|
This is a sensitive and complex issue, please do not make comments without first reading the facts, which are cataloged in the OP.
If you make an uninformed post, or one that isn't relevant to the discussion, you will be moderated. If in doubt, don't post. |
On July 10 2013 07:34 sc2superfan101 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2013 07:23 crms wrote:On July 10 2013 07:22 sc2superfan101 wrote:
LOL this defense is so awesome. what happened!??!? it's hard to explain. the whole prosecution was to try to say that you couldn't line up the John Good/Jenna Laure(sp?) timelines. thats absurd of course, and the defense tried using two parallel lines to barney style it. doesn't look like it worked though.
The problem was that the animation lining up the two accounts was using the gunshot timing in conjunction with Good's testimony that he went inside and called 911, and the gunshot occurred while he was waiting. Apparently didn't attempt to line up his actual connection to the 911 call in linking, so judge is questioning the accuracy of the timelines "lining up" and that's why I think the Lauer recording is going to be taken out because she said while it doesn't have to be exactly accurate, it has to be more rather than less accurate.
|
Uh oh... Good involved is bad.
|
Although I know this dude's tic is by no means his fault, it really makes him seem untrustworthy.
|
Oh she's pissed now lol. no way it's getting in with the 911 call might of just lost the rest of the animation trying to save the phone call
|
hey look, its John Good on the animation.
|
Umm that position doesn't match GZ's story of the events.
|
heheh. This sounded like such a serious trial, but from these posts its like its a comedy XD. Can't wait to see the youtube videos
|
On July 10 2013 07:41 radscorpion9 wrote:
heheh. This sounded like such a serious trial, but from these posts its like its a comedy XD. Can't wait to see the youtube videos
Pretty sure the skype trolls or the lawyers unable to open the dvd drive are some of my favorite "faith in humanity moments"
|
On July 10 2013 07:42 GreenHorizons wrote:Show nested quote +On July 10 2013 07:41 radscorpion9 wrote:
heheh. This sounded like such a serious trial, but from these posts its like its a comedy XD. Can't wait to see the youtube videos Pretty sure the skype trolls or the lawyers unable to open the dvd drive are some of my favorite "faith in humanity moments"
Let's not forget discrediting Jenna Lauer by claiming she was following people on Twitter simply because Twitter suggested them as people it thinks she might be interested in following...
|
Figures were already created, yeah totally stole them from the Sims, lol. SHHHH.
|
Common sense...
sorry bud, these guys have none. LOL
omg this DA is so retarded...
1) the gun has to be accessible
2) DeMaio already testified as to their position.
|
This poor guy is getting crucified.
|
687 Posts
Prosecution trying to grill the cop/animation guy? hard.
|
On July 10 2013 07:57 TheRealArtemis wrote:
Prosecution trying to grill the cop/animation guy? hard.
They have to hang their hats on being able to make somebody look guilty. It sure ain't working with Zimmerman.
|
The prosecutor really missed point B when trying to connect A to C. Seems like everyone (at least me and the witness) is struggling to follow the conclusion he's trying to make.
I'm so confused.
|
I feel absolutely terrible for the dude on the stand. He looks like Dante from Clerks, only skinnier and with a tic, and for that he gets tons of sympathy from me. 
|
I hate this guy's face, haha. The prosecutor. I hate the faces he makes.
Witness is going to stroke out, that twitch is getting worse.
|
On July 10 2013 07:58 Craton wrote:
The prosecutor really missed point B when trying to connect A to C. Seems like everyone is struggling to follow the conclusion he's trying to make.
I'm so confused.
He is trying to say that because a whole bunch of irrelevant factors weren't used that the video is somehow invalid. He might as well have said:
"This animation can't cook me bacon. Therefore, it is inaccurate."
|
|
|
PA: So there are variables X, Y, Z, W, U, V and you depicted them yes or no?
E: Uh...some of them were.
PA: yes or no?
E: seriously?
EDIT: And the State wants you to run a whole bunch of statistics on it because we don't agree with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
