EPTComputer gamers more likely to be drunk self-hater - Page 4
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
stack
Canada348 Posts
| ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
Anyone who thinks this research is useless/doesn't prove anything is clueless about scientific research or in hardcore denial. | ||
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On January 25 2009 07:14 Frits wrote: Anyone who thinks this research is useless/doesn't prove anything is clueless about scientific research or in hardcore denial. Yep. Even if it's seemingly obvious and intuitive, legitimate research needs to be done before any policies are made by companies/doctors/hospitals/government/etc. It's like the driving with cell phone studies. No shit, txting at the wheel is dangerous but they need some empirical proof before they make it a crime. | ||
|
Archaic
United States4024 Posts
| ||
|
Frits
11782 Posts
On January 25 2009 07:18 Jibba wrote: Yep. Even if it's seemingly obvious and intuitive, legitimate research needs to be done before any policies are made by companies/doctors/hospitals/government/etc. It's like the driving with cell phone studies. No shit, txting at the wheel is dangerous but they need some empirical proof before they make it a crime. Funny you should mention that because it reminds me of the economical component vs moral considerations. A big influence is that if it wasn't so good for the economy texting/calling behind the wheel would be outlawed a long time ago. It's known to be as dangerous as driving with twice the legal amount of alcohol in your system. That same system actually works in the favor of gaming, before they take any action in such a huge business they'll make damn sure that it's worth it, with hard evidence of causality and the consequences would have to be that it's turning a lot of people antisocial. It's not like they will or even can suddenly take away gaming in liberal countries. | ||
|
Zapdos_Smithh
Canada2620 Posts
On January 25 2009 07:07 Jibba wrote: What do you think correlate means? It's honestly a bit amusing seeing everyone here jump into defensive mode. Most people would agree with Rekrul yet they hate the research because SK gaming did a shitty job explaining the article. Sorry, let me rephrase that. They may be correlated, but this correlation does not indicate that gaming causes this type of behaviour. | ||
|
Sonu
Canada577 Posts
On January 25 2009 06:29 Fontong wrote: Imo loner ---> loner gamer, not gamer ---> gamer loner. Unless it was WoW that did to to them hehehe. Play games as a loner is really far less fun than playing games with irl friends anyway, I think most of us can relate that having friends play SC with you makes it way more fun due to rivalries. I agree that playing wth friends is more fun. But i still think this study wasnt a very good one. Only 800 students? and in Utah? Wat about other states. or other countries. I watched the video... and i still think this is a badly done study. a good concept. just the way they did it was bad | ||
|
KaasZerg
Netherlands927 Posts
Conclusion A--->B or B--->A (can be a lot more complex like C---->A and B) and the conclusion the most convenient to the 'scientist' preconceptions is chosen. These people should be shunned from the scientific community with their pre-kindergarden logic. And burned to the stake in the name of progress. | ||
|
Drakill Tannan
Mexico13 Posts
| ||
cgrinker
United States3824 Posts
 | ||
|
funkie
Venezuela9374 Posts
I don't use drugs at all. I don't have low self-esteem I think Dr. Laura is a fucking ignorant. | ||
|
MeriaDoKk
Chile1726 Posts
| ||
|
MarklarMarklar
Fiji1823 Posts
On January 25 2009 09:09 MeriaDoKk wrote: I don't drink, don't use drugs, but smoke like 1 box a day. idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! u dont get any effect from smoking LOL!!!!!!!!!! but its SUPER HARMFUL why man? | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
On January 25 2009 09:13 MarklarMarklar wrote: idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! u dont get any effect from smoking LOL!!!!!!!!!! but its SUPER HARMFUL why man? hahaha, doesn't do any of the worthwhile drugs but "oh yea i do the most retarded one". | ||
|
CharlieMurphy
United States22895 Posts
| ||
|
Jibba
United States22883 Posts
On January 25 2009 07:51 Resonance wrote: Sorry, let me rephrase that. They may be correlated, but this correlation does not indicate that gaming causes this type of behaviour. So you agree with what they reported. Jesus people... whatever happened to TL's 190 IQ. | ||
|
Cloud
Sexico5880 Posts
On January 25 2009 09:16 CharlieMurphy wrote: I think I would rather rail a line of coke every morning than smoke a pack of cigs every day. I just KNEW there would be an explanation. I love you charlie. | ||
|
SmoKing2012
United States385 Posts
On January 25 2009 06:47 Not_Computer wrote: ![[image loading]](http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/9236/faillt6.jpg) ![[image loading]](http://g.imageshack.us/img140/faillt6.jpg/1/) good catch although as a self hating drunk pothead I can't really argue the study | ||
|
Loanshark
China3094 Posts
"Female gamers were more likely to suffer low self-esteem than other women, an effect not seen among male players, the study found." And above that: "By contrast, only around 7 per cent of women admitted that they played computer games that often." | ||
|
Sadist
United States7229 Posts
| ||
| ||
