EPTkdawg'ed
(sorry some ppl will understand )Overclocking processors. - Page 3
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
deTwisj
Netherlands288 Posts
kdawg'ed (sorry some ppl will understand ) | ||
|
HovZ
United States1917 Posts
| ||
|
schooled
Canada46 Posts
 at idle, but if i start running 3d mark it goes up to 50. When its not overclocked it runs at 33 idle, and 36 under full load. So ya, when your overclocking, its not just your processor that your overclocking, its your ram and sometimes mother board that matter the most.if u dontr know what your doingt dont get into over clocking, you will fry your cpu and your motherboard - Hovz ^ No shit, maybe your going to tell us your white next time to. | ||
|
HovZ
United States1917 Posts
also OC'ing an 1800+ to 2300 mhz is a lot more then 500, here again u prove your ignorance, cuz the 1800 isnt the spec of thwe MHZ, its the comparable performance of the pentium 4 at 1800 mhz, an 1800+ runs somewhere around 1600, maybe a bit less so your telling us your OCing an athlon processor by 700+ MHZ with stock cooling? sure kid | ||
|
ObsoleteLogic
United States3676 Posts
I don't bother with it because it takes a lot more patience/effort than I have. My AMD XP 2000+ 1.7 is good enough, considering that I don't run anything more intensive than Bryce 5. | ||
|
Artenus
United States162 Posts
| ||
|
HovZ
United States1917 Posts
| ||
|
Ion)Positive
Morocco1389 Posts
| ||
|
Artenus
United States162 Posts
| ||
|
HovZ
United States1917 Posts
| ||
|
schooled
Canada46 Posts
. My processor is usually 40 overcloeked at 2000 mhz (500mhz overclock at idle, but if i start running 3d mark it goes up to 50. 2000 MHZ - 1500 MHZ = 500 MHZ. Its called math, they learn it in a place called school you fucking idiot. And if you KNEW anything, you would know that overclocking your mulitplier and your FSB is different. FSB affects ram and cpu, multiplier doesnt. Your actually the most retarded son of a bitch I have ever met, like actually. | ||
|
schooled
Canada46 Posts
| ||
|
mindspike
Canada1902 Posts
At most u get 15% boost and in 6 months there will be a new processor with 50% more power at the same cost. | ||
|
Artenus
United States162 Posts
On June 27 2003 00:41 HovZ wrote: for 50 bucks u wont get anything other then a low speed budget chip(which u can then fry trying to OC again) like i said...the chance of frying your cpu is very low. just make sure the cpu temp doesnt get over 45c and it will be fine. seriously...stop posting bs and misconceptions. | ||
|
Artenus
United States162 Posts
On June 27 2003 06:05 mindspike wrote: Overclocking is fine but theres very little performance increase At most u get 15% boost and in 6 months there will be a new processor with 50% more power at the same cost. it varies. some application will benefit a lot from faster cpu. besides whos going upgrade a comp every 6months... gets really expensive and its hard to keep up(unless youre rich) | ||
|
HovZ
United States1917 Posts
| ||
|
iSuXOr
United States606 Posts
| ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
| ||
|
Artenus
United States162 Posts
On June 27 2003 07:46 HovZ wrote: schooled are u an idiot? U DONT OC A MULTIPLIER, A MULTIPLIER IS THE RATE AT WHICH THE FSB IS MULTIPLIED TO ACHIEVE THE CPU SPEED, SO IF THE MULTIPLIER ISNT RELATED TO THE CPU, WHAT IS IT RELATED TO? AND U SAID U GOT UR ATHLON TO 2300 MHZ WITH STOCK COOLING, LIE MORE PLZ u overclock BY CHANGING(PLZ READ CAREFULLY) the multiplier not oc!!!...sigh...and WHEN DID I POST I GOT MY ATHLON TO 2300 MHZ WITH STOCK COOLING??? LEARN TO READ??? | ||
|
Artenus
United States162 Posts
On June 27 2003 07:58 iSuXOr wrote: Artenus, how about instead of having a 1.4 and spending $40 on a heatsink and fan for a marginal increase in speed you just buy a 1700+ since it's about the same price. Overclocking just isn't worth it and it's stupid in almost every situation. You either don't get a big increase in performance and possibly lose stability. Or you pay the equivalent of just buying a better processor for some cooling. Overclocking is NOT worth it and only a retard would think the pros outweigh the cons... DID READY WHAT I WROTE??? I SAID SOME CPUS ARE UNDERCLOCKED. SO ITS POSSIBLE TO GET YOUR CPU UP TO HIGHER CLOCK WITHOUT USING TOP OF THE LINE HEATSINKS. AND WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU TRYING TO SHOW WITH 1.4 AND 1700+? YOURE SEEMED CONFUSED ABOUT THE RATING SYSTEM. AND LIKE I SAID EARLIER... OVERCLOCKING CAN BE VERY GOOD SOMETIMES BUT NOT ALL THE TIME. SOMETIMES ITS POSSIBLE TO GET AN HUGE PERFORMANCE GAIN WHILE LOSING NO STABILITY. ILL STOP POSTING ABOUT THIS NOW. IF YOU GUYS THINK ITS RETARDED THEN SO BE IT. ITS YOUR LOSS NOT MINE, SO I DO NOT GIVE A SHIT. JUST STOP TRYING TO CONFUSE OTHERS BY POSTING BS. | ||
| ||
