart at the end of the qualifying rounds. In the qualifying rounds a team may only be permitted two starts. I agree it probably needs more clarification, seems very unclear. However what happened to GB would clearly be described as a 'mishap'. So the result doesn't even need debating and it's frankly completely unfair to the athletes to question it. It isn't unfair at all. If you are willing to ignore sportsmanship and and choose to abuse a rule, going completely against the rule's intent, then you deserve to have your honor questioned. Dont question what you clearly dont understand.
brits are omniscients, bow in front of them. <3 arrogance
|
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Random tangent guys. Someone posted a method of setting up a proxy so you can watch the BBC. Where's that post? I cant seen to find it
|
|
On August 04 2012 20:53 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2012 20:53 Aristodemus wrote:On August 04 2012 20:52 Crushinator wrote:On August 04 2012 20:48 sinii wrote:On August 04 2012 20:42 Crushinator wrote:On August 04 2012 20:34 Aristodemus wrote:You know, these complaints keep popping up about the cycling (usually from French) but if you watched it all you saw teams getting restarts just for spinning their wheels (it is explained as sweat being mechanical reason) and Hinds had a much bigger problem. Nobody mentions this though because the other teams didnt smash the WR and the Frenchies data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a2ab/2a2ab74658533de3b3fa5b5f78fa2b9909d13585" alt="" As for rowing his seat broke and if it happens in the first 100m you get a restart. Mathew Pinsent explains here "The news is that the wheel of the bow seat came off. It was inside 100m. The British boat have been allowed to fix it and can race in the final which will begin again at 1221 BST." Yet you compare it to match fixing? Pfft. I think the rule is bad. Taking care of your equipment is part of any sport. The other athletes shouldn't be at a disadvantage, just because British people are terrible mechanics. Can't accuse them of cheating ofcourse, it is a rule afterall. The cycling thing is total bullshit, having a rego under false pretenses, just because it didnt go well is borderline cheating. If this is common in track cycling then that sport can fuck off. The rule in question reads: "THE RULE IN FULL FROM UCI - Cycling Regulations Team Sprint section 3.2.154 Qualifying rounds: In the event of a mishap, the team must restart at the end of the qualifying rounds. Any team which may have been hindered by a mishap to its opponents may, by decision of the commissaires' panel, be granted a restart at the end of the qualifying rounds. In the qualifying rounds a team may only be permitted two starts. I agree it probably needs more clarification, seems very unclear. However what happened to GB would clearly be described as a 'mishap'. So the result doesn't even need debating and it's frankly completely unfair to the athletes to question it. It isn't unfair at all. If you are willing to ignore sportsmanship and and choose to abuse a rule, going completely against the rule's intent, then you deserve to have your honor questioned. Dont question what you clearly dont understand. brits are omniscients, bow in front of them. <3 arrogance British people renowned for their arrogance.... o wait.
|
Haha just jogging along the others.
|
I love Bolt
|
|
On August 04 2012 20:56 Aristodemus wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2012 20:53 sAsImre wrote:On August 04 2012 20:53 Aristodemus wrote:On August 04 2012 20:52 Crushinator wrote:On August 04 2012 20:48 sinii wrote:On August 04 2012 20:42 Crushinator wrote:On August 04 2012 20:34 Aristodemus wrote:You know, these complaints keep popping up about the cycling (usually from French) but if you watched it all you saw teams getting restarts just for spinning their wheels (it is explained as sweat being mechanical reason) and Hinds had a much bigger problem. Nobody mentions this though because the other teams didnt smash the WR and the Frenchies data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a2ab/2a2ab74658533de3b3fa5b5f78fa2b9909d13585" alt="" As for rowing his seat broke and if it happens in the first 100m you get a restart. Mathew Pinsent explains here "The news is that the wheel of the bow seat came off. It was inside 100m. The British boat have been allowed to fix it and can race in the final which will begin again at 1221 BST." Yet you compare it to match fixing? Pfft. I think the rule is bad. Taking care of your equipment is part of any sport. The other athletes shouldn't be at a disadvantage, just because British people are terrible mechanics. Can't accuse them of cheating ofcourse, it is a rule afterall. The cycling thing is total bullshit, having a rego under false pretenses, just because it didnt go well is borderline cheating. If this is common in track cycling then that sport can fuck off. The rule in question reads: "THE RULE IN FULL FROM UCI - Cycling Regulations Team Sprint section 3.2.154 Qualifying rounds: In the event of a mishap, the team must restart at the end of the qualifying rounds. Any team which may have been hindered by a mishap to its opponents may, by decision of the commissaires' panel, be granted a restart at the end of the qualifying rounds. In the qualifying rounds a team may only be permitted two starts. I agree it probably needs more clarification, seems very unclear. However what happened to GB would clearly be described as a 'mishap'. So the result doesn't even need debating and it's frankly completely unfair to the athletes to question it. It isn't unfair at all. If you are willing to ignore sportsmanship and and choose to abuse a rule, going completely against the rule's intent, then you deserve to have your honor questioned. Dont question what you clearly dont understand. brits are omniscients, bow in front of them. <3 arrogance British people renowned for their arrogance.... o wait.
almost as much as the French, but don't deny you appeared like a dick in this post
|
United States97274 Posts
Spain started this basketball game on a 20-2 run. Now they are down by 1 with 5.3 secs left and Russia has the ball. no time outs
|
Isinbaeva is back to business apparently.
|
On August 04 2012 20:58 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2012 20:56 Aristodemus wrote:On August 04 2012 20:53 sAsImre wrote:On August 04 2012 20:53 Aristodemus wrote:On August 04 2012 20:52 Crushinator wrote:On August 04 2012 20:48 sinii wrote:On August 04 2012 20:42 Crushinator wrote:On August 04 2012 20:34 Aristodemus wrote:You know, these complaints keep popping up about the cycling (usually from French) but if you watched it all you saw teams getting restarts just for spinning their wheels (it is explained as sweat being mechanical reason) and Hinds had a much bigger problem. Nobody mentions this though because the other teams didnt smash the WR and the Frenchies data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a2ab/2a2ab74658533de3b3fa5b5f78fa2b9909d13585" alt="" As for rowing his seat broke and if it happens in the first 100m you get a restart. Mathew Pinsent explains here "The news is that the wheel of the bow seat came off. It was inside 100m. The British boat have been allowed to fix it and can race in the final which will begin again at 1221 BST." Yet you compare it to match fixing? Pfft. I think the rule is bad. Taking care of your equipment is part of any sport. The other athletes shouldn't be at a disadvantage, just because British people are terrible mechanics. Can't accuse them of cheating ofcourse, it is a rule afterall. The cycling thing is total bullshit, having a rego under false pretenses, just because it didnt go well is borderline cheating. If this is common in track cycling then that sport can fuck off. The rule in question reads: "THE RULE IN FULL FROM UCI - Cycling Regulations Team Sprint section 3.2.154 Qualifying rounds: In the event of a mishap, the team must restart at the end of the qualifying rounds. Any team which may have been hindered by a mishap to its opponents may, by decision of the commissaires' panel, be granted a restart at the end of the qualifying rounds. In the qualifying rounds a team may only be permitted two starts. I agree it probably needs more clarification, seems very unclear. However what happened to GB would clearly be described as a 'mishap'. So the result doesn't even need debating and it's frankly completely unfair to the athletes to question it. It isn't unfair at all. If you are willing to ignore sportsmanship and and choose to abuse a rule, going completely against the rule's intent, then you deserve to have your honor questioned. Dont question what you clearly dont understand. brits are omniscients, bow in front of them. <3 arrogance British people renowned for their arrogance.... o wait. almost as much as the French, but don't deny you appeared like a dick in this post data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" I dont have a clue about quantum physics so I dont lecture people who do on it. You appear a bitter Frenchman
|
On August 04 2012 20:54 Hassybaby wrote: Random tangent guys. Someone posted a method of setting up a proxy so you can watch the BBC. Where's that post? I cant seen to find it http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=15652845 Not much explaining to do, that program does it all for you. When installed and connected just go to the BBC iplayer website
|
On August 04 2012 21:00 Dust14 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2012 20:54 Hassybaby wrote: Random tangent guys. Someone posted a method of setting up a proxy so you can watch the BBC. Where's that post? I cant seen to find it http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=15652845Not much explaining to do, that program does it all for you. When installed and connected just go to the BBC iplayer website For live viewing use BBC sport.
|
That 18yr old Brit runner looks like a nice prospect for the future!
|
russia beating spain in basketball that's really bad for Spain, they will have to face USA in semi I guess
|
On August 04 2012 21:03 sinii wrote:That 18yr old Brit runner looks like a nice prospect for the future! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
yeah cool, europe will have a few decent contenders for a 100m final in a near future
|
On August 04 2012 20:42 Crushinator wrote:Show nested quote +On August 04 2012 20:34 Aristodemus wrote:You know, these complaints keep popping up about the cycling (usually from French) but if you watched it all you saw teams getting restarts just for spinning their wheels (it is explained as sweat being mechanical reason) and Hinds had a much bigger problem. Nobody mentions this though because the other teams didnt smash the WR and the Frenchies data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2a2ab/2a2ab74658533de3b3fa5b5f78fa2b9909d13585" alt="" As for rowing his seat broke and if it happens in the first 100m you get a restart. Mathew Pinsent explains here "The news is that the wheel of the bow seat came off. It was inside 100m. The British boat have been allowed to fix it and can race in the final which will begin again at 1221 BST." Yet you compare it to match fixing? Pfft. I think the rule is bad. Taking care of your equipment is part of any sport. The other athletes shouldn't be at a disadvantage, just because British people are terrible mechanics. Can't accuse them of cheating ofcourse, it is a rule afterall. The cycling thing is total bullshit, having a rego under false pretenses, just because it didnt go well is borderline cheating. If this is common in track cycling then that sport can fuck off. This!
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51449 Posts
|
|
|
|