| Forum Index > LoL Tournaments |
Two things as public notice: 1. + Show Spoiler [Quarterfinals 1 spoiler] + Congrats to Fnatic, they played superbly and glgl to them in the Semis! No one is saying that Fnatic only won because of the level 1 in Game 3. Please keep the nationalistic statements out of our subforum. 2. Riot's Worlds format is atrocious. Let's not beat a dead horse here. I will certainly be talking to Riot's eSports dept about it in the near future. I simply ask everyone to be civil. Humble in victory, graceful in defeat. Enjoy the games~ -Neo, Sept 23rd, 3:20 PM PDT, page 120 | ||
|
nafta
Bulgaria18893 Posts
On September 25 2013 09:05 Dandel Ion wrote: I've seen SotG for different games (like guildwars) years ago. With the exact same name too. It's not a new thing. Yeah I know.I mean the idea isn't exactly anything special lol. | ||
|
Headshot
United States1656 Posts
On September 25 2013 09:08 BlueBird. wrote: raging/toxic in solo que, I just hate when people ruin games like that and I hope he gets eliminated.  .Fair enough. There was no way to tell what you were insinuating from his lolking alone. | ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
StarStruck
25339 Posts
On September 25 2013 09:13 oneofthem wrote: if they allowed pick-an-opponent, then the outcome will probably be the same. either royal or swords will get first pick from whatever round the seeds play, bears will get last, and c9 somewhere in the middle. so gambit will be taken first, then between omg and fnatic royal might pick omg for the personal revenge factor, thinking they need to prove themselves. then bears are stuck with t1 lol It's not really meant for the final brackets. It's meant for Group Stages. | ||
|
sataNik[pG]
Greece724 Posts
All fnatic has to do to beat Royal is survive the early. Then there is literally no way to lose. No matter how accurate or ruthless Royal's aggression be, its after all fully anticipated and as the game moves on fnatic's strategic rotations will certainly be mud waters for them as of where to stand and what to do on the map. Vs OMG however, it wont be easy at all, as this team posesses numerous original strategic concepts which they prefer to impose on enemy teams. I expect OMG to be able to handle well the progression to lategame, even though they didnt react well to the SKT T1 group mid push. Lessons be learned I guess. I think that both chinse teams absolutely love(need?) to be proactive but in their respective match OMG might be all too happy to play the reactive role. OMG's also has the important groupstage warmup advantage. I predict a relatively easy 2-0 for OMG, maybe 2-1 if blueside advanatage counts for chinese teams (doubtful). | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On September 25 2013 06:11 Carnivorous Sheep wrote: yea it was silly as hell lol WE LPL playoffs pls. i would watch china but its gonna be like 2 - 5am zzzzz Riot should re-rig quarterfinals so no CN vs CN | ||
|
overt
United States9006 Posts
On September 25 2013 09:23 sataNik[pG] wrote: So, my thoughts for this side of the brackets: #AlexIch All fnatic has to do to beat Royal is survive the early. Then there is literally no way to lose. No matter how accurate or ruthless Royal's aggression be, its after all fully anticipated and as the game moves on fnatic's strategic rotations will certainly be mud waters for them as of where to stand and what to do on the map. Vs OMG however, it wont be easy at all, as this team posesses numerous original strategic concepts which they prefer to impose on enemy teams. I expect OMG to be able to handle well the progression to lategame, even though they didnt react well to the SKT T1 group mid push. Lessons be learned I guess. I think that both chinse teams absolutely love(need?) to be proactive but in their respective match OMG might be all too happy to play the reactive role. OMG's also has the important groupstage warmup advantage. I predict a relatively easy 2-0 for OMG, maybe 2-1 if blueside advanatage counts for chinese teams (doubtful). I think you're greatly under estimating Royal. Royal can fuck up sometimes and are not a late game team but they're a better team than OMG when they're on their game imoimo. Like, Royal on point isn't going to let Fnatic get to late game. And if they do I don't think Fnatic's late game is necessarily stronger than Royal lol. | ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
Puzuzuzuzuz and Yellowstar have been good, but Uzi might be the best ADC on the planet. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On September 25 2013 10:35 Fionn wrote: Royal has Uzi. Puzuzuzuzuz and Yellowstar have been good, but Uzi might be the best ADC on the planet. What really irked me about ozone was even when Dade is complete shit, imp was playing shit too, there's no reason why mata and imp couldn't of seriously put their entire team on their back and beat both Fnatic and Gambit. If you know your midlaner is going to suck balls, then build a fucking 4 protect 1 comp, and don't lose lane too badly. They pretty much could have played S2 CLG style, except Dade would be HSGG. | ||
|
Nos-
Canada12016 Posts
| ||
|
cLutZ
United States19574 Posts
On September 25 2013 10:45 wei2coolman wrote: What really irked me about ozone was even when Dade is complete shit, imp was playing shit too, there's no reason why mata and imp couldn't of seriously put their entire team on their back and beat both Fnatic and Gambit. If you know your midlaner is going to suck balls, then build a fucking 4 protect 1 comp, and don't lose lane too badly. They pretty much could have played S2 CLG style, except Dade would be HSGG. But then you mid needs to play ori + 1~2 other utility mid s. | ||
|
Itsmedudeman
United States19229 Posts
On September 25 2013 10:53 Nos- wrote: Imp played really well?... I don't know what you're saying. Mata was derping but Imp was still a god Imp and mata, considering their reputation, could have both played better. | ||
|
JazzVortical
Australia1825 Posts
On September 25 2013 10:53 cLutZ wrote: But then you mid needs to play ori + 1~2 other utility mid s. Ryze gives plenty of utility! That W is sooooooo good for controlling the enemy team. | ||
|
sataNik[pG]
Greece724 Posts
On September 25 2013 10:45 wei2coolman wrote: What really irked me about ozone was even when Dade is complete shit, imp was playing shit too, there's no reason why mata and imp couldn't of seriously put their entire team on their back and beat both Fnatic and Gambit. If you know your midlaner is going to suck balls, then build a fucking 4 protect 1 comp, and don't lose lane too badly. They pretty much could have played S2 CLG style, except Dade would be HSGG. 0 preparation, no leader to make the calls and the plans. Carryability potential based on skill is generally overrated and, in Dade's case, heaviness due to lack of it is overrated as well. | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
 | ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
| ||
|
ketchup
14521 Posts
| ||
|
JazzVortical
Australia1825 Posts
| ||
|
Hesmyrr
Canada5776 Posts
On September 25 2013 11:04 JazzVortical wrote: Let the puns begin! Oh god, I can't stand to bear the puns. | ||
|
wei2coolman
United States60033 Posts
On September 25 2013 11:01 sataNik[pG] wrote: 0 preparation, no leader to make the calls and the plans. Carryability potential based on skill is generally overrated and, in Dade's case, heaviness due to lack of it is overrated as well. It should have been plainly obvious after the first 2 games they played that Dade is going to get abused, and if so, play something like malphite mid, or ori mid (against someone other than mineski), etc etc. Not like malphite is hard to play. It's something that could have been easily adaptable to a 4 protect 1 comp. An outdated style, but much better than forcing dade to play useless shit. | ||
| ||
|
|
CranKy Ducklings
Epic.LAN
IPSL
Dragon vs Hawk
RSL Revival
Classic vs Trap
herO vs SHIN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
IPSL
Bonyth vs Ret
WardiTV Weekly
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
