US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5810
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
|
LightSpectra
United States2775 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46121 Posts
On June 25 2026 06:55 LightSpectra wrote: Whether it was good or bad publicity, it inspired you to learn more about the position of your own impetus. Would you have done so if she took the safe route by saying "of course serial murderers still need to be imprisoned"? Sure I would have, and it would have seemed like a much more realistic position with that acknowledgement explicitly being stated. For me, it's a net-negative when someone completely dodges a relevant question over and over and over again. | ||
|
KwarK
United States44126 Posts
On June 25 2026 02:20 Simberto wrote: Yes, i was joking there. I just kind of find bad math to be funny. I liked it. | ||
|
Vivax
22399 Posts
Christian camp unprepared for flood isn‘t really something I find entertaining, much like I don‘t find it entertaining when mosques or synagogues get targeted deliberately. You can be atheist without being straight up anti-religious or taking delight in the desecration of beliefs. | ||
|
Razyda
1029 Posts
On June 25 2026 06:34 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: I'm not so sure that all publicity is good publicity, but I'm with you that our prison system needs to be significantly reformed and that we can emulate other countries that do it so much better than we do. Happy birthday, btw! Yeah definitely. Her lack of an answer regarding murderers made me curious as to what other prison abolitionists might say about what to do with violent criminals. I found this article from another political abolitionist, where the author starts with their stated goal: "The most common question posed to abolitionists is “what about the rapists and murderers?” Most people are not satisfied with the answer they receive. This article is an attempt to break this question down further from my perspective as an abolitionist." https://transformharm.org/ab_resource/what-about-the-rapists-and-murderers/ I feel like most people who pose the question are just generally looking for an acknowledgement that dangerous people need to (at least temporarily) be removed from society, and the author above seems to struggle with immediately making that acknowledgement alongside promoting rehabilitation, just like how Chevalier struggled in her interview. The article's author makes plenty of important points about how the current criminal justice system is broken, most rapists and murderers are still out on the street, and how income inequality and other systemic injustices are huge factors in why violent crimes occur... but it's not until the very end of the article that I found some proposed alternatives: "Imagine a survivor whose version of accountability looks like trauma treatment and alcohol addiction treatment for their abuser instead of jail. For a family whose loved one was murdered, imagine the person who harmed them was required to help support them financially while they adjust and heal. Imagine folks who are trained in violence intervention strategies called to intervene in volatile situations, and resolving the issue both immediately and over time. Imagine properly funded anti racist or anti gender based violence community programs that can regularly engage with people who have engaged in abusive behavior or folks with racist beliefs in group and individual settings over long periods of time." I appreciate that they lay out all their critiques of the status quo - I think they do a fine job arguing that a lot needs to change about our current system. I think some political abolitionists may believe that if they were to accept the premise that some criminals can't be rehabilitated - that even if it's just the hypothetical worst of the worst, rarest 0.0001% outliers who need to be isolated from society - then their entire position might be in jeopardy, so I'm not particularly surprised if they act cagey when it comes to violent criminals. Taking the "okay fine, prison as a very last resort" position completely off the table just isn't going to be satisfying for a lot of people though, and there are so many helpful intermediary steps our society could still take without needing to be sold on literally zero incarcerations. Did you really linked this excuse of an article??? " To ask “what will we do about the rapists and murderers” implies that rapists and murderers primarily make up the 2.3 million people currently incarcerated, not inclusive of people impacted by mandates, probation, parole, and e-carceration." - No it doesnt imply anything like that - it specifically ask about rapists and murderers "The underlying implication is that prison is a place where dangerous people go to be held accountable for their poor choices" - it is not implication it is a fact "Prison is not a place for bad people" - by the very definition it is, and if not is it place for good people? "In the U.S., prison is an invention of white supremacist capitalism." - this translates to " i dont know history, or even what the words I use mean" Then you have bunch of paragraphs saying essentialy: so little rapists and murderers go to prison, whats the point then. "Again, the question “what about the murderers” ignores the fact that police and prisons are the murderers. ⅓ of all stranger murders are committed by police" - sure because every time police kills someone it is a murder. "Murder is avoidable" - just have this weird feeling that not incarcerating murderers would very much increased number of murders. "What good does it do a survivor for the state to spend endless amounts of money incarcerating their abuser if they are still unable to heal because they don’t have access to mental health resources, stable income, and shelter? " - Their abuser wouldnt be abusing them anymore, seems kinda obvious to me. "Native and indigenous communities have functioned for centuries without the carceral system" - only small ones where every person was essential to survival, and everyone in the tribe new what they did. "The Navajo Nation’s peacemaking process is an extremely popular model." - as in where entire family bore the financial and social responsibility of the crime, well... that seems enticing. I can go on, but the author is simply deranged. Like, I am genuinely surprised that anyone would chose this article for anything. | ||
|
KwarK
United States44126 Posts
On June 25 2026 09:24 Vivax wrote: Christian camp unprepared for flood isn‘t really something I find entertaining, much like I don‘t find it entertaining when mosques or synagogues get targeted deliberately. You can be atheist without being straight up anti-religious or taking delight in the desecration of beliefs. You're not passing. | ||
|
Razyda
1029 Posts
On June 25 2026 02:06 GreenHorizons wrote: Democrat's chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus lost their primary to democratic socialist Darializa Avila Chevalier. www.nbcnews.com That seems like a reasonably significant development regarding US politics? Essentially this means: Unless Democrats go with somethng crazy, like making Hunter their candidate, Republican wins next presidency. | ||
|
Billyboy
1899 Posts
On June 25 2026 10:11 Razyda wrote: Essentially this means: Unless Democrats go with somethng crazy, like making Hunter their candidate, Republican wins next presidency. Mind walking us through how you got from A to 6? | ||
| ||