Democrats start their Primary in Iowa too, so it speaks much less than you think.
That was set up as more of a State publicity thing (holding their primary earlier than other states). There was a big of a controversy with a bunch of states moving up their primaries this year, with Florida losing half of their delegates to the RNC for doing it without approval.
Colorado basically splits between rural and urban when it comes to conservative / liberal; same as Virginia (with most of the urban liberals living in the to Washington DC suburbs of Northern Virginia).
On November 09 2012 07:45 Teggy03 wrote: So... When are people complaining that Romney won the popular vote going to realize he actually lost it by 2 million votes?
That's before you account for the known liberal bias that reality has. Once you subtract the bias it becomes obvious Romney won.
On November 09 2012 07:45 Teggy03 wrote: So... When are people complaining that Romney won the popular vote going to realize he actually lost it by 2 million votes?
It's actually almost 3 million now, ~2.94 million ahead atm. Obama also got over 50% of the overall vote too, which is nice to see.
On November 09 2012 07:45 Teggy03 wrote: So... When are people complaining that Romney won the popular vote going to realize he actually lost it by 2 million votes?
They were posting about that "grave injustice" before any of the votes from the West Coast had been counted. Maybe they thought California would forget to vote or something, I don't know.
Still it's funny how there is so much complaining going on about it at all, even premature, especially after many of may have told democrats to "suck it" after Gore won the popular vote in 2000 but lost the election.
On November 09 2012 07:57 Teggy03 wrote: Still it's funny how there is so much complaining going on about it at all, even premature, especially after many of may have told democrats to "suck it" after Gore won the popular vote in 2000 but lost the election.
That's just humans being humans though. Obviously many people were very passionate about these elections, and there's bad winners and losers all around. Butthurt just needs to flow out of people.
I'm wondering if anyone else finds it strange to see sad children less than 10 years of age in some of the pictures going around that were taken when it was announced that Obama had won.
On November 09 2012 08:03 Teggy03 wrote: I'm wondering if anyone else finds it strange to see sad children less than 10 years of age in some of the pictures going around that were taken when it was announced that Obama had won.
Indoctrinating children is standard for this crowd, no? Force an opinion before they can possibly question you and get them for life.
On November 09 2012 07:45 Teggy03 wrote: So... When are people complaining that Romney won the popular vote going to realize he actually lost it by 2 million votes?
They were posting about that "grave injustice" before any of the votes from the West Coast had been counted. Maybe they thought California would forget to vote or something, I don't know.
They don't understand you can win an election without 100% reporting it only takes 270 electoral college votes with 48 winner take all states it doesn't take alot. And calling a state only takes 50%+1 votes to win in not heavily contested areas that comes quickly. Maybe they also lack understanding of time zones and how the east coast has a 3 hour head-start on counting.
On November 09 2012 08:03 Teggy03 wrote: I'm wondering if anyone else finds it strange to see sad children less than 10 years of age in some of the pictures going around that were taken when it was announced that Obama had won.
Indoctrinating children is standard for this crowd, no? Force an opinion before they can possibly question you and get them for life.
On November 09 2012 08:03 Teggy03 wrote: I'm wondering if anyone else finds it strange to see sad children less than 10 years of age in some of the pictures going around that were taken when it was announced that Obama had won.
Not strange at all. It's one of the strongest features of the fundamentalist group, they are able to indoctrinate their children and surround them with like-minded people so that they are unable to ever form their own opinions.
During the 2008 election, I overheard my girlfriend-at-the-time's best friend's little brother, in response to an Obama ad piece running on the television, say "They call it the White House for a reason Obama." The boy couldn't have been older than 8 or 9. Children that age don't form those opinions on their own, they overhear them from their parents and siblings.
On November 09 2012 07:45 Teggy03 wrote: So... When are people complaining that Romney won the popular vote going to realize he actually lost it by 2 million votes?
To be completely fair, they made those statements that night before all the votes were counted. Granted, they made those statements that night before all the votes were counted.
On November 09 2012 08:03 Teggy03 wrote: I'm wondering if anyone else finds it strange to see sad children less than 10 years of age in some of the pictures going around that were taken when it was announced that Obama had won.
Indoctrinating children is standard for this crowd, no? Force an opinion before they can possibly question you and get them for life.
I recall seeing pictures of children celebrating too. It's comments like this that make me hate politics.
Wow thats realy well done, they synched his lips with the text by putting the lips of the songer in but you can hardly see that lol. Funny song, think romney has spend quiet a bit of his own monney on the campaign as well, specially in the last days. Its an expensive hobby. Still bit sad he didnt win, i think he would have done way better then most people think. Obama isnt to bad either though.
JonnyBNoHo November 09 2012 08:44. Posts 1502
Lol. They did kinda. both coasts ended up blue. European liberals all along, i knew it.
On November 09 2012 08:39 oneofthem wrote: the romney popular vote lead was going so well until the sea people surfaced and landed en-mass on the western shores.
I would have assumed that the sea peoples would hit the East coast, being Europe based and all
On November 09 2012 08:03 Teggy03 wrote: I'm wondering if anyone else finds it strange to see sad children less than 10 years of age in some of the pictures going around that were taken when it was announced that Obama had won.
Not strange at all. It's one of the strongest features of the fundamentalist group, they are able to indoctrinate their children and surround them with like-minded people so that they are unable to ever form their own opinions.
During the 2008 election, I overheard my girlfriend-at-the-time's best friend's little brother, in response to an Obama ad piece running on the television, say "They call it the White House for a reason Obama." The boy couldn't have been older than 8 or 9. Children that age don't form those opinions on their own, they overhear them from their parents and siblings.
Oh goodness, it goes both ways. Stop acting like it's just one group that does it, or it makes you look just as ignorant.
I grew up in a very religious Christian family. I have two brothers: One of them is very liberal, one of them is very conservative, and I'm pretty much in the middle. Seems pretty fair to me.
Meanwhile, I see other families who have parents that lean liberal that also force their views on their kids. Naturally, it must be fair to say that all liberal parents do so, right?