EPTOn September 19 2018 01:58 JimmiC wrote:
What cheat is that?
What cheat is that?
5x Ziggs could basically become immortal with the satchel shield augment since it worked on all Ziggs when stacked.
[Patch 8.18] Odyssey Extraction General Discussion - Page 3
| Forum Index > LoL General |
|
Jek
Denmark2771 Posts
5x Ziggs could basically become immortal with the satchel shield augment since it worked on all Ziggs when stacked. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
General_Winter
United States719 Posts
| ||
|
Ansibled
United Kingdom9872 Posts
| ||
|
Sent.
Poland9331 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
| ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
AdsMoFro
Japan4761 Posts
| ||
|
St3MoR
Spain3256 Posts
| ||
|
M2
Bulgaria4186 Posts
| ||
|
M2
Bulgaria4186 Posts
On September 20 2018 02:40 Sent. wrote: I never pay attention to my lp or division so I like this change, though I'd prefer more leagues on top instead of adding anything below bronze. It should not matter where you put the new layers, except for aesthetics, if done right people will be distributed accordingly and proportionally among them. It matters what MMR and how Riot with assign it to them | ||
|
Sent.
Poland9331 Posts
1. Adding more layers on top means bronze I boys would get to feel better about themselves because that would most likely result in them getting promoted to silver. Not that I care, but Riot guys made it look like they want all players to feel better so it would make more sense instead of telling the impossibly bad baddies they're too bad to play in bronze. 2. The amount of effort necessary to climb from plart to diamond V or even from gold to plat is much greater than what you need to get out of bronze. Which is important because more leagues on top would lead to league badges being better skill indicators while adding more leagues on the bottom may not necessarily lead to the same result. I think it won't because I'm convinced (most) bronzies simply aren't interested in getting better, they just want to have fun with what looks the most cool in their eyes. In other words I think bronze I guy might be as good as his bronze IV friend if difference between them is just that the former likes garen and the latter likes vayne mid. | ||
|
M2
Bulgaria4186 Posts
On September 20 2018 19:35 Sent. wrote: I disagree and think it matters for 2 reasons: 1. Adding more layers on top means bronze I boys would get to feel better about themselves because that would most likely result in them getting promoted to silver. Not that I care, but Riot guys made it look like they want all players to feel better so it would make more sense instead of telling the impossibly bad baddies they're too bad to play in bronze. 2. The amount of effort necessary to climb from plart to diamond V or even from gold to plat is much greater than what you need to get out of bronze. Which is important because more leagues on top would lead to league badges being better skill indicators while adding more leagues on the bottom may not necessarily lead to the same result. I think it won't because I'm convinced (most) bronzies simply aren't interested in getting better, they just want to have fun with what looks the most cool in their eyes. In other words I think bronze I guy might be as good as his bronze IV friend if difference between them is just that the former likes garen and the latter likes vayne mid. Both of your examples are just aesthetic, but I feel lazy to explain. Will try to do it short, hopefully it will be comprehensible. The MMR is the objectively important thing. A 1500mmr person who is lets say gold now, will stay 1500 with the new layers added, but he will move aesthetically down or up, he might become either silver or stay gold (in some cases he will stay gold or move up to plat) depending on which side you add a layer, however, he will always be on the 3rd (or 4th consecutive layer depending on the case), which will be silver if you add an iron layer or still gold when you add a emerald layer or whatever, something above the old gold. The example is not really precise, because, many people will move only within their tier (gold 1 to gold 3 for example) and not full tiers up or down, which is the whole point, but hopefully the example is clear enough to show my point And you are right about how people will feel, however, I call this aesthetics. | ||
|
Numy
South Africa35471 Posts
Aesthetics are important. What a person feels is often more important that the actual information being conveyed. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
General_Winter
United States719 Posts
How badass does that sound. | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
Jek
Denmark2771 Posts
| ||
|
Gahlo
United States35174 Posts
| ||
|
evilfatsh1t
Australia8939 Posts
the lowest tier should have been called wood. or plastic. the toxicity would be hilarious | ||
| ||
