EPTSupcom vs SC - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
HunterGatherer
118 Posts
| ||
|
[X]Ken~D
377 Posts
I ask them to explain to me the strategies in TA. They really couldn't give me a decent answer that I would be satisfied with. Saying it has 12318209382 units, 3D with great physics, true projectile that miss isn't enough to make a game deeply strategic. Then again, there are BW players that like to spout out 300-400 APM as though that was strategy  but they are probably just crappy BW players and even worse in other RTS.If your friend likes Supreme commander, just let him like it. No point in arguing about it if neither sides played the other game. | ||
Last Romantic
United States20667 Posts
| ||
|
Element)LoGiC
Canada1143 Posts
On September 02 2007 03:28 iNFeRnO wrote: hmm me and this guy were arguing about which game is superior, I already know what u guys will say about sc but I'd like to hear some reasonable analysis about why SC is a better game than supcom. anyway the dude is a damn rock, no matter how i earnestly reason with him, he ends up bashing SC.. here is some chat logs S says: its got more air units then SC has all units combined S says: almost Asura - ramen ftw says: rofl thats bs S says: yea S says: how many units in SC total per faction? S says: doubt more then 30 Asura - ramen ftw says: less is more, for the reason 1 unit has multiple roles, thus u can use it many different ways S says: haha less is more.. not in this situation S says: honestly, this unit multi function is crap S says: thas what i hate quite alot iin SC S says: now that u mentioned it S says: that makes SC even more stupid S says: cuz you be pushig out unit of 1 type with multiple capabilities S says: how gay is that S says: so with 3 types of units you pretty much covered S says: thats some child stuff Asura - ramen ftw says: haha dude u dont know what ur talking about S says: yea i do S says: now is a tank, then its a fortified gun S says: pfft S says: give me a break S says: how stupid is that S says: supcom and sc are not even debatable S says: you wasting your time S says: you know what i think? S says: i think you been brainwashed by SC S says: blinded by blizzard Asura - ramen ftw says: LOL S says: heh S says: but in the end, i'll still prolly end up buying SC2 S says: so i can make more fun of it please discuss SC isn't better. We just like it more | ||
|
i.play.ZERG
Canada276 Posts
On September 02 2007 15:57 Element)LoGiC wrote: SC isn't better. We just like it more WTF you call yourself a TL denizen? | ||
|
XCetron
5226 Posts
On September 02 2007 14:20 Excalibur_Z wrote: While ordinarily I would flame your post because it's yet another chatlog of yet another person bashing SC yet again, I'll simply say that if you want your friend to play SC, you simply need to show him one or all of the following 3 things: 1) Pro replays (to get an up-close look at the skill involved, and when watched in multiplayer you can explain some of the more amazing parts of the game and direct his focus) 2) Televised league games, esp. championship games like an OGN Final (to get a feel for the size of the fanbase) 3) Pro FPVODs (to showcase the necessary speed and multitasking to compete at high levels) Usually that is enough to inspire even the newbiest of newbs to try playing. Then once they try, the game will either inspire them further to become determined to improve (which is when the game can be appreciated on so many different levels and becomes truly enjoyable) or it will break their spirits once they realize how hard it is. Both outcomes accomplish the same goal: your friend will have the utmost respect for SC. I tried this. "SC is basically just a spam fest" I dont talk to that guy much anymore. | ||
alffla
Hong Kong20321 Posts
| ||
|
lololol
5198 Posts
On September 02 2007 15:57 Element)LoGiC wrote: SC isn't better. We just like it more  | ||
|
Nickisonfire
United States440 Posts
 | ||
|
JensOfSweden
Cameroon1767 Posts
| ||
|
Highways
Australia6124 Posts
| ||
|
minus_human
4784 Posts
But it is a GAME Starcraft is a SPORT, with PAID PROFESSIONAL PLAYERS. Sure Kespa isn't like NBA, or anything, but does SupCom have a KESPA? Didn't think so. Not to mention, it's almost a religion in certain parts of the world. Like Seoul PC Bangs (at least a few years ago) | ||
|
Gokey
United States2722 Posts
On September 02 2007 22:09 Highways wrote: SC > SC nice, hahaha clever | ||
|
PePe QuiCoSE
Argentina1204 Posts
On September 02 2007 15:57 Element)LoGiC wrote: SC isn't better. We just like it more I agree. You can compare them objectively and technically you can't say one game is better than the other, but you'll find that starcraft is more fun to play for you for reasons you find strong enough to say SC is better than SupCom. That's that... | ||
|
Sr18
Netherlands1141 Posts
| ||
|
iNFeRnO
Canada254 Posts
On September 02 2007 23:26 PePe QuiCoSE wrote: I agree. You can compare them objectively and technically you can't say one game is better than the other, but you'll find that starcraft is more fun to play for you for reasons you find strong enough to say SC is better than SupCom. That's that... i'm pretty sure SC is a better game than supcom, not only for the reason its more fun for me. SC was a milestone for the entire RTS genre, and it still is popular after 10 years. What about supcom? I played when the game came out and there were some ppl but it was all hype, nowadays u get to see as many as only 500 players on their server, the game lasted what, a couple months? This fact alone already tells you which game is more superior, not to mention the gameplay mechanics. | ||
|
nontoxic
United States30 Posts
@2:40 Now i know whwat they ripped the colossus from | ||
|
Navane
Netherlands2763 Posts
On September 02 2007 03:34 PTC-Hurricane wrote: Is supcom a professional sport? No, but SC is. | ||
|
Navane
Netherlands2763 Posts
On September 02 2007 03:34 PTC-Hurricane wrote: Is supcom a professional sport? No, but SC is. | ||
|
Xeofreestyler
Belgium6787 Posts
| ||
| ||
