|
Bill307
Canada9103 Posts
On October 24 2008 05:01 BlueRoyaL wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2008 02:34 Bill307 wrote: Get ready for the news report on how hot females are suddenly more likely to be picked for "random" scans.
This is obviously going to be abused by some of the people on the job, unless they make females scan females only and males scan males only. Even if it's not a totally revealing nude picture, how do you think those women are going to feel knowing the guys at the station are scanning them solely to see them "naked"? Try not to think like a sex-deprived guy for once. i don't think this is a good way to think of it, because no matter how hot the girl is, i dont think watching these black and white x-ray scans would turn me on, it just looks kinda weird "It wouldn't turn me on, therefore it isn't arousing to anyone."
Brilliant.
|
|
|
First pic, looks like projectile shit.
|
Considering that most people have a lot of body fat, it probably wouldn't be a very enjoyable experience to watch those nude scans all day.
Unless they were all of TL members, all that hotkey spamming probably keeps everyone here pretty thin.
|
I'm usually all for civil liberties and crap like that, but this isn't anything to get worked up about. Look at the images.
Seriously, flogging the dolphin to that shit is the equivalent of a horny 13 year old attempting to watch the Playboy channel through the blurry lines.
|
|
|
i actually went through one of those in Brazil. yeah... didn't get to see my own picture though. was curious as to how it looked.
|
I'm astonished at how many people feel comfortable with that scan. Of course this is something to get worked about!
Apart from the fact that I doubt the need for this technology (any planes been hijacked with plastic explosives or bone carved knives? go paranoia!) right now, it could potentially open the doors for other areas and even abuse. Maybe next they will install these scanners in every supermarket to catch shoplifters? Or trains? Maybe mosques?
|
On October 24 2008 06:36 Schnake wrote: Of course this is something to get worked about!
We need better quality pictures first!
On October 24 2008 06:36 Schnake wrote: Apart from the fact that I doubt the need for this technology (any planes been hijacked with plastic explosives or bone carved knives? go paranoia!) right now, it could potentially open the doors for other areas and even abuse. Maybe next they will install these scanners in every supermarket to catch shoplifters? Or trains? Maybe mosques? Yeah, as we all know we already have X-rays at walmart so this is the logical next step.
|
You guys really care if someone sees a black and white photo of you on a computer screen "naked" ??
|
technically this isn't a naked picture of you tho right ? its a scan, an assumption with a 3d model drawn over it ?
|
If grey bald naked chicks are your thing.
Isn't being frisked a bigger invasion of your privacy?
|
Fucking shit, they don't even care about airport security theses bastards.
Just want to create some paranoic climate.
Fuckers. Politics are fucked up nowadays.
|
On October 24 2008 07:47 LordofToast wrote: If grey bald naked chicks are your thing.
Isn't being frisked a bigger invasion of your privacy?
I agree. I'd rather walk though an xray than get frisked.
|
I have nothing to hide, so I rather just go behind an x-ray, and get scanned. No biggie.
|
United States17042 Posts
On October 24 2008 07:47 LordofToast wrote: If grey bald naked chicks are your thing.
Isn't being frisked a bigger invasion of your privacy?
It's supposed to be about the same in terms of the law system- the idea being that you have nothing in your pockets/taped to your body.
|
I would hate to be the guy looking at these photos.
|
Just put the bombs on <18 people.
|
I heard that the people who are communicating with you at the actually scanner aren't the ones viewing the images, which makes it wayy less awkard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|