EPT2008 US Presidential Election - Page 17
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
a-game
Canada5209 Posts
| ||
|
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
| ||
|
DrainX
Sweden3187 Posts
| ||
|
GeneralStan
United States4789 Posts
Obama has found a niche into which he fits like a hand into a glove, and he can aim straight into the top office. Its likely if money was his motivator that he could have more financial benefit as an ex president than he could have had if he devoted his life to business. | ||
|
D10
Brazil3409 Posts
As someone said in the previous topic, its amazing how it seems like the man and the moment were made for each other | ||
|
Sadist
United States7328 Posts
I mean ive posted my rants on these "debates" before so I wont do that again..... but winning? GTFO | ||
|
a-game
Canada5209 Posts
On October 16 2008 14:17 Sadist wrote: How the fuck can CNN say john mccain "won" the debate? I mean ive posted my rants on these "debates" before so I wont do that again..... but winning? GTFO this is why i'm so happy that there are those "instapolls" right after the debate. we still have to listen to the pundits pontificate for 10 minutes or so, but then boom we get to see what the actual voters thought and that's what ultimately sets the narrative for the following cycles. on nights like this when the pundits were all getting ready to laud mccain's performance it feels really sweet that we have those instapolls to jerk them back to reality | ||
|
D10
Brazil3409 Posts
Unless i missed something (witch i prolly did) | ||
|
a-game
Canada5209 Posts
except for that when they later broke down the poll into democrats/republicans/independents, the margin among independents was just as huge. (and the margin at CBS uncommitted voters was much larger still) god i hate pundits (except david gergen) | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
|
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
11739 Posts
On October 16 2008 12:13 Mindcrime wrote: Then it was a non-sequitur. Who was talking about them? Who was talking about half the shit they go on rants about? On October 16 2008 12:22 NastyMarine wrote: SweeTLemonS Its being replayed all over regular cable. A few of them will restart at the top of the hour I wasn't looking for this one, I wanted the first two. On October 16 2008 12:38 fusionsdf wrote: I thought he said mydebate.com, but both mydomain.com and mydomain.org are parked domains, so I dont know Yeah, that's what I thought he said too. | ||
|
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
![[image loading]](http://images.dailykos.com/images/user/1054/mctongue.jpg) Also: | ||
|
RivetHead
United States842 Posts
On October 16 2008 13:18 a-game wrote: epic: (focus on mccains face) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EASpPlcVbdI Wow, lol. That is hillarious, especially when McCain says "Zero?" like hes absolutely stunned/shocked/flabbergasted. He did look like a deer in the headlights, which is strange because I don't quite get why he was freaking out so hard. | ||
|
The Storyteller
Singapore2486 Posts
It doesn't hurt that Obama LOOKS like a president as well (unless his skin colour is a problem). He's tall, handsome and radiates calm. I mean, this is extreme but look at that pic of Obama striding out from behind the table and McCain trying to act funny and pretending not to know which way to go. Not saying that that means Obama would make a good president, but man he looks like one. And seriously, how can some "political analyst" think that McCain won the debate? | ||
|
D10
Brazil3409 Posts
On October 16 2008 16:24 The Storyteller wrote: And seriously, how can some "political analyst" think that McCain won the debate? Money lad, money. | ||
|
Funnytoss
Taiwan1471 Posts
| ||
|
BlackStar
Netherlands3029 Posts
| ||
|
KOFgokuon
United States14911 Posts
| ||
|
Flaccid
8903 Posts
On October 16 2008 11:50 HeavOnEarth wrote: your sig. Is it trying to point out how vague obama is or his awesome non-sequitors that are unnoticable to the general public ;O If I recall, it was about Republicans getting a hardon for how many times Obama said 'I agree' in the first debate when in reality he was the only one providing any qualification and specifics for what were otherwise blanket, 'no shit' comments by McCain. Ok, back to catching up the thread. edits: On Fox News: They're simply trying to save face at this point. It's obvious that without some kind of divine intervention (or a major slip up), this election belongs to Obama. They don't want to appear blantantly partisan by backing the dying horse in a lost race. They're just acknowledging the inevitable and the undeniable. And Jibba, that Batman clip was priceless. Where did you ever find that? | ||
|
wswordsmen
United States987 Posts
On October 16 2008 14:17 Sadist wrote: How the fuck can CNN say john mccain "won" the debate? I mean ive posted my rants on these "debates" before so I wont do that again..... but winning? GTFO I thought McCain won the debate in an indecisive fashion, but it doesn't matter since anything but a decisive win for McCain wouldn't be enough to stop Obama from beating him, if not routing him, in the electoral college (and likely the popular vote). Also Obama had a really bad start to this debate if it continued like the first 10 or 20 minutes went he might have lost a large chunk of his lead in the election, but something changed to give him momentum. | ||
| ||
