EPTI guess.
Is crying on oprah directly linked to this program?
US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1163
| Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10639 Posts
I guess. Is crying on oprah directly linked to this program? | ||
|
Nouar
France3270 Posts
On February 28 2019 07:01 CorsairHero wrote: what happened to meadows Earlier he brought a black woman working in the Trump govt and used her to say that Trump was not racist. It's the old "I have a colored friend, look I'm not racist". Tlaib did not like that, she said bringing a black woman as a prop was a racist act by itself, and Meadows of course does not like that. | ||
|
Ayaz2810
United States2763 Posts
On February 28 2019 07:01 CorsairHero wrote: what happened to meadows He did a racist thing and got called on it by a brown lady and lost his shit. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10639 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States42258 Posts
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenthelper/636-michael-cohens-congressional-t/3a1530b333230e775df5/optimized/full.pdf | ||
|
Gear 3rd
1244 Posts
2 cents.. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
| ||
|
NewSunshine
United States5938 Posts
| ||
|
Velr
Switzerland10639 Posts
| ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On February 28 2019 07:27 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: Is there any real angle the republicans have on wanting Rosenstein for discussing the 25th? Jordan ended saying their time could have been better used to ask him about that. I mean Trump can call it a unconstitutional coup attempt all he wants but in reality Rosenstein is surely free to discuss something like that? Doesn't it just look bad on Trump that it was discussed? They are fixated on that because it feeds into their deep state argument that Trump and the conservatives love. The acting FBI direction and Deputy AG discussing who do deal with a clearly criminal president is to much for them. These jokers would also have supported Nixon firing the AG and Deputy AG. On February 28 2019 07:30 Velr wrote: What we learned today: There will be a book and a movie. This is one of the things that hurt the Republicans more than anything, Cohen's stark honesty about this intent to make money after he serves his time. The dude was not at all shy about who he is or how far he has fallen. Cohen said it all when they asked "You call Trump a conman, what does that make you?" and he responded "A fool." | ||
|
crms
United States11933 Posts
I'm sure it will work on a shameful amount of people but haven't we relied on witness testimony of criminals for damn near eternity? The whole origin of criminals hating 'rats' is the embodiment of this process. We've had to rely on criminal testimony for some of the largest and smallest criminal cases our country has ever seen. Thousands and thousands of cases have been built on the back of criminals testifying due to being forced or due to flipping/cooperating, wtf. What a stupid, stupid, stupid argument. edit: i get the uneasy nature of trusting a known liar/cheat/whatever but hypocrisy aside (Trump lies constantly...) testimony from those with access and receipts regardless of their criminality can definitely be useful in ongoing investigations...wtf? | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
ticklishmusic
United States15977 Posts
On February 28 2019 07:05 Ayaz2810 wrote: He did a racist thing and got called on it by a brown lady and lost his shit. mark meadows is highly offended at being called a racist, because he totally isn't one. On February 28 2019 07:46 crms wrote: I can't believe the GOP think their supporters are so stupid to buy the argument that because Cohen was a liar and a criminal, his testimony is worthless. I'm sure it will work on a shameful amount of people but haven't we relied on witness testimony of criminals for damn near eternity? The whole origin of criminals hating 'rats' is the embodiment of this process. We've had to rely on criminal testimony for some of the largest and smallest criminal cases our country has ever seen. Thousands and thousands of cases have been built on the back of criminals testifying due to being forced or due to flipping/cooperating, wtf. What a stupid, stupid, stupid argument. edit: i get the uneasy nature of trusting a known liar/cheat/whatever but hypocrisy aside (Trump lies constantly...) testimony from those with access and receipts regardless of their criminality can definitely be useful in ongoing investigations...wtf? one of the dems pointed out that having criminals testify is how RICO works, lol. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
| ||
|
iamthedave
England2814 Posts
On February 28 2019 07:08 Plansix wrote: Mark Meadows is not used to being in the minority. He is used to having the Republican leadership protect him and gets very very mad when that doesn’t happen. These guys got elected to oppose a black president who couldn’t call them out in person. They are clueless in this new environment. He does sound like a giant tool. I can't remember the name of the guy I called out as a knob when I was doing running commentary on the Comey hearings, but Meadows seems knobbier even than that guy. I keep thinking the Republicans are going to run out of these twats but they always seem to have a new one hiding under a paving slab like some shitty version of a Norwegian bridge troll. On February 28 2019 07:46 crms wrote: I can't believe the GOP think their supporters are so stupid to buy the argument that because Cohen was a liar and a criminal, his testimony is worthless. I'm sure it will work on a shameful amount of people but haven't we relied on witness testimony of criminals for damn near eternity? The whole origin of criminals hating 'rats' is the embodiment of this process. We've had to rely on criminal testimony for some of the largest and smallest criminal cases our country has ever seen. Thousands and thousands of cases have been built on the back of criminals testifying due to being forced or due to flipping/cooperating, wtf. What a stupid, stupid, stupid argument. edit: i get the uneasy nature of trusting a known liar/cheat/whatever but hypocrisy aside (Trump lies constantly...) testimony from those with access and receipts regardless of their criminality can definitely be useful in ongoing investigations...wtf? That is literally the thread title on T_D dealing with this matter. They're there before you, my man. | ||
|
Ayaz2810
United States2763 Posts
On February 28 2019 07:44 Plansix wrote: They are fixated on that because it feeds into their deep state argument that Trump and the conservatives love. The acting FBI direction and Deputy AG discussing who do deal with a clearly criminal president is to much for them. These jokers would also have supported Nixon firing the AG and Deputy AG. This is one of the things that hurt the Republicans more than anything, Cohen's stark honesty about this intent to make money after he serves his time. The dude was not at all shy about who he is or how far he has fallen. Cohen said it all when they asked "You call Trump a conman, what does that make you?" and he responded "A fool." It's remarkable that they can't accept that career Republicans (and some of his own appointees) are doubting his fitness for office because, wait for it.... HE MAY NOT BE FIT FOR OFFICE. It's always got to be some "deep state" plot or "war against the constitution". | ||
|
JimmiC
Canada22817 Posts
| ||
|
NewSunshine
United States5938 Posts
On February 28 2019 08:32 JimmiC wrote: Trumpism is nearing religion status. Logic and reality need not apply. Nearing? Logic and reality parted ways a long time ago out of inconvenience. | ||
| ||
