EPTPro scene rumor mill - Page 42
| Forum Index > LoL General |
New Season - New Thread: You can find the new thread here http://www.liquidlegends.net/forum/liquid-legends/497276-rumors-thread | ||
|
Slusher
United States19143 Posts
| ||
niukasu1990
1007 Posts
| ||
|
krndandaman
Mozambique16569 Posts
| ||
|
Mensol
14536 Posts
It shouldnt be hard for him to switch back top lane. He has amazing mechanics plus wide champion pool. | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
Coco/Swift reunion dead or will bjergsen not ever join TSM again? You decide | ||
|
Ansibled
United Kingdom9872 Posts
The EULCS needs a trackball. | ||
|
AlterKot
Poland7525 Posts
| ||
|
Ansibled
United Kingdom9872 Posts
lol | ||
|
oo_Wonderful_oo
The land of freedom23126 Posts
Not like it's something unexpected, lol. At least, it confirms Rekkles to Fnatic 100%, because rumours were still split before that post. Forg1ven is probably going to sit out another season in search of top team. | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
Somehow that feels awful. | ||
|
Ansibled
United Kingdom9872 Posts
Look at the 10/10 Twitter responses. | ||
|
AsnSensation
Germany24009 Posts
| ||
|
Ansibled
United Kingdom9872 Posts
On May 03 2015 05:41 AsnSensation wrote: ffs lol candypandy... are they serious Still better than WildTurtle. | ||
|
Maluk
France987 Posts
| ||
|
AlterKot
Poland7525 Posts
| ||
|
Wijnruit
Brazil294 Posts
| ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On May 03 2015 05:55 AlterKot wrote: I mean if UoL want to see Forgiven on their team as much as I do then I hope SK is a less scummy organisation than CW (and history indicates that it's true). Or that Thorin was right and keeping him on contract while he's not playing isn't legal and that he'll seek legal advice. Wtf would be the point of contracts if players can just leave it like they want to and only the organisation has to honor it? SK will want to see money just like anyone else. | ||
|
AlterKot
Poland7525 Posts
| ||
|
oo_Wonderful_oo
The land of freedom23126 Posts
On May 03 2015 06:24 AlterKot wrote: I don't know what the practice is and I don't know what precedences set it. From my pov a contract that says "you either play with us or for noone (unless we receive an unreasonable sum of money)" is just a scummy thing. It's not like there are no precedents in soccer when guy goes on loan but can't play against his main team, lol. If SK wants to cockblock Forg1ven, they have every right to, because after all, it's them who're paying him due to contract obligations. | ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On May 03 2015 06:24 AlterKot wrote: I don't know what the practice is and I don't know what precedences set it. From my pov a contract that says "you either play with us or for noone (unless we receive an unreasonable sum of money)" is just a scummy thing. So is it also scummy by a player to force a team to continue to pay him because the contract says so even if they dont want him on the roster anymore ? A contract binds both parties, not just one. | ||
| ||
